arXiv++ Combinatorics

A tanglegram consists of two rooted binary trees with the same number of leaves and a perfect matching between the leaves of the trees. Given a size-$n$ tanglegram, i.e., a tanglegram for two trees with $n$ leaves, a multiset of induced size-$(n-1)$ tanglegrams is obtained by deleting a pair of matched leaves in every possible way. Here, we analyze whether a size-$n$ tanglegram is uniquely encoded by this multiset of size-$(n-1)$ tanglegrams. We answer this question affirmatively in the case that at least one of the two trees of the tanglegram is a caterpillar tree.

We consider extremal problems related to decks and multidecks of rooted binary trees (a.k.a. rooted phylogenetic tree shapes). Here, the deck (resp. multideck) of a tree $T$ refers to the set (resp. multiset) of leaf induced binary subtrees of $T$. On the one hand, we consider the reconstruction of trees from their (multi)decks. We give lower and upper bounds on the minimum (multi)deck size required to uniquely encode a rooted binary tree on $n$ leaves. On the other hand, we consider problems related to deck cardinalities. In particular, we characterize trees with minimum-size as well as maximum-size decks. Finally, we present some exhaustive computations for $k$-universal trees, i.e., rooted binary trees that contain all $k$-leaf rooted binary trees as induced subtrees.

We provide an $Ω(n\log n) $ lower bound and an $O(n^2)$ upper bound for the smallest size of rooted binary trees (a.k.a. phylogenetic tree shapes), which are universal for rooted binary trees with $n$ leaves, i.e., contain all of them as induced binary subtrees. We explicitly compute the smallest universal trees for $n\leq 11$. We also provide an $Ω(n^2) $ lower bound and an $O(n^4)$ upper bound for the smallest size of tanglegrams, which are universal for size $n$ tanglegrams, i.e., which contain all of them as induced subtanglegrams. Some of our results generalize to rooted $d$-ary trees and to $d$-ary tanglegrams.

The derived graph of a voltage graph consisting of a single vertex and two loops of different voltages is a circulant graph with two generators. We characterize the automorphism groups of connected, two-generator circulant graphs, and give their determining and distinguishing number, and when relevant, their cost of 2-distinguishing. We do the same for the subdivisions of connected, two-generator circulant graphs obtained by replacing one loop in the voltage graph with a directed cycle.

In this paper we study the symmetry parameters determining number, distinguishing number, and cost of 2-distinguishing, for some variations on hypercubes, namely Hamming graphs, powers of hypercubes, folded hypercubes, enhanced hypercubes, augmented hypercubes and locally twisted hypercubes.

The game of best choice (or "secretary problem") is a model for making an irrevocable decision among a fixed number of candidate choices that are presented sequentially in random order, one at a time. Because the classically optimal solution is known to reject an initial sequence of candidates, a paradox emerges from the fact that candidates have an incentive to position themselves immediately after this cutoff which challenges the assumption that candidates arrive in uniformly random order. One way to resolve this is to consider games for which every (reasonable) strategy results in the same probability of success. In this work, we classify these "strategy-indifferent" games of best choice. It turns out that the probability of winning such a game is essentially the reciprocal of the expected number of left-to-right maxima in the full collection of candidate rank orderings. We present some examples of these games based on avoiding permutation patterns of size 3, which involves computing the distribution of left-to-right maxima in each of these pattern classes.

The Mycielskian construction, denoted $μ(G)$, takes a finite simple graph $G$ to a larger graph with of the same clique number but larger chromatic number. The generalized Mycielskian construction, denoted $μ_t(G)$, takes $G$ to a larger graph with the same chromatic number but with larger odd girth. In this chapter we look at symmetry parameters of $μ(G)$ and $μ_t(G)$ in terms of the same parameters of $G$. These symmetry parameters include determining number, distinguishing number, and cost of distinguishing.

