arXiv++ Combinatorics

A path in an edge-colored graph is said to be a rainbow path if no two edges on the path have the same color. An edge-colored graph is (strongly) rainbow connected if there exists a rainbow (geodesic) path between every pair of vertices. The (strong) rainbow connection number of $G$, denoted by ($scr(G)$, respectively) $rc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ (strongly) rainbow connected. Though for a general graph $G$ it is NP-Complete to decide whether $rc(G)=2$, in this paper, we show that the problem becomes easy when $G$ is a bipartite graph. Moreover, it is known that deciding whether a given edge-colored (with an unbound number of colors) graph is rainbow connected is NP-Complete. We will prove that it is still NP-Complete even when the edge-colored graph is bipartite. We also show that a few NP-hard problems on rainbow connection are indeed NP-Complete.

For a connected graph $G$, the \emph{rainbow connection number $rc(G)$} of a graph $G$ was introduced by Chartrand et al. In "Chakraborty et al., Hardness and algorithms for rainbow connection, J. Combin. Optim. 21(2011), 330--347", Chakraborty et al. proved that for a graph $G$ with diameter 2, to determine $rc(G)$ is NP-Complete, and they left 4 open questions at the end, the last one of which is the following: Suppose that we are given a graph $G$ for which we are told that $rc(G)=2$. Can we rainbow-color it in polynomial time with $o(n)$ colors ? In this paper, we settle down this question by showing a stronger result that for any graph $G$ with $rc(G)=2$, we can rainbow-color $G$ in polynomial time by at most 5 colors.

A path in an edge-colored graph $G$, where adjacent edges may have the same color, is called rainbow if no two edges of the path are colored the same. The rainbow connection number $rc(G)$ of $G$ is the smallest integer $k$ for which there exists a $k$-edge-coloring of $G$ such that every pair of distinct vertices of $G$ is connected by a rainbow path. It is known that for every integer $k\geq 2$ deciding if a graph $G$ has $rc(G)\leq k$ is NP-Hard, and a graph $G$ with $rc(G)\leq k$ has diameter $diam(G)\leq k$. In foregoing papers, we showed that a bridgeless graph with diameter 2 has rainbow connection number at most 5. In this paper, we prove that a bridgeless graph with diameter 3 has rainbow connection number at most 9. We also prove that for any bridgeless graph $G$ with radius $r$, if every edge of $G$ is contained in a triangle, then $rc(G)\leq 3r$. As an application, we get that for any graph $G$ with minimum degree at least 3, $rc(L(G))\leq 3 rad(L(G))\leq 3 (rad(G)+1)$.

In 1978, Chvátal and Thomassen showed that every bridgeless graph with diameter 2 has an orientation with diameter at most 6. They also gave general bounds on the smallest value $f(d)$ such that every bridgeless graph $G$ with diameter $d$ has an orientation with diameter at most $f(d)$. For $d=3$, they proved that $8\leq f(d)\leq 24$. Until recently, Kwok, Liu and West improved the above bounds by proving $9\leq f(3)\leq 11$ in [P.K. Kwok, Q. Liu and D.B. West, Oriented diameter of graphs with diameter 3, J. Combin. Theory Ser.B 100(2010), 265-274]. In this paper, we determine the oriented diameter among the bridgeless graphs with diameter 3 that have minimum number of edges.

The concept of generalized $k$-connectivity $κ_{k}(G)$ of a graph $G$ was introduced by Chartrand et al. in recent years. In our early paper, extremal theory for this graph parameter was started. We determined the minimal number of edges of a graph of order $n$ with $κ_{3}= 2$, i.e., for a graph $G$ of order $n$ and size $e(G)$ with $κ_{3}(G)= 2$, we proved that $e(G)\geq (6/5)n$, and the lower bound is sharp by constructing a class of graphs, only for $n\equiv 0 \ (mod \ 5)$ and $n\neq 10$. In this paper, we improve the lower bound to $\lceil(6/5)n\rceil$. Moreover, we show that for all $n\geq 4$ but $n= 9, 10$, there always exists a graph of order $n$ with $κ_{3}= 2$ whose size attains the lower bound $\lceil(6/5)n\rceil$. Whereas for $n= 9, 10$ we give examples to show that $\lceil(6/5)n\rceil+1$ is the best possible lower bound. This gives a clear picture on the minimal size of a graph of order $n$ with generalized connectivity $κ_{3}= 2$.

