arXiv++ Combinatorics

The maximum agreement forest (MAF) problem in phylogenetics takes as input a set t >=2 of binary phylogenetic trees T on the same set of taxa X. It asks for a partition X into the smallest number of blocks such that the subtrees induced by these blocks are disjoint and have common topology across all the trees in T. We produce a modified version of the well-known chain reduction rule in order to prove the existence of a kernel of size O( t * r * k ) where k is the natural parameter (the number of blocks) and r=min{max{k,3},t+1}}. We prove this bound for both the unrooted and rooted version of the problem, and demonstrate that the bound r, the length to which common chains are truncated, is tight. Our results constitute the first kernels for MAF in the t > 2 regime.

Phylogenetic trees and networks are graphs used to model evolutionary relationships, with trees representing strictly branching histories and networks allowing for events in which lineages merge, called reticulation events. While the question of data sufficiency has been studied extensively in the context of trees, it remains largely unexplored for networks. In this work we take a first step in this direction by establishing bounds on the amount of genomic data required to reconstruct binary level-$1$ semi-directed phylogenetic networks, which are binary networks in which reticulation events are indicated by directed edges, all other edges are undirected, and cycles are vertex-disjoint. For this class, methods have been developed recently that are statistically consistent. Roughly speaking, such methods are guaranteed to reconstruct the correct network assuming infinitely long genomic sequences. Here we consider the question whether networks from this class can be uniquely and correctly reconstructed from finite sequences. Specifically, we present an inference algorithm that takes as input genetic sequence data, and demonstrate that the sequence length sufficient to reconstruct the correct network with high probability, under the Cavender-Farris-Neyman model of evolution, scales logarithmically, polynomially, or polylogarithmically with the number of taxa, depending on the parameter regime. As part of our contribution, we also present novel inference rules for quartet data in the semi-directed phylogenetic network setting.

In this article we prove that the distance $d_{\mathrm{MP}}(T_1,T_2) = k$ between two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees $T_1, T_2$ on the same set of taxa can be defined by a character that is convex on one of $T_1, T_2$ and which has at most $2k$ states. This significantly improves upon the previous bound of $7k-5$ states. We also show that for every $k \geq 1$ there exist two trees $T_1, T_2$ with $d_{\mathrm{MP}}(T_1,T_2) = k$ such that at least $k+1$ states are necessary in any character that achieves this distance and which is convex on one of $T_1, T_2$. We augment these lower and upper bounds with an empirical analysis which shows that in practice significantly fewer than $k+1$ states are usually required.

In phylogenetics, a key problem is to construct evolutionary trees from collections of characters where, for a set X of species, a character is simply a function from X onto a set of states. In this context, a key concept is convexity, where a character is convex on a tree with leaf set X if the collection of subtrees spanned by the leaves of the tree that have the same state are pairwise disjoint. Although collections of convex characters on a single tree have been extensively studied over the past few decades, very little is known about coconvex characters, that is, characters that are simultaneously convex on a collection of trees. As a starting point to better understand coconvexity, in this paper we prove a number of extremal results for the following question: What is the minimal number of coconvex characters on a collection of n-leaved trees taken over all collections of size t >= 2, also if we restrict to coconvex characters which map to k states? As an application of coconvexity, we introduce a new one-parameter family of tree metrics, which range between the coarse Robinson-Foulds distance and the much finer quartet distance. We show that bounds on the quantities in the above question translate into bounds for the diameter of the tree space for the new distances. Our results open up several new interesting directions and questions which have potential applications to, for example, tree spaces and phylogenomics.

Agreement forests continue to play a central role in the comparison of phylogenetic trees since their introduction more than 25 years ago. More specifically, they are used to characterise several distances that are based on tree rearrangement operations and related quantifiers of dissimilarity between phylogenetic trees. In addition, the concept of agreement forests continues to underlie most advancements in the development of algorithms that exactly compute the aforementioned measures. In this paper, we introduce agreement digraphs, a concept that generalises agreement forests for two phylogenetic trees to two phylogenetic networks. Analogous to the way in which agreement forests compute the subtree prune and regraft distance between two phylogenetic trees but inherently more complex, we then use agreement digraphs to bound the subnet prune and regraft distance between two tree-child networks from above and below and show that our bounds are tight.

