arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

order dimension

33 papers tagged with this keyword
2015-01-06 v2
The Complexity of the Partial Order Dimension Problem - Closing the Gap
Published • View PublicationBIB
The dimension of a partial order $P$ is the minimum number of linear orders whose intersection is $P$. There are efficient algorithms to test if a partial order has dimension at most $2$. In 1982 Yannakakis showed that for $k\geq 3$ to test if a partial order has dimension $\leq k$ is NP-complete. The height of a partial order $P$ is the maximum size of a chain in $P$. Yannakakis also showed that for $k\geq 4$ to test if a partial order of height $2$ has dimension $\leq k$ is NP-complete. The complexity of deciding whether an order of height $2$ has dimension $3$ was left open. This question became one of the best known open problems in dimension theory for partial orders. We show that the problem is NP-complete. Technically we show that the decision problem (3DH2) for dimension is equivalent to deciding for the existence of bipartite triangle containment representations (BTCon). This problem then allows a reduction from a class of planar satisfiability problems (P-3-CON-3-SAT(4)) which is known to be NP-hard.
2014-09-15
The complexity of counting poset and permutation patterns
We introduce a notion of pattern occurrence that generalizes both classical permutation patterns as well as poset containment. Many questions about pattern statistics and avoidance generalize naturally to this setting, and we focus on functional complexity problems -- particularly those that arise by constraining the order dimensions of the pattern and text posets. We show that counting the number of induced, injective occurrences among dimension 2 posets is #P-hard; enumerating the linear extensions that occur in realizers of dimension 2 posets can be done in polynomial time, while for unconstrained dimension it is GI-complete; counting not necessarily induced, injective occurrences among dimension 2 posets is #P-hard; counting injective or not necessarily injective occurrences of an arbitrary pattern in a dimension 1 text is #P-hard, although it is in FP if the pattern poset is constrained to have bounded intrinsic width; and counting injective occurrences of a dimension 1 pattern in an arbitrary text is #P-hard, while it is in FP for bounded dimension texts. This framework easily leads to a number of open questions, chief among which are (1) is it #P-hard to count the number of occurrences of a dimension 2 pattern in a dimension 1 text, and (2) is it #P-hard to count the number of texts which avoid a given pattern?
2014-05-21 v2
Two lower bounds for the Stanley depth of monomial ideals
Let $J\varsubsetneq I$ be two monomial ideals of the polynomial ring $S=\mathbb{K}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$. In this paper, we provide two lower bounds for the Stanley depth of $I/J$. On the one hand, we introduce the notion of lcm number of $I/J$, denoted by $l(I/J)$, and prove that the inequality ${\rm sdepth}(I/J)\geq n-l(I/J)+1$ hold. On the other hand, we show that ${\sdepth}(I/J)\geq n-\dim L_{I/J}$, where $\dim L_{I/J}$ denotes the order dimension of the lcm lattice of $I/J$. We show that $I$ and $S/I$ satisfy Stanley's conjecture, if either the lcm number of $I$ or the order dimension of the lcm lattice of $I$ is small enough. Among other results, we also prove that the Stanley--Reisner ideal of a vertex decomposable simplicial complex satisfies Stanley's conjecture.
2012-01-28 v3
Parameterized and Approximation Algorithms for Boxicity
Published • View PublicationBIB
Boxicity of a graph $G(V,$ $E)$, denoted by $box(G)$, is the minimum integer $k$ such that $G$ can be represented as the intersection graph of axis parallel boxes in $\mathbb{R}^k$. The problem of computing boxicity is inapproximable even for graph classes like bipartite, co-bipartite and split graphs within $O(n^{1 - ε})$-factor, for any $ε>0$ in polynomial time unless $NP=ZPP$. We give FPT approximation algorithms for computing the boxicity of graphs, where the parameter used is the vertex or edge edit distance of the given graph from families of graphs of bounded boxicity. This can be seen as a generalization of the parameterizations discussed in \cite{Adiga2}. Extending the same idea in one of our algorithms, we also get an $O\left(\frac{n\sqrt{\log \log n}}{\sqrt{\log n}}\right)$ factor approximation algorithm for computing boxicity and an $O\left(\frac{n {(\log \log n)}^{\frac{3}{2}}}{\sqrt{\log n}}\right)$ factor approximation algorithm for computing the cubicity. These seem to be the first $o(n)$ factor approximation algorithms known for both boxicity and cubicity. As a consequence of this result, a $o(n)$ factor approximation algorithm for computing the partial order dimension of finite posets and a $o(n)$ factor approximation algorithm for computing the threshold dimension of split graphs would follow.
