arXiv++ Combinatorics

A set $A$ of integers is an $h$-basis for $n$ if every integer in $[0,n] = \{0,1,2,\ldots,n\}$ belongs to the sumset $hA$, that is, can be represented as the sum of exactly $h$ not necessarily distinct elements of $A$. The classical postage stamp problem asks for the largest integer $n_h(k)$ such that $[0,n_h(k)] \subseteq hA$ for some set $A$ of nonnegative integers of size $k+1$. We consider the effect of allowing negative elements. Let $n^{\flat}_h(k)$ be the largest integer such that $[0,n^{\flat}_h(k)] \subseteq hA$ for some set $A$ of integers of size $k+1$ containing at least one negative integer. For $k=2$, we have $n^{\flat}_h(2) < n_h(2)$ if $h$ is odd or $h=4$ and $n^{\flat}_h(2) = n_h(2)$ if $h$ is even and $h \neq 4$. Proofs of these comparison results were autonomously discovered and formally verified in Lean by https://aristotle.harmonic.fun/}{Aristotle}, a formal reasoning agent developed by https://www.harmonic.fun/}{Harmonic}. In this paper we give new proofs of these results.

The Kourovka Notebook is a long-running collection of open problems in group theory. In this paper we present solutions to eight of its problems. We construct a group with exactly two maximal locally soluble normal subgroups and show that, for every $1 \le k\le n!$, there is a group containing $n$ distinct elements whose $n!$ ordered products take exactly $k$ distinct values. We also give examples showing that group order together with the statistic $\sum_g\varphi(\lvert g\rvert)$ does not determine simplicity, and we construct a surjective non-injective Rota-Baxter operator on a non-abelian group. Further, we determine the group generated by the class transpositions of moduli at most $k$, prove that every power graph of a finite group that is a cograph is chordal, show that the right-relatively convex subgroups of a right-orderable group need not form a sublattice of its subgroup lattice, and disprove a proposed rank inequality for certain $p$-group extensions. All of these solutions were autonomously discovered and formally verified in Lean by Aristotle, a formal reasoning agent developed by Harmonic.

For a positive integer $n$, let $g(n)$ denote the infimum of all real numbers $L$ such that there exists a multiplicative Sidon set $A\subseteq\{1,2,\dots,n\}$ that intersects every interval $[x,x+L]\subseteq[1,n]$. Sárközy asked for estimates on $g(n)$, and he in particular asked whether one has $g(n)\le\sqrt n$ for every $n\in\mathbb{N}$. We first show that this estimate does indeed hold, with a proof that was autonomously discovered and formally verified in Lean by Aristotle. Next, we improve the upper bound further and, with $ρ= \frac{13-\sqrt{69}}{10} < 0.47$, prove that $g(n)\ll_{\varepsilon} n^{ρ+\varepsilon}$ for every $\varepsilon > 0$.

For a family $(A_q)_{q\in Q}$ of subsets of a semigroup, the product intersection set records those exponents $h \in \mathbb{N}$ for which the $h$-fold product set of the intersection, $(\bigcap_q A_q)^h$, is equal to $\bigcap_q A_q^h$, the intersection of the product sets. Nathanson recently asked which subsets of $\mathbb{N}$ can occur as a product intersection set, both for arbitrary and for decreasing families $(A_q)_{q\in Q}$. We solve both problems by giving a complete classification. In particular, when $|Q| \ge 2$, we show that in either case any subset $X \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ with $1 \in X$ occurs as a product intersection set. Both classifications were autonomously discovered and formally verified in Lean by Aristotle, a formal reasoning agent developed by Harmonic.

This document is a blueprint for the formalization in Lean of the structural theory of regular matroids underlying Seymour's decomposition theorem. We present a modular account of regularity via totally unimodular representations, show that regularity is preserved under $1$-, $2$-, and $3$-sums, and establish regularity for several special classes of matroids, including graphic, cographic, and the matroid $R_{10}$. The blueprint records the logical structure of the proof, the precise dependencies between results, and their correspondence with Lean declarations. It is intended both as a guide for the ongoing formalization effort and as a human-readable reference for the organization of the proof.