Semi-directed networks are partially directed graphs that model evolution where the directed edges represent reticulate evolutionary events. We present an algorithm that reconstructs binary $n$-leaf semi-directed level-1 networks in $O( n^2)$ time from its quarnets (4-leaf subnetworks). Our method assumes we have direct access to all quarnets, yet uses only an asymptotically optimal number of $O(n \log n)$ quarnets. When the network is assumed to contain no triangles, our method instead relies only on four-cycle quarnets and the splits of the other quarnets. A variant of our algorithm works with quartets rather than quarnets and we show that it reconstructs most of a semi-directed level-1 network from an asymptotically optimal $O(n \log n)$ of the quartets it displays. Additionally, we provide an $O(n^3)$ time algorithm that reconstructs the tree-of-blobs of any binary $n$-leaf semi-directed network with unbounded level from $O(n^3)$ splits of its quarnets.

Given a set $X$ of species, a phylogenetic tree is an unrooted binary tree whose leaves are bijectively labelled by $X$. Such trees can be used to show the way species evolve over time. One way of understanding how topologically different two phylogenetic trees are, is to construct a minimum-size agreement forest: a partition of $X$ into the smallest number of blocks, such that the blocks induce homeomorphic, non-overlapping subtrees in both trees. This comparison yields insight into commonalities and differences in the evolution of $X$ across the two trees. Computing a smallest agreement forest is NP-hard (Hein, Jiang, Wang and Zhang, Discrete Applied Mathematics 71(1-3), 1996). In this work we study the problem on caterpillars, which are path-like phylogenetic trees. We will demonstrate that, even if we restrict the input to this highly restricted subclass, the problem remains NP-hard and is in fact APX-hard. Furthermore we show that for caterpillars two standard reductions rules well known in the literature yield a tight kernel of size at most $7k$, compared to $15k$ for general trees (Kelk and Simone, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 33(3), 2019). Finally we demonstrate that we can determine if two caterpillars have an agreement forest with at most $k$ blocks in $O^*(2.49^k)$ time, compared to $O^*(3^k)$ for general trees (Chen, Fan and Sze, Theoretical Computater Science 562, 2015), where $O^*(.)$ suppresses polynomial factors.

Let $G$ be an undirected graph. We say that $G$ contains a ladder of length $k$ if the $2 \times (k+1)$ grid graph is an induced subgraph of $G$ that is only connected to the rest of $G$ via its four cornerpoints. We prove that if all the ladders contained in $G$ are reduced to length 4, the treewidth remains unchanged (and that this bound is tight). Our result indicates that, when computing the treewidth of a graph, long ladders can simply be reduced, and that minimal forbidden minors for bounded treewidth graphs cannot contain long ladders. Our result also settles an open problem from algorithmic phylogenetics: the common chain reduction rule, used to simplify the comparison of two evolutionary trees, is treewidth-preserving in the display graph of the two trees.

We describe a kernel of size 9k-8 for the NP-hard problem of computing the Tree Bisection and Reconnect (TBR) distance k between two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees. We achieve this by extending the existing portfolio of reduction rules with three novel new reduction rules. Two of the rules are based on the idea of topologically transforming the trees in a distance-preserving way in order to guarantee execution of earlier reduction rules. The third rule extends the local neighbourhood approach introduced in (Kelk and Linz, Annals of Combinatorics 24(3), 2020) to more global structures, allowing new situations to be identified when deletion of a leaf definitely reduces the TBR distance by one. The bound on the kernel size is tight up to an additive term. Our results also apply to the equivalent problem of computing a Maximum Agreement Forest (MAF) between two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees. We anticipate that our results will be more widely applicable for computing agreement-forest based dissimilarity measures.

Phylogenetic trees are used to model evolution: leaves are labelled to represent contemporary species ("taxa") and interior vertices represent extinct ancestors. Informally, convex characters are measurements on the contemporary species in which the subset of species (both contemporary and extinct) that share a given state, form a connected subtree. In \cite{KelkS17} it was shown how to efficiently count, list and sample certain restricted subfamilies of convex characters, and algorithmic applications were given. We continue this work in a number of directions. First, we show how combining the enumeration of convex characters with existing parameterised algorithms can be used to speed up exponential-time algorithms for the \emph{maximum agreement forest problem} in phylogenetics. Second, we re-visit the quantity $g_2(T)$, defined as the number of convex characters on $T$ in which each state appears on at least 2 taxa. We use this to give an algorithm with running time $O( φ^{n} \cdot \text{poly}(n) )$, where $φ\approx 1.6181$ is the golden ratio and $n$ is the number of taxa in the input trees, for computation of \emph{maximum parsimony distance on two state characters}. By further restricting the characters counted by $g_2(T)$ we open an interesting bridge to the literature on enumeration of matchings. By crossing this bridge we improve the running time of the aforementioned parsimony distance algorithm to $O( 1.5895^{n} \cdot \text{poly}(n) )$, and obtain a number of new results in themselves relevant to enumeration of matchings on at-most binary trees.

