arXiv++ Combinatorics

The seminal Erdős--Ko--Rado (EKR) theorem states that if $\mathcal{F}$ is a family of $k$-subsets of an $n$-element set $X$ for $k\leq n/2$ such that every pair of subsets in $\mathcal{F}$ has a nonempty intersection, then $\mathcal{F}$ can be no bigger than the trivially intersecting family obtained by including all $k$-subsets of $X$ that contain a fixed element $x\in X$. This family is called the star centered at $x$. In this paper, we formulate and prove an EKR theorem for intersecting families of subgraphs of the perfect matching graph, the graph consisting of $n$ disjoint edges. This can be considered a generalization not only of the aforementioned EKR theorem but also of a signed variant of it, first stated by Meyer (1974), and proved separately by Deza--Frankl (1983) and Bollobás--Leader (1997). The proof of our main theorem relies on a novel extension of Katona's beautiful cycle method.

A family of sets is intersecting if any two sets in the family intersect. Given a graph $G$ and an integer $r\geq 1$, let $\mathcal{I}^{(r)}(G)$ denote the family of independent sets of size $r$ of $G$. For a vertex $v$ of $G$, the family of independent sets of size $r$ that contain $v$ is called an $r$-star. Then $G$ is said to be $r$-EKR if no intersecting subfamily of $ \mathcal{I}^{(r)}(G)$ is bigger than the largest $r$-star. Let $n$ be a positive integer, and let $G$ consist of the disjoint union of $n$ paths each of length 2. We prove that if $1 \leq r \leq n/2$, then $G$ is $r$-EKR. This affirms a longstanding conjecture of Holroyd and Talbot for this class of graphs and can be seen as an analogue of a well-known theorem on signed sets, proved using different methods, by Deza and Frankl and by Bollobás and Leader. Our main approach is a novel probabilistic extension of Katona's elegant cycle method, which might be of independent interest.

Let ${\mathscr L}=(X,\preceq)$ be a lattice. For ${\cal P}\subseteq X$ we say that ${\cal P}$ is $t$-{\it intersecting} if ${\sf rank}(x\wedge y)\ge t$ for all $x,y\in{\cal P}$. The seminal theorem of Erdős, Ko and Rado describes the maximum intersecting ${\cal P}$ in the lattice of subsets of a finite set with the additional condition that ${\cal P}$ is contained within a level of the lattice. The Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem has been extensively studied and generalized to other objects and lattices. In this paper, we focus on intersecting families of permutations as defined with respect to the weak Bruhat lattice. In this setting, we prove analogs of certain extremal results on intersecting set systems. In particular we give a characterization of the maximum intersecting families of permutations in the Bruhat lattice. We also characterize the maximum intersecting families of permutations within the $r^{\textrm{th}}$ level of the Bruhat lattice of permutations of size $n$, provided that $n$ is large relative to $r$.

A starting point in the investigation of intersecting systems of subsets of a finite set is the elementary observation that the size of a family of pairwise intersecting subsets of a finite set [n]={1,...,n}, denoted by 2^{[n]}, is at most 2^{n-1}, with one of the extremal structures being the family comprised of all subsets of [n] containing a fixed element, called as a star. A longstanding conjecture of Chvátal aims to generalize this simple observation for all downsets of 2^{[n]}. In this note, we prove this conjecture for all downsets where every subset contains at most 3 elements.

A family of sets is intersecting if every pair of its sets intersect. A star is a family with some element (a center) in each of its sets. The classical 1961 result of Erdős, Ko, and Rado states that every intersecting family of r-sets with $r\leq n/2$ has size at most that of a star. We say that graph G is r-EKR if, among all intersecting families of independent r-sets of G, the largest is attained by a star. In 2005 Holroyd and Talbot conjectured that every graph G is r-EKR for all $1\leq r\leq μ(G)/2$, where $μ(G)$ is the size of the smallest maximal independent set in G. We verified the conjecture in 2011 for all chordal graphs containing an isolated vertex. For graphs without isolated vertices it is difficult to determine the center of the largest star, which is often necessary to prove that they are EKR. A tree has the leaf property if its largest star occurs on one of its leaves. We proved that every tree T has the leaf property when $r\leq 4$, and in 2017 Borg and other authors gave examples of families of trees not having the leaf property when $r\geq 5$. A split vertex in a tree is a vertex of degree at least 3. A spider is a tree with exactly one split vertex. Here we prove that all spiders have the leaf property for all $r\leq α(G)$, where $α(G)$ is the independence number of $G$, and we characterize which of its leaves are maximum star centers. A pendant tree is one for which each of its split vertices is adjacent to a leaf. Here we show that all pendant trees have the leaf property for all $r\leq α(G)$. We also consider pendant trees with exactly two split vertices and provide partial results on the locations of their maximum star centers.

