Papers by Warren D. Smith
6 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Better-than-average uniform random variables and Eulerian numbers, or: How many candidates should a voter approve?
Consider $n$ independent random numbers with a uniform distribution on $[0,1]$. The number of them that exceed their mean is shown to have an Eulerian distribution, i.e., it is described by the Eulerian numbers. This is related to, but distinct from, the well known fact that the integer part of the sum of independent random numbers uniform on $[0,1]$ has an Eulerian distribution. One motivation for this problem comes from voting theory.
Probabilistic lower bounds on maximal determinants of binary matrices
Published in Australasian Journal of Combinatorics 66 (2016), 350-364
• Search Publication
Let ${\mathcal D}(n)$ be the maximal determinant for $n \times n$ $\{\pm 1\}$-matrices, and $\mathcal R(n) = {\mathcal D}(n)/n^{n/2}$ be the ratio of ${\mathcal D}(n)$ to the Hadamard upper bound. Using the probabilistic method, we prove new lower bounds on ${\mathcal D}(n)$ and $\mathcal R(n)$ in terms of $d = n-h$, where $h$ is the order of a Hadamard matrix and $h$ is maximal subject to $h \le n$. For example, $\mathcal R(n) > (πe/2)^{-d/2}$ if $1 \le d \le 3$, and $\mathcal R(n) > (πe/2)^{-d/2}(1 - d^2(π/(2h))^{1/2})$ if $d > 3$. By a recent result of Livinskyi, $d^2/h^{1/2} \to 0$ as $n \to \infty$, so the second bound is close to $(πe/2)^{-d/2}$ for large $n$. Previous lower bounds tended to zero as $n \to \infty$ with $d$ fixed, except in the cases $d \in \{0,1\}$. For $d \ge 2$, our bounds are better for all sufficiently large $n$. If the Hadamard conjecture is true, then $d \le 3$, so the first bound above shows that $\mathcal R(n)$ is bounded below by a positive constant $(πe/2)^{-3/2} > 0.1133$.
Lower bounds on maximal determinants of binary matrices via the probabilistic method
Let $D(n)$ be the maximal determinant for $n \times n$ $\{\pm 1\}$-matrices, and ${\mathcal R}(n) = D(n)/n^{n/2}$ be the ratio of $D(n)$ to the Hadamard upper bound. We give several new lower bounds on ${\mathcal R}(n)$ in terms of $d$, where $n = h+d$, $h$ is the order of a Hadamard matrix, and $h$ is maximal subject to $h \le n$. A relatively simple bound is \[{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{πe}\right)^{d/2}
\left(1 - d^2\left(\fracπ{2h}\right)^{1/2}\right)
\;\text{ for all }\; n \ge 1.\] An asymptotically sharper bound is \[{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{πe}\right)^{d/2}
\exp\left(d\left(\fracπ{2h}\right)^{1/2} +
\; O\left(\frac{d^{5/3}}{h^{2/3}}\right)\right).\] We also show that \[{\mathcal R}(n) \ge \left(\frac{2}{πe}\right)^{d/2}\] if $n \ge n_0$ and $n_0$ is sufficiently large, the threshold $n_0$ being independent of $d$, or for all $n\ge 1$ if $0 \le d \le 3$ (which would follow from the Hadamard conjecture). The proofs depend on the probabilistic method, and generalise previous results that were restricted to the cases $d=0$ and $d=1$.
Bounds on determinants of perturbed diagonal matrices
Published in Linear Algebra and its Applications 466 (2015), 21-26
• View Publication
• BIB
We give upper and lower bounds on the determinant of a perturbation of the identity matrix or, more generally, a perturbation of a nonsingular diagonal matrix. The matrices considered are, in general, diagonally dominant. The lower bounds are best possible, and in several cases they are stronger than well-known bounds due to Ostrowski and other authors. If $A = I-E$ is an $n \times n$ matrix and the elements of $E$ are bounded in absolute value by $\varepsilon \le 1/n$, then a lower bound of Ostrowski (1938) is $\det(A) \ge 1-n\varepsilon$. We show that if, in addition, the diagonal elements of $E$ are zero, then a best-possible lower bound is \[\det(A) \ge (1-(n-1)\varepsilon)\,(1+\varepsilon)^{n-1}.\] Corresponding upper bounds are respectively \[\det(A) \le (1 + 2\varepsilon + n\varepsilon^2)^{n/2}\] and \[\det(A) \le (1 + (n-1)\varepsilon^2)^{n/2}.\] The first upper bound is stronger than Ostrowski's bound (for $\varepsilon < 1/n$) $\det(A) \le (1 - n\varepsilon)^{-1}$. The second upper bound generalises Hadamard's inequality, which is the case $\varepsilon = 1$.
A necessary and sufficient condition for our upper bounds to be best possible for matrices of order $n$ and all positive $\varepsilon$ is the existence of a skew-Hadamard matrix of order $n$.
Lower bounds on maximal determinants of +-1 matrices via the probabilistic method
We show that the maximal determinant D(n) for $n \times n$ ${\pm 1}$-matrices satisfies $R(n) := D(n)/n^{n/2} \ge κ_d > 0$. Here $n^{n/2}$ is the Hadamard upper bound, and $κ_d$ depends only on $d := n-h$, where $h$ is the maximal order of a Hadamard matrix with $h \le n$. Previous lower bounds on R(n) depend on both $d$ and $n$. Our bounds are improvements, for all sufficiently large $n$, if $d > 1$.
We give various lower bounds on R(n) that depend only on $d$. For example, $R(n) \ge 0.07 (0.352)^d > 3^{-(d+3)}$. For any fixed $d \ge 0$ we have $R(n) \ge (2/(πe))^{d/2}$ for all sufficiently large $n$ (and conjecturally for all positive $n$). If the Hadamard conjecture is true, then $d \le 3$ and $κ_d \ge (2/(πe))^{d/2} > 1/9$.
New lower bounds for the maximal determinant problem
We report new world records for the maximal determinant of an n-by-n matrix with entries +/-1. Using various techniques, we beat existing records for n=22, 23, 27, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 39, 45, 47, 53, 63, 69, 73, 77, 79, 93, and 95, and we present the record-breaking matrices here. We conjecture that our n=22 value attains the globally maximizing determinant in its dimension. We also tabulate new records for n=67, 75, 83, 87, 91 and 99, dimensions for which no previous claims have been made. The relevant matrices in all these dimensions, along with other pertinent information, are posted at http://www.indiana.edu/~maxdet \.