arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider the problem of approximating certain combinatorial polynomials. First, we consider the problem of approximating the Tutte polynomial of a binary matroid with parameters q>= 2 and gamma. (Relative to the classical (x,y) parameterisation, q=(x-1)(y-1) and gamma=y-1.) A graph is a special case of a binary matroid, so earlier work by the authors shows inapproximability (subject to certain complexity assumptions) for q>2, apart from the trivial case gamma=0. The situation for q=2 is different. Previous results for graphs imply inapproximability in the region -2<=gamma<0, apart from at two "special points" where the polynomial can be computed exactly in polynomial time. For binary matroids, we extend this result by showing (i) there is no FPRAS in the region gamma<-2 unless NP=RP, and (ii) in the region gamma>0, the approximation problem is hard for the complexity class #RHPi_1 under approximation-preserving (AP) reducibility. The latter result indicates a gap in approximation complexity at q=2: whereas an FPRAS is known in the graphical case, there can be none in the binary matroid case, unless there is an FPRAS for all of #RHPi_1. The result also implies that it is computationally difficult to approximate the weight enumerator of a binary linear code, apart from at the special weights at which the problem is exactly solvable in polynomial time. As a consequence, we show that approximating the cycle index polynomial of a permutation group is hard for #RHPi_1 under AP-reducibility, partially resolving a question that we first posed in 1992.

We provide evidence that it is computationally difficult to approximate the partition function of the ferromagnetic q-state Potts model when q>2. Specifically we show that the partition function is hard for the complexity class #RHPi_1 under approximation-preserving reducibility. Thus, it is as hard to approximate the partition function as it is to find approximate solutions to a wide range of counting problems, including that of determining the number of independent sets in a bipartite graph. Our proof exploits the first order phase transition of the "random cluster" model, which is a probability distribution on graphs that is closely related to the q-state Potts model.

The Tutte polynomial of a graph G is a two-variable polynomial T(G;x,y) that encodes many interesting properties of the graph. We study the complexity of the following problem, for rationals x and y: given as input a planar graph G, determine T(G;x,y). Vertigan completely mapped the complexity of exactly computing the Tutte polynomial of a planar graph. He showed that the problem can be solved in polynomial time if (x,y) is on the hyperbola H_q given by (x-1)(y-1)=q for q=1 or q=2 or if (x,y) is one of the two special points (x,y)=(-1,-1) or (x,y)=(1,1). Otherwise, the problem is #P-hard. In this paper, we consider the problem of approximating T(G;x,y), in the usual sense of "fully polynomial randomised approximation scheme" or FPRAS. Roughly speaking, an FPRAS is required to produce, in polynomial time and with high probability, an answer that has small relative error. Assuming that NP is different from RP, we show that there is no FPRAS for the Tutte polynomial in a large portion of the (x,y) plane. In particular, there is no FPRAS if x>1, y<-1 or if y>1, x<-1 or if x<0, y<0 and q>5. Also, there is no FPRAS if x<1, y<1 and q=3. For q>5, our result is intriguing because it shows that there is no FPRAS at (x,y)=(1-q/(1+epsilon),-epsilon) for any positive epsilon but it leaves open the limit point epsilon=0, which corresponds to approximately counting q-colourings of a planar graph.

This paper gives a dichotomy theorem for the complexity of computing the partition function of an instance of a weighted Boolean constraint satisfaction problem. The problem is parameterised by a finite set F of non-negative functions that may be used to assign weights to the configurations (feasible solutions) of a problem instance. Classical constraint satisfaction problems correspond to the special case of 0,1-valued functions. We show that the partition function, i.e. the sum of the weights of all configurations, can be computed in polynomial time if either (1) every function in F is of ``product type'', or (2) every function in F is ``pure affine''. For every other fixed set F, computing the partition function is FP^{#P}-complete.

The Tutte polynomial of a graph G is a two-variable polynomial T(G;x,y) that encodes many interesting properties of the graph. We study the complexity of the following problem, for rationals x and y: take as input a graph G, and output a value which is a good approximation to T(G;x,y). Jaeger, Vertigan and Welsh have completely mapped the complexity of exactly computing the Tutte polynomial. They have shown that this is #P-hard, except along the hyperbola (x-1)(y-1)=1 and at four special points. We are interested in determining for which points (x,y) there is a "fully polynomial randomised approximation scheme" (FPRAS) for T(G;x,y). Under the assumption RP is not equal to NP, we prove that there is no FPRAS at (x,y) if (x,y) is in one of the half-planes x<-1 or y<-1 (excluding the easy-to-compute cases mentioned above). Two exceptions to this result are the half-line x<-1, y=1 (which is still open) and the portion of the hyperbola (x-1)(y-1)=2 corresponding to y<-1 which we show to be equivalent in difficulty to approximately counting perfect matchings. We give further intractability results for (x,y) in the vicinity of the origin. A corollary of our results is that, under the assumption RP is not equal to NP, there is no FPRAS at the point (x,y)=(0,1--lambda) when λ>2 is a positive integer. Thus there is no FPRAS for counting nowhere-zero λflows for λ>2. This is an interesting consequence of our work since the corresponding decision problem is in P for example for λ=6.

The property of balance (in the sense of Feder and Mihail) is investigated in the context of paving matroids. The following examples are exhibited: (a) a class of ``sparse'' paving matroids that are balanced, but at the same time rich enough combinatorially to permit the encoding of hard counting problems; and (b) a paving matroid that is not balanced. The computational significance of (a) is the following. As a consequence of balance, there is an efficient algorithm for approximating the number of bases of a sparse paving matroid within specified relative error. On the other hand, determining the number of bases exactly is likely to be computationally intractable.