arXiv++ Combinatorics

In phylogenetics, Metropolis-Hastings methods are commonly used to sample phylogenetic trees or networks, for example from Bayesian posteriors. These methods generally use transitions that distinguish all nodes involved, and thus require fully labelled representations of phylogenetic networks. We argue that sampling leaf-labelled phylogenetic networks demands a correction for the number of fully labelled representatives of a leaf-labelled network, or, equivalently, for its internal symmetry. Without correction, there is a danger of undersampling networks with internal symmetries. We show that this correction can be realized by a quotient construction on the Metropolis-Hastings Markov chain, which, in practice, requires the calculation of the size of the network's automorphism group. Using $μ$-vectors, we show that the automorphism group is trivial for orchard networks, and thus also for tree-child networks and trees. This implies that a correction for symmetry is not needed when sampling only from such network classes. More generally, using our Python implementation of the algorithms in this paper, we show that using $μ$-vectors can significantly speed up calculations of automorphism group sizes and thus of Metropolis-Hastings sampling of leaf-labelled networks.

Phylogenetic networks are used in biology to represent evolutionary histories. The class of orchard phylogenetic networks was recently introduced for their computational benefits, without any biological justification. Here, we show that orchard networks can be interpreted as trees with additional \emph{horizontal} arcs. Therefore, they are closely related to tree-based networks, where the difference is that in tree-based networks the additional arcs do not need to be horizontal. Then, we use this new characterization to show that the space of orchard networks is connected under the rNNI rearrangement move, with a diameter of at most $4kn+n\lceil \log_2(n) \rceil +2k+6n-8$.

Phylogenetic networks represent evolutionary history of species and can record natural reticulate evolutionary processes such as horizontal gene transfer and gene recombination. This makes phylogenetic networks a more comprehensive representation of evolutionary history compared to phylogenetic trees. Stochastic processes for generating random trees or networks are important tools in evolutionary analysis, especially in phylogeny reconstruction where they can be utilized for validation or serve as priors for Bayesian methods. However, as more network generators are developed, there is a lack of discussion or comparison for different generators. To bridge this gap, we compare a set of phylogenetic network generators by profiling topological summary statistics of the generated networks over the number of reticulations and comparing the topological profiles.

The unit distance graph $G_{\mathbb{R}^d}^1$ is the infinite graph whose nodes are points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, with an edge between two points if the Euclidean distance between these points is 1. The 2-dimensional version $G_{\mathbb{R}^2}^1$ of this graph is typically studied for its chromatic number, as in the Hadwiger-Nelson problem. However, other properties of unit distance graphs are rarely studied. Here, we consider the restriction of $G_{\mathbb{R}^d}^1$ to closed convex subsets $X$ of $\mathbb{R}^d$. We show that the graph $G_{\mathbb{R}^d}^1[X]$ is connected precisely when the radius of $r(X)$ of $X$ is equal to 0, or when $r(X)\geq 1$ and the affine dimension of $X$ is at least 2. For hyperrectangles, we give bounds for the graph diameter in the critical case that the radius is exactly 1.

Recently it was shown that a certain class of phylogenetic networks, called level-$2$ networks, cannot be reconstructed from their associated distance matrices. In this paper, we show that they can be reconstructed from their induced shortest and longest distance matrices. That is, if two level-$2$ networks induce the same shortest and longest distance matrices, then they must be isomorphic. We further show that level-$2$ networks are reconstructible from their shortest distance matrices if and only if they do not contain a subgraph from a family of graphs. A generator of a network is the graph obtained by deleting all pendant subtrees and suppressing degree-$2$ vertices. We also show that networks with a leaf on every generator side is reconstructible from their induced shortest distance matrix, regardless of level.

Phylogenetic networks are used to study evolutionary relationships between species in biology. Such networks are often categorized into classes by their topological features, which stem from both biological and computational motivations. We study two network classes in this paper: tree-based networks and orchard networks. Tree-based networks are those that can be obtained by inserting edges between the edges of an underlying tree. Orchard networks are a recently introduced generalization of the class of tree-child networks. Structural characterizations have already been discovered for tree-based networks; this is not the case for orchard networks. In this paper, we introduce cherry covers---a unifying characterization of both network classes---in which we decompose the edges of the networks into so-called cherry shapes and reticulated cherry shapes. We show that cherry covers can be used to characterize the class of tree-based networks as well as the class of orchard networks. Moreover, we also generalize these results to non-binary networks.

The burning number of a graph was recently introduced by Bonato et al. Although they mention that the burning number generalises naturally to directed graphs, no further research on this has been done. Here, we introduce graph burning for directed graphs, and we study bounds for the corresponding burning number and the hardness of finding this number. We derive sharp bounds from simple algorithms and examples. The hardness question yields more surprising results: finding the burning number of a directed tree is NP-hard, but FPT; however, it is W[2]-complete for DAGs. Finally, we give a fixed-parameter algorithm to find the burning number of a digraph, with a parameter inspired by research in phylogenetic networks.

Phylogenetic networks are important for the study of evolution. The number of methods to find such networks is increasing, but most such methods can only reconstruct small networks. To find bigger networks, one can attempt to combine small networks. In this paper, we study the {\sc Network Hybridization} problem, a problem of combining networks into another network with low complexity. We characterize this complexity via a restricted problem, {\sc Tree-child Network Hybridization}, and we present an FPT algorithm to efficiently solve this restricted problem.

We present the first fixed-parameter algorithm for constructing a tree-child phylogenetic network that displays an arbitrary number of binary input trees and has the minimum number of reticulations among all such networks. The algorithm uses the recently introduced framework of cherry picking sequences and runs in $O((8k)^k \mathrm{poly}(n, t))$ time, where $n$ is the number of leaves of every tree, $t$ is the number of trees, and $k$ is the reticulation number of the constructed network. Moreover, we provide an efficient parallel implementation of the algorithm and show that it can deal with up to $100$ input trees on a standard desktop computer, thereby providing a major improvement over previous phylogenetic network construction methods.

This paper studies the relationship between undirected (unrooted) and directed (rooted) phylogenetic networks. We describe a polynomial-time algorithm for deciding whether an undirected nonbinary phylogenetic network, given the locations of the root and reticulation vertices, can be oriented as a directed nonbinary phylogenetic network. Moreover, we characterize when this is possible and show that, in such instances, the resulting directed nonbinary phylogenetic network is unique. In addition, without being given the location of the root and the reticulation vertices, we describe an algorithm for deciding whether an undirected binary phylogenetic network $N$ can be oriented as a directed binary phylogenetic network of a certain class. The algorithm is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when the parameter is the level of $N$ and is applicable to classes of directed phylogenetic networks that satisfy certain conditions. As an example, we show that the well-studied class of binary tree-child networks satisfies these conditions.

Rearrangement operations transform a phylogenetic tree into another one and hence induce a metric on the space of phylogenetic trees. Popular operations for unrooted phylogenetic trees are NNI (nearest neighbour interchange), SPR (subtree prune and regraft), and TBR (tree bisection and reconnection). Recently, these operations have been extended to unrooted phylogenetic networks, which are generalisations of phylogenetic trees that can model reticulated evolutionary relationships. Here, we study global and local properties of spaces of phylogenetic networks under these three operations. In particular, we prove connectedness and asymptotic bounds on the diameters of spaces of different classes of phylogenetic networks, including tree-based and level-k networks. We also examine the behaviour of shortest TBR-sequence between two phylogenetic networks in a class, and whether the TBR-distance changes if intermediate networks from other classes are allowed: for example, the space of phylogenetic trees is an isometric subgraph of the space of phylogenetic networks under TBR. Lastly, we show that computing the TBR-distance and the PR-distance of two phylogenetic networks is NP-hard.

Phylogenetic networks are used to represent evolutionary scenarios in biology and linguistics. To find the most probable scenario, it may be necessary to compare candidate networks, to distinguish different networks, and to see when one network is contained in another. In this paper, we introduce cherry-picking networks, a class of networks that can be reduced by a sequence of two graph operations. We show that some networks are uniquely determined by the sequences that reduce them---we call these the reconstructible cherry-picking networks, and further show that given two cherry-picking networks within the same reconstructible class, one is contained in the other if a sequence for the latter network reduces the former network. By restricting our scope to tree-child networks, we show that the converse of the above statement holds, thereby showing that {\sc Network Containment}, the problem of checking whether a network is contained in another, can be solved in linear time for tree-child networks. We implement this algorithm in Python and show that the linear-time theoretical bound on the input size is achievable in practice. Lastly, we provide a linear time algorithm for deciding whether two tree-child networks are isomorphic.

Network reconstruction lies at the heart of phylogenetic research. Two well studied classes of phylogenetic networks include tree-child networks and level-$k$ networks. In a tree-child network, every non-leaf node has a child that is a tree node or a leaf. In a level-$k$ network, the maximum number of reticulations contained in a biconnected component is $k$. Here, we show that level-$k$ tree-child networks are encoded by their reticulate-edge-deleted subnetworks, which are subnetworks obtained by deleting a single reticulation edge, if $k\geq 2$. Following this, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm for uniquely reconstructing such networks from their reticulate-edge-deleted subnetworks. Moreover, we show that this can even be done when considering subnetworks obtained by deleting one reticulation edge from each biconnected component with $k$ reticulations.

Head moves are a type of rearrangement moves for phylogenetic networks. They have mostly been studied as part of more encompassing types of moves, such as rSPR moves. Here, we study head moves as a type of moves on themselves. We show that the tiers ($k>0$) of phylogenetic network space are connected by local head moves. Then we show tail moves and head moves are closely related: sequences of tail moves can be converted to sequences of head moves and vice versa, changing the length by at most a constant factor. Because the tiers of network space are connected by rSPR moves, this gives a second proof of the connectivity of these tiers. Furthermore, we show that these tiers have small diameter by reproving the connectivity a third time. As the head move neighbourhood is in general small, this makes head moves a good candidate for local search heuristics. Finally we prove that finding the shortest sequence of head moves between two networks is NP-hard.

Popular methods for exploring the space of rooted phylogenetic trees use rearrangement moves such as rNNI (rooted Nearest Neighbour Interchange) and rSPR (rooted Subtree Prune and Regraft). Recently, these moves were generalized to rooted phylogenetic networks, which are a more suitable representation of reticulate evolutionary histories, and it was shown that any two rooted phylogenetic networks of the same complexity are connected by a sequence of either rSPR or rNNI moves. Here, we show that this is possible using only tail moves, which are a restricted version of rSPR moves on networks that are more closely related to rSPR moves on trees. The connectedness still holds even when we restrict to distance-1 tail moves (a localized version of tail-moves). Moreover, we give bounds on the number of (distance-1) tail moves necessary to turn one network into another, which in turn yield new bounds for rSPR, rNNI and SPR (i.e. the equivalent of rSPR on unrooted networks). The upper bounds are constructive, meaning that we can actually find a sequence with at most this length for any pair of networks. Finally, we show that finding a shortest sequence of tail or rSPR moves is NP-hard.