Papers by Oleg Verbitsky
23 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Canonical labelling of sparse random graphs
We show that if $p=O(1/n)$, then the Erdős-Rényi random graph $G(n,p)$ with high probability admits a canonical labeling computable in time $O(n\log n)$. Combined with the previous results on the canonization of random graphs, this implies that $G(n,p)$ with high probability admits a polynomial-time canonical labeling whatever the edge probability function $p$. Our algorithm combines the standard color refinement routine with simple post-processing based on the classical linear-time tree canonization. Noteworthy, our analysis of how well color refinement performs in this setting allows us to complete the description of the automorphism group of the 2-core of $G(n,p)$.
New bounds for the optimal density of covering single-insertion codes via the Turán density
Published in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 4260-4266 (2025)
• View Publication
• BIB
We prove that the density of any covering single-insertion code $C\subseteq X^r$ over the $n$-symbol alphabet $X$ cannot be smaller than $1/r+δ_r$ for some positive real $δ_r$ not depending on $n$. This improves the volume lower bound of $1/(r+1)$. On the other hand, we observe that, for all sufficiently large $r$, if $n$ tends to infinity then the asymptotic upper bound of $7/(r+1)$ due to Lenz et al (2021) can be improved to $4.911/(r+1)$.
Both the lower and the upper bounds are achieved by relating the code density to the Turán density from extremal combinatorics. For the last task, we use the analytic framework of measurable subsets of the real cube $[0,1]^r$.
Gathering Information about a Graph by Counting Walks from a Single Vertex
We say that a vertex $v$ in a connected graph $G$ is decisive if the numbers of walks from $v$ of each length determine the graph $G$ rooted at $v$ up to isomorphism among all connected rooted graphs with the same number of vertices. On the other hand, $v$ is called ambivalent if it has the same walk counts as a vertex in a non-isomorphic connected graph with the same number of vertices as $G$. Using the classical constructions of cospectral trees, we first observe that ambivalent vertices exist in almost all trees. If a graph $G$ is determined by spectrum and its characteristic polynomial is irreducible, then we prove that all vertices of $G$ are decisive. Note that both assumptions are conjectured to be true for almost all graphs. Without using any assumption, we are able to prove that the vertices of a random graph are with high probability distinguishable from each other by the numbers of closed walks of length at most 4. As a consequence, the closed walk counts for lengths 2, 3, and 4 provide a canonical labeling of a random graph. Answering a question posed in chemical graph theory, we finally show that all walk counts for a vertex in an $n$-vertex graph are determined by the counts for the $2n$ shortest lengths, and the bound $2n$ is here asymptotically tight.
On the Expressibility of the Reconstructional Color Refinement
One of the most basic facts related to the famous Ulam reconstruction conjecture is that the connectedness of a graph can be determined by the deck of its vertex-deleted subgraphs, which are considered up to isomorphism. We strengthen this result by proving that connectedness can still be determined when the subgraphs in the deck are given up to equivalence under the color refinement isomorphism test. Consequently, this implies that connectedness is recognizable by Reconstruction Graph Neural Networks, a recently introduced GNN architecture inspired by the reconstruction conjecture (Cotta, Morris, Ribeiro 2021).
On a Hierarchy of Spectral Invariants for Graphs
We consider a hierarchy of graph invariants that naturally extends the spectral invariants defined by Fürer (Lin. Alg. Appl. 2010) based on the angles formed by the set of standard basis vectors and their projections onto eigenspaces of the adjacency matrix. We provide a purely combinatorial characterization of this hierarchy in terms of the walk counts. This allows us to give a complete answer to Fürer's question about the strength of his invariants in distinguishing non-isomorphic graphs in comparison to the 2-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm, extending the recent work of Rattan and Seppelt (SODA 2023). As another application of the characterization, we prove that almost all graphs are determined up to isomorphism in terms of the spectrum and the angles, which is of interest in view of the long-standing open problem whether almost all graphs are determined by their eigenvalues alone. Finally, we describe the exact relationship between the hierarchy and the Weisfeiler-Leman algorithms for small dimensions, as also some other important spectral characteristics of a graph such as the generalized and the main spectra.