Let $G$ be a connected graph. The \emph{rainbow connection number $rc(G)$} of a graph $G$ was recently introduced by Chartrand et al. Li et al. proved that for every bridgeless graph $G$ with diameter 2, $rc(G)\leq 5$. They gave examples for which $rc(G)\leq 4$. However, they could not show that the upper bound 5 is sharp. It is known that for a graph $G$ with diameter 2, to determine $rc(G)$ is NP-hard. So, it is interesting to know the best upper bound of $rc(G)$ for such a graph $G$. In this paper, we use different way to obtain the same upper bound, and moreover, examples are given to show that the upper is best possible.

A path in an edge (vertex)-colored graph $G$, where adjacent edges (vertices) may have the same color, is called a rainbow path if no pair of edges (internal vertices) of the path are colored the same. The rainbow (vertex) connection number $rc(G)$ ($rvc(G)$) of $G$ is the minimum integer $i$ for which there exists an $i$-edge (vertex)-coloring of $G$ such that every two distinct vertices of $G$ are connected by a rainbow path. Denote by $\mathcal{G}_d(n)$ ($\mathcal{G'}_d(n)$) the set of all graphs of order $n$ with rainbow (vertex) connection number $d$, and define $e_d(n)=\min\{e(G)\,|\, G\in \mathcal{G}_d(n)\}$ ($e_d'(n)=\min\{e(G)\,|\, G\in \mathcal{G'}_d(n)\}$), where $e(G)$ denotes the number of edges in $G$. In this paper, we investigate the bounds of $e_2(n)$ and get the exact asymptotic value. i.e., $\displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{e_2(n)}{n\log_2 n}=1$. Meanwhile, we obtain $e'_d(n)=n-1$ for $d\geq 2$, and the equality holds if and only if $G$ is such a graph such that deleting all leaves of $G$ results in a tree of order $d$.

An edge-colored graph $G$, where adjacent edges may be colored the same, is rainbow connected if any two vertices of $G$ are connected by a path whose edges have distinct colors. The rainbow connection number $rc(G)$ of a connected graph $G$ is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow connected. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound that $rc(G)\leq\lceil\frac{n}{2}\rceil$ for any 2-connected graph $G$ of order $n$, which improves the results of Caro et al. to best possible.

Let $G$ be a connected graph. The notion \emph{the rainbow connection number $rc(G)$} of a graph $G$ was introduced recently by Chartrand et al. Basavaraju et al. showed that for every bridgeless graph $G$ with radius $r$, $rc(G)\leq r(r+2)$, and the bound is tight. In this paper, we prove that if $G$ is a connected graph, and $D^{k}$ is a connected $k$-step dominating set of $G$, then $G$ has a connected $(k-1)$-step dominating set $D^{k-1}\supset D^{k}$ such that $rc(G[D^{k-1}])\leq rc(G[D^{k}])+\max\{2k+1,b_k\}$, where $b_k$ is the number of bridges in $ E(D^{k}, N(D^{k}))$. Furthermore, for a connected graph $G$ with radius $r$, let $u$ be the center of $G$, and $D^{r}=\{u\}$. Then $G$ has $r-1$ connected dominating sets $ D^{r-1}, D^{r-2},..., D^{1}$ satisfying $D^{r}\subset D^{r-1}\subset D^{r-2} ...\subset D^{1}\subset D^{0}=V(G)$, and $rc(G)\leq \sum_{i=1}^{r}\max\{2i+1,b_i\}$, where $b_i$ is the number of bridges in $ E(D^{i}, N(D^{i})), 1\leq i \leq r$. From the result, we can get that if for all $1\leq i\leq r, b_i\leq 2i+1$, then $rc(G)\leq \sum_{i=1}^{r}(2i+1)= r(r+2)$; if for all $1\leq i\leq r, b_i> 2i+1$, then $rc(G)= \sum_{i=1}^{r}b_i$, the number of bridges of $G$. This generalizes the result of Basavaraju et al.

