arXiv++ Combinatorics

A sequence of nonnegative integers $π$ is {\it graphic} if it is the degree sequence of some graph $G$. In this case we say that $G$ is a \textit{realization} of $π$, and we write $π=π(G)$. A graphic sequence $π$ is {\it potentially $H$-graphic} if there is a realization of $π$ that contains $H$ as a subgraph. Given nonincreasing graphic sequences $π_1=(d_1,\ldots,d_n)$ and $π_2 = (s_1,\ldots,s_n)$, we say that $π_1$ {\it majorizes} $π_2$ if $d_i \geq s_i$ for all $i$, $1 \leq i \leq n$. In 1970, Erdős showed that for any $K_{r+1}$-free graph $H$, there exists an $r$-partite graph $G$ such that $π(G)$ majorizes $π(H)$. In 2005, Pikhurko and Taraz generalized this notion and showed that for any graph $F$ with chromatic number $r+1$, the degree sequence of an $F$-free graph is, in an appropriate sense, nearly majorized by the degree sequence of an $r$-partite graph. In this paper, we give similar results for degree sequences that are not potentially $H$-graphic. In particular, there is a graphic sequence $π^*(H)$ such that if $π$ is a graphic sequence that is not potentially $H$-graphic, then $π$ is close to being majorized by $π^*(H)$. Similar to the role played by complete multipartite graphs in the traditional extremal setting, the sequence $π^*(H)$ asymptotically gives the maximum possible sum of a graphic sequence $π$ that is not potentially $H$-graphic.

A basic pigeonhole principle insures an existence of two objects of the same type if the number of objects is larger than the number of types. Can such a principle be extended to a more complex combinatorial structure? Here, we address such a question for graphs. We call two disjoint subsets $A, B$ of vertices \emph{\textbf{twins}} if they have the same cardinality and induce subgraphs of the same size. Let $t(G)$ be the largest $k$ such that $G$ has twins on $k$ vertices each. We provide the bounds on $t(G)$ in terms of the number of edges and vertices using discrepancy results for induced subgraphs. In addition, we give conditions under which $t(G)= |V(G)|/2$ and show that if $G$ is a forest then $t(G) \geq |V(G)|/2 - 1$.

The Boolean lattice of dimension two, also known as the diamond, consists of four distinct elements with the following property: $A\subset B,C\subset D$. A diamond-free family in the $n$-dimensional Boolean lattice is a subposet such that no four elements form a diamond. Note that elements $B$ and $C$ may or may not be related. There is a diamond-free family in the $n$-dimensional Boolean lattice of size $(2-o(1)){n\choose\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$. In this paper, we prove that any diamond-free family in the $n$-dimensional Boolean lattice has size at most $(2.25+o(1)){n\choose\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$. Furthermore, we show that the so-called Lubell function of a diamond-free family in the $n$-dimensional Boolean lattice is at most $2.25+o(1)$, which is asymptotically best possible.

In this paper, we discuss a generalization of the notion of saturation in graphs in order to deal with induced structures. In particular, we define ${\rm indsat}(n,H)$, which is the fewest number of gray edges in a trigraph so that no realization of that trigraph has an induced copy of $H$, but changing any white or black edge to gray results in some realization that does have an induced copy of $H$. We give some general and basic results and then prove that ${\rm indsat}(n,P_4)=\lceil (n+1)/3\rceil$ for $n\geq 4$ where $P_4$ is the path on 4 vertices. We also show how induced saturation in this setting extends to a natural notion of saturation in the context of general Boolean formulas.

The editing of a combinatorial object is the alteration of some of its elements such that the resulting object satisfies a certain fixed property. The edit problem for graphs, when the edges are added or deleted, was first studied independently by the authors and Kézdy [J. Graph Theory (2008), 58(2), 123--138] and by Alon and Stav [Random Structures Algorithms (2008), 33(1), 87--104]. In this paper, a generalization of graph editing is considered for multicolorings of the complete graph as well as for directed graphs. Specifically, the number of edge-recolorings sufficient to be performed on any edge-colored complete graph to satisfy a given hereditary property is investigated. The theory for computing the edit distance is extended using random structures and so-called types or colored homomorphisms of graphs.

In this manuscript we develop a version of Szemerédi's regularity lemma that is suitable for analyzing multicolorings of complete graphs and directed graphs. In this, we follow the proof of Alon, Fischer, Krivelevich and M. Szegedy [Combinatorica, 20(4) (2000), 451--476] who prove a similar result for graphs. The purpose is to extend classical results on dense hereditary properties, such as the speed of the property or edit distance, to the above-mentioned combinatorial objects.

The edit distance between two graphs on the same labeled vertex set is the size of the symmetric difference of the edge sets. The edit distance function of the hereditary property, $\mathcal{H}$, is a function of $p\in[0,1]$ and is the limit of the maximum normalized distance between a graph of density $p$ and $\mathcal{H}$. This paper uses the symmetrization method of Sidorenko in order to compute the edit distance function of various hereditary properties. For any graph $H$, ${\rm Forb}(H)$ denotes the property of not having an induced copy of $H$. We compute the edit distance function for ${\rm Forb}(H)$, where $H$ is any split graph, and the graph $H_9$, a graph first used to describe the difficulties in computing the edit distance function.

The edit distance between two graphs on the same vertex set is defined to be the size of the symmetric difference of their edge sets. The edit distance function of a hereditary property, $\mathcal{H}$, is a function of $p$, and measures, asymptotically, the furthest graph of edge density $p$ from $\mathcal{H}$ under this metric. In this paper, we address the hereditary property $\forb(K_{2,t})$, the property of having no induced copy of the complete bipartite graph with 2 vertices in one class and $t$ in the other. Employing an assortment of techniques and colored regularity graph constructions, we are able to determine the edit distance function over the entire domain $p\in [0,1]$ when $t=3,4$ and extend the interval over which the edit distance function for $\forb(K_{2,t})$ is known for all values of $t$, determining its maximum value for all odd $t$. We also prove that the function for odd $t$ has a nontrivial interval on which it achieves its maximum. These are the only known principal hereditary properties for which this occurs. In the process of studying this class of functions, we encounter some surprising connections to extremal graph theory problems, such as strongly regular graphs and the problem of Zarankiewicz. This is an extended version of a paper with the same name now published in the Journal of Graph Theory \cite{jgt_version}. In particular, this version contains Appendix A, which has tables and graphs pertaining to the hereditary property $\forb(K_{2,t})$ for small $t$, and Appendix B, which has the proofs of Lemma 31, Proposition 32, Proposition 33, and Lemma 34.

The edit distance between two graphs on the same labeled vertex set is the size of the symmetric difference of the edge sets. The distance between a graph, $G$, and a hereditary property, ${\cal H}$, is the minimum of the distance between $G$ and each $G'\in{\cal H}$. The edit distance function of ${\cal H}$ is a function of $p\in[0,1]$ and is the limit of the maximum normalized distance between a graph of density $p$ and ${\cal H}$. This paper develops a method, called localization, for computing the edit distance function of various hereditary properties. For any graph $H$, ${\rm Forb}(H)$ denotes the property of not having an induced copy of $H$. This paper gives some results regarding estimation of the function for an arbitrary hereditary property. This paper also gives the edit distance function for ${\rm Forb}(H)$, where $H$ is a cycle on 9 or fewer vertices.

There is a sufficiently large $N\in h\mathbb{N}$ such that the following holds. If $G$ is a tripartite graph with $N$ vertices in each vertex class such that every vertex is adjacent to at least $2N/3+2h-1$ vertices in each of the other classes, then $G$ can be tiled perfectly by copies of $K_{h,h,h}$. This extends work by two of the authors [Electron. J. Combin, 16(1), 2009] and also gives a sufficient condition for tiling by any fixed 3-colorable graph. Furthermore, we show that $2N/3+2h-1$ in our result can not be replaced by $2N/3+ h-2$ and that if $N$ is divisible by $6h$, then we can replace it with the value $2N/3+h-1$ and this is tight.

For a family $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets of [n]=\{1, 2, ..., n} ordered by inclusion, and a partially ordered set P, we say that $\mathcal{F}$ is P-free if it does not contain a subposet isomorphic to P. Let $ex(n, P)$ be the largest size of a P-free family of subsets of [n]. Let $Q_2$ be the poset with distinct elements a, b, c, d, a<b, c<d; i.e., the 2-dimensional Boolean lattice. We show that $2N -o(N) \leq ex(n, Q_2)\leq 2.283261N +o(N), $ where $N = \binom{n}{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}$. We also prove that the largest $Q_2$-free family of subsets of [n] having at most three different sizes has at most 2.20711N members.

For a fixed integer h>=1, let G be a tripartite graph with N vertices in each vertex class, N divisible by 6h, such that every vertex is adjacent to at least 2N/3+h-1 vertices in each of the other classes. We show that if N is sufficiently large, then G can be tiled perfectly by copies of K_{h,h,h}. This extends the work in [19] and also gives a sufficient condition for tiling by any (fixed) 3-colorable graph. Furthermore, we show that this minimum-degree condition is best possible and provide very tight bounds when N is divisible by h but not by 6h.

An edge-operation on a graph $G$ is defined to be either the deletion of an existing edge or the addition of a nonexisting edge. Given a family of graphs $\mathcal{G}$, the editing distance from $G$ to $\mathcal{G}$ is the smallest number of edge-operations needed to modify $G$ into a graph from $\mathcal{G}$. In this paper, we fix a graph $H$ and consider ${\rm Forb}(n,H)$, the set of all graphs on $n$ vertices that have no induced copy of $H$. We provide bounds for the maximum over all $n$-vertex graphs $G$ of the editing distance from $G$ to ${\rm Forb}(n,H)$, using an invariant we call the {\it binary chromatic number} of the graph $H$. We give asymptotically tight bounds for that distance when $H$ is self-complementary and exact results for several small graphs $H$.