On anti-stochastic properties of unlabeled graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We study vulnerability of a uniformly distributed random graph to an attack by an adversary who aims for a global change of the distribution while being able to make only a local change in the graph. We call a graph property $A$ anti-stochastic if the probability that a random graph $G$ satisfies $A$ is small but, with high probability, there is a small perturbation transforming $G$ into a graph satisfying $A$. While for labeled graphs such properties are easy to obtain from binary covering codes, the existence of anti-stochastic properties for unlabeled graphs is not so evident. If an admissible perturbation is either the addition or the deletion of one edge, we exhibit an anti-stochastic property that is satisfied by a random unlabeled graph of order $n$ with probability $(2+o(1))/n^2$, which is as small as possible. We also express another anti-stochastic property in terms of the degree sequence of a graph. This property has probability $(2+o(1))/(n\ln n)$, which is optimal up to factor of 2.
The Weisfeiler-Leman Algorithm and Recognition of Graph Properties
The $k$-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm ($k$-WL) is a very useful combinatorial tool in graph isomorphism testing. We address the applicability of $k$-WL to recognition of graph properties. Let $G$ be an input graph with $n$ vertices. We show that, if $n$ is prime, then vertex-transitivity of $G$ can be seen in a straightforward way from the output of 2-WL on $G$ and on the vertex-individualized copies of $G$. However, if $n$ is divisible by 16, then $k$-WL is unable to distinguish between vertex-transitive and non-vertex-transitive graphs with $n$ vertices as long as $k=o(\sqrt n)$. Similar results are obtained for recognition of arc-transitivity.
Local WL Invariance and Hidden Shades of Regularity
The $k$-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm is a powerful tool in graph isomorphism testing. For an input graph $G$, the algorithm determines a canonical coloring of $s$-tuples of vertices of $G$ for each $s$ between 1 and $k$. We say that a numerical parameter of $s$-tuples is $k$-WL-invariant if it is determined by the tuple color. As an application of Dvořák's result on $k$-WL-invariance of homomorphism counts, we spot some non-obvious regularity properties of strongly regular graphs and related graph families. For example, if $G$ is a strongly regular graph, then the number of paths of length 6 between vertices $x$ and $y$ in $G$ depends only on whether or not $x$ and $y$ are adjacent (and the length 6 is here optimal). Or, the number of cycles of length 7 passing through a vertex $x$ in $G$ is the same for every $x$ (where the length 7 is also optimal).
Identifiability of Graphs with Small Color Classes by the Weisfeiler-Leman Algorithm
As it is well known, the isomorphism problem for vertex-colored graphs with color multiplicity at most 3 is solvable by the classical 2-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm (2-WL). On the other hand, the prominent Cai-Fürer-Immerman construction shows that even the multidimensional version of the algorithm does not suffice for graphs with color multiplicity 4. We give an efficient decision procedure that, given a graph $G$ of color multiplicity 4, recognizes whether or not $G$ is identifiable by 2-WL, that is, whether or not 2-WL distinguishes $G$ from any non-isomorphic graph. In fact, we solve the much more general problem of recognizing whether or not a given coherent configuration of maximum fiber size 4 is separable. This extends our recognition algorithm to graphs of color multiplicity 4 with directed and colored edges.
Our decision procedure is based on an explicit description of the class of graphs with color multiplicity 4 that are not identifiable by 2-WL. The Cai-Fürer-Immerman graphs of color multiplicity 4 distinctly appear here as a natural subclass, which demonstrates that the Cai-Fürer-Immerman construction is not ad hoc. Our classification reveals also other types of graphs that are hard for 2-WL. One of them arises from patterns known as $(n_3)$-configurations in incidence geometry.
Drawing Graphs on Few Lines and Few Planes
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We investigate the problem of drawing graphs in 2D and 3D such that their edges (or only their vertices) can be covered by few lines or planes. We insist on straight-line edges and crossing-free drawings. This problem has many connections to other challenging graph-drawing problems such as small-area or small-volume drawings, layered or track drawings, and drawing graphs with low visual complexity. While some facts about our problem are implicit in previous work, this is the first treatment of the problem in its full generality. Our contribution is as follows.
