arXiv++ Combinatorics

Temporal graphs arise when modeling interactions that evolve over time. They usually come in several flavors, depending on the number of parameters used to describe the temporal aspects of the interactions: time of appearance, duration, delay of transmission. In the point model, edges appear at specific points in time, whereas in the more general interval model, edges can be present over specific time intervals. In both models, the delay for traversing an edge can change with each edge appearance. When time is discrete, the two models are equivalent in the sense that the presence of an edge during an interval is equivalent to a sequence of point-in-time occurrences of the edge. However, this transformation can drastically change the size of the input and has implications for complexity. Indeed, we show a gap between the two models with respect to the complexity of the classical problem of computing a fastest temporal path from a source vertex to a target vertex, i.e. a path where edges can be traversed one after another in time and such that the total duration from source to target is minimized. It can be solved in near-linear time in the point model, while we show that the interval model requires quadratic time under classical assumptions of fine-grained complexity. With respect to linear time, our lower bound implies a factor of the number of vertices, while the best known algorithm has a factor of the number of underlying edges. We also show a similar complexity gap for computing a shortest temporal path, i.e. a temporal path with a minimum number of edges. Here our lower bound matches known upper bounds up to a logarithmic factor. Interestingly, we show that near-linear time for fastest temporal path computation is possible in the interval model when it is restricted to uniform delay zero, i.e., when traversing an edge is instantaneous. However, this special case is not exempt from our lower bound for shortest temporal path computation. These two results should be contrasted with the computation of a foremost temporal path, i.e., a temporal path that arrives as early as possible. It is well known that this computation can be solved in near-linear time in both models. We also show that there is no gap in testing the all-to-all temporal connectivity of a temporal graph. We demonstrate a quadratic lower bound that applies to both the interval and point models and aligns with the existing upper bounds.

A ($λ,μ$)-bow metric was defined in (Dragan & Ducoffe, 2023) as a far reaching generalization of an $α_i$-metric (which is equivalent to a ($0,i$)-bow metric). A graph $G=(V,E)$ is said to satisfy ($λ,μ$)-bow metric if for every four vertices $u,v,w,x$ of $G$ the following holds: if two shortest paths $P(u,w)$ and $P(v,x)$ share a common shortest subpath $P(v,w)$ of length more than $λ$ (that is, they overlap by more than $λ$), then the distance between $u$ and $x$ is at least $d_G(u,v)+d_G(v,w)+d_G(w,x)-μ$. ($λ,μ$)-Bow metric can also be considered for all geodesic metric spaces. It was shown by Dragan & Ducoffe that every $δ$-hyperbolic graph (in fact, every $δ$-hyperbolic geodesic metric space) satisfies ($δ, 2δ$)-bow metric. Thus, ($λ,μ$)-bow metric is a common generalization of hyperbolicity and of $α_i$-metric. In this paper, we investigate an intriguing question whether ($λ,μ$)-bow metric implies hyperbolicity in graphs. Note that, this is not the case for general geodesic metric spaces as Euclidean spaces satisfy ($0,0$)-bow metric whereas they have unbounded hyperbolicity. We conjecture that, in graphs, ($λ,μ$)-bow metric indeed implies hyperbolicity and show that our conjecture is true for several large families of graphs.

In a directed graph $D$ on vertex set $v_1,\dots ,v_n$, a \emph{forward arc} is an arc $v_iv_j$ where $i<j$. A pair $v_i,v_j$ is \emph{forward connected} if there is a directed path from $v_i$ to $v_j$ consisting of forward arcs. In the {\tt Forward Connected Pairs Problem} ({\tt FCPP}), the input is a strongly connected digraph $D$, and the output is the maximum number of forward connected pairs in some vertex enumeration of $D$. We show that {\tt FCPP} is in APX, as one can efficiently enumerate the vertices of $D$ in order to achieve a quadratic number of forward connected pairs. For this, we construct a linear size balanced bi-tree $T$ (an out-tree and an in-tree with same size which roots are identified). The existence of such a $T$ was left as an open problem motivated by the study of temporal paths in temporal networks. More precisely, $T$ can be constructed in quadratic time (in the number of vertices) and has size at least $n/3$. The algorithm involves a particular depth-first search tree (Left-DFS) of independent interest, and shows that every strongly connected directed graph has a balanced separator which is a circuit. Remarkably, in the request version {\tt RFCPP} of {\tt FCPP}, where the input is a strong digraph $D$ and a set of requests $R$ consisting of pairs $\{x_i,y_i\}$, there is no constant $c>0$ such that one can always find an enumeration realizing $c.|R|$ forward connected pairs $\{x_i,y_i\}$ (in either direction).