The revised Szeged index $Sz^*(G)$ is defined as $Sz^*(G)=\sum_{e=uv \in E}(n_u(e)+ n_0(e)/2)(n_v(e)+ n_0(e)/2),$ where $n_u(e)$ and $n_v(e)$ are, respectively, the number of vertices of $G$ lying closer to vertex $u$ than to vertex $v$ and the number of vertices of $G$ lying closer to vertex $v$ than to vertex $u$, and $n_0(e)$ is the number of vertices equidistant to $u$ and $v$. Hansen used the AutoGraphiX and made the following conjecture about the revised Szeged index for a connected bicyclic graph $G$ of order $n \geq 6$: $$ Sz^*(G)\leq \{{array}{ll} (n^3+n^2-n-1)/4,& {if $n$ is odd}, (n^3+n^2-n)/4, & {if $n$ is even}. {array}. $$ with equality if and only if $G$ is the graph obtained from the cycle $C_{n-1}$ by duplicating a single vertex. This paper is to give a confirmative proof to this conjecture.

The generalized connectivity of a graph, which was introduced recently by Chartrand et al., is a generalization of the concept of vertex connectivity. Let $S$ be a nonempty set of vertices of $G$, a collection $\{T_1,T_2,...,T_r\}$ of trees in $G$ is said to be internally disjoint trees connecting $S$ if $E(T_i)\cap E(T_j)=\emptyset$ and $V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S$ for any pair of distinct integers $i,j$, where $1\leq i,j\leq r$. For an integer $k$ with $2\leq k\leq n$, the $k$-connectivity $κ_k(G)$ of $G$ is the greatest positive integer $r$ for which $G$ contains at least $r$ internally disjoint trees connecting $S$ for any set $S$ of $k$ vertices of $G$. Obviously, $κ_2(G)=κ(G)$ is the connectivity of $G$. Sabidussi showed that $κ(G\Box H) \geq κ(G)+κ(H)$ for any two connected graphs $G$ and $H$. In this paper, we first study the 3-connectivity of the Cartesian product of a graph $G$ and a tree $T$, and show that $(i)$ if $κ_3(G)=κ(G)\geq 1$, then $κ_3(G\Box T)\geq κ_3(G)$; $(ii)$ if $1\leq κ_3(G)< κ(G)$, then $κ_3(G\Box T)\geq κ_3(G)+1$. Furthermore, for any two connected graphs $G$ and $H$ with $κ_3(G)\geqκ_3(H)$, if $κ(G)>κ_3(G)$, then $κ_3(G\Box H)\geq κ_3(G)+κ_3(H)$; if $κ(G)=κ_3(G)$, then $κ_3(G\Box H)\geq κ_3(G)+κ_3(H)-1$. Our result could be seen as a generalization of Sabidussi's result. Moreover, all the bounds are sharp.

For a simple graph $G$, the energy $E(G)$ is defined as the sum of the absolute values of all eigenvalues of its adjacent matrix. For $Δ\geq 3$ and $t\geq 3$, denote by $T_a(Δ,t)$ (or simply $T_a$) the tree formed from a path $P_t$ on $t$ vertices by attaching $Δ-1$ $P_2$'s on each end of the path $P_t$, and $T_b(Δ, t)$ (or simply $T_b$) the tree formed from $P_{t+2}$ by attaching $Δ-1$ $P_2$'s on an end of the $P_{t+2}$ and $Δ-2$ $P_2$'s on the vertex next to the end. In [X. Li, X. Yao, J. Zhang and I. Gutman, Maximum energy trees with two maximum degree vertices, J. Math. Chem. 45(2009), 962--973], Li et al. proved that among trees of order $n$ with two vertices of maximum degree $Δ$, the maximal energy tree is either the graph $T_a$ or the graph $T_b$, where $t=n+4-4Δ\geq 3$. However, they could not determine which one of $T_a$ and $T_b$ is the maximal energy tree. This is because the quasi-order method is invalid for comparing their energies. In this paper, we use a new method to determine the maximal energy tree. It turns out that things are more complicated. We prove that the maximal energy tree is $T_b$ for $Δ\geq 7$ and any $t\geq 3$, while the maximal energy tree is $T_a$ for $Δ=3$ and any $t\geq 3$. Moreover, for $Δ=4$, the maximal energy tree is $T_a$ for all $t\geq 3$ but $t=4$, for which $T_b$ is the maximal energy tree. For $Δ=5$, the maximal energy tree is $T_b$ for all $t\geq 3$ but $t$ is odd and $3\leq t\leq 89$, for which $T_a$ is the maximal energy tree. For $Δ=6$, the maximal energy tree is $T_b$ for all $t\geq 3$ but $t=3,5,7$, for which $T_a$ is the maximal energy tree. One can see that for most $Δ$, $T_b$ is the maximal energy tree, $Δ=5$ is a turning point, and $Δ=3$ and 4 are exceptional cases.