A set $S$ of vertices is a determining set for a graph $G$ if every automorphism of $G$ is uniquely determined by its action on $S$. The size of a smallest determining set for $G$ is called its determining number, $Det(G)$. A graph $G$ is said to be $d$-distinguishable if there is a coloring of the vertices with $d$ colors so that only the trivial automorphism preserves the color classes. The smallest such $d$ is the distinguishing number, $Dist(G)$. If $Dist(G) = 2$, the cost of 2-distinguishing, $ρ(G)$, is the size of a smallest color class over all 2-distinguishing colorings of $G$. The Mycielskian, $μ(G)$, of a graph $G$ is constructed by adding a shadow master vertex $w$, and for each vertex $v_i$ of $G$ adding a shadow vertex $u_i$ with edges so that the neighborhood of $u_i$ in $μ(G)$ is the same as the neighborhood of $v_i$ in $G$ with the addition of $w$. That is, $N(u_i)=N_G(v_i)\cup\{w\}$. The generalized Mycielskian $μ^{(t)}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is a Mycielskian graph with $t$ layers of shadow vertices, each with edges to layers above and below, and $w$ only adjacent to the top layer of shadow vertices. A graph is twin-free if it has no pair of vertices with the same set of neighbors. This paper examines the determining number and, when relevant, the cost of 2-distinguishing for Mycielskians and generalized Mycielskians of simple graphs with no isolated vertices. In particular, if $G \neq K_2$ is twin-free with no isolated vertices, then $Det(μ^{(t)}(G)) = Det(G)$. Further, if $Det(G) = k \geq 2$ and $t \ge k-1$, then $Dist(μ^{(t)}(G))=2$, and $Det(μ^{(t)}(G)) = ρ(μ^{(t)}(G))= k$. For $G$ with twins, we develop a framework using quotient graphs with respect to equivalence classes of twin vertices to give bounds on the determining number of Mycielskians. Moreover, we identify classes of graphs with twins for which $Det(μ^{(t)}(G)) = (t{+}1) Det(G)$.

A graph $G$ is $d$-distinguishable if there is a coloring of the vertices with $d$ colors so that only the trivial automorphism preserves the color classes. The smallest such $d$ is the distinguishing number, $\operatorname{Dist}(G)$. The Mycielskian $μ(G)$ of a graph $G$ is constructed by adding a shadow vertex $u_i$ for each vertex $v_i$ of $G$ and one additional vertex $w$ and adding edges so that $N(u_i)~=~N_G(v_i)~\cup~\{w\}$. The generalized Mycielskian $μ_t(G)$ is a Mycielskian graph with $t$ layers of shadow vertices, each with edges to layers above and below. This paper examines the distinguishing number of the traditional and generalized Mycielskian graphs. Notably, if $G~\neq ~K_1,~K_2$ and the number of isolated vertices in $μ_t(G)$ is at most $\operatorname{Dist}(G)$, then $\operatorname{Dist}(μ_t(G)) \le \operatorname{Dist}(G)$. This result proves and exceeds a conjecture of Alikhani and Soltani.

A generalization of list-coloring, now known as DP-coloring, was recently introduced by Dvořák and Postle. Essentially, DP-coloring assigns an arbitrary matching between lists of colors at adjacent vertices, as opposed to only matching identical colors as is done for list-coloring. Several results on list-coloring of planar graphs have since been extended to the setting of DP-coloring. We note that list-coloring results do not always extend to DP-coloring results. Our main result in this paper is to prove that every planar graph without cycles of length $\{4, a, b, 9\}$ for $a, b \in \{6, 7, 8\}$ is DP-$3$-colorable, extending three existing results on $3$-choosability of planar graphs.

In this article, we use a unified approach to prove several classes of planar graphs are DP-$3$-colorable, which extend the corresponding results on $3$-choosability.

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a family of edge-colored graphs. A $t$-edge colored graph $G$ is $(\mathcal{C}, t)$-saturated if $G$ does not contain any graph in $\mathcal{C}$ but the addition of any edge in any color in $[t]$ creates a copy of some graph in $\mathcal{C}$. Similarly to classical saturation functions, define $\mathrm{sat}_t(n, \mathcal{C})$ to be the minimum number of edges in a $(\mathcal{C},t)$ saturated graph. Let $\mathcal{C}_r(H)$ be the family consisting of every edge-colored copy of $H$ which uses exactly $r$ colors. In this paper we consider a variety of colored saturation problems. We determine the order of magnitude for $\mathrm{sat}_t(n, \mathcal{C}_r(K_k))$ for all $r$, showing a sharp change in behavior when $r\geq \binom{k-1}{2}+2$. A particular case of this theorem proves a conjecture of Barrus, Ferrara, Vandenbussche, and Wenger. We determine $\mathrm{sat}_t(n, \mathcal{C}_2(K_3))$ exactly and determine the extremal graphs. Additionally, we document some interesting irregularities in the colored saturation function.

