arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study two new parameters for finite posets motivated by the problem of efficiently determining the set of successors of a given element. A plane map of a poset $P=(X,\leq)$ is an injective mapping of $X$ into the Cartesian plane $\mathbb{R}^2$. Given two different points $a$ and $b$ in the plane, we say that $b$ dominates $a$ if $a<b$ coordinatewise. We say that an element $x$ of $P$ is tight in a plane map $μ$ if the following holds: $x<y$ in $P$ if and only if $μ(y)$ dominates $μ(x)$. Note that, by definition, every 2-dimensional poset admits a map such that every element of the poset is tight. For any poset $P$, we define the mapability of $P$, $\mathrm{dmap}(P)$, to be the maximum number of elements that are tight in a single map, and we define the atlas thickness of $P$, $\mathrm{at}(P)$, to be the size of the smallest collection of maps such that every element is tight in at least one map of the collection. We relate these parameters to the classical notions of dimension and width: for every poset $P$, we show that $\mathrm{dim}(P) \le 2\mathrm{at}(P) \le \mathrm{width}(P)+1$. On the other hand, there exists a sequence of posets $(P_n)_{n \ge 1}$ such that the atlas thickness of $P_n$ is doubly exponential in the dimension of $P_n$. On the computational side, we prove that it is NP-complete, for a given poset $P$, to compute the mapability of $P$ and to decide whether $\mathrm{at}(P) \le 2$. In contrast to the latter, we show that computing the mapability of a poset is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the natural parameter.

Recently, there has been interest in representing single graphs by multiple drawings; for example, using graph stories, storyplans, or uncrossed collections. In this paper, we apply this idea to orthogonal graph drawing. Due to the orthogonal drawing style, we focus on 4-graphs, that is, graphs of maximum degree 4. We restrict ourselves to plane graphs, that is, planar graphs whose embedding is fixed. Our goal is to represent any plane 4-graph $G$ by an unbent collection, that is, a collection of orthogonal drawings of $G$ that adhere to the embedding of $G$ and ensure that each edge of $G$ is drawn without bends in at least one of the drawings. We investigate two objectives. First, we consider minimizing the number of drawings in an unbent collection. We prove that every plane 4-graph can be represented by a collection with at most three drawings, which is tight. We also give necessary and sufficient conditions for a graph to admit an unbent collection of size $2$. Second, we consider minimizing the total number of bends over all drawings in an unbent collection. We show that this problem is NP-hard and give a 3-approximation algorithm. For the special case of plane triconnected cubic graphs, we show how to compute minimum-bend collections in linear time.

An obstacle representation of a graph $G$ consists of a set of pairwise disjoint simply-connected closed regions and a one-to-one mapping of the vertices of $G$ to points such that two vertices are adjacent in $G$ if and only if the line segment connecting the two corresponding points does not intersect any obstacle. The obstacle number of a graph is the smallest number of obstacles in an obstacle representation of the graph in the plane such that all obstacles are simple polygons. It is known that the obstacle number of each $n$-vertex graph is $O(n \log n)$ [Balko, Cibulka, and Valtr, 2018] and that there are $n$-vertex graphs whose obstacle number is $Ω(n/(\log\log n)^2)$ [Dujmović and Morin, 2015]. We improve this lower bound to $Ω(n/\log\log n)$ for simple polygons and to $Ω(n)$ for convex polygons. To obtain these stronger bounds, we improve known estimates on the number of $n$-vertex graphs with bounded obstacle number, solving a conjecture by Dujmović and Morin. We also show that if the drawing of some $n$-vertex graph is given as part of the input, then for some drawings $Ω(n^2)$ obstacles are required to turn them into an obstacle representation of the graph. Our bounds are asymptotically tight in several instances. We complement these combinatorial bounds by two complexity results. First, we show that computing the obstacle number of a graph $G$ is fixed-parameter tractable in the vertex cover number of $G$. Second, we show that, given a graph $G$ and a simple polygon $P$, it is NP-hard to decide whether $G$ admits an obstacle representation using $P$ as the only obstacle.

We study straight-line drawings of graphs where the vertices are placed in convex position in the plane, i.e., \emph{convex drawings}. We consider two families of graph classes with convex drawings: \emph{outer $k$-planar} graphs, where each edge is crossed by at most $k$ other edges; and, \emph{outer $k$-quasi-planar} graphs where no $k$ edges can mutually cross. We show that the outer $k$-planar graphs are $\lfloor3.5\sqrt{k}\rfloor$-degenerate, and consequently that every outer $k$-planar graph can be colored with $\lfloor3.5\sqrt{k}\rfloor + 1$ colors. We further show that every outer $k$-planar graph has a balanced vertex separator of size at most $2k+3$. For each fixed $k$, these small balanced separators allow us to test outer $k$-planarity in quasi-polynomial time, e.g., this implies that none of these recognition problems is NP-hard unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. We also show that the class of outer $k$-quasi-planar graphs and the class of planar graphs are incomparable. Finally, we restrict outer $k$-planar and outer $k$-quasi-planar drawings to \emph{full} drawings (where no crossing appears on the boundary of the outer face) and to \emph{closed} drawings (where the vertex sequence on the boundary of the outer face is a Hamiltonian cycle in the graph). For each $k$, we express \emph{closed outer $k$-planarity} and \emph{closed outer $k$-quasi-planarity} in \emph{extended monadic second-order logic}. Due to a result of Wood and Telle (New York J. Math., 2007) every outer $k$-planar graph has treewidth at most $3k+11$. Thus, Courcelle's theorem implies that closed outer $k$-planarity is linear time testable. We leverage this result to further show that full outer $k$-planarity can also be tested in linear time.

