arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider the 2-limited packing problem: for a graph $G=(V,E)$ one seeks to find a maximum cardinality subset $B\subseteq V$, such that, for all $v\in V$, the closed neighbourhood of $v$ contains at most two vertices in $B$. We compare this packing problem to the well-known Roman domination problem by pointing out some similarities and differences in the behaviour of the optimal solutions of both problems and show that these two problems are weakly dual. We show that for trees, the two problems are strongly dual, letting us solve the Roman domination problem by computing an optimal solution to the 2-limited packing problem.

We introduce the parametric matroid one-interdiction problem. Given a matroid, each element of its ground set is associated with a weight that depends linearly on a real parameter from a given parameter interval. The goal is to find, for each parameter value, one element that, when being removed, maximizes the weight of a minimum weight basis. The complexity of this problem can be measured by the number of slope changes of the piecewise linear function mapping the parameter to the weight of the optimal solution of the parametric matroid one-interdiction problem. We provide two polynomial upper bounds as well as a lower bound on the number of these slope changes. Using these, we develop algorithms that require a polynomial number of independence tests and analyse their running time in the special case of graphical matroids.

By Menger's theorem the maximum number of arc-disjoint paths from a vertex s to a vertex t in a directed graph equals the minumum number of arcs needed to disconnect s and t, i.e., the minimum size of an s-t-cut. The max-flow problem in a network with unit capacities is equivalent to the arc-disjoint paths problem. Moreover the max-flow and min-cut problems form a strongly dual pair. We relax the disjointedness requirement on the paths, allowing them to be almost disjoint, meaning they may share up to one arc. The resulting almost disjoint paths problem (ADP) asks for k s-t-paths such that any two of them are almost disjoint. The separating by forbidden pairs problem (SFP) is the corresponding dual problem and calls for a set of k arc pairs such that every s-t-path contains both arcs of at least one such pair. In this paper, we explore these two problems, showing that they have an unbounded duality gap in general and analyzing their complexity. We prove that ADP is NP-complete when k is part of the input and that SFP is Sigma_2P-complete, even for acyclic graphs. Furthermore, we efficiently solve ADP when k<=2 is fixed and present a polynomial time algorithm based on dynamic programming for ADP when k is constant and the considered graphs are acyclic.

The 3-decomposition conjecture is wide open. It asserts that every finite connected cubic graph can be decomposed into a spanning tree, a disjoint union of cycles, and a matching. We show that every such decomposition is derived from a homeomorphically irreducible spanning tree (HIST). This allows us to propose a novel reformulation of the 3-decomposition conjecture: the HIST-extension conjecture. We also prove that the following graphs are reducible configurations with respect to the 3-decomposition conjecture: the triangle, the K_{2,3}, the Petersen graph with one vertex removed, the claw-square, the twin-house, and the domino. As an application, we show that all 3-connected graphs of tree-width at most 3 or of path-width at most 4 satisfy the 3-decomposition conjecture and that a 3-connected minimum counterexample to the conjecture is triangle-free, all cycles of length at most 6 are induced, and every edge is in the centre of an induced P_6. Finally, we automate the naive part of the process of checking whether a configuration is reducible and we prove that all graphs of order at most 20 satisfy the 3-decomposition conjecture.

We present an interactive framework that, given a membership test for a graph class $\mathcal{G}$ and a number $k$, finds and tests unavoidable sets for the class of graphs in $\mathcal{G}$ of path-width at most $k$. We put special emphasis on the case that $\mathcal{G}$ is the class of cubic graphs and tailor the algorithm to this case. In particular, we introduce the new concept of high-degree-first path-decompositions, which yields highly efficient pruning techniques. Using this framework we determine all extremal girth values of cubic graphs of path-width $k$ for all $k \in \{3,\dots, 10\}$. Moreover, we determine all smallest graphs which take on these extremal girth values. As a further application of our framework we characterise the extremal cubic graphs of path-width 3 and girth 4.

A decomposition of a graph is a set of subgraphs whose edges partition those of $G$. The 3-decomposition conjecture posed by Hoffmann-Ostenhof in 2011 states that every connected cubic graph can be decomposed into a spanning tree, a 2-regular subgraph, and a matching. It has been settled for special classes of graphs, one of the first results being for Hamiltonian graphs. In the past two years several new results have been obtained, adding the classes of plane, claw-free, and 3-connected tree-width 3 graphs to the list. In this paper, we regard a natural extension of Hamiltonian graphs: removing a Hamiltonian cycle from a cubic graph leaves a perfect matching. Conversely, removing a perfect matching $M$ from a cubic graph $G$ leaves a disjoint union of cycles. Contracting these cycles yields a new graph $G_M$. The graph $G$ is star-like if $G_M$ is a star for some perfect matching $M$, making Hamiltonian graphs star-like. We extend the technique used to prove that Hamiltonian graphs satisfy the 3-decomposition conjecture to show that 3-connected star-like graphs satisfy it as well.

This paper addresses the robust single machine makespan scheduling with uncertain release dates of the jobs. The release dates take values within know intervals. We use the concept of gamma-robustness in two different settings and address both the robust absolute and robust regret criteria. Our main results are polynomial time algorithms which have the same running time (O(n log n)) as the best algorithms for the non-robust case.