arXiv++ Combinatorics

Bang (1976) proved the inequality for matrix permanents $\mathrm{per}^2(A) \geq 2^{-2n}\mathrm{per}(A \otimes J_2)$, where $J_2$ is the $2 \times 2$ all-ones matrix and $A$ is any $n \times n$ matrix with non-negative entries. We show that, if $A$ is any $n \times n$ real-valued matrix with rank at most two (possibly having negative entries), this inequality can be sharpened, replacing the constant $2^{-2n}$ by $1 / \binom{2n}{n} = (n!)^2 / (2n)! > 2^{-2n}$. We then show that this sharpened inequality also implies new inequalities for finite free convolutions of polynomials: if $p$ and $q$ are monic real-rooted polynomials of degree $n$, then $(p \boxplus_n q)(x)^2 \geq (p^2 \boxplus_{2n} q^2)(x)$ and $(p \boxtimes_n q)(x)^2 \geq (p^2 \boxtimes_{2n} q^2)(x)$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$, for $\boxplus_n$ and $\boxtimes_n$ the finite free additive and multiplicative convolution operations, respectively, on polynomials of degree $n$.

In this work, we present the first analysis of low degree polynomial threshold functions for the natural hypothesis testing problem of detecting the noisy random lift of a base $d$-regular graph from a uniformly random $d$-regular graph. Along the way, we obtain a new result for the distribution of short cycle counts in noisy random lift up to logarithmic lengths, which generalizes results by McKay, Wormald, and Wysocka and by Johnson in the case of random regular graphs, and the result by Fortin and Rudinsky in the case of random lift.

We study the problem of detecting or recovering a planted ranked subgraph from a directed graph, an analog for directed graphs of the well-studied planted dense subgraph model. We suppose that, among a set of $n$ items, there is a subset $S$ of $k$ items having a latent ranking in the form of a permutation $π$ of $S$, and that we observe a fraction $p$ of pairwise orderings between elements of $\{1, \dots, n\}$ which agree with $π$ with probability $\frac{1}{2} + q$ between elements of $S$ and otherwise are uniformly random. Unlike in the planted dense subgraph and planted clique problems where the community $S$ is distinguished by its unusual density of edges, here the community is only distinguished by the unusual consistency of its pairwise orderings. We establish computational and statistical thresholds for both detecting and recovering such a ranked community. In the log-density setting where $k$, $p$, and $q$ all scale as powers of $n$, we establish the exact thresholds in the associated exponents at which detection and recovery become statistically and computationally feasible. These regimes include a rich variety of behaviors, exhibiting both statistical-computational and detection-recovery gaps. We also give finer-grained results for two extreme cases: (1) $p = 1$, $k = n$, and $q$ small, where a full tournament is observed that is weakly correlated with a global ranking, and (2) $p = 1$, $q = \frac{1}{2}$, and $k$ small, where a small "ordered clique" (totally ordered directed subgraph) is planted in a random tournament.

We consider the problem of inferring an unknown ranking of $n$ items from a random tournament on $n$ vertices whose edge directions are correlated with the ranking. We establish, in terms of the strength of these correlations, the computational and statistical thresholds for detection (deciding whether an observed tournament is purely random or drawn correlated with a hidden ranking) and recovery (estimating the hidden ranking with small error in Spearman's footrule or Kendall's tau metric on permutations). Notably, we find that this problem provides a new instance of a detection-recovery gap: solving the detection problem requires much weaker correlations than solving the recovery problem. In establishing these thresholds, we also identify simple algorithms for detection (thresholding a degree 2 polynomial) and recovery (outputting a ranking by the number of "wins" of a tournament vertex, i.e., the out-degree) that achieve optimal performance up to constants in the correlation strength. For detection, we find that the above low-degree polynomial algorithm is superior to a natural spectral algorithm. We also find that, whenever it is possible to achieve strong recovery (i.e., to estimate with vanishing error in the above metrics) of the hidden ranking, then the above "Ranking By Wins" algorithm not only does so, but also outputs a close approximation of the maximum likelihood estimator, a task that is NP-hard in the worst case.

We introduce a new conjecture on the computational hardness of detecting random lifts of graphs: we claim that there is no polynomial-time algorithm that can distinguish between a large random $d$-regular graph and a large random lift of a Ramanujan $d$-regular base graph (provided that the lift is corrupted by a small amount of extra noise), and likewise for bipartite random graphs and lifts of bipartite Ramanujan graphs. We give evidence for this conjecture by proving lower bounds against the local statistics hierarchy of hypothesis testing semidefinite programs. We then explore the consequences of this conjecture for the hardness of certifying bounds on numerous functions of random regular graphs, expanding on a direction initiated by Bandeira, Banks, Kunisky, Moore, and Wein (2021). Conditional on this conjecture, we show that no polynomial-time algorithm can certify tight bounds on the maximum cut of random 3- or 4-regular graphs, the maximum independent set of random 3- or 4-regular graphs, or the chromatic number of random 7-regular graphs. We show similar gaps asymptotically for large degree for the maximum independent set and for any degree for the minimum dominating set, finding that naive spectral and combinatorial bounds are optimal among all polynomial-time certificates. Likewise, for small-set vertex and edge expansion in the limit of very small sets, we show that the spectral bounds of Kahale (1995) are optimal among all polynomial-time certificates.