A vertex-colored graph $G$ is rainbow vertex-connected if any pair of distinct vertices are connected by a path whose internal vertices have distinct colors. The rainbow vertex-connection number of $G$, denoted by $rvc(G)$, is the minimum number of colors that are needed to make $G$ rainbow vertex-connected. In this paper we give a Nordhaus-Gaddum-type result of the rainbow vertex-connection number. We prove that when $G$ and $\bar{G}$ are both connected, then $2\leq rvc(G)+rvc(\bar{G})\leq n-1$. Examples are given to show that both the upper bound and the lower bound are best possible for all $n\geq 5$.

The rainbow connection number $rc(G)$ and the rainbow vertex-connection number $rvc(G)$ of a graph $G$ were introduced by Chartrand et al. and Krivelevich and Yuster, respectively. Good upper bounds in terms of minimum degree $δ$ were reported by Chandran et al., Krivelevich and Yuster, and Li and Shi. However, if a graph has a small minimum degree $δ$ and a large number of vertices $n$, these upper bounds are very large, linear in $n$. Hence, one may think to look for a good parameter to replace $δ$ and decrease the upper bounds significantly. Such a natural parameter is $σ_k$. In this paper, for the rainbow connection number we prove that if $G$ is a connected graph of order $n$ with $k$ independent vertices, then $rc(G)\leq 3k\frac{n-2}{σ_k+k}+6k-4$. For the rainbow vertex-connection number, we prove that $rvc(G)\leq \frac{(4k+2k^{2})n}{σ_k+k}+5k $ if $σ_k\leq 7k$ and $σ_k\geq 8k$, and $rvc(G)\leq \frac{(\frac{38k}{9}+2k^{2})n}{σ_k+k}+5k$ if $7k<σ_k< 8k$. Examples are given showing that our bounds are much better than the existing ones, i.e., for the examples $δ$ is very small but $σ_k$ is very large, and the bounds are $rc(G)< 9k-3$ and $rvc(G)\leq 9k+2k^{2}$ or $rvc(G)\leq\frac{83k}{9}+2k^{2}$, which imply that both $rc(G)$ and $rvc(G)$ can be upper bounded by constants from our upper bounds, but linear in $n$ from the existing ones.

The concept of rainbow connection was introduced by Chartrand et al. in 2008. It is fairly interesting and recently quite a lot papers have been published about it. In this survey we attempt to bring together most of the results and papers that dealt with it. We begin with an introduction, and then try to organize the work into five categories, including (strong) rainbow connection number, rainbow $k$-connectivity, $k$-rainbow index, rainbow vertex-connection number, algorithms and computational complexity. This survey also contains some conjectures, open problems or questions.

Let $G$ be a nontrivial connected graph of order $n$ and $k$ an integer with $2\leq k\leq n$. For a set $S$ of $k$ vertices of $G$, let $κ(S)$ denote the maximum number $\ell$ of edge-disjoint trees $T_1,T_2,...,T_\ell$ in $G$ such that $V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S$ for every pair $i,j$ of distinct integers with $1\leq i,j\leq \ell$. Chartrand et al. generalized the concept of connectivity as follows: The $k$-$connectivity$, denoted by $κ_k(G)$, of $G$ is defined by $κ_k(G)=$min$\{κ(S)\}$, where the minimum is taken over all $k$-subsets $S$ of $V(G)$. Thus $κ_2(G)=κ(G)$, where $κ(G)$ is the connectivity of $G$. This paper mainly focuses on the minimal number of edges of a graph $G$ with $κ_{3}(G)= 2$. For a graph $G$ of order $v(G)$ and size $e(G)$ with $κ_{3}(G)= 2$, we obtain that $e(G)\geq 6/5v(G)$, and the lower bound is sharp by showing a class of examples attaining the lower bound.