Let $\mathcal{T}$ be an unrooted binary tree with $n$ distinctly labelled leaves. Deriving its name from the field of phylogenetics, a convex character on $\mathcal{T}$ is simply a partition of the leaves such that the minimal spanning subtrees induced by the blocks of the partition are mutually disjoint. In earlier work Kelk and Stamoulis (Advances in Applied Mathematics 84 (2017), pp. 34--46) defined $g_k(\mathcal{T})$ as the number of convex characters where each block has at least $k$ leaves. Exact expressions were given for $g_1$ and $g_2$, where the topology of $\mathcal{T}$ turns out to be irrelevant, and it was noted that for $k \geq 3$ topological neutrality no longer holds. In this article, for every $k \geq 3$ we describe tree topologies achieving the maximum and minimum values of $g_k$ and determine corresponding expressions and exponential bounds for $g_k$. Finally, we reflect briefly on possible algorithmic applications of these results.

In 2001 Allen and Steel showed that, if subtree and chain reduction rules have been applied to two unrooted phylogenetic trees, the reduced trees will have at most 28k taxa where k is the TBR (Tree Bisection and Reconnection) distance between the two trees. Here we reanalyse Allen and Steel's kernelization algorithm and prove that the reduced instances will in fact have at most 15k-9 taxa. Moreover we show, by describing a family of instances which have exactly 15k-9 taxa after reduction, that this new bound is tight. These instances also have no common clusters, showing that a third commonly-encountered reduction rule, the cluster reduction, cannot further reduce the size of the kernel in the worst case. To achieve these results we introduce and use "unrooted generators" which are analogues of rooted structures that have appeared earlier in the phylogenetic networks literature. Using similar argumentation we show that, for the minimum hybridization problem on two rooted trees, 9k-2 is a tight bound (when subtree and chain reduction rules have been applied) and 9k-4 is a tight bound (when, additionally, the cluster reduction has been applied) on the number of taxa, where k is the hybridization number of the two trees.

Perfect phylogenies are fundamental in the study of evolutionary trees because they capture the situation when each evolutionary trait emerges only once in history; if such events are believed to be rare, then by Occam's Razor such parsimonious trees are preferable as a hypothesis of evolution. A classical result states that 2-state characters permit a perfect phylogeny precisely if each subset of 2 characters permits one. More recently, it was shown that for 3-state characters the same property holds but for size-3 subsets. A long-standing open problem asked whether such a constant exists for each number of states. More precisely, it has been conjectured that for any fixed integer $r$, there exists a constant $f(r)$ such that a set of $r$-state characters $C$ has a perfect phylogeny if and only if every subset of at most $f(r)$ characters has a perfect phylogeny. In this paper, we show that this conjecture is false. In particular, we show that for any constant $t$, there exists a set $C$ of $8$-state characters such that $C$ has no perfect phylogeny, but there exists a perfect phylogeny for every subset of $t$ characters. This negative result complements the two negative results ("strikes") of Bodlaender et al. We reflect on the consequences of this third strike, pointing out that while it does close off some routes for efficient algorithm development, many others remain open.

Phylogenetic trees are used to model evolution: leaves are labelled to represent contemporary species ("taxa") and interior vertices represent extinct ancestors. Informally, convex characters are measurements on the contemporary species in which the subset of species (both contemporary and extinct) that share a given state, form a connected subtree. Given an unrooted, binary phylogenetic tree T on a set of n >= 2 taxa, a closed (but fairly opaque) expression for the number of convex characters on T has been known since 1992, and this is independent of the exact topology of T. In this note we prove that this number is actually equal to the (2n-1)th Fibonacci number. Next, we define g_k(T) to be the number of convex characters on T in which each state appears on at least k taxa. We show that, somewhat curiously, g_2(T) is also independent of the topology of T, and is equal to to the (n-1)th Fibonacci number. As we demonstrate, this topological neutrality subsequently breaks down for k >= 3. However, we show that for each fixed k >= 1, g_k(T) can be computed in O(n) time and the set of characters thus counted can be efficiently listed and sampled. We use these insights to give a simple but effective exact algorithm for the NP-hard maximum parsimony distance problem that runs in time $Θ( φ^{n} \cdot n^2 )$, where $φ\approx 1.618...$ is the golden ratio, and an exact algorithm which computes the tree bisection and reconnection distance (equivalently, a maximum agreement forest) in time $Θ( φ^{2n}\cdot \text{poly}(n))$, where $φ^2 \approx 2.619$.

