arXiv++ Combinatorics

In the uniform sparsest cut problem we are asked to find a vertex set that cuts few edges relative to the number of vertex pairs it separates. The Goemans-Linial SDP coupled with the Arora-Rao-Vazirani rounding gives an $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\log n})$ approximation on arbitrary graphs on $n$ vertices. We study this relaxation on finite Abelian Cayley graphs. First we show that when the second normalized Laplacian eigenvalue of $G= \mathrm{Cayley}(Γ, S)$ is realized by a Fourier character with image size at most four then $λ_2(G)=\mathrm{SDP}_{\mathrm{GL}}(G)=ψ(G)$. Geometrically, a character maps the vertices onto a regular polygon where the squared chord distance satisfies the triangle inequalities exactly when the polygon has at most four vertices. Grouping equal character fibers gives a cyclic quotient where the optimal cut can be found exactly and so the relaxation is exact on finite Abelian Cayley graphs on groups of exponent at most four. Second, we replace each generator $s$ of $S$ by a uniformly random element of its cyclic subgroup (including identity). If $r_s$ is the order of $s$, we let $α(r_s)$ to be the average number of $\pm s$ steps needed to simulate such a move, and let $ρ(S)=\max_{s\in S}α(r_s)$ be its worst case. Full cyclic averaging eliminates character phases and choosing a nontrivial character $χ^*$ minimizing the auxiliary eigenvalue and taking $K=\mathrm{ker}χ^*$ gives \[ ψ(G)\leqψ_G(K)\leq\frac{q^*}{q^*-1} \cdotρ(S)\cdot\mathrm{SDP}_{\mathrm{GL}}(G)\leq 2ρ(S)\cdot\mathrm{SDP}_{\mathrm{GL}}(G), \] where $q^*=|χ^*(Γ)|$. If all generator orders are at most $R$, this is an $R/2$ approximation. Finally, we construct an infinite family of finite Abelian Cayley graphs with Goemans-Linial integrality gap exactly $16/15$.

Let $G$ be an undirected graph. We say that $G$ contains a ladder of length $k$ if the $2 \times (k+1)$ grid graph is an induced subgraph of $G$ that is only connected to the rest of $G$ via its four cornerpoints. We prove that if all the ladders contained in $G$ are reduced to length 4, the treewidth remains unchanged (and that this bound is tight). Our result indicates that, when computing the treewidth of a graph, long ladders can simply be reduced, and that minimal forbidden minors for bounded treewidth graphs cannot contain long ladders. Our result also settles an open problem from algorithmic phylogenetics: the common chain reduction rule, used to simplify the comparison of two evolutionary trees, is treewidth-preserving in the display graph of the two trees.

Phylogenetic trees are used to model evolution: leaves are labelled to represent contemporary species ("taxa") and interior vertices represent extinct ancestors. Informally, convex characters are measurements on the contemporary species in which the subset of species (both contemporary and extinct) that share a given state, form a connected subtree. Given an unrooted, binary phylogenetic tree T on a set of n >= 2 taxa, a closed (but fairly opaque) expression for the number of convex characters on T has been known since 1992, and this is independent of the exact topology of T. In this note we prove that this number is actually equal to the (2n-1)th Fibonacci number. Next, we define g_k(T) to be the number of convex characters on T in which each state appears on at least k taxa. We show that, somewhat curiously, g_2(T) is also independent of the topology of T, and is equal to to the (n-1)th Fibonacci number. As we demonstrate, this topological neutrality subsequently breaks down for k >= 3. However, we show that for each fixed k >= 1, g_k(T) can be computed in O(n) time and the set of characters thus counted can be efficiently listed and sampled. We use these insights to give a simple but effective exact algorithm for the NP-hard maximum parsimony distance problem that runs in time $Θ( φ^{n} \cdot n^2 )$, where $φ\approx 1.618...$ is the golden ratio, and an exact algorithm which computes the tree bisection and reconnection distance (equivalently, a maximum agreement forest) in time $Θ( φ^{2n}\cdot \text{poly}(n))$, where $φ^2 \approx 2.619$.