arXiv++ Combinatorics

We show that Hoffman's sum of eigenvalues bound for the chromatic number is at least as good as the Lovász theta number, but no better than the ceiling of the fractional chromatic number. In order to do so, we display an interesting connection between this sum of eigenvalues bound and a generalization of the Lovász theta number introduced by Manber and Narasimhan in 1988.

We extend the clique-coclique inequality, previously known to hold for graphs in association schemes and vertex-transitive graphs, to graphs in homogeneous coherent configurations and 1-walk regular graphs. We further generalize it to a stronger inequality involving the Lovász theta number of such graphs, and some theta variants, including characterizations of the equality.

The notion of duality is a key element in understanding the interplay between the stability and chromatic numbers of a graph. This notion is a central aspect in the celebrated theory of perfect graphs, and is further and deeply developed in the context of the Lovász theta function and its equivalent characterizations and variants. The main achievement of this paper is the introduction of a new family of norms, providing upper bounds for the stability number, that are obtained from duality from the norms motivated by Hoffman's lower bound for the chromatic number and which achieve the (complementary) Lovász theta function at their optimum. As a consequence, our norms make it formal that Hoffman's bound for the chromatic number and the Delsarte-Hoffman ratio bound for the stability number are indeed dual. Further, we show that our new bounds strengthen the convex quadratic bounds for the stability number studied by Luz and Schrijver, and which achieve the Lovász theta function at their optimum. One of the key observations regarding weighted versions of these bounds is that, for any upper bound for the stability number of a graph which is a positive definite monotone gauge function, its gauge dual is a lower bound on the fractional chromatic number, and conversely. Our presentation is elementary and accessible to a wide audience.

Total dual integrality is a powerful and unifying concept in polyhedral combinatorics and integer programming that enables the refinement of geometric min-max relations given by linear programming Strong Duality into combinatorial min-max theorems. The definition of total dual integrality (TDI) revolves around the existence of optimal dual solutions that are integral, and thus naturally applies to a host of combinatorial optimization problems that are cast as integer programs whose LP relaxations have the TDIness property. However, when combinatorial problems are formulated using more general convex relaxations, such as semidefinite programs (SDPs), it is not at all clear what an appropriate notion of integrality in the dual program is, thus inhibiting the generalization of the theory to more general forms of structured convex optimization. (In fact, we argue that the rank-one constraint usually added to SDP relaxations is not adequate in the dual SDP.) In this paper, we propose a notion of total dual integrality for SDPs that generalizes the notion for LPs, by relying on an "integrality constraint" for SDPs that is primal-dual symmetric. A key ingredient for the theory is a generalization to compact convex sets of a result of Hoffman for polytopes, fundamental for generalizing the polyhedral notion of total dual integrality introduced by Edmonds and Giles. We study the corresponding theory applied to SDP formulations for stable sets in graphs using the Lovász theta function and show that total dual integrality in this case corresponds to the underlying graph being perfect. We also relate dual integrality of an SDP formulation for the maximum cut problem to bipartite graphs. Total dual integrality for extended formulations naturally comes into play in this context.

The theory of flag algebras, introduced by Razborov in 2007, has opened the way to a systematic approach to the development of computer-assisted proofs in extremal combinatorics. It makes it possible to derive bounds for parameters in extremal combinatorics with the help of a computer, in a semi-automated manner. This article describes the main points of the theory in a complete way, using Mantel's theorem as a guiding example.

Lovasz theta function and the related theta body of graphs have been in the center of the intersection of four research areas: combinatorial optimization, graph theory, information theory, and semidefinite optimization. In this paper, utilizing a modern convex optimization viewpoint, we provide a set of minimal conditions (axioms) under which certain key, desired properties are generalized, including the main equivalent characterizations of the theta function, the theta body of graphs, and the corresponding antiblocking duality relations. Our framework describes several semidefinite and polyhedral relaxations of the stable set polytope of a graph as generalized theta bodies. As a by-product of our approach, we introduce the notion of "Schur Lifting" of cones which is dual to PSD Lifting (more commonly used in SDP relaxations of combinatorial optimization problems) in our axiomatic generalization. We also generalize the notion of complements of graphs to diagonally scaling-invariant polyhedral cones. Finally, we provide a weighted generalization of the copositive formulation of the fractional chromatic number by Dukanovic and Rendl.

Utilizing dual descriptions of the normal cone of convex optimization problems in conic form, we characterize the vertices of semidefinite representations arising from Lovász theta body, generalizations of the elliptope, and related convex sets. Our results generalize vertex characterizations due to Laurent and Poljak from the 1990's. Our approach also leads us to nice characterizations of strict complementarity and to connections with some of the related literature.

Recently there has been much interest in "sparsifying" sums of rank one matrices: modifying the coefficients such that only a few are nonzero, while approximately preserving the matrix that results from the sum. Results of this sort have found applications in many different areas, including sparsifying graphs. In this paper we consider the more general problem of sparsifying sums of positive semidefinite matrices that have arbitrary rank. We give several algorithms for solving this problem. The first algorithm is based on the method of Batson, Spielman and Srivastava (2009). The second algorithm is based on the matrix multiplicative weights update method of Arora and Kale (2007). We also highlight an interesting connection between these two algorithms. Our algorithms have numerous applications. We show how they can be used to construct graph sparsifiers with auxiliary constraints, sparsifiers of hypergraphs, and sparse solutions to semidefinite programs.

We study the relationship between unit-distance representations and Lovasz theta number of graphs, originally established by Lovasz. We derive and prove min-max theorems. This framework allows us to derive a weighted version of the hypersphere number of a graph and a related min-max theorem. Then, we connect to sandwich theorems via graph homomorphisms. We present and study a generalization of the hypersphere number of a graph and the related optimization problems. The generalized problem involves finding the smallest ellipsoid of a given shape which contains a unit-distance representation of the graph. We prove that arbitrary positive semidefinite forms describing the ellipsoids yield NP-hard problems.