arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Valeria Leoni

6 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
Released packing functions in graphs
We introduce and start the study of a variant of packing functions in graphs. Given a graph $G$ with vertex set $V$ and nonnegative integer vectors $\mathbf{k}=(k_v)_{v\in V}$, $\boldsymbol\ell=(l_v)_{v\in V}$ and $\mathbf{u}=(u_v)_{v\in V}$, a function $f : V \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}_0^+$ is a Released $( \mathbf{k}, \boldsymbol\ell, \mathbf{u})$-packing function of $G$ if $l_v\leq f(v)\leq u_v$ for every $v\in V$ and the sum of the values of $f$ over the closed neighborhood of vertices $v$ with $f(v) = u_v$ is at most $k_v$. The weight of $f$ is the value $f(V) = \sum_{v\in V} f(v)$. We study the associated decision problem (RPP), which asks, given $G$, $\mathbf{k}$, $\boldsymbol\ell$, $\mathbf{u}$ and an integer number $x$, whether $G$ admits a Released $( \mathbf{k}, \boldsymbol\ell, \mathbf{u})$-packing function of weight at least $x$. We relate RPP to the $r$-dependent set problem, derive several NP-hardness results, model RPP as a compact (polynomial in size) Integer Linear Program, and take the first steps of a polyhedral study.
2026-08-06
On $\{2\}$-Roman graph recognition of Partner Limited graphs
Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, $f : V \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2\}$ is a \emph{Roman $\{2\}$-dominating function} of $G$ if for every vertex $v\in V$ with $f(v) =0$, either there exists a vertex $u$ adjacent to $v$ with $f(u) = 2$, or two distinct vertices $x,\; y$ both adjacent to $v$ with $f(x)=f(y)=1$ (Chellali et al. 2016). Every graph $G$ satisfies $γ_{\{R2\}}(G) \leq 2γ(G)$, where $γ_{\{R2\}}(G)$ denotes the minimum weight of a $\{2\}$-Roman dominating function of $G$ and $γ(G)$ is the domination number of $G$. \emph{$\{2\}$-Roman graphs} are those for which the equality is reached (Klostermeyer et al. 2019). A characterization of $\{2\}$-Roman trees was given by Henning et al. in 2017. In 2025, Ferrari et al. characterized the $\{2\}$-Roman property by the existence of a minimum $\{2\}$-Roman dominating function of $G$ that assumes only $0, 2$-values. Afterwards in 2025, Bešter Štorgel et al. introduced the problem of recognizing $\{2\}$-Roman graphs, proved polinomiality for middle graphs, and characterized \hbox{$\{2\}$-Roman} split graphs that can be decomposed with respect to the split join operation into two smaller split graphs. Recognition complexity is still open for general graphs. In this paper we study the \hbox{$\{2\}$-Roman} property on graphs that can be decomposed into two smaller graphs with respect to the join and union operations, allowing to completely characterize the $\{2\}$-Roman property. The 4-path is the non trivial connected non $\{2\}$-Roman graph with the fewest number of vertices and edges. We classify the $\{2\}$-Roman property within specific families of non decomposable graphs with a limited number of 4-paths which are present in the decomposition of partner limited graphs; these are well-labelled spiders, the graphs in ZOO and some special split graphs.
2025-11-21 v2
Roman $\{2\}$-domination on Graphs with "few" 4-paths
Given a graph $G$ with vertex set $V$, $f : V \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2\}$ is a \emph{Roman $\{2\}$-dominating function} (or \emph{italian dominating function}) of $G$ if for every vertex $v\in V$ with $f(v) =0$, either there exists a vertex $u$ adjacent to $v$ with $f(u) = 2$, or two distinct vertices $x,\; y$ both adjacent to $v$ with $f(x)=f(y)=1$. The decision problem associated with Roman $\{2\}$-domination is NP-complete even for bipartite graphs (Chellali et al., 2016). In this work we initiate the study of Roman $\{2\}$-domination on graph classes with a limited number of 4-paths. We base our study on a modular decomposition analysis. In particular, we study Roman $\{2\}$-domination under some operations in graphs such as join, union, complementation, addition of pendant vertices and addition of twin vertices. We then obtain the Roman $\{2\}$-domination number of spiders, well-labelled spiders and certain prime split graphs that are crucial in the modular decomposition of partner-limited graphs. In all, we provide linear-time algorithms to compute the Roman $\{2\}$-domination number of cographs, $P_4$-sparse graphs, $P_4$-tidy graphs and partner-limited graphs. Finally, we derive the NP-completeness of Roman $\{2\}$-domination on $P_4$-laden graphs.
