arXiv++ Combinatorics

We say that a first order sentence A defines a graph G if A is true on G but false on any graph non-isomorphic to G. Let L(G) (resp. D(G)) denote the minimum length (resp. quantifier rank) of a such sentence. We define the succinctness function s(n) (resp. its variant q(n)) to be the minimum L(G) (resp. D(G)) over all graphs on n vertices. We prove that s(n) and q(n) may be so small that for no general recursive function f we can have f(s(n))\ge n for all n. However, for the function q^*(n)=\max_{i\le n}q(i), which is the least monotone nondecreasing function bounding q(n) from above, we have q^*(n)=(1+o(1))\log^*n, where \log^*n equals the minimum number of iterations of the binary logarithm sufficient to lower n below 1. We show an upper bound q(n)<\log^*n+5 even under the restriction of the class of graphs to trees. Under this restriction, for q(n) we also have a matching lower bound. We show a relationship D(G)\ge(1-o(1))\log^*L(G) and prove, using the upper bound for q(n), that this relationship is tight. For a non-negative integer a, let D_a(G) and q_a(n) denote the analogs of D(G) and q(n) for defining formulas in the negation normal form with at most a quantifier alternations in any sequence of nested quantifiers. We show a superrecursive gap between D_0(G) and D_3(G) and hence between D_0(G) and D(G). Despite it, for q_0(n) we still have a kind of log-star upper bound: q_0(n)\le2\log^*n+O(1) for infinitely many n.

It is not hard to write a first order formula which is true for a given graph G but is false for any graph not isomorphic to G. The smallest number $(G) of nested quantifiers in a such formula can serve as a measure for the ``first order complexity'' of G. Here, this parameter is studied for random graphs. We determine it asymptotically when the edge probability p is constant; in fact, D(G) is of order log n then. For very sparse graphs its magnitude is Θ(n). On the other hand, for certain (carefully chosen) values of p the parameter D(G) can drop down to the very slow growing function log^* n, the inverse of the tower-function. The general picture, however, is still a mystery.

We say that a first order formula A distinguishes a graph G from another graph G' if A is true on G and false on G'. Provided G and G' are non-isomorphic, let D(G,G') denote the minimal quantifier rank of a such formula. We prove that, if G and G' have the same order n, then D(G,G')\le(n+3)/2, which is tight up to an additive constant of 1. The analogous questions are considered for directed graphs (more generally, for arbitrary structures with maximum relation arity 2) and for k-uniform hypergraphs. Also, we study defining formulas, where we require that A distinguishes G from any other non-isomorphic G'.

We study s(k,n), the maximum size of A+A where A is a k-subset of [n]. A few known functions from additive number theory can be expressed via s(k,n). For example, our estimates of s(k,n) imply new bounds on the maximum size of quasi-Sidon sets, a problem posed by Erdos and Freud [J. Number Th.38 (1991) 196-205]. Also, applications to so-called edge-magic labellings of graphs are given.

Given a relational structure M on n elements, let D(M) be the minimum quantifier rank of a first order formula identifying M up to isomorphism in the class of n-element structures. The obvious upper bound is D(M)\le n. We show that if the relations in M have arity at most k, then D(M)<(1-\frac{1}{2k})n+k^2-k+2. The coefficient at n, which equals 1-\frac{1}{2k}, is probably not best possible but this is the first known bound having it strictly below 1 (for fixed k). If one is content to have the worse coefficient 1-\frac{1}{2k^2+2}, then one can choose an identifying formula of a very special form: a prenex formula with at most one quantifier alternation. A few other results in this vein are presented.

Borsuk's conjecture states that any bounded set in R^n can be partitioned into n+1 sets of smaller diameter. It is known to be false for all n bigger or equal to 323. Here we show that Borsuk's conjecture fails in dimensions 321 and 322. (This result has been independently discovered by Hinrichs and Richter.)

Caro and Yuster (Electronic J.Comb 7 (2000)) studied a generalization of the Turan problem, where a certain function (instead of the size) of an F-free graph of order n has to be maximized. We prove that for a wide class of functions the asymptotics of the maximum is given by complete partite graphs.

We investigate size Ramsey numbers involving bipartite graphs. It is proved that, if each forbidden graph is fixed or grows with n (in a certain uniform manner), then the extremal function has a linear asymptotics. The corresponding slope can be obtained as the minimum of a certain mixed integer program. Applying the Farkas Lemma, we solve the MIP for complete bipartite graphs, in particular answering a question of Erdos, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp (1978) who asked for the asymptotics of the size Ramsey number of (K_{s,n},K_{s,n}) for fixed s and large n.

We show that, if the interior of a lattice d-polytope P contains at least one lattice point, then it contains a lattice point whose coefficient of asymmetry with respect to P is at most b for some number b depending on d only. As an application, we obtain new upper bounds on the volume of a lattice polytope given the number of lattice points in its interior.

We present bijections enumerating (k,m)-trees, k-gon trees, edge labelled (2,1)-trees, and other tree-like structures. Our constructions are based on Foata's (1971) bijection for cycle-free functions, which is simplified here.