arXiv++ Combinatorics

Tree-decompositions and treewidth are of fundamental importance in structural and algorithmic graph theory. The "spread" of a tree-decomposition is the minimum integer $s$ such that every vertex lies in at most $s$ bags. A tree-decomposition is "domino" if it has spread 2, which is the smallest interesting value of spread. So that spread 1 becomes interesting, one can relax the definition of tree-decomposition to "tree-partition", which allows the endpoints of each edge to be in the same bag or adjacent bags, while demanding that each vertex appears in exactly one bag. Ding and Oporowski [1995] showed that every graph $G$ with treewidth $k$ and maximum degree $Δ$ has a tree-partition with width $O(kΔ)$. We prove the same result with an improved constant, and with the extra property that the underlying tree has maximum degree $O(Δ)$ and $O(|V(G)|/kΔ)$ vertices. This result implies (with an improved constant) the best known upper bound on the domino treewidth of $O(kΔ^2)$, due to Bodlaender [1999]. Moreover, solving an open problem of Bodlaender, we show this upper bound is best possible, by exhibiting graphs with domino treewidth $Ω(kΔ^2)$ for $k\geqslant 2$. On the other hand, allowing the spread to be a function of $k$, we show that width $O(kΔ)$ can be achieved. This result exploits a connection to chordal completions, which we show is best possible, a result of independent interest.

Chung and Graham [J. London Math. Soc. 1983] claimed to prove that there exists an $n$-vertex graph $G$ with $ \frac{5}{2}n \log_2 n + O(n)$ edges that contains every $n$-vertex tree as a subgraph. Frati, Hoffmann and Tóth [Combin. Probab. Comput. 2023] discovered an error in the proof. By adding more edges to $G$ the error can be corrected, bringing the number of edges in $G$ to $\frac{7}{2}n \log_2 n + O(n). $ We make the first improvement to Chung and Graham's bound in over four decades by showing that there exists an $n$-vertex graph with $ \frac{14}{5}n \log_2 n + O(n) $ edges that contains every $n$-vertex tree as a subgraph. Furthermore, we generalise this bound for treewidth-$k$ graphs by showing that there exists a graph with $O(kn\log(n/k+1))$ edges that contains every $n$-vertex treewidth-$k$ graph as a subgraph. This is best possible in the sense that $Ω(kn\log(n/k+1))$ edges are required.

Let $s(n)$ be the minimum number of edges in a graph that contains every $n$-vertex tree as a subgraph. Chung and Graham [J. London Math. Soc. 1983] claim to prove that $s(n)\leqslant O(n\log n)$. We point out a mistake in their proof. The previously best known upper bound is $s(n)\leqslant O(n(\log n)(\log\log n)^{2})$ by Chung, Graham and Pippenger [Proc. Hungarian Coll. on Combinatorics 1976], the proof of which is missing many crucial details. We give a fully self-contained proof of the new and improved upper bound $s(n)\leqslant O(n(\log n)(\log\log n))$. The best known lower bound is $s(n)\geqslant Ω(n\log n)$. We generalise these results for graphs of treewidth $k$. For an integer $k\geqslant 1$, let $s_k(n)$ be the minimum number of edges in a graph that contains every $n$-vertex graph with treewidth $k$ as a subgraph. So $s(n)=s_1(n)$. We show that $Ω(k n\log n) \leqslant s_k(n) \leqslant O(kn(\log n)(\log\log n))$.