Storyline visualizations help visualize encounters of the characters in a story over time. Each character is represented by an x-monotone curve that goes from left to right. A meeting is represented by having the characters that participate in the meeting run close together for some time. In order to keep the visual complexity low, rather than just minimizing pairwise crossings of curves, we propose to count block crossings, that is, pairs of intersecting bundles of lines. Our main results are as follows. We show that minimizing the number of block crossings is NP-hard, and we develop, for meetings of bounded size, a constant-factor approximation. We also present two fixed-parameter algorithms and, for meetings of size 2, a greedy heuristic that we evaluate experimentally.

We investigate the problem of drawing graphs in 2D and 3D such that their edges (or only their vertices) can be covered by few lines or planes. We insist on straight-line edges and crossing-free drawings. This problem has many connections to other challenging graph-drawing problems such as small-area or small-volume drawings, layered or track drawings, and drawing graphs with low visual complexity. While some facts about our problem are implicit in previous work, this is the first treatment of the problem in its full generality. Our contribution is as follows. We show lower and upper bounds for the numbers of lines and planes needed for covering drawings of graphs in certain graph classes. In some cases our bounds are asymptotically tight; in some cases we are able to determine exact values. We relate our parameters to standard combinatorial characteristics of graphs (such as the chromatic number, treewidth, maximum degree, or arboricity) and to parameters that have been studied in graph drawing (such as the track number or the number of segments appearing in a drawing). We pay special attention to planar graphs. For example, we show that there are planar graphs that can be drawn in 3-space on a lot fewer lines than in the plane.

Obstacle representations of graphs have been investigated quite intensely over the last few years. We focus on graphs that can be represented by a single obstacle. Given a (topologically open) polygon $C$ and a finite set $P$ of points in general position in the complement of $C$, the visibility graph $G_C(P)$ has a vertex for each point in $P$ and an edge $pq$ for any two points $p$ and $q$ in $P$ that can see each other, that is, $\overline{pq} \cap C=\emptyset$. We draw $G_C(P)$ straight-line. Given a graph $G$, we want to compute an obstacle representation of $G$, that is, an obstacle $C$ and a set of points $P$ such that $G=G_C(P)$. The complexity of this problem is open, even for the case that the points are exactly the vertices of a simple polygon and the obstacle is the complement of the polygon-the simple-polygon visibility graph problem. There are two types of obstacles; an inside obstacle lies in a bounded component of the complement of the visibility drawing, whereas an outside obstacle lies in the unbounded component. We show that the class of graphs with an inside-obstacle representation is incomparable with the class of graphs that have an outside-obstacle representation. We further show that any graph with at most seven vertices or circumference at most 6 has an outside-obstacle representation, which does not hold for a specific graph with 8 vertices and circumference 8. Finally, we consider the outside-obstacle graph sandwich problem: given graphs $G$ and $H$ on the same vertex set, is there a graph $K$ such that $G \subseteq K \subseteq H$ and $K$ has an outside-obstacle representation? We show that this problem is NP-hard even for co-bipartite graphs. With slight modifications, our proof also shows that the inside-obstacle graph sandwich problem, the single-obstacle graph sandwich problem, and the simple-polygon visibility graph sandwich problem are all NP-hard.

We study contact representations for graphs, which we call pixel representations in 2D and voxel representations in 3D. Our representations are based on the unit square grid whose cells we call pixels in 2D and voxels in 3D. Two pixels are adjacent if they share an edge, two voxels if they share a face. We call a connected set of pixels or voxels a blob. Given a graph, we represent its vertices by disjoint blobs such that two blobs contain adjacent pixels or voxels if and only if the corresponding vertices are adjacent. We are interested in the size of a representation, which is the number of pixels or voxels it consists of. We first show that finding minimum-size representations is NP-complete. Then, we bound representation sizes needed for certain graph classes. In 2D, we show that, for $k$-outerplanar graphs with $n$ vertices, $Θ(kn)$ pixels are always sufficient and sometimes necessary. In particular, outerplanar graphs can be represented with a linear number of pixels, whereas general planar graphs sometimes need a quadratic number. In 3D, $Θ(n^2)$ voxels are always sufficient and sometimes necessary for any $n$-vertex graph. We improve this bound to $Θ(n\cdot τ)$ for graphs of treewidth $τ$ and to $O((g+1)^2n\log^2n)$ for graphs of genus $g$. In particular, planar graphs admit representations with $O(n\log^2n)$ voxels.

For $t,g>0$, a vertex-weighted graph of total weight $W$ is $(t,g)$-trimmable if it contains a vertex-induced subgraph of total weight at least $(1-1/t)W$ and with no simple path of more than $g$ edges. A family of graphs is trimmable if for each constant $t>0$, there is a constant $g=g(t)$ such that every vertex-weighted graph in the family is $(t,g)$-trimmable. We show that every family of graphs of bounded domino treewidth is trimmable. This implies that every family of graphs of bounded degree is trimmable if the graphs in the family have bounded treewidth or are planar. Based on this result, we derive a polynomial-time approximation scheme for the problem of labeling weighted points with nonoverlapping sliding labels of unit height and given lengths so as to maximize the total weight of the labeled points. This settles one of the last major open questions in the theory of map labeling.