arXiv++ Combinatorics

In phylogenetics, Metropolis-Hastings methods are commonly used to sample phylogenetic trees or networks, for example from Bayesian posteriors. These methods generally use transitions that distinguish all nodes involved, and thus require fully labelled representations of phylogenetic networks. We argue that sampling leaf-labelled phylogenetic networks demands a correction for the number of fully labelled representatives of a leaf-labelled network, or, equivalently, for its internal symmetry. Without correction, there is a danger of undersampling networks with internal symmetries. We show that this correction can be realized by a quotient construction on the Metropolis-Hastings Markov chain, which, in practice, requires the calculation of the size of the network's automorphism group. Using $μ$-vectors, we show that the automorphism group is trivial for orchard networks, and thus also for tree-child networks and trees. This implies that a correction for symmetry is not needed when sampling only from such network classes. More generally, using our Python implementation of the algorithms in this paper, we show that using $μ$-vectors can significantly speed up calculations of automorphism group sizes and thus of Metropolis-Hastings sampling of leaf-labelled networks.

Phylogenetic networks are used to represent the evolutionary history of species. Due to biological interpretations and computational advantages, researchers have focused on restricted classes of phylogenetic networks, such as tree-child, orchard, and tree-based. These classes capture different notions of tree-likeness: tree-child networks require every internal vertex to have a taxon reachable by a tree path, orchard networks are trees with horizontal arcs (for modelling histories rife with horizontal gene transfers), and tree-based networks are trees with additional (not-necessarily horizontal) arcs. A natural question to ask is ``how far is a given network from belonging to a particular class?'' This motivates the study of proximity measures, which measure the minimum number of graph modifications required to transform a network into one belonging to a particular class. In this paper, we consider three proximity measures based on leaf addition, valid arc deletion, and arc deletion. We study pairwise comparability of the proximity measures, prove complexity results, and derive extremal bounds for the classes of tree, tree-child, orchard, and tree-based networks.

A directed phylogenetic network is tree-child if every non-leaf vertex has a child that is not a reticulation. As a class of directed phylogenetic networks, tree-child networks are very useful from a computational perspective. For example, several computationally difficult problems in phylogenetics become tractable when restricted to tree-child networks. At the same time, the class itself is rich enough to contain quite complex networks. Furthermore, checking whether a directed network is tree-child can be done in polynomial time. In this paper, we seek a class of undirected phylogenetic networks that is rich and computationally useful in a similar way to the class tree-child directed networks. A natural class to consider for this role is the class of tree-child-orientable networks which contains all those undirected phylogenetic networks whose edges can be oriented to create a tree-child network. However, we show here that recognizing such networks is NP-hard, even for binary networks, and as such this class is inappropriate for this role. Towards finding a class of undirected networks that fills a similar role to directed tree-child networks, we propose new classes called $q$-cuttable networks, for any integer $q\geq 1$. We show that these classes have many of the desirable properties, similar to tree-child networks in the rooted case, including being recognizable in polynomial time, for all $q\geq 1$. Towards showing the computational usefulness of the class, we show that the NP-hard problem Tree Containment is polynomial-time solvable when restricted to $q$-cuttable networks with $q\geq 3$.

The maximum agreement forest (MAF) problem in phylogenetics takes as input a set t >=2 of binary phylogenetic trees T on the same set of taxa X. It asks for a partition X into the smallest number of blocks such that the subtrees induced by these blocks are disjoint and have common topology across all the trees in T. We produce a modified version of the well-known chain reduction rule in order to prove the existence of a kernel of size O( t * r * k ) where k is the natural parameter (the number of blocks) and r=min{max{k,3},t+1}}. We prove this bound for both the unrooted and rooted version of the problem, and demonstrate that the bound r, the length to which common chains are truncated, is tight. Our results constitute the first kernels for MAF in the t > 2 regime.

