arXiv++ Combinatorics

Hindman's theorem and van der Waerden's theorem are two classical Ramsey theoretic results, the first one deals with finite configurations and the second one deals with infinite configurations. The Central Sets Theorem due to Furstenberg is a strong simultaneous extension of both theorems, which also applies to general commutative semigroups. Beiglboeck provided a common extension of the Central Sets Theorem and Milliken-Taylor Theorem in commutative case. Furstenberg's original Central Sets Theorem was proved in \cite{key-2} for $\left(\mathbb{N},+\right)$ for finitely many sequences at a time. Bergelson and Hindman provided a non commutative version of this Theorem \cite{key-3}. The first author of this article jointly with Hindman and Straus provided a non-commutative version of Central Sets Theorem using arbitrary many sequence at a time \cite{key-5}. In this work we will provide a non-commutative extension of Beiglboeck's Theorem. We also provide polynomial generalization of Beiglbock's theorem.

Furstenberg introduced the notion of Central sets in 1981. Later in 1990 V. Bergelson and N. Hindman proved a different but an equivalent version of the central set theorem. In 2008 D. De, N. Hindman and D. Strauss proved a stronger version of central sets theorem. Hindman and Leader first introduced the concept of near zero. Recently S. Goswami, L. Baglini and S. Patra did a polynomial extension of Stronger Central sets theorem in 2023. In this article, we proved the Polynomial stronger Central Sets Theorem near zero.

Combinatorially Rich sets were introduced by Bergelson and Glasscock for commutative semigroup. Latter Hindman, Hosseini, Strauss and Tootkaboni extended the definition of Combinatorially Rich sets for arbitrary semigroup. Recently Goswami proved that product of two Combinatorially Rich sets is also a Combinatorially Rich set. On the other hand Hindman and Leader were the first to introduce the concept of central sets near zero for dense semigroups of $\left(\left(0,\infty\right),+\right)$ and demonstrated an important combinatorial consequence regarding these sets. In this article we provided dynamical and combinatorial characterization of essential CR-sets near zero and explore the cartesian product of these sets.

The notion of abundance of certain type of configuration in certain large sets was first proved by Furstenberg and Glazner in 1998. After that many author investigate abundance of different types of configurations in different types of large sets. Hindman, Hosseini, Strauss and Tootkaboni recently introduced another notion of large sets called $CR$ sets. Then Debnath and De proved abundance of arithmetic progression in $CR$ sets for commutative semigroups. In the present article we investigate abundance of progressions in for non-commutative semigroups.

Using the notions of Topological dynamics, H. Furstenberg defined central sets and proved the Central Sets Theorem. Later V. Bergelson and N. Hindman characterized central sets in terms of algebra of the Stone-Čech compactification of discrete semigroup. They found that central sets are the members of the minimal idempotents of \b{eta}S, the Stone-Čech compactification of a semigroup (S, .). Hindman and leader introduced the notion of Central set near zero algebraically. Later dynamical and combinatorial characterization have also been established. For any given filter F in S a set A is said to be a F- central set if it is a member of a minimal idempotent of a closed subsemigroup of \b{eta}S, generated by the filter F. In a recent article Bergelson, Hindman and Strauss introduced strongly central and very strongly central sets in [BHS]. They also dynamically characterized the sets in the same paper. In the present article we will characterize the strongly F- central sets dynamically and combinatorially. Here we introduce the filter version of strongly central sets and very strongly central sets. We also provide dynamical and combinatorial characterization of such sets.

Sets satisfying Central sets theorem and other Ramsey theoretic large sets were studied extensively in literature. Hindman and Strauss proved that product of some of these large sets is again large. In this paper we show that if we take two combinatorially large sets along idempotent filters, then their product is also a filter large set. The techniques used here to prove our results are completely elementary in nature.

The Central Sets Theorem near zero was originally proved by Hindman and Leader. Later a version of Central Sets Theorem was proved by De, Hindman and Strauss known to be the stronger Central Sets Theorem. Subsequently many other versions of Central Sets Theorem came, among which Dev Phulara proved the theorem for a sequence of central sets instead of taking one set. In this paper, we provide various general versions of the theorem along Dev Phulara's way with some Ramsey theoretic applications.