In this note we provide a combinatorial interpretation for the powers of the hypergraph Laplacians. Our motivation comes from the discrete formulation of quantum mechanics and thermodynamics in the case of finite graphs, which suggest a natural extension to simplicial and CW-complexes. With this motivation, we also define generalizations of the odd Laplacian which is specific to hypergraphs arising from CW-complexes. We then provide a combinatorial interpretation for the powers of these Laplacians.

A proper vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is $r$-dynamic if for each $v\in V(G)$, at least $\min\{r,d(v)\}$ colors appear in $N_G(v)$. In this paper we investigate $r$-dynamic versions of coloring, list coloring, and paintability. We prove that planar and toroidal graphs are 3-dynamically 10-colorable, and this bound is sharp for toroidal graphs. We also give bounds on the minimum number of colors needed for any $r$ in terms of the genus of the graph: for sufficiently large $r$, every graph with genus $g$ is $r$-dynamically $((r+1)(g+5)+3)$-colorable when $g\leq2$ and $r$-dynamically $((r+1)(2g+2)+3)$-colorable when $g\geq3$. Furthermore, each of these upper bounds for $r$-dynamic $k$-colorability also holds for $r$-dynamic $k$-choosability and for $r$-dynamic $k$-paintability. We develop a method to prove that certain configurations are reducible for each of the corresponding $r$-dynamic parameters.

A star $k$-coloring is a proper $k$-coloring where the union of two color classes induces a star forest. While every planar graph is 4-colorable, not every planar graph is star 4-colorable. One method to produce a star 4-coloring is to partition the vertex set into a 2-independent set and a forest; such a partition is called an I,F-partition. We use a combination of potential functions and discharging to prove that every graph with maximum average degree less than $\frac{5}{2}$ has an I,F-partition, which is sharp and answers a question of Cranston and West [A guide to the discharging method, arXiv:1306.4434]. This result implies that planar graphs of girth at least 10 are star 4-colorable, improving upon previous results of Bu, Cranston, Montassier, Raspaud, and Wang [Star coloring of sparse graphs, J. Graph Theory 62 (2009), 201-219].

Given a proper total $k$-coloring $c:V(G)\cup E(G)\to\{1,2,\ldots,k\}$ of a graph $G$, we define the value of a vertex $v$ to be $c(v) + \sum_{uv \in E(G)} c(uv)$. The smallest integer $k$ such that $G$ has a proper total $k$-coloring whose values form a proper coloring is the neighbor sum distinguishing total chromatic number of $G$, $χ"_Σ(G)$. Pilśniak and Woźniak (2013) conjectured that $χ"_Σ(G)\leq Δ(G)+3$ for any simple graph with maximum degree $Δ(G)$. In this paper, we prove this bound to be asymptotically correct by showing that $χ"_Σ(G)\leq Δ(G)(1+o(1))$. The main idea of our argument relies on Przybyło's proof (2014) regarding neighbor sum distinguishing edge-colorings.

Peg solitaire is a game generalized to connected graphs by Beeler and Hoilman. In the game pegs are placed on all but one vertex. If $xyz$ form a 3-vertex path and $x$ and $y$ each have a peg but $z$ does not, then we can remove the pegs at $x$ and $y$ and place a peg at $z$. By analogy with the moves in the original game, this is called a jump. The goal of the peg solitaire game on graphs is to find jumps that reduce the number of pegs on the graph to 1. Beeler and Rodriguez proposed a variant where we instead want to maximize the number of pegs remaining when no more jumps can be made. Maximizing over all initial locations of a single hole, the maximum number of pegs left on a graph $G$ when no jumps remain is the fool's solitaire number $F(G)$. We determine the fool's solitaire number for the join of any graphs $G$ and $H$. For the cartesian product, we determine $F(G \Box K_k)$ when $k \ge 3$ and $G$ is connected and show why our argument fails when $k=2$. Finally, we give conditions on graphs $G$ and $H$ that imply $F(G \Box H) \ge F(G) F(H)$.