Phylogenetic trees and networks are graphs used to model evolutionary relationships, with trees representing strictly branching histories and networks allowing for events in which lineages merge, called reticulation events. While the question of data sufficiency has been studied extensively in the context of trees, it remains largely unexplored for networks. In this work we take a first step in this direction by establishing bounds on the amount of genomic data required to reconstruct binary level-$1$ semi-directed phylogenetic networks, which are binary networks in which reticulation events are indicated by directed edges, all other edges are undirected, and cycles are vertex-disjoint. For this class, methods have been developed recently that are statistically consistent. Roughly speaking, such methods are guaranteed to reconstruct the correct network assuming infinitely long genomic sequences. Here we consider the question whether networks from this class can be uniquely and correctly reconstructed from finite sequences. Specifically, we present an inference algorithm that takes as input genetic sequence data, and demonstrate that the sequence length sufficient to reconstruct the correct network with high probability, under the Cavender-Farris-Neyman model of evolution, scales logarithmically, polynomially, or polylogarithmically with the number of taxa, depending on the parameter regime. As part of our contribution, we also present novel inference rules for quartet data in the semi-directed phylogenetic network setting.

In evolutionary biology, phylogenetic networks are graphs that provide a flexible framework for representing complex evolutionary histories that involve reticulate evolutionary events. Recently phylogenetic studies have started to focus on a special class of such networks called semi-directed networks. These graphs are defined as mixed graphs that can be obtained by de-orienting some of the arcs in some rooted phylogenetic network, that is, a directed acyclic graph whose leaves correspond to a collection of species and that has a single source or root vertex. However, this definition of semi-directed networks is implicit in nature since it is not clear when a mixed-graph enjoys this property or not. In this paper, we introduce novel, explicit mathematical characterizations of semi-directed networks, and also multi-semi-directed networks, that is, mixed graphs that can be obtained from directed phylogenetic networks that may have more than one root. In addition, through extending foundational tools from the theory of rooted networks into the semi-directed setting - such as cherry picking sequences, omnians, and path partitions - we characterize when a (multi-)semi-directed network can be obtained by de-orienting some rooted network that is contained in one of the well-known classes of tree-child, orchard, tree-based or forest-based networks. These results address structural aspects of (multi-)semi-directed networks and pave the way to improved theoretical and computational analyses of such networks, for example, within the development of algebraic evolutionary models that are based on such networks.

The inference of phylogenetic networks, which model complex evolutionary processes including hybridization and gene flow, remains a central challenge in evolutionary biology. Until now, statistically consistent inference methods have been limited to phylogenetic level-1 networks, which allow no interdependence between reticulate events. In this work, we establish the theoretical foundations for a statistically consistent inference method for a much broader class: semi-directed level-2 networks that are outer-labeled planar and galled. We precisely characterize the features of these networks that are distinguishable from the topologies of their displayed quartet trees. Moreover, we prove that an inter-taxon distance derived from these quartets is circular decomposable, enabling future robust inference of these networks from quartet data, such as concordance factors obtained from gene tree distributions under the Network Multispecies Coalescent model. Our results also have novel identifiability implications across different data types and evolutionary models, applying to any setting in which displayed quartets can be distinguished.

Phylogenetic networks are useful in representing the evolutionary history of taxa. In certain scenarios, one requires a way to compare different networks. In practice, this can be rather difficult, except within specific classes of networks. In this paper, we derive metrics for the class of \emph{orchard networks} and the class of \emph{strongly reticulation-visible} networks, from variants of so-called \emph{$μ$-representations}, which are vector representations of networks. For both network classes, we impose degree constraints on the vertices, by considering \emph{semi-binary} networks.

Semi-directed networks are partially directed graphs that model evolution where the directed edges represent reticulate evolutionary events. We present an algorithm that reconstructs binary $n$-leaf semi-directed level-1 networks in $O( n^2)$ time from its quarnets (4-leaf subnetworks). Our method assumes we have direct access to all quarnets, yet uses only an asymptotically optimal number of $O(n \log n)$ quarnets. When the network is assumed to contain no triangles, our method instead relies only on four-cycle quarnets and the splits of the other quarnets. A variant of our algorithm works with quartets rather than quarnets and we show that it reconstructs most of a semi-directed level-1 network from an asymptotically optimal $O(n \log n)$ of the quartets it displays. Additionally, we provide an $O(n^3)$ time algorithm that reconstructs the tree-of-blobs of any binary $n$-leaf semi-directed network with unbounded level from $O(n^3)$ splits of its quarnets.