A temporal graph is a graph in which edges are assigned a time label. Two nodes u and v of a temporal graph are connected one to the other if there exists a path from u to v with increasing edge time labels. We consider the problem of assigning time labels to the edges of a digraph in order to maximize the total reachability of the resulting temporal graph (that is, the number of pairs of nodes which are connected one to the other). In particular, we prove that this problem is NP-hard. We then conjecture that the problem is approximable within a constant approximation ratio. This conjecture is a consequence of the following graph theoretic conjecture: any strongly connected directed graph with n nodes admits an out-arborescence and an in-arborescence that are edge-disjoint, have the same root, and each spans $Ω$(n) nodes.

The average properties of the well-known Subset Sum Problem can be studied by the means of its randomised version, where we are given a target value $z$, random variables $X_1, \ldots, X_n$, and an error parameter $\varepsilon > 0$, and we seek a subset of the $X_i$s whose sum approximates $z$ up to error $\varepsilon$. In this setup, it has been shown that, under mild assumptions on the distribution of the random variables, a sample of size $\mathcal{O}(\log(1/\varepsilon))$ suffices to obtain, with high probability, approximations for all values in $[-1/2, 1/2]$. Recently, this result has been rediscovered outside the algorithms community, enabling meaningful progress in other fields. In this work we present an alternative proof for this theorem, with a more direct approach and resourcing to more elementary tools.

When can we compute the diameter of a graph in quasi linear time? We address this question for the class of {\em split graphs}, that we observe to be the hardest instances for deciding whether the diameter is at most two. We stress that although the diameter of a non-complete split graph can only be either $2$ or $3$, under the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH) we cannot compute the diameter of an $n$-vertex $m$-edge split graph in less than quadratic time -- in the size $n+m$ of the input. Therefore it is worth to study the complexity of diameter computation on {\em subclasses} of split graphs, in order to better understand the complexity border. Specifically, we consider the split graphs with bounded {\em clique-interval number} and their complements, with the former being a natural variation of the concept of interval number for split graphs that we introduce in this paper. We first discuss the relations between the clique-interval number and other graph invariants such as the classic interval number of graphs, the treewidth, the {\em VC-dimension} and the {\em stabbing number} of a related hypergraph. Then, in part based on these above relations, we almost completely settle the complexity of diameter computation on these subclasses of split graphs: - For the $k$-clique-interval split graphs, we can compute their diameter in truly subquadratic time if $k={\cal O}(1)$, and even in quasi linear time if $k=o(\log{n})$ and in addition a corresponding ordering of the vertices in the clique is given. However, under SETH this cannot be done in truly subquadratic time for any $k = ω(\log{n})$. - For the {\em complements} of $k$-clique-interval split graphs, we can compute their diameter in truly subquadratic time if $k={\cal O}(1)$, and even in time ${\cal O}(km)$ if a corresponding ordering of the vertices in the stable set is given. Again this latter result is optimal under SETH up to polylogarithmic factors. Our findings raise the question whether a $k$-clique interval ordering can always be computed in quasi linear time. We prove that it is the case for $k=1$ and for some subclasses such as bounded-treewidth split graphs, threshold graphs and comparability split graphs. Finally, we prove that some important subclasses of split graphs -- including the ones mentioned above -- have a bounded clique-interval number.