arXiv++ Combinatorics

Elo rating systems measure the approximate skill of each competitor in a game or sport. A competitor's rating increases when they win and decreases when they lose. Increasing one's rating can be difficult work; one must hone their skills and consistently beat the competition. Alternatively, with enough money you can rig the outcome of games to boost your rating. This paper poses a natural question for Elo rating systems: say you manage to get together $n$ people (including yourself) and acquire enough money to rig $k$ games. How high can you get your rating, asymptotically in $k$? In this setting, the people you gathered aren't very interested in the game, and will only play if you pay them to. This paper resolves the question for $n=2$ up to constant additive error, and provide close upper and lower bounds for all other $n$, including for $n$ growing arbitrarily with $k$. There is a phase transition at $n=k^{1/3}$: there is a huge increase in the highest possible Elo rating from $n=2$ to $n=k^{1/3}$, but (depending on the particular Elo system used) little-to-no increase for any higher $n$. Past the transition point $n>k^{1/3}$, the highest possible Elo is at least $Θ(k^{1/3})$. The corresponding upper bound depends on the particular system used, but for the standard Elo system, is $Θ(k^{1/3}\log(k)^{1/3})$.

We prove upper bounds on the graph diameters of polytopes in two settings. The first is a worst-case bound for polytopes defined by integer constraints in terms of the height of the integers and certain subdeterminants of the constraint matrix, which in some cases improves previously known results. The second is a smoothed analysis bound: given an appropriately normalized polytope, we add small Gaussian noise to each constraint. We consider a natural geometric measure on the vertices of the perturbed polytope (corresponding to the mean curvature measure of its polar) and show that with high probability there exists a "giant component" of vertices, with measure $1-o(1)$ and polynomial diameter. Both bounds rely on spectral gaps -- of a certain Schrödinger operator in the first case, and a certain continuous time Markov chain in the second -- which arise from the log-concavity of the volume of a simple polytope in terms of its slack variables.

This work shows that the smallest natural number $d_n$ that is not the determinant of some $n\times n$ binary matrix is at least $c\,2^n/n$ for $c=1/201$. That same quantity naturally lower bounds the number of distinct integers $D_n$ which can be written as the determinant of some $n\times n$ binary matrix. This asymptotically improves the previous result of $d_n=Ω(1.618^n)$ and slightly improves the previous result of $D_n\ge 2^n/g(n)$ for a particular $g(n)=ω(n^2)$ function.