arXiv++ Combinatorics

Bang-Jensen, Bessy, Havet and Yeo showed that every digraph of independence number at most 2 and arc-connectivity at least 2 has an out-branching $B^+$ and an in-branching $B^-$ which are arc-disjoint (such two branchings are called a {\it good pair}), which settled a conjecture of Thomassen for digraphs of independence number 2. They also proved that every digraph on at most 6 vertices and arc-connectivity at least 2 has a good pair and gave an example of a 2-arc-strong digraph $D$ on 10 vertices with independence number 4 that has no good pair. They asked for the smallest number $n$ of vertices in a 2-arc-strong digraph which has no good pair. In this paper, we prove that every digraph on at most 9 vertices and arc-connectivity at least 2 has a good pair, which solves this problem.

For a graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $S\subseteq V(G)$ of size at least $2$, a path in $G$ is said to be an $S$-path if it connects all vertices of $S$. Two $S$-paths $P_1$ and $P_2$ are said to be internally disjoint if $E(P_1)\cap E(P_2)=\emptyset$ and $V(P_1)\cap V(P_2)=S$. Let $π_G (S)$ denote the maximum number of internally disjoint $S$-paths in $G$. The $k$-path-connectivity $π_k(G)$ of $G$ is then defined as the minimum $π_G (S)$, where $S$ ranges over all $k$-subsets of $V(G)$. In [M. Hager, Path-connectivity in graphs, Discrete Math. 59(1986), 53--59], the $k$-path-connectivity of the complete bipartite graph $K_{a,b}$ was calculated, where $k\geq 2$. But, from his proof, only the case that $2\leq k\leq min\{a,b\}$ was considered. In this paper, we calculate the the situation that $min\{a,b\}+1\leq k\leq a+b$ and complete the result.

For a graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $S\subseteq V(G)$ of size at least $2$, an $S$-Steiner tree $T$ is a subgraph of $G$ that is a tree with $S\subseteq V(T)$. Two $S$-Steiner trees $T$ and $T'$ are internally disjoint (resp. edge-disjoint) if $E(T)\cap E(T')=\emptyset$ and $V(T)\cap V(T')=S$ (resp. if $E(T)\cap E(T')=\emptyset$). Let $κ_G (S)$ (resp. $λ_G (S)$) denote the maximum number of internally disjoint (resp. edge-disjoint) $S$-Steiner trees in $G$. The $k$-tree connectivity $κ_k(G)$ (resp. $k$-tree edge-connectivity $λ_k(G)$) of $G$ is then defined as the minimum $κ_G (S)$ (resp. $λ_G (S)$), where $S$ ranges over all $k$-subsets of $V(G)$. In [H. Li, B. Wu, J. Meng, Y. Ma, Steiner tree packing number and tree connectivity, Discrete Math. 341(2018), 1945--1951], the authors conjectured that if a connected graph $G$ has at least $k$ vertices and at least $k$ edges, then $κ_k(L(G))\geq λ_k(G)$ for any $k\geq 2$, where $L(G)$ is the line graph of $G$. In this paper, we confirm this conjecture and prove that the bound is sharp.

An edge-coloured cycle is $rainbow$ if all edges of the cycle have distinct colours. For $k\geq 1$, let $\mathcal{F}_{k}$ denote the family of all graphs with the property that any $k$ vertices lie on a cycle. For $G\in \mathcal{F}_{k}$, a $k$-$rainbow$ $cycle$ $colouring$ of $G$ is an edge-colouring such that any $k$ vertices of $G$ lie on a rainbow cycle in $G$. The $k$-$rainbow$ $cycle$ $index$ of $G$, denoted by $crx_{k}(G)$, is the minimum number of colours needed in a $k$-rainbow cycle colouring of $G$. In this paper, we restrict our attention to the computational aspects of $k$-rainbow cycle colouring. First, we prove that the problem of deciding whether $crx_1=3$ can be solved in polynomial time, but that of deciding whether $crx_1 \leq k$ is NP-Complete, where $k\geq 4$. Then we show that the problem of deciding whether $crx_2=3$ can be solved in polynomial time, but those of deciding whether $crx_2 \leq 4$ or $5$ are NP-Complete. Furthermore, we also consider the cases of $crx_3=3$ and $crx_3 \leq 4$. Finally, We prove that the problem of deciding whether a given edge-colouring (with an unbounded number of colours) of a graph is a $k$-rainbow cycle colouring, is NP-Complete for $k=1$, $2$ and $3$, respectively. Some open problems for further study are mentioned.

