arXiv++ Combinatorics

The maximum agreement forest (MAF) problem in phylogenetics takes as input a set t >=2 of binary phylogenetic trees T on the same set of taxa X. It asks for a partition X into the smallest number of blocks such that the subtrees induced by these blocks are disjoint and have common topology across all the trees in T. We produce a modified version of the well-known chain reduction rule in order to prove the existence of a kernel of size O( t * r * k ) where k is the natural parameter (the number of blocks) and r=min{max{k,3},t+1}}. We prove this bound for both the unrooted and rooted version of the problem, and demonstrate that the bound r, the length to which common chains are truncated, is tight. Our results constitute the first kernels for MAF in the t > 2 regime.

Given a set $X$ of species, a phylogenetic tree is an unrooted binary tree whose leaves are bijectively labelled by $X$. Such trees can be used to show the way species evolve over time. One way of understanding how topologically different two phylogenetic trees are, is to construct a minimum-size agreement forest: a partition of $X$ into the smallest number of blocks, such that the blocks induce homeomorphic, non-overlapping subtrees in both trees. This comparison yields insight into commonalities and differences in the evolution of $X$ across the two trees. Computing a smallest agreement forest is NP-hard (Hein, Jiang, Wang and Zhang, Discrete Applied Mathematics 71(1-3), 1996). In this work we study the problem on caterpillars, which are path-like phylogenetic trees. We will demonstrate that, even if we restrict the input to this highly restricted subclass, the problem remains NP-hard and is in fact APX-hard. Furthermore we show that for caterpillars two standard reductions rules well known in the literature yield a tight kernel of size at most $7k$, compared to $15k$ for general trees (Kelk and Simone, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 33(3), 2019). Finally we demonstrate that we can determine if two caterpillars have an agreement forest with at most $k$ blocks in $O^*(2.49^k)$ time, compared to $O^*(3^k)$ for general trees (Chen, Fan and Sze, Theoretical Computater Science 562, 2015), where $O^*(.)$ suppresses polynomial factors.

Let $G$ be an undirected graph. We say that $G$ contains a ladder of length $k$ if the $2 \times (k+1)$ grid graph is an induced subgraph of $G$ that is only connected to the rest of $G$ via its four cornerpoints. We prove that if all the ladders contained in $G$ are reduced to length 4, the treewidth remains unchanged (and that this bound is tight). Our result indicates that, when computing the treewidth of a graph, long ladders can simply be reduced, and that minimal forbidden minors for bounded treewidth graphs cannot contain long ladders. Our result also settles an open problem from algorithmic phylogenetics: the common chain reduction rule, used to simplify the comparison of two evolutionary trees, is treewidth-preserving in the display graph of the two trees.

We describe a kernel of size 9k-8 for the NP-hard problem of computing the Tree Bisection and Reconnect (TBR) distance k between two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees. We achieve this by extending the existing portfolio of reduction rules with three novel new reduction rules. Two of the rules are based on the idea of topologically transforming the trees in a distance-preserving way in order to guarantee execution of earlier reduction rules. The third rule extends the local neighbourhood approach introduced in (Kelk and Linz, Annals of Combinatorics 24(3), 2020) to more global structures, allowing new situations to be identified when deletion of a leaf definitely reduces the TBR distance by one. The bound on the kernel size is tight up to an additive term. Our results also apply to the equivalent problem of computing a Maximum Agreement Forest (MAF) between two unrooted binary phylogenetic trees. We anticipate that our results will be more widely applicable for computing agreement-forest based dissimilarity measures.

Phylogenetic trees are used to model evolution: leaves are labelled to represent contemporary species ("taxa") and interior vertices represent extinct ancestors. Informally, convex characters are measurements on the contemporary species in which the subset of species (both contemporary and extinct) that share a given state, form a connected subtree. In \cite{KelkS17} it was shown how to efficiently count, list and sample certain restricted subfamilies of convex characters, and algorithmic applications were given. We continue this work in a number of directions. First, we show how combining the enumeration of convex characters with existing parameterised algorithms can be used to speed up exponential-time algorithms for the \emph{maximum agreement forest problem} in phylogenetics. Second, we re-visit the quantity $g_2(T)$, defined as the number of convex characters on $T$ in which each state appears on at least 2 taxa. We use this to give an algorithm with running time $O( φ^{n} \cdot \text{poly}(n) )$, where $φ\approx 1.6181$ is the golden ratio and $n$ is the number of taxa in the input trees, for computation of \emph{maximum parsimony distance on two state characters}. By further restricting the characters counted by $g_2(T)$ we open an interesting bridge to the literature on enumeration of matchings. By crossing this bridge we improve the running time of the aforementioned parsimony distance algorithm to $O( 1.5895^{n} \cdot \text{poly}(n) )$, and obtain a number of new results in themselves relevant to enumeration of matchings on at-most binary trees.

Let $\mathcal{T}$ be an unrooted binary tree with $n$ distinctly labelled leaves. Deriving its name from the field of phylogenetics, a convex character on $\mathcal{T}$ is simply a partition of the leaves such that the minimal spanning subtrees induced by the blocks of the partition are mutually disjoint. In earlier work Kelk and Stamoulis (Advances in Applied Mathematics 84 (2017), pp. 34--46) defined $g_k(\mathcal{T})$ as the number of convex characters where each block has at least $k$ leaves. Exact expressions were given for $g_1$ and $g_2$, where the topology of $\mathcal{T}$ turns out to be irrelevant, and it was noted that for $k \geq 3$ topological neutrality no longer holds. In this article, for every $k \geq 3$ we describe tree topologies achieving the maximum and minimum values of $g_k$ and determine corresponding expressions and exponential bounds for $g_k$. Finally, we reflect briefly on possible algorithmic applications of these results.