Phylogenetic networks are graphs that are used to represent evolutionary relationships between different taxa. They generalize phylogenetic trees since for example, unlike trees, they permit lineages to combine. Recently, there has been rising interest in semi-directed phylogenetic networks, which are mixed graphs in which certain lineage combination events are represented by directed edges coming together, whereas the remaining edges are left undirected. One reason to consider such networks is that it can be difficult to root a network using real data. In this paper, we consider the problem of when a semi-directed phylogenetic network is defined or encoded by the smaller networks that it induces on the 4-leaf subsets of its leaf set. These smaller networks are called quarnets. We prove that semi-directed binary level-2 phylogenetic networks are encoded by their quarnets, but that this is not the case for level-3. In addition, we prove that the so-called blob tree of a semi-directed binary network, a tree that give the coarse-grained structure of the network, is always encoded by the quarnets of the network. These results are relevant for proving the statistical consistency of programs that are currently being developed for reconstructing phylogenetic networks from practical data, such as the recently developed Squirrel software tool.

Orchards are a biologically relevant class of phylogenetic networks as they can describe treelike evolutionary histories augmented with horizontal transfer events. Moreover, the class has attractive mathematical characterizations that can be exploited algorithmically. On the other hand, undirected orchard networks have hardly been studied yet. Here, we prove that deciding whether an undirected, binary phylogenetic network is an orchard -- or equivalently, whether it has an orientation that makes it a rooted orchard -- is NP-hard. For this, we introduce a new characterization of undirected orchards which could be useful for proving positive results.

To measure the tree-likeness of a directed acyclic graph (DAG), a new width parameter that considers the directions of the arcs was recently introduced: scanwidth. We present the first algorithm that efficiently computes the exact scanwidth of general DAGs. For DAGs with one root and scanwidth $k$ it runs in $O(k \cdot n^k \cdot m)$ time. The algorithm also functions as an FPT algorithm with complexity $O(2^{4 \ell - 1} \cdot \ell \cdot n + n^2)$ for phylogenetic networks of level-$\ell$, a type of DAG used to depict evolutionary relationships among species. Our algorithm performs well in practice, being able to compute the scanwidth of synthetic networks up to 30 reticulations and 100 leaves within 500 seconds. Furthermore, we propose a heuristic that obtains an average practical approximation ratio of 1.5 on these networks. While we prove that the scanwidth is bounded from below by the treewidth of the underlying undirected graph, experiments suggest that for networks the parameters are close in practice.

Phylogenetic networks are used to represent the evolutionary history of species. Recently, the new class of orchard networks was introduced, which were later shown to be interpretable as trees with additional horizontal arcs. This makes the network class ideal for capturing evolutionary histories that involve horizontal gene transfers. Here, we study the minimum number of additional leaves needed to make a network orchard. We demonstrate that computing this proximity measure for a given network is NP-hard and describe a tight upper bound. We also give an equivalent measure based on vertex labellings to construct a mixed integer linear programming formulation. Our experimental results, which include both real-world and synthetic data, illustrate the effectiveness of our implementation.

Graph invariants are a useful tool in graph theory. Not only do they encode useful information about the graphs to which they are associated, but complete invariants can be used to distinguish between non-isomorphic graphs. Polynomial invariants for graphs such as the well-known Tutte polynomial have been studied for several years, and recently there has been interest to also define such invariants for phylogenetic networks, a special type of graph that arises in the area of evolutionary biology. Recently Liu gave a complete invariant for (phylogenetic) trees. However, the polynomial invariants defined thus far for phylogenetic networks that are not trees require vertex labels and either contain a large number of variables, or they have exponentially many terms in the number of reticulations. This can make it difficult to compute these polynomials and to use them to analyse unlabelled networks. In this paper, we shall show how to circumvent some of these difficulties for rooted cactuses and cactuses. As well as being important in other areas such as operations research, rooted cactuses contain some common classes of phylogenetic networks such phylogenetic trees and level-1 networks. More specifically, we define a polynomial $F$ that is a complete invariant for the class of rooted cactuses without vertices of indegree 1 and outdegree 1 that has 5 variables, and a polynomial $Q$ that is a complete invariant for the class of rooted cactuses that has 6 variables \vince{whose degree can be bounded linearly in terms of the size of the rooted cactus}. We also explain how to extend the $Q$ polynomial to define a complete invariant for leaf-labelled rooted cactuses as well as (unrooted) cactuses.