A set system F is intersecting if any pair of sets in F have a nonempty intersection. A fundamental theorem of Erdős, Ko and Rado states that if F is an intersecting family of r-subsets of [n]={1,...,n}, and n>= 2r, then the cardinality of F is at most the cardinality of the family of all r-subsets of [n] containing a fixed element. Furthermore, when n>2r, equality holds if and only if F is the family of all r-subsets of [n] containing a fixed element. This characterization was proved as part of a stronger result by Hilton and Milner. In this note, we provide new injective proofs of the Erdős--Ko--Rado and the Hilton--Milner theorems.

We consider the following generalization of the seminal Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem, due to Frankl. For k>= 2, let F be a k-wise intersecting family of r-subsets of an n element set X, i.e. any k sets in F have a nonempty intersection. If r<= (k-1/k)n, then |F|<={n-1 \choose r-1}. We extend Frankl's theorem in a graph-theoretic direction. For a graph G, and r>=1, let P^r(G) be the family of all r-subsets of the vertex set of G such that every r-subset is either an independent set or contains a maximum independent set. We will consider k-wise intersecting subfamilies of this family for the graph M_n, where M_n is the perfect matching on 2n vertices, and prove an analog of Frankl's theorem. This result can also be considered as an extension of a theorem of Bollobás and Leader for intersecting families of independent vertex sets in M_n.

We consider the following higher-order analog of the Erdős--Ko--Rado theorem. For positive integers r and n with r<= n, let M^r_n be the family of all matchings of size r in the complete graph K_{2n}. For any edge e in E(K_{2n}), the family M^r_n(e), which consists of all sets in M^r_n containing e, is called the star centered at e. We prove that if r<n and A is an intersecting family of matchings in M^r_n, then |A|<=|M^r_n(e)|$, where e is an edge in E(K_{2n}). We also prove that equality holds if and only if A is a star. The main technique we use to prove the theorem is an analog of Katona's elegant cycle method.

Let A_1,...,A_k be a collection of families of subsets of an n-element set. We say that this collection is cross-intersecting if for any i,j in [k] with i not equal to j, A in A_i and B in A_j implies that the intersection of A and B is nonempty. We consider a theorem of Hilton which gives a best possible upper bound on the sum of the cardinalities of uniform cross-intersecting subfamilies. We formulate a graph-theoretic analogue of Hilton's cross-intersection theorem, similar to the one developed by Holroyd, Spencer and Talbot for the Erdos-Ko-Rado theorem. In particular we build on a result of Borg and Leader for signed sets and prove a theorem for uniform cross-intersecting subfamilies of independent vertex subsets of a disjoint union of complete graphs. We proceed to obtain a result for a much larger class of graphs, namely chordal graphs and propose a conjecture for all graphs. We end by proving this conjecture for the cycle on n vertices.

We consider the following generalization of the seminal Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem, due to Frankl. For some k>=2, let F be a k-wise intersecting family of r-subsets of an n element set X, i.e. for any k sets F1,...,Fk in F, their intersection is nonempty. If r <= ((k-1)n)/k, then |F|<= {n-1 \choose r-1}. We prove a stability version of this theorem, analogous to similar results of Dinur-Friedgut, Keevash-Mubayi and others for the Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem. The technique we use is a generalization of Katona's circle method, initially employed by Keevash, which uses expansion properties of a particular Cayley graph of the symmetric group.

One of the more recent generalizations of the Erdös-Ko-Rado theorem, formulated by Holroyd, Spencer and Talbot, defines the Erdös-Ko-Rado property for graphs in the following manner: for a graph G and a positive integer r, G is said to be r-EKR if no intersecting subfamily of the family of all independent vertex sets of size r is larger than the largest star, where a star centered at a vertex v is the family of all independent sets of size $r$ containing v. In this paper, we prove that if G is a disjoint union of chordal graphs, including at least one singleton, then G is r-EKR if $r\leq mu(G)/2$, where mu(G) is the minimum size of a maximal independent set. We will also prove Erdös-Ko-Rado results for chains of complete graphs, which are a class of chordal graphs obtained by blowing up edges of a path into complete graphs. We also consider similar problems for ladder graphs and trees, and prove preliminary results for these graphs.

Suppose 2n voters vote sequentially for one of two candidates. For how many such sequences does one candidate have strictly more votes than the other at each stage of the voting? The answer is \binom{2n}{n} and, while easy enough to prove using generating functions, for example, only two combinatorial proofs exist, due to Kleitman and Gessel. In this paper we present two new (far simpler) bijective proofs.