arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Menachem Kojman

3 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2012-09-06 v4
Splitting families of sets in ZFC
Published • View PublicationBIB
Miller's 1937 splitting theorem was proved for pairs of cardinals $(\n,ρ)$ in which $n$ is finite and $ρ$ is infinite. An extension of Miller's theorem is proved here in ZFC for pairs of cardinals $(ν,ρ)$ in which $ν$ is arbitrary and $ρ\ge \beth_\om(ν)$. The proof uses a new general method that is based on Shelah's revises Generalized Continuum Hypothesis theorem. Upper bounds on conflict-free coloring numbers of families of sets and a general comparison theorem follow as corollaries of the main theorem. Other corollaries eliminate the use of additional axioms from splitting theorems due to Erdos, Hajnal, Komjath, Juhasz and Shelah.
2005-05-05
The Threshold for Ackermannian Ramsey numbers
For a function $g:\N\to \N$, the \emph{$g$-regressive Ramsey number} of $k$ is the least $N$ so that \[N\stackrel \min \longrightarrow (k)_g\] . This symbol means: for every $c:[N]^2\to \N$ that satisfies $c(m,n)\le g(\min\{m,n\})$ there is a \emph{min-homogeneous} $H\su N$ of size $k$, that is, the color $c(m,n)$ of a pair $\{m,n\}\su H$ depends only on $\min\{m,n\}$. It is known (\cite{km,ks}) that $\id$-regressive Ramsey numbers grow in $k$ as fast as $\Ack(k)$, Ackermann's function in $k$. On the other hand, for constant $g$, the $g$-regressive Ramsey numbers grow exponentially in $k$, and are therefore primitive recursive in $k$. We compute below the threshold in which $g$-regressive Ramsey numbers cease to be primitive recursive and become Ackermannian, by proving: Suppose $g:\N\to \N$ is weakly increasing. Then the $g$-regressive Ramsey numbers are primitive recursive if an only if for every $t>0$ there is some $M_t$ so that for all $n\ge M_t$ it holds that $g(m)<n^{1/t}$ and $M_t$ is bounded by a primitive recursive function in $t$.
1998-05-15
Regressive Ramsey numbers are Ackermannian
Published • View PublicationBIB
We give an elementary proof of the fact that regressive Ramsey numbers are Ackermannian. This fact was first proved by Kanamori and McAloon with mathematical logic techniques.