arXiv++ Combinatorics

The reciprocal of $e^{-x}$ has a power series about $0$ in which all coefficients are non-negative. Gessel [Reciprocals of exponential polynomials and permutation enumeration, Australas. J. Combin., 74, 2019] considered truncates of the power series of $e^{-x}$, i.e. polynomials of the form $\sum_{n=0}^r (-1)^n\frac{x^n}{n!}$, and established combinatorially that the reciprocal of the truncate has a power series with all coefficients non-negative precisely when $r$ is odd. Here we extend Gessel's observations to arbitrary ``thinned exponential series''. To be precise, let $A \subseteq \{1,3,5,\ldots\}$ and $B \subseteq \{2,4,6,\ldots\}$, and consider the series \[ 1-\sum_{a \in A} \frac{x^a}{a!} + \sum_{b \in B} \frac{x^b}{b!}. \] We consider conditions on $A$ and $B$ that ensure that the reciprocal series has all coefficients non-negative. We give combinatorial proofs for a large set of conditions, including whenever $1 \in A$ and the endpoints of the maximal consecutive intervals in $A \cup B$ are odd integers. In particular, the coefficients in the reciprocal series can be interpreted as ordered set partitions of $[n]$ with block size restrictions, or in terms of permutations with restricted lengths of maximally increasing runs, suitably weighted.

We give a simple proof of a major index determinant formula in the symmetric group discovered by Krattenthaler and first proved by Thibon using noncommutative symmetric functions. We do so by proving a factorization of an element in the group ring of the symmetric group. By applying similar methods to the groups of signed permutations and colored permutations, we prove determinant formulas in these groups as conjectured by Krattenthaler.

The partition lattice and noncrossing partition lattice are well studied objects in combinatorics. Given a graph $G$ on vertex set $\{1,2,\dots, n\}$, its bond lattice, $L_G$, is the subposet of the partition lattice formed by restricting to the partitions whose blocks induce connected subgraphs of $G$. In this article, we introduce a natural noncrossing analogue of the bond lattice, the noncrossing bond poset, $NC_G$, obtained by restricting to the noncrossing partitions of $L_G$. Both the noncrossing partition lattice and the bond lattice have many nice combinatorial properties. We show that, for several families of graphs, the noncrossing bond poset also exhibits these properties. We present simple necessary and sufficient conditions on the graph to ensure the noncrossing bond poset is a lattice. Additionally, for several families of graphs, we give combinatorial descriptions of the Möbius function and characteristic polynomial of the noncrossing bond poset. These descriptions are in terms of a noncrossing analogue of non-broken circuit (NBC) sets of the graphs and can be thought of as a noncrossing version of Whitney's NBC theorem for the chromatic polynomial. We also consider the shellability and supersolvability of the noncrossing bond poset, providing sufficient conditions for both. We end with some open problems.

Let alpha = (a,b,...) be a composition. Consider the associated poset F(alpha), called a fence, whose covering relations are x_1 < x_2 < ... < x_{a+1} > x_{a+2} > ... > x_{a+b+1} < x_{a+b+2} < ... . We study the associated distributive lattice L(alpha) consisting of all lower order ideals of F(alpha). These lattices are important in the theory of cluster algebras and their rank generating functions can be used to define q-analogues of rational numbers. In particular, we make progress on a recent conjecture of Morier-Genoud and Ovsienko that L(alpha) is rank unimodal. We show that if one of the parts of alpha is greater than the sum of the others, then the conjecture is true. We conjecture that L(alpha) enjoys the stronger properties of having a nested chain decomposition and having a rank sequence which is either top or bottom interlacing, the latter being a recently defined property of sequences. We verify that these properties hold for compositions with at most three parts and for what we call d-divided posets, generalizing work of Claussen and simplifying a construction of Gansner.

Given $R \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ let ${n \brace k}_R$, ${n \brack k}_R$, and $L(n,k)_R$ be the number of ways of partitioning the set $[n]$ into $k$ non-empty subsets, cycles and lists, respectively, with each block having cardinality in $R$. We refer to these as the $R$-restricted Stirling numbers of the second and first kind and the $R$-restricted Lah numbers, respectively. Note that the classical Stirling numbers of the second kind and first kind, and Lah numbers are ${n \brace k} = {n \brace k}_{\mathbb{N}}$, ${n \brack k} = {n \brack k}_{\mathbb{N}} $ and $L(n,k) = L(n,k)_{\mathbb{N}}$, respectively. The matrices $[{n \brace k}]_{n,k \geq 1}$, $[{n \brack k}]_{n,k \geq 1}$ and $[L(n,k)]_{n,k \geq 1}$ have inverses $[(-1)^{n-k}{n \brack k}]_{n,k \geq 1}$, $[(-1)^{n-k} {n \brace k}]_{n,k \geq 1}$ and $[(-1)^{n-k} L(n,k)]_{n,k \geq 1}$ respectively. The inverse matrices $[{n \brace k}_R]^{-1}_{n,k \geq 1}$, $[{n \brack k}_R]^{-1}_{n,k \geq 1}$ and $[L(n,k)_R]^{-1}_{n,k \geq 1}$ exist if and only if $1 \in R$. We express each entry of each of these matrices as the difference between the cardinalities of two explicitly defined families of labeled forests. In particular the entries of $[{n \brace k}_{[r]}]^{-1}_{n,k \geq 1}$ have combinatorial interpretations, affirmatively answering a question of Choi, Long, Ng and Smith from 2006. If $1,2 \in R$ and if for all $n \in R$ with $n$ odd and $n \geq 3$, we have $n \pm 1 \in R$, we additionally show that each entry of $[{n \brace k}_R]^{-1}_{n,k \geq 1}$, $[{n \brack k}_R]^{-1}_{n,k \geq 1}$ and $[L(n,k)_R]^{-1}_{n,k \geq 1}$ is up to an explicit sign the cardinality of a single explicitly defined family of labeled forests. Our results also provide combinatorial interpretations of the $k$th Whitney numbers of the first and second kinds of $Π_n^{1,d}$, the poset of partitions of $[n]$ that have each part size congruent to $1$ mod $d$.