On $\{k\}$-Roman graphs: complexity of recognition and the case of split graphs
For a positive integer $k$, a $\{k\}$-Roman dominating function of a graph $G = (V,E)$ is a function $f\colon V \rightarrow \{0,1,\ldots,k\}$ satisfying $f (N(v)) \geq k$ for each vertex $v\in V$ with $f (v) = 0$. Every graph $G$ satisfies $γ_{\{Rk\}}(G) \leq kγ(G)$, where $γ_{\{Rk\}}(G)$ denotes the minimum weight of a $\{k\}$-Roman dominating function of $G$ and $γ(G)$ is the domination number of $G$. In this work we study graphs for which the equality is reached, called \emph{$\{k\}$-Roman graphs}. This extends the concept of $\{k\}$-Roman trees studied by Wang et al. in 2021 to general graphs. We prove that for every $k\geq 3$, the problem of recognizing $\{k\}$-Roman graphs is NP-hard, even when restricted to split graphs. We provide partial answers to the question of which split graphs are $\{2\}$-Roman: we characterize $\{2\}$-Roman split graphs that can be decomposed with respect to the split join operation into two smaller split graphs and classify the $\{k\}$-Roman property within two specific families of split graphs that are prime with respect to the split join operation: suns and their complements.
Efficient algorithms for tuple domination on co-biconvex graphs and web graphs
A vertex in a graph dominates itself and each of its adjacent vertices. The \emph{$k$-tuple domination problem}, for a fixed positive integer $k$, is to find a minimum sized vertex subset in a given graph such that every vertex is dominated by at least $k$ vertices of this set. From the computational point of view, this problem is NP-hard. It follows from previous works by Bui-Xuan et al.~(2013) and by Belmonte et al.~(2013) -- in the context of locally checkable vertex subset problems in graph classes with quickly computable and bounded min-width -- that the $k$-tuple domination problem is solvable in time $\mathcal{O}(|V(G)|^{6k+4})$ in the class of circular-arc graphs. In this work, we develop faster algorithms for $k$-tuple domination in co-biconvex graphs and in web graphs, which are incomparable subclasses of concave-round graphs and thus of circular-arc graphs. On the one hand, we present an $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$-time algorithm for solving it for each $2\leq k\leq |U|+3$, where $U$ is the set of universal vertices and $n$ the total number of vertices of the input co-biconvex graph. On the other hand, the study of this problem on web graphs was already started by Argiroffo et al. (2010) from a polyhedral point of view only for the cases $k=2$ and $k=d(G)$, where $d(G)$ equals the degree of each vertex of the input web graph $G$. We complete this study for web graphs from an algorithmic point of view, by designing a linear-time algorithm based on the modular arithmetic for integer numbers. The algorithms presented in this work are mutually independent but both exploit the circular properties of the augmented adjacency matrices of each studied graph class.
Tuple domination on graphs with the consecutive-zeros property
The $k$-tuple domination problem, for a fixed positive integer $k$, is to find a minimum sized vertex subset such that every vertex in the graph is dominated by at least $k$ vertices in this set. The $k$-tuple domination is NP-hard even for chordal graphs. For the class of circular-arc graphs, its complexity remains open for $k\geq 2$. A $0,1$-matrix has the consecutive 0's property (C0P) for columns if there is a permutation of its rows that places the 0's consecutively in every column. Due to A. Tucker, graphs whose augmented adjancency matrix has the C0P for columns are circular-arc. In this work we study the $k$-tuple domination problem on graphs $G$ whose augmented adjacency matrix has the C0P for columns, for $ 2\leq k\leq |U|+3$, where $U$ is the set of universal vertices of $G$. From an algorithmic point of view, this takes linear time.