arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this article we investigate the structure of uniformly $k$-connected and uniformly $k$-edge-connected graphs. Whereas both types have previously been studied independent of each other, we analyze relations between these two classes. We prove that any uniformly $k$-connected graph is also uniformly $k$-edge-connected for $k\le 3$ and demonstrate that this is not the case for $k>3$. Furthermore, uniformly $k$-connected and uniformly $k$-edge-connected graphs are well understood for $k\le 2$ and it is known how to construct uniformly $3$-edge-connected graphs. We contribute here a constructive characterization of uniformly $3$-connected graphs that is inspired by Tuttes Wheel Theorem. Eventually, these results help us to prove a tight bound on the number of vertices of minimum degree in uniformly $3$-connected graphs.

If a biconnected graph stays connected after the removal of an arbitrary vertex and an arbitrary edge, then it is called 2.5-connected. We prove that every biconnected graph has a canonical decomposition into 2.5-connected components. These components are arranged in a tree-structure. We also discuss the connection between 2.5-connected components and triconnected components and use this to present a linear-time algorithm which computes the 2.5-connected components of a graph. We show that every critical 2.5-connected graph other than K4 can be obtained from critical 2.5-connected graphs of smaller order using simple graph operations. Furthermore, we demonstrate applications of 2.5-connected components in the context of cycle decompositions and cycle packings.

The conjecture of Beineke and Harary states that for any two vertices which can be separated by $k$ vertices and $l$ edges for $l\geq 1$ but neither by $k$ vertices and $l-1$ edges nor $k-1$ vertices and $l$ edges there are $k+l$ edge-disjoint paths connecting these two vertices of which $k+1$ are internally disjoint. In this paper we consider this conjecture for $l=2$ and any $k\in \mathbb{N}$. Afterwards, we utilize this result to prove that the conjecture holds for all graphs of treewidth at most $3$ and all $k$ and $l$. We also show that it is NP-complete to decide whether two vertices can be separated by $k$ vertices and $l$ edges.

The Min-$q$-Multiset Multicover problem presented in this paper is a special version of the Multiset Multicover problem. For a fixed positive integer $q$, we are given a finite ground set $J$, an integral demand for each element in $J$ and a collection of subsets of $J$. The task is to choose sets of the collection (multiple choices are allowed) such that each element in $J$ is covered at least as many times as specified by the demand of the element. In contrast to Multiset Multicover, in Min-$q$-Multiset Multicover each of the chosen subsets may only cover up to $q$ of its elements with multiple choices being allowed. Our main focus is a robust version of Min-$q$-Multiset Multicover, called Robust Min-$q$-Multiset Multicover, in which the demand of each element in $J$ may vary in a given interval with an additional budget constraint bounding the sum of the demands. Again, the task is to find a selection of subsets which is feasible for all admissible demands. We show that the non-robust version is NP-complete for $q$ greater than two, whereas the robust version is strongly NP-hard for any positive $q$. Furthermore, we present two solution approaches based on constraint generation and investigate the corresponding separation problems. We present computational results using randomly generated instances as well as instances emerging from the problem of locating emergency doctors.

We investigate the problem of simultaneously dominating all spanning trees of a given graph. We prove that on 2-connected graphs, a subset of the vertices dominates all spanning trees of the graph if and only if it is a vertex cover. Using this fact we present an exact algorithm that finds a simultaneous dominating set of minimum size using an oracle for finding a minimum vertex cover. The algorithm can be implemented to run in polynomial time on several graph classes, such as bipartite or chordal graphs. We prove that there is no polynomial time algorithm that finds a minimum simultaneous dominating set on perfect graphs, unless P=NP. Finally, we provide a 2-approximation algorithm for finding a minimum simultaneous dominating set.

Decomposing an Eulerian graph into a minimum respectively maximum number of edge disjoint cycles is an NP-complete problem. We prove that an Eulerian graph decomposes into a unique number of cycles if and only if it does not contain two edge disjoint cycles sharing three or more vertices. To this end, we discuss the interplay of three binary graph operators leading to novel constructive characterizations of two subclasses of Eulerian graphs. This enables us to present a polynomial-time algorithm which decides whether the number of cycles in a cycle decomposition of a given Eulerian graph is unique.

Hajós' conjecture states that an Eulerian graph of order n can be decomposed into at most (n-1)/2 edge-disjoint cycles. We describe preprocessing steps, heuristics and integer programming techniques that enable us to verify Hajós' conjecture for all Eulerian graphs with up to twelve nodes.