A probabilistic characterization of the dominance partial order on the set of partitions is presented. This extends work in "Symmetric polynomials and symmetric mean inequalities". Electron. J. Combin., 20(3): Paper 34, 2013. Let $n$ be a positive integer and let $ν$ be a partition of $n$. Let $F$ be the Ferrers diagram of $ν$. Let $m$ be a positive integer and let $p \in (0,1)$. Fill each cell of $F$ with balls, the number of which is independently drawn from the random variable $X = Bin(m,p)$. Given non-negative integers $j$ and $t$, let $P(ν,j,t)$ be the probability that the total number of balls in $F$ is $j$ and that no row of $F$ contains more that $t$ balls. We show that if $ν$ and $μ$ are partitions of $n$, then $ν$ dominates $μ$, i.e. $\sum_{i=1}^k ν(i) \geq \sum_{i=1}^k μ(i)$ for all positive integers $k$, if and only if $P(ν,j,t) \leq P(μ,j,t)$ for all non-negative integers $j$ and $t$. It is also shown that this same result holds when $X$ is replaced by any one member of a large class of random variables. Let $p = \{p_n\}_{n=0}^\infty$ be a sequence of real numbers. Let ${\cal T}_p$ be the $\mathbb{N}$ by $\mathbb{N}$ matrix with $({\cal T}_p)_{i,j} = p_{j-i}$ for all $i, j \in \mathbb{N}$ where we take $p_n = 0$ for $n < 0$. Let $(p^i)_j$ be the coefficient of $x^j$ in $(p(x))^i$ where $p(x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty p_n x^n$ and $p^0(x) =1$. Let ${\cal S}_p$ be the $\mathbb{N}$ by $\mathbb{N}$ matrix with $({\cal S}_p)_{i,j} = (p^i)_j$ for all $i, j \in \mathbb{N}$. We show that if ${\cal T}_p$ is totally non-negative of order $k$ then so is ${\cal S}_p$. The case $k=2$ of this result is a key step in the proof of the result on domination. We also show that the case $k=2$ would follow from a combinatorial conjecture that might be of independent interest.

Let $G = (V,E)$ be a graph and let $r,s,k$ be positive integers. "Revolutionaries and Spies", denoted $\cG(G,r,s,k)$, is the following two-player game. The sets of positions for player 1 and player 2 are $V^r$ and $V^s$ respectively. Each coordinate in $p \in V^r$ gives the location of a "revolutionary" in $G$. Similarly player 2 controls $s$ "spies". We say $u, u' \in V(G)^n$ are adjacent, $u \sim u'$, if for all $1 \leq i \leq n$, $u_i = u'_i$ or ${u_i,u'_i} \in E(G)$. In round 0 player 1 picks $p_0 \in V^r$ and then player 2 picks $q_0 \in V^s$. In each round $i \geq 1$ player 1 moves to $p_i \sim p_{i-1}$ and then player 2 moves to $q_i \sim q_{i-1}$. Player 1 wins the game if he can place $k$ revolutionaries on a vertex $v$ in such a way that player 1 cannot place a spy on $v$ in his following move. Player 2 wins the game if he can prevent this outcome. Let $s(G,r,k)$ be the minimum $s$ such that player 2 can win $\cG(G,r,s,k)$. We show that for $d \geq 2$, $s(\Z^d,r,2)\geq 6 \lfloor \frac{r}{8} \rfloor$. Here $a,b \in \Z^{d}$ with $a \neq b$ are connected by an edge if and only if $|a_i - b_i| \leq 1$ for all $i$ with $1 \leq i \leq d$.

A non-crossing pairing on a bitstring matches 1s and 0s in a manner such that the pairing diagram is nonintersecting. By considering such pairings on arbitrary bitstrings $1^{n_1} 0^{m_1} ... 1^{n_r} 0^{m_r}$, we generalize classical problems from the theory of Catalan structures. In particular, it is very difficult to find useful explicit formulas for the enumeration function $φ(n_1, m_1, ..., n_r, m_r)$, which counts the number of pairings as a function of the underlying bitstring. We determine explicit formulas for $φ$, and also prove general upper bounds in terms of Fuss-Catalan numbers by relating non-crossing pairings to other generalized Catalan structures (that are in some sense more natural). This enumeration problem arises in the theory of random matrices and free probability.

Let D(G) be the smallest quantifier depth of a first order formula which is true for a graph G but false for any other non-isomorphic graph. This can be viewed as a measure for the first order descriptive complexity of G. We will show that almost surely D(G)=Θ(\ln n/\ln\ln n), where G is a random tree of order n or the giant component of a random graph G(n,c/n) with constant c>1. These results rely on computing the maximum of D(T) for a tree T of order n and maximum degree l, so we study this problem as well.