An edge-coloured path is \emph{rainbow} if its edges have distinct colours. An edge-coloured connected graph is said to be \emph{rainbow connected} if any two vertices are connected by a rainbow path, and \emph{strongly rainbow connected} if any two vertices are connected by a rainbow geodesic. The (\emph{strong}) \emph{rainbow connection number} of a connected graph is the minimum number of colours needed to make the graph (strongly) rainbow connected. These two graph parameters were introduced by Chartrand, Johns, McKeon and Zhang in 2008. As an extension, Krivelevich and Yuster proposed the concept of \emph{rainbow vertex-connection}. The topic of rainbow connection in graphs drew much attention and various similar parameters were introduced, mostly dealing with undirected graphs. Dorbec, Schiermeyer, Sidorowicz and Sopena extended the concept of the rainbow connection to digraphs. In this paper, we consider the (strong) rainbow vertex-connection number of digraphs. Results on the (strong) rainbow vertex-connection number of biorientations of graphs, cycle digraphs, circulant digraphs and tournaments are presented.

A path in an edge-colored graph is said to be a rainbow path if no two edges on the path have the same color. An edge-colored graph is (strongly) rainbow connected if there exists a rainbow (geodesic) path between every pair of vertices. The (strong) rainbow connection number of $G$, denoted by ($scr(G)$, respectively) $rc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ (strongly) rainbow connected. Though for a general graph $G$ it is NP-Complete to decide whether $rc(G)=2$, in this paper, we show that the problem becomes easy when $G$ is a bipartite graph. Moreover, it is known that deciding whether a given edge-colored (with an unbound number of colors) graph is rainbow connected is NP-Complete. We will prove that it is still NP-Complete even when the edge-colored graph is bipartite. We also show that a few NP-hard problems on rainbow connection are indeed NP-Complete.

The concept of generalized $k$-connectivity $κ_{k}(G)$ of a graph $G$ was introduced by Chartrand et al. in recent years. In our early paper, extremal theory for this graph parameter was started. We determined the minimal number of edges of a graph of order $n$ with $κ_{3}= 2$, i.e., for a graph $G$ of order $n$ and size $e(G)$ with $κ_{3}(G)= 2$, we proved that $e(G)\geq (6/5)n$, and the lower bound is sharp by constructing a class of graphs, only for $n\equiv 0 \ (mod \ 5)$ and $n\neq 10$. In this paper, we improve the lower bound to $\lceil(6/5)n\rceil$. Moreover, we show that for all $n\geq 4$ but $n= 9, 10$, there always exists a graph of order $n$ with $κ_{3}= 2$ whose size attains the lower bound $\lceil(6/5)n\rceil$. Whereas for $n= 9, 10$ we give examples to show that $\lceil(6/5)n\rceil+1$ is the best possible lower bound. This gives a clear picture on the minimal size of a graph of order $n$ with generalized connectivity $κ_{3}= 2$.

Let $G$ be a nontrivial connected graph of order $n$ and $k$ an integer with $2\leq k\leq n$. For a set $S$ of $k$ vertices of $G$, let $κ(S)$ denote the maximum number $\ell$ of edge-disjoint trees $T_1,T_2,...,T_\ell$ in $G$ such that $V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S$ for every pair $i,j$ of distinct integers with $1\leq i,j\leq \ell$. Chartrand et al. generalized the concept of connectivity as follows: The $k$-$connectivity$, denoted by $κ_k(G)$, of $G$ is defined by $κ_k(G)=$min$\{κ(S)\}$, where the minimum is taken over all $k$-subsets $S$ of $V(G)$. Thus $κ_2(G)=κ(G)$, where $κ(G)$ is the connectivity of $G$. This paper mainly focuses on the minimal number of edges of a graph $G$ with $κ_{3}(G)= 2$. For a graph $G$ of order $v(G)$ and size $e(G)$ with $κ_{3}(G)= 2$, we obtain that $e(G)\geq 6/5v(G)$, and the lower bound is sharp by showing a class of examples attaining the lower bound.