Within the field of phylogenetics there is great interest in distance measures to quantify the dissimilarity of two trees. Recently, a new distance measure has been proposed: the Maximum Parsimony (MP) distance. This is based on the difference of the parsimony scores of a single character on both trees under consideration, and the goal is to find the character which maximizes this difference. Here we show that computation of MP distance on two \emph{binary} phylogenetic trees is NP-hard. This is a highly nontrivial extension of an earlier NP-hardness proof for two multifurcating phylogenetic trees, and it is particularly relevant given the prominence of binary trees in the phylogenetics literature. As a corollary to the main hardness result we show that computation of MP distance is also hard on binary trees if the number of states available is bounded. In fact, via a different reduction we show that it is hard even if only two states are available. Finally, as a first response to this hardness we give a simple Integer Linear Program (ILP) formulation which is capable of computing the MP distance exactly for small trees (and for larger trees when only a small number of character states are available) and which is used to computationally verify several auxiliary results required by the hardness proofs.

Within the field of phylogenetics there is great interest in distance measures to quantify the dissimilarity of two trees. Here, based on an idea of Bruen and Bryant, we propose and analyze a new distance measure: the Maximum Parsimony (MP) distance. This is based on the difference of the parsimony scores of a single character on both trees under consideration, and the goal is to find the character which maximizes this difference. In this article we show that this new distance is a metric and provides a lower bound to the well-known Subtree Prune and Regraft (SPR) distance. We also show that to compute the MP distance it is sufficient to consider only characters that are convex on one of the trees, and prove several additional structural properties of the distance. On the complexity side, we prove that calculating the MP distance is in general NP-hard, and identify an interesting island of tractability in which the distance can be calculated in polynomial time.

In this short note we prove that, given two (not necessarily binary) rooted phylogenetic trees T_1, T_2 on the same set of taxa X, where |X|=n, the hybridization number of T_1 and T_2 can be computed in time O^{*}(2^n) i.e. O(2^{n} poly(n)). The result also means that a Maximum Acyclic Agreement Forest (MAAF) can be computed within the same time bound.

Phylogenetic networks are used to display the relationship of different species whose evolution is not treelike, which is the case, for instance, in the presence of hybridization events or horizontal gene transfers. Tree inference methods such as Maximum Parsimony need to be modified in order to be applicable to networks. In this paper, we discuss two different definitions of Maximum Parsimony on networks, "hardwired" and "softwired", and examine the complexity of computing them given a network topology and a character. By exploiting a link with the problem Multicut, we show that computing the hardwired parsimony score for 2-state characters is polynomial-time solvable, while for characters with more states this problem becomes NP-hard but is still approximable and fixed parameter tractable in the parsimony score. On the other hand we show that, for the softwired definition, obtaining even weak approximation guarantees is already difficult for binary characters and restricted network topologies, and fixed-parameter tractable algorithms in the parsimony score are unlikely. On the positive side we show that computing the softwired parsimony score is fixed-parameter tractable in the level of the network, a natural parameter describing how tangled reticulate activity is in the network. Finally, we show that both the hardwired and softwired parsimony score can be computed efficiently using Integer Linear Programming. The software has been made freely available.

Given two rooted phylogenetic trees on the same set of taxa X, the Maximum Agreement Forest problem (MAF) asks to find a forest that is, in a certain sense, common to both trees and has a minimum number of components. The Maximum Acyclic Agreement Forest problem (MAAF) has the additional restriction that the components of the forest cannot have conflicting ancestral relations in the input trees. There has been considerable interest in the special cases of these problems in which the input trees are required to be binary. However, in practice, phylogenetic trees are rarely binary, due to uncertainty about the precise order of speciation events. Here, we show that the general, nonbinary version of MAF has a polynomial-time 4-approximation and a fixed-parameter tractable (exact) algorithm that runs in O(4^k poly(n)) time, where n = |X| and k is the number of components of the agreement forest minus one. Moreover, we show that a c-approximation algorithm for nonbinary MAF and a d-approximation algorithm for the classical problem Directed Feedback Vertex Set (DFVS) can be combined to yield a d(c+3)-approximation for nonbinary MAAF. The algorithms for MAF have been implemented and made publicly available.

Here we present a new fixed parameter tractable algorithm to compute the hybridization number r of two rooted, not necessarily binary phylogenetic trees on taxon set X in time (6^r.r!).poly(n)$, where n=|X|. The novelty of this approach is its use of terminals, which are maximal elements of a natural partial order on X, and several insights from the softwired clusters literature. This yields a surprisingly simple and practical bounded-search algorithm and offers an alternative perspective on the underlying combinatorial structure of the hybridization number problem.