arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider the 2-limited packing problem: for a graph $G=(V,E)$ one seeks to find a maximum cardinality subset $B\subseteq V$, such that, for all $v\in V$, the closed neighbourhood of $v$ contains at most two vertices in $B$. We compare this packing problem to the well-known Roman domination problem by pointing out some similarities and differences in the behaviour of the optimal solutions of both problems and show that these two problems are weakly dual. We show that for trees, the two problems are strongly dual, letting us solve the Roman domination problem by computing an optimal solution to the 2-limited packing problem.

By Menger's theorem the maximum number of arc-disjoint paths from a vertex s to a vertex t in a directed graph equals the minumum number of arcs needed to disconnect s and t, i.e., the minimum size of an s-t-cut. The max-flow problem in a network with unit capacities is equivalent to the arc-disjoint paths problem. Moreover the max-flow and min-cut problems form a strongly dual pair. We relax the disjointedness requirement on the paths, allowing them to be almost disjoint, meaning they may share up to one arc. The resulting almost disjoint paths problem (ADP) asks for k s-t-paths such that any two of them are almost disjoint. The separating by forbidden pairs problem (SFP) is the corresponding dual problem and calls for a set of k arc pairs such that every s-t-path contains both arcs of at least one such pair. In this paper, we explore these two problems, showing that they have an unbounded duality gap in general and analyzing their complexity. We prove that ADP is NP-complete when k is part of the input and that SFP is Sigma_2P-complete, even for acyclic graphs. Furthermore, we efficiently solve ADP when k<=2 is fixed and present a polynomial time algorithm based on dynamic programming for ADP when k is constant and the considered graphs are acyclic.

This article focuses on a biobjective extension of the maximum flow network interdiction problem, where each arc in the network is associated with two capacity values. Two maximum flows from a source to a sink are to be computed independently of each other with respect to the first and second capacity function, respectively, while an interdictor aims to minimize the value of both maximum flows by interdicting arcs. We show that this problem is intractable and that the decision problem, which asks whether or not a feasible interdiction strategy is efficient, is NP-complete. We propose a pseudopolynomial time algorithm in the case of two-terminal series-parallel graphs and positive integer-valued interdiction costs. We extend this algorithm to a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme for the case of unit interdiction costs by appropriately partitioning the objective space.

A decomposition of a graph is a set of subgraphs whose edges partition those of $G$. The 3-decomposition conjecture posed by Hoffmann-Ostenhof in 2011 states that every connected cubic graph can be decomposed into a spanning tree, a 2-regular subgraph, and a matching. It has been settled for special classes of graphs, one of the first results being for Hamiltonian graphs. In the past two years several new results have been obtained, adding the classes of plane, claw-free, and 3-connected tree-width 3 graphs to the list. In this paper, we regard a natural extension of Hamiltonian graphs: removing a Hamiltonian cycle from a cubic graph leaves a perfect matching. Conversely, removing a perfect matching $M$ from a cubic graph $G$ leaves a disjoint union of cycles. Contracting these cycles yields a new graph $G_M$. The graph $G$ is star-like if $G_M$ is a star for some perfect matching $M$, making Hamiltonian graphs star-like. We extend the technique used to prove that Hamiltonian graphs satisfy the 3-decomposition conjecture to show that 3-connected star-like graphs satisfy it as well.

This paper addresses the robust single machine makespan scheduling with uncertain release dates of the jobs. The release dates take values within know intervals. We use the concept of gamma-robustness in two different settings and address both the robust absolute and robust regret criteria. Our main results are polynomial time algorithms which have the same running time (O(n log n)) as the best algorithms for the non-robust case.

The conjecture of Beineke and Harary states that for any two vertices which can be separated by $k$ vertices and $l$ edges for $l\geq 1$ but neither by $k$ vertices and $l-1$ edges nor $k-1$ vertices and $l$ edges there are $k+l$ edge-disjoint paths connecting these two vertices of which $k+1$ are internally disjoint. In this paper we consider this conjecture for $l=2$ and any $k\in \mathbb{N}$. Afterwards, we utilize this result to prove that the conjecture holds for all graphs of treewidth at most $3$ and all $k$ and $l$. We also show that it is NP-complete to decide whether two vertices can be separated by $k$ vertices and $l$ edges.

The Min-$q$-Multiset Multicover problem presented in this paper is a special version of the Multiset Multicover problem. For a fixed positive integer $q$, we are given a finite ground set $J$, an integral demand for each element in $J$ and a collection of subsets of $J$. The task is to choose sets of the collection (multiple choices are allowed) such that each element in $J$ is covered at least as many times as specified by the demand of the element. In contrast to Multiset Multicover, in Min-$q$-Multiset Multicover each of the chosen subsets may only cover up to $q$ of its elements with multiple choices being allowed. Our main focus is a robust version of Min-$q$-Multiset Multicover, called Robust Min-$q$-Multiset Multicover, in which the demand of each element in $J$ may vary in a given interval with an additional budget constraint bounding the sum of the demands. Again, the task is to find a selection of subsets which is feasible for all admissible demands. We show that the non-robust version is NP-complete for $q$ greater than two, whereas the robust version is strongly NP-hard for any positive $q$. Furthermore, we present two solution approaches based on constraint generation and investigate the corresponding separation problems. We present computational results using randomly generated instances as well as instances emerging from the problem of locating emergency doctors.

We investigate the problem of simultaneously dominating all spanning trees of a given graph. We prove that on 2-connected graphs, a subset of the vertices dominates all spanning trees of the graph if and only if it is a vertex cover. Using this fact we present an exact algorithm that finds a simultaneous dominating set of minimum size using an oracle for finding a minimum vertex cover. The algorithm can be implemented to run in polynomial time on several graph classes, such as bipartite or chordal graphs. We prove that there is no polynomial time algorithm that finds a minimum simultaneous dominating set on perfect graphs, unless P=NP. Finally, we provide a 2-approximation algorithm for finding a minimum simultaneous dominating set.

Substantial efforts have been made to compute or estimate the minimum number $c(G)$ of cycles needed to partition the edges of an Eulerian graph. We give an equivalent characterization of Eulerian graphs of treewidth $2$ and with maximum degree $4$. This characterization enables us to present a linear time algorithm for the computation of $c(G)$ for all $G$ in this class.