Let $G$ be a nontrivial connected graph of order $n$, and $k$ an integer with $2\leq k\leq n$. For a set $S$ of $k$ vertices of $G$, let $κ(S)$ denote the maximum number $\ell$ of edge-disjoint trees $T_1,T_2,...,T_\ell$ in $G$ such that $V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S$ for every pair $i,j$ of distinct integers with $1\leq i,j\leq \ell$. Chartrand et al. generalized the concept of connectivity as follows: The $k$-$connectivity$, denoted by $κ_k(G)$, of $G$ is defined by $κ_k(G)=$min$\{κ(S)\}$, where the minimum is taken over all $k$-subsets $S$ of $V(G)$. Thus $κ_2(G)=κ(G)$, where $κ(G)$ is the connectivity of $G$. Moreover, $κ_{n}(G)$ is the maximum number of edge-disjoint spanning trees of $G$. This paper mainly focus on the $k$-connectivity of complete bipartite graphs $K_{a,b}$. First, we obtain the number of edge-disjoint spanning trees of $K_{a,b}$, which is $\lfloor\frac{ab}{a+b-1}\rfloor$, and specifically give the $\lfloor\frac{ab}{a+b-1}\rfloor$ edge-disjoint spanning trees. Then based on this result, we get the $k$-connectivity of $K_{a,b}$ for all $2\leq k \leq a+b$. Namely, if $k>b-a+2$ and $a-b+k$ is odd then $κ_{k}(K_{a,b})=\frac{a+b-k+1}{2}+\lfloor\frac{(a-b+k-1)(b-a+k-1)}{4(k-1)}\rfloor,$ if $k>b-a+2$ and $a-b+k$ is even then $κ_{k}(K_{a,b})=\frac{a+b-k}{2}+\lfloor\frac{(a-b+k)(b-a+k)}{4(k-1)}\rfloor,$ and if $k\leq b-a+2$ then $κ_{k}(K_{a,b})=a. $

Let $G$ be a nontrivial connected graph of order $n$ and let $k$ be an integer with $2\leq k\leq n$. For a set $S$ of $k$ vertices of $G$, let $κ(S)$ denote the maximum number $\ell$ of edge-disjoint trees $T_1,T_2,...,T_\ell$ in $G$ such that $V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S$ for every pair $i,j$ of distinct integers with $1\leq i,j\leq \ell$. A collection $\{T_1,T_2,...,T_\ell\}$ of trees in $G$ with this property is called an internally disjoint set of trees connecting $S$. Chartrand et al. generalized the concept of connectivity as follows: The $k$-$connectivity$, denoted by $κ_k(G)$, of $G$ is defined by $κ_k(G)=$min$\{κ(S)\}$, where the minimum is taken over all $k$-subsets $S$ of $V(G)$. Thus $κ_2(G)=κ(G)$, where $κ(G)$ is the connectivity of $G$, for which there are polynomial-time algorithms to solve it. This paper mainly focus on the complexity of the generalized connectivity. At first, we obtain that for two fixed positive integers $k_1$ and $k_2$, given a graph $G$ and a $k_1$-subset $S$ of $V(G)$, the problem of deciding whether $G$ contains $k_2$ internally disjoint trees connecting $S$ can be solved by a polynomial-time algorithm. Then, we show that when $k_1$ is a fixed integer of at least 4, but $k_2$ is not a fixed integer, the problem turns out to be NP-complete. On the other hand, when $k_2$ is a fixed integer of at least 2, but $k_1$ is not a fixed integer, we show that the problem also becomes NP-complete. Finally we give some open problems.

Let $G$ be a nontrivial connected graph of order $n$ and let $k$ be an integer with $2\leq k\leq n$. For a set $S$ of $k$ vertices of $G$, let $κ(S)$ denote the maximum number $\ell$ of edge-disjoint trees $T_1,T_2,...,T_\ell$ in $G$ such that $V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S$ for every pair $i,j$ of distinct integers with $1\leq i,j\leq \ell$. A collection $\{T_1,T_2,...,T_\ell\}$ of trees in $G$ with this property is called an internally disjoint set of trees connecting $S$. Chartrand et al. generalized the concept of connectivity as follows: The $k$-$connectivity$, denoted by $κ_k(G)$, of $G$ is defined by $κ_k(G)=$min$\{κ(S)\}$, where the minimum is taken over all $k$-subsets $S$ of $V(G)$. Thus $κ_2(G)=κ(G)$, where $κ(G)$ is the connectivity of $G$. In general, the investigation of $κ_k(G)$ is very difficult. We therefore focus on the investigation on $κ_3(G)$ in this paper. We study the relation between the connectivity and the 3-connectivity of a graph. First we give sharp upper and lower bounds of $κ_3(G)$ for general graphs $G$, and construct two kinds of graphs which attain the upper and lower bound, respectively. We then show that if $G$ is a connected planar graph, then $κ(G)-1 \leq κ_3(G)\leq κ(G)$, and give some classes of graphs which attain the bounds. In the end we show that the problem whether $κ(G)=κ_3(G)$ for a planar graph $G$ can be solved in polynomial time.