For a graph $G$, we define $σ_2(G)=min \{d(u)+d(v)| u,v\in V(G), uv\not\in E(G)\}$, or simply denoted by $σ_2$. A edge-colored graph is rainbow edge-connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose edges have distinct colors, which was introduced by Chartrand et al. The rainbow connection of a connected graph $G$, denoted by $rc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow edge-connected. We prove that if $G$ is a connected graph of order $n$, then $rc(G)\leq 6\frac{n-2}{σ_2+2}+7$. Moreover, the bound is seen to be tight up to additive factors by a construction mentioned by Caro et al. A vertex-colored graph is rainbow vertex-connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose internal vertices have distinct colors, which was recently introduced by Krivelevich and Yuster. The rainbow vertex-connection of a connected graph $G$, denoted by $rvc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow vertex-connected. We prove that if $G$ is a connected graph of order $n$, then $rvc(G)\leq 8\frac{n-2}{σ_2+2}+10 $ for $2\leq σ_2\leq 6, σ_2\geq 28 $, while for $ 7 \leq σ_2\leq 8, 16\leq σ_2\leq 27$, $ rvc(G)\leq \frac{10n-16}{σ_2+2}+10$, and for $9 \leq σ_2\leq 15, rvc(G)\leq \frac{10n-16}{σ_2+2}+A(σ_2)$ where $ A(σ_2)= 63,41,27,20,16,13,11,$ respectively.

A vertex-colored graph is {\it rainbow vertex-connected} if any two vertices are connected by a path whose internal vertices have distinct colors, which was introduced by Krivelevich and Yuster. The {\it rainbow vertex-connection} of a connected graph $G$, denoted by $rvc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow vertex-connected. In this paper, we study the computational complexity of vertex-rainbow connection of graphs and prove that computing $rvc(G)$ is NP-Hard. Moreover, we show that it is already NP-Complete to decide whether $rvc(G)=2$. We also prove that the following problem is NP-Complete: given a vertex-colored graph $G$, check whether the given coloring makes $G$ rainbow vertex-connected.

A path in an edge-colored graph $G$, where adjacent edges may have the same color, is called a rainbow path if no two edges of the path are colored the same. The rainbow connection number $rc(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum integer $i$ for which there exists an $i$-edge-coloring of $G$ such that every two distinct vertices of $G$ are connected by a rainbow path. It is known that for a graph $G$ with diameter 2, to determine $rc(G)$ is NP-hard. So, it is interesting to know the best upper bound of $rc(G)$ for such a graph $G$. In this paper, we show that $rc(G)\leq 5$ if $G$ is a bridgeless graph with diameter 2, and that $rc(G)\leq k+2$ if $G$ is a connected graph of diameter 2 with $k$ bridges, where $k\geq 1$.

The energy of a simple graph $G$, denoted by $E(G)$, is defined as the sum of the absolute values of all eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix. Let $C_n$ denote the cycle of order $n$ and $P^{6,6}_n$ the graph obtained from joining two cycles $C_6$ by a path $P_{n-12}$ with its two leaves. Let $\mathscr{B}_n$ denote the class of all bipartite bicyclic graphs but not the graph $R_{a,b}$, which is obtained from joining two cycles $C_a$ and $C_b$ ($a, b\geq 10$ and $a \equiv b\equiv 2\, (\,\textmd{mod}\, 4)$) by an edge. In [I. Gutman, D. Vidović, Quest for molecular graphs with maximal energy: a computer experiment, {\it J. Chem. Inf. Sci.} {\bf41}(2001), 1002--1005], Gutman and Vidović conjectured that the bicyclic graph with maximal energy is $P^{6,6}_n$, for $n=14$ and $n\geq 16$. In [X. Li, J. Zhang, On bicyclic graphs with maximal energy, {\it Linear Algebra Appl.} {\bf427}(2007), 87--98], Li and Zhang showed that the conjecture is true for graphs in the class $\mathscr{B}_n$. However, they could not determine which of the two graphs $R_{a,b}$ and $P^{6,6}_n$ has the maximal value of energy. In [B. Furtula, S. Radenković, I. Gutman, Bicyclic molecular graphs with the greatest energy, {\it J. Serb. Chem. Soc.} {\bf73(4)}(2008), 431--433], numerical computations up to $a+b=50$ were reported, supporting the conjecture. So, it is still necessary to have a mathematical proof to this conjecture. This paper is to show that the energy of $P^{6,6}_n$ is larger than that of $R_{a,b}$, which proves the conjecture for bipartite bicyclic graphs. For non-bipartite bicyclic graphs, the conjecture is still open.