2011-10-14 v2
Some inequalities for orderings of acyclic digraphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
Let $D=(V,A)$ be an acyclic digraph. For $x\in V$ define $e_{_{D}}(x)$ to be the difference of the indegree and the outdegree of $x$. An acyclic ordering of the vertices of $D$ is a one-to-one map $g: V \rightarrow [1,|V|] $ that has the property that for all $x,y\in V$ if $(x,y)\in A$, then $g(x) < g(y)$. We prove that for every acyclic ordering $g$ of $D$ the following inequality holds: \[\sum_{x\in V} e_{_{D}}(x)\cdot g(x) ~\geq~ \frac{1}{2} \sum_{x\in V}[e_{_{D}}(x)]^2~.\] The class of acyclic digraphs for which equality holds is determined as the class of comparbility digraphs of posets of order dimension two.
2011-09-12
On the Order Dimension of Convex Geometries
Published in Order 30 (2012), pp 837-845 • View PublicationBIB
We study the order dimension of the lattice of closed sets for a convex geometry. Further, we prove the existence of large convex geometries realized by planar point sets that have very low order dimension. We show that the planar point set of Erdos and Szekeres from 1961 which is a set of 2^(n-2) points and contains no convex n-gon has order dimension n - 1 and any larger set of points has order dimension strictly larger than n - 1.
2011-07-14 v3
The Reversal Ratio of a Poset
Published in Order (2015) 32:43--52 • View PublicationBIB
Felsner and Reuter introduced the linear extension diameter of a partially ordered set $\mathbf{P}$, denoted $\mbox{led}(\mathbf{P})$, as the maximum distance between two linear extensions of $\mathbf{P}$, where distance is defined to be the number of incomparable pairs appearing in opposite orders (reversed) in the linear extensions. In this paper, we introduce the reversal ratio $RR(\mathbf{P})$ of $\mathbf{P}$ as the ratio of the linear extension diameter to the number of (unordered) incomparable pairs. We use probabilistic techniques to provide a family of posets $\mathbf{P}_k$ on at most $k\log k$ elements for which the reversal ratio $RR(\mathbf{P}_k)\leq C/\log k$, where $C$ is a constant. We also examine the questions of bounding the reversal ratio in terms of order dimension and width.
Boxicity and Poset Dimension
Published • View PublicationBIB
Let $G$ be a simple, undirected, finite graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. A $k$-dimensional box is a Cartesian product of closed intervals $[a_1,b_1]\times [a_2,b_2]\times...\times [a_k,b_k]$. The {\it boxicity} of $G$, $\boxi(G)$ is the minimum integer $k$ such that $G$ can be represented as the intersection graph of $k$-dimensional boxes, i.e. each vertex is mapped to a $k$-dimensional box and two vertices are adjacent in $G$ if and only if their corresponding boxes intersect. Let $\poset=(S,P)$ be a poset where $S$ is the ground set and $P$ is a reflexive, anti-symmetric and transitive binary relation on $S$. The dimension of $\poset$, $\dim(\poset)$ is the minimum integer $t$ such that $P$ can be expressed as the intersection of $t$ total orders. Let $G_\poset$ be the \emph{underlying comparability graph} of $\poset$, i.e. $S$ is the vertex set and two vertices are adjacent if and only if they are comparable in $\poset$. It is a well-known fact that posets with the same underlying comparability graph have the same dimension. The first result of this paper links the dimension of a poset to the boxicity of its underlying comparability graph. In particular, we show that for any poset $\poset$, $\boxi(G_\poset)/(χ(G_\poset)-1) \le \dim(\poset)\le 2\boxi(G_\poset)$, where $χ(G_\poset)$ is the chromatic number of $G_\poset$ and $χ(G_\poset)\ne1$. It immediately follows that if $\poset$ is a height-2 poset, then $\boxi(G_\poset)\le \dim(\poset)\le 2\boxi(G_\poset)$ since the underlying comparability graph of a height-2 poset is a bipartite graph. The second result of the paper relates the boxicity of a graph $G$ with a natural partial order associated with the \emph{extended double cover} of $G$, denoted as $G_c$: Note that $G_c$ is a bipartite graph with partite sets $A$ and $B$ which are copies of $V(G)$ such that corresponding to every $u\in V(G)$, there are two vertices $u_A\in A$ and $u_B\in B$ and $\{u_A,v_B\}$ is an edge in $G_c$ if and only if either $u=v$ or $u$ is adjacent to $v$ in $G$. Let $\poset_c$ be the natural height-2 poset associated with $G_c$ by making $A$ the set of minimal elements and $B$ the set of maximal elements. We show that $\frac{\boxi(G)}{2} \le \dim(\poset_c) \le 2\boxi(G)+4$. These results have some immediate and significant consequences. The upper bound $\dim(\poset)\le 2\boxi(G_\poset)$ allows us to derive hitherto unknown upper bounds for poset dimension such as $\dim(\poset)\le 2\tw(G_\poset)+4$, since boxicity of any graph is known to be at most its $\tw+2$. In the other direction, using the already known bounds for partial order dimension we get the following: (1) The boxicity of any graph with maximum degree $Δ$ is $O(Δ\log^2Δ)$ which is an improvement over the best known upper bound of $Δ^2+2$. (2) There exist graphs with boxicity $Ω(Δ\logΔ)$. This disproves a conjecture that the boxicity of a graph is $O(Δ)$. (3) There exists no polynomial-time algorithm to approximate the boxicity of a bipartite graph on $n$ vertices with a factor of $O(n^{0.5-ε})$ for any $ε>0$, unless $NP=ZPP$.
2009-06-02
On the Order Dimension of Outerplanar Maps
Published • View PublicationBIB
Schnyder characterized planar graphs in terms of order dimension. Brightwell and Trotter proved that the dimension of the vertex-edge-face poset $\Pvef{M}$ of a planar map $M$ is at most four. In this paper we investigate cases where $\dim(\Pvef{M}) \leq 3$ and also where $\dim(\Qvf{M}) \leq 3$; here $\Qvf{M}$ denotes the vertex-face poset of $M$. We show: - If $M$ contains a $K_4$-subdivision, then $\dim(\Pvef{M}) = \dim(\Qvf{M}) = 4$. - If $M$ or the dual $M^*$ contains a $K_{2,3}$-subdivision, then $\dim(\Pvef{M}) = 4$. Hence, a map $M$ with $\dim(\Pvef{M}) \leq 3$ must be outerplanar and have an outerplanar dual. We concentrate on the simplest class of such maps and prove that within this class $\dim(\Pvef{M}) \leq 3$ is equivalent to the existence of a certain oriented coloring of edges. This condition is easily checked and can be turned into a linear time algorithm returning a 3-realizer. Additionally, we prove that if $M$ is 2-connected and $M$ and $M^*$ are outerplanar, then $\dim(\Qvf{M}) \leq 3$. There are, however, outerplanar maps with $\dim(\Qvf{M}) = 4$. We construct the first such example.
2007-06-11
On multipartite posets
Published • View PublicationBIB
A poset $\mathbf{P} = (X,\preceq)$ is {\em $m$-partite} if $X$ has a partition $X = X_1 \cup ... \cup X_m$ such that (1) each $X_i$ forms an antichain in $\mathbf{P}$, and (2) $x\prec y$ implies $x\in X_i$ and $y\in X_j$ where $i<j$. In this article we derive a tight asymptotic upper bound on the order dimension of $m$-partite posets in terms of $m$ and their bipartite sub-posets in a constructive and elementary way.
2007-02-17
A half-space approach to order dimension
Published in Order 24 (2007) 59-73 • View PublicationBIB
The aim of the present paper is to investigate the half-spaces in the convexity structure of all quasiorders on a given set and to use them in an alternative approach to classical order dimension. The main result states that linear orders can almost always be replaced by half-space quasiorders in the definition of the dimension of a partially ordered set.
2006-02-03
Orthogonal surfaces
Published • View PublicationBIB
Orthogonal surfaces are nice mathematical objects which have interesting connections to various fields, e.g., integer programming