We show lower and upper bounds for the numbers of lines and planes needed for covering drawings of graphs in certain graph classes. In some cases our bounds are asymptotically tight; in some cases we are able to determine exact values.
We relate our parameters to standard combinatorial characteristics of graphs (such as the chromatic number, treewidth, maximum degree, or arboricity) and to parameters that have been studied in graph drawing (such as the track number or the number of segments appearing in a drawing).
We pay special attention to planar graphs. For example, we show that there are planar graphs that can be drawn in 3-space on a lot fewer lines than in the plane.
Graph Isomorphism, Color Refinement, and Compactness
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Color refinement is a classical technique used to show that two given graphs G and H are non-isomorphic; it is very efficient, although it does not succeed on all graphs. We call a graph G amenable to color refinement if it succeeds in distinguishing G from any non-isomorphic graph H. Tinhofer (1991) explored a linear programming approach to Graph Isomorphism and defined compact graphs: A graph is compact if its fractional automorphisms polytope is integral. Tinhofer noted that isomorphism testing for compact graphs can be done quite efficiently by linear programming. However, the problem of characterizing and recognizing compact graphs in polynomial time remains an open question.
Our results are summarized below:
- We show that amenable graphs are recognizable in time O((n + m)logn), where n and m denote the number of vertices and the number of edges in the input graph.
- We show that all amenable graphs are compact.
- We study related combinatorial and algebraic graph properties introduced by Tinhofer and Godsil. The corresponding classes of graphs form a hierarchy and we prove that recognizing each of these graph classes is P-hard. In particular, this gives a first complexity lower bound for recognizing compact graphs.
On the Isomorphism Problem for Helly Circular-Arc Graphs
Published in Information and Computation 247 (2016), pp. 266-277
• View Publication
• BIB
The isomorphism problem is known to be efficiently solvable for interval graphs, while for the larger class of circular-arc graphs its complexity status stays open. We consider the intermediate class of intersection graphs for families of circular arcs that satisfy the Helly property. We solve the isomorphism problem for this class in logarithmic space. If an input graph has a Helly circular-arc model, our algorithm constructs it canonically, which means that the models constructed for isomorphic graphs are equal.
Logical complexity of graphs: a survey
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We discuss the definability of finite graphs in first-order logic with two relation symbols for adjacency and equality of vertices. The logical depth $D(G)$ of a graph $G$ is equal to the minimum quantifier depth of a sentence defining $G$ up to isomorphism. The logical width $W(G)$ is the minimum number of variables occurring in such a sentence. The logical length $L(G)$ is the length of a shortest defining sentence. We survey known estimates for these graph parameters and discuss their relations to other topics (such as the efficiency of the Weisfeiler-Lehman algorithm in isomorphism testing, the evolution of a random graph, quantitative characteristics of the zero-one law, or the contribution of Frank Ramsey to the research on Hilbert's Entscheidungsproblem). Also, we trace the behavior of the descriptive complexity of a graph as the logic becomes more restrictive (for example, only definitions with a bounded number of variables or quantifier alternations are allowed) or more expressible (after powering with counting quantifiers).
Fermat's spiral and the line between Yin and Yang
Published in Amer. Math. Monthly. 117:9 (2010), 786-800
• View Publication
• BIB
Let $D$ denote a disk of unit area. We call a subset $A$ of $D$ perfect if it has measure 1/2 and, with respect to any axial symmetry of $D$, the maximal symmetric subset of $A$ has measure 1/4. We call a curve $β$ in $D$ an yin-yang line if
$β$ splits $D$ into two congruent perfect sets,
$β$ crosses each concentric circle of $D$ twice,
$β$ crosses each radius of $D$ once.
We prove that Fermat's spiral is a unique yin-yang line in the class of smooth curves algebraic in polar coordinates.
How Much Work Does It Take To Straighten a Plane Graph Out?
We prove that if one wants to make a plane graph drawing straight-line then in the worst case one has to move almost all vertices.
On the logical complexity of convex polygon dissections
The logical depth of a graph $G$ is the minimum quantifier depth of a first order sentence defining $G$ up to isomorphism in the language of the adjacency and the equality relations. We consider the case that $G$ is a dissection of a convex polygon or, equivalently, a biconnected outerplanar graph. We bound the logical depth of a such $G$ from above by a function of combinatorial parameters of the dual tree of $G$.
First Order Definability of Trees and Sparse Random Graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let D(G) be the smallest quantifier depth of a first order formula which is true for a graph G but false for any other non-isomorphic graph. This can be viewed as a measure for the first order descriptive complexity of G.
We will show that almost surely D(G)=Θ(\ln n/\ln\ln n), where G is a random tree of order n or the giant component of a random graph G(n,c/n) with constant c>1. These results rely on computing the maximum of D(T) for a tree T of order n and maximum degree l, so we study this problem as well.
The First Order Definability of Graphs with Separators via the Ehrenfeucht Game
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We say that a first order formula $Φ$ defines a graph $G$ if $Φ$ is true on $G$ and false on every graph $G'$ non-isomorphic with $G$. Let $D(G)$ be the minimal quantifier rank of a such formula. We prove that, if $G$ is a tree of bounded degree or a Hamiltonian (equivalently, 2-connected) outerplanar graph, then $D(G)=O(\log n)$, where $n$ denotes the order of $G$. This bound is optimal up to a constant factor. If $h$ is a constant, for connected graphs with no minor $K_h$ and degree $O(\sqrt n/\log n)$, we prove the bound $D(G)=O(\sqrt n)$. This result applies to planar graphs and, more generally, to graphs of bounded genus.
On the Lengths of Symmetry Breaking-Preserving Games on Graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Given a graph $G$, we consider a game where two players, $A$ and $B$, alternatingly color edges of $G$ in red and in blue respectively. Let $l(G)$ be the maximum number of moves in which $B$ is able to keep the red and the blue subgraphs isomorphic, if $A$ plays optimally to destroy the isomorphism. This value is a lower bound for the duration of any avoidance game on $G$ under the assumption that $B$ plays optimally. We prove that if $G$ is a path or a cycle of odd length $n$, then $Ω(\log n)\le l(G)\le O(\log^2 n)$. The lower bound is based on relations with Ehrenfeucht games from model theory. We also consider complete graphs and prove that $l(K_n)=O(1)$.
Succinct Definitions in the First Order Theory of Graphs
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
We say that a first order sentence A defines a graph G if A is true on G but false on any graph non-isomorphic to G. Let L(G) (resp. D(G)) denote the minimum length (resp. quantifier rank) of a such sentence. We define the succinctness function s(n) (resp. its variant q(n)) to be the minimum L(G) (resp. D(G)) over all graphs on n vertices.
We prove that s(n) and q(n) may be so small that for no general recursive function f we can have f(s(n))\ge n for all n. However, for the function q^*(n)=\max_{i\le n}q(i), which is the least monotone nondecreasing function bounding q(n) from above, we have q^*(n)=(1+o(1))\log^*n, where \log^*n equals the minimum number of iterations of the binary logarithm sufficient to lower n below 1.
We show an upper bound q(n)<\log^*n+5 even under the restriction of the class of graphs to trees. Under this restriction, for q(n) we also have a matching lower bound.
We show a relationship D(G)\ge(1-o(1))\log^*L(G) and prove, using the upper bound for q(n), that this relationship is tight.
For a non-negative integer a, let D_a(G) and q_a(n) denote the analogs of D(G) and q(n) for defining formulas in the negation normal form with at most a quantifier alternations in any sequence of nested quantifiers. We show a superrecursive gap between D_0(G) and D_3(G) and hence between D_0(G) and D(G). Despite it, for q_0(n) we still have a kind of log-star upper bound: q_0(n)\le2\log^*n+O(1) for infinitely many n.