Phylogenetic networks are used in biology to represent evolutionary histories. The class of orchard phylogenetic networks was recently introduced for their computational benefits, without any biological justification. Here, we show that orchard networks can be interpreted as trees with additional \emph{horizontal} arcs. Therefore, they are closely related to tree-based networks, where the difference is that in tree-based networks the additional arcs do not need to be horizontal. Then, we use this new characterization to show that the space of orchard networks is connected under the rNNI rearrangement move, with a diameter of at most $4kn+n\lceil \log_2(n) \rceil +2k+6n-8$.

Recently it was shown that a certain class of phylogenetic networks, called level-$2$ networks, cannot be reconstructed from their associated distance matrices. In this paper, we show that they can be reconstructed from their induced shortest and longest distance matrices. That is, if two level-$2$ networks induce the same shortest and longest distance matrices, then they must be isomorphic. We further show that level-$2$ networks are reconstructible from their shortest distance matrices if and only if they do not contain a subgraph from a family of graphs. A generator of a network is the graph obtained by deleting all pendant subtrees and suppressing degree-$2$ vertices. We also show that networks with a leaf on every generator side is reconstructible from their induced shortest distance matrix, regardless of level.

Phylogenetic networks are used to study evolutionary relationships between species in biology. Such networks are often categorized into classes by their topological features, which stem from both biological and computational motivations. We study two network classes in this paper: tree-based networks and orchard networks. Tree-based networks are those that can be obtained by inserting edges between the edges of an underlying tree. Orchard networks are a recently introduced generalization of the class of tree-child networks. Structural characterizations have already been discovered for tree-based networks; this is not the case for orchard networks. In this paper, we introduce cherry covers---a unifying characterization of both network classes---in which we decompose the edges of the networks into so-called cherry shapes and reticulated cherry shapes. We show that cherry covers can be used to characterize the class of tree-based networks as well as the class of orchard networks. Moreover, we also generalize these results to non-binary networks.

A phylogenetic network is a graph-theoretical tool that is used by biologists to represent the evolutionary history of a collection of species. One potential way of constructing such networks is via a distance-based approach, where one is asked to find a phylogenetic network that in some way represents a given distance matrix, which gives information on the evolutionary distances between present-day taxa. Here, we consider the following question. For which~$k$ are unrooted level-$k$ networks uniquely determined by their distance matrices? We consider this question for shortest distances as well as for the case that the multisets of all distances is given. We prove that level-$1$ networks and level-$2$ networks are reconstructible from their shortest distances and multisets of distances, respectively. Furthermore we show that, in general, networks of level higher than~$1$ are not reconstructible from shortest distances and that networks of level higher than~$2$ are not reconstructible from their multisets of distances.

We present the first fixed-parameter algorithm for constructing a tree-child phylogenetic network that displays an arbitrary number of binary input trees and has the minimum number of reticulations among all such networks. The algorithm uses the recently introduced framework of cherry picking sequences and runs in $O((8k)^k \mathrm{poly}(n, t))$ time, where $n$ is the number of leaves of every tree, $t$ is the number of trees, and $k$ is the reticulation number of the constructed network. Moreover, we provide an efficient parallel implementation of the algorithm and show that it can deal with up to $100$ input trees on a standard desktop computer, thereby providing a major improvement over previous phylogenetic network construction methods.

This paper studies the relationship between undirected (unrooted) and directed (rooted) phylogenetic networks. We describe a polynomial-time algorithm for deciding whether an undirected nonbinary phylogenetic network, given the locations of the root and reticulation vertices, can be oriented as a directed nonbinary phylogenetic network. Moreover, we characterize when this is possible and show that, in such instances, the resulting directed nonbinary phylogenetic network is unique. In addition, without being given the location of the root and the reticulation vertices, we describe an algorithm for deciding whether an undirected binary phylogenetic network $N$ can be oriented as a directed binary phylogenetic network of a certain class. The algorithm is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when the parameter is the level of $N$ and is applicable to classes of directed phylogenetic networks that satisfy certain conditions. As an example, we show that the well-studied class of binary tree-child networks satisfies these conditions.