arXiv++ Combinatorics

Spectral hypergraph theory studies the structural properties of a hypergraph that can be inferred from the eigenvalues and the eigenvectors of either matrices or tensors associated with it. In this paper we study the spectral indistinguishability in the hypergraph setting. We present a general switching method to construct uniform $E$-cospectral hypergraphs (hypergraphs with the same $E$-spectrum), and discuss some of its multiple applications. Our method not only provides a framework to unify the existing methods for obtaining $E$-cospectral hypergraphs via switching, but also generalizes most of the existing switching tools, yielding multiple new constructions. Finally, we compare common methods of computing $E$-characteristic polynomials, and in particular show that one standard method, while useful for generic tensors, is uninformative for almost all hypergraphs.

Due to Veblen's Theorem, if a connected multigraph $X$ has even degrees at each vertex, then it is Eulerian and its edge set has a partition into cycles. In this paper, we show that an Eulerian multigraph has a unique partition into cycles if and only if it belongs to the family $\mathcal{S}$, ``bridgeless cactus multigraphs", elements of which are obtained by replacing every edge of a tree with a cycle of length $\geq 2$. Other characterizing conditions for bridgeless cactus multigraphs and digraphs are provided. Furthermore, for a digraph $D$, we list conditions equivalent to having a unique Eulerian circuit, thereby generalizing a previous result of Arratia-Bollobás-Sorkin. In particular, we show that digraphs with a unique Eulerian circuit constitute a subfamily of $\mathcal{S}$, namely, ``Christmas cactus digraphs".

We investigate a cancellation property satisfied by a connected Eulerian digraph $D$. Namely, unless $D$ is a single directed cycle, we have $\sum_{k\geq 1} (-1)^{k} f_k(D)=0$, where $f_k(D)$ is the number of partitions of Eulerian circuits of $D$ into $k$ circuits. This property is a consequence of the fact that the Martin polynomial of a digraph has no constant term. We provide an alternative proof by employing Viennot's theory of Heaps of Pieces, and in particular, a bijection between closed trails of a digraph and heaps with a unique maximal piece, which are also in bijection with unique sink orientations of the intersection graphs $G_a$ of partitions $a$ of $E(D)$ into cycles. The argument considers the partition lattice of the edge set of a digraph $D$, restricted to the join-semilattice $T(D)$ induced by elements whose blocks are connected and Eulerian. The minimal elements of $T(D)$ are exactly the partitions of $D$ into cycles, and the up-set of a minimal element $a\in T(D)$ is shown to be isomorphic to the bond lattice $L(G_a)$. Using tools developed by Whitney and Rota, we perform Möbius inversion on $T(D)$ and obtain the claimed cancellation. As a consequence of this alternative proof, we relate the Martin polynomial of a digraph directly to the chromatic polynomials of the intersection graphs of partitions of $D$ into cycles. Finally, we apply the cancellation property in order to deduce the classical Harary-Sachs Theorem for graphs of rank $2$ from a hypergraph generalization thereof, remedying a gap in a previous proof of this.

A tanglegram consists of two rooted binary trees with the same number of leaves and a perfect matching between the leaves of the trees. Given a size-$n$ tanglegram, i.e., a tanglegram for two trees with $n$ leaves, a multiset of induced size-$(n-1)$ tanglegrams is obtained by deleting a pair of matched leaves in every possible way. Here, we analyze whether a size-$n$ tanglegram is uniquely encoded by this multiset of size-$(n-1)$ tanglegrams. We answer this question affirmatively in the case that at least one of the two trees of the tanglegram is a caterpillar tree.

It is a classical result due to Jacobi in algebraic combinatorics that the generating function of closed walks at a vertex $u$ in a graph $G$ is determined by the rational function \[ \frac{φ_{G-u}(t)}{φ_G(t)} \] where $φ_G(t)$ is the characteristic polynomial of $G$. In this paper, we show that the corresponding rational function for a hypergraph is also a generating function for some combinatorial objects in the hypergraph. We make use of the Heaps of Pieces framework, developed by Viennot, demonstrating its use on graphs, digraphs, and multigraphs before using it on hypergraphs. In the case of a graph $G$, the pieces are cycles and the concurrence relation is sharing a vertex. The pyramids with maximal piece containing a vertex $u \in V(G)$ are in one-to-one correspondence with closed walks at $u$. In the case of a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$, connected "infragraphs" can be defined as the set of pieces, with the same concurrence relation: sharing a vertex. Our main results are established by analyzing multivariate resultants of polynomial systems associated to adjacency hypermatrices.

We show that, in general, the characteristic polynomial of a hypergraph is not determined by its ``polynomial deck'', the multiset of characteristic polynomials of its vertex-deleted subgraphs, thus settling the ``polynomial reconstruction problem'' for hypergraphs in the negative. The proof proceeds by showing that a construction due to Kocay of an infinite family of pairs of $3$-uniform hypergraphs which are non-isomorphic but share the same hypergraph deck, in fact, have different characteristic polynomials. The question remain unresolved for ordinary graphs.

We consider extremal problems related to decks and multidecks of rooted binary trees (a.k.a. rooted phylogenetic tree shapes). Here, the deck (resp. multideck) of a tree $T$ refers to the set (resp. multiset) of leaf induced binary subtrees of $T$. On the one hand, we consider the reconstruction of trees from their (multi)decks. We give lower and upper bounds on the minimum (multi)deck size required to uniquely encode a rooted binary tree on $n$ leaves. On the other hand, we consider problems related to deck cardinalities. In particular, we characterize trees with minimum-size as well as maximum-size decks. Finally, we present some exhaustive computations for $k$-universal trees, i.e., rooted binary trees that contain all $k$-leaf rooted binary trees as induced subtrees.

We provide an $Ω(n\log n) $ lower bound and an $O(n^2)$ upper bound for the smallest size of rooted binary trees (a.k.a. phylogenetic tree shapes), which are universal for rooted binary trees with $n$ leaves, i.e., contain all of them as induced binary subtrees. We explicitly compute the smallest universal trees for $n\leq 11$. We also provide an $Ω(n^2) $ lower bound and an $O(n^4)$ upper bound for the smallest size of tanglegrams, which are universal for size $n$ tanglegrams, i.e., which contain all of them as induced subtanglegrams. Some of our results generalize to rooted $d$-ary trees and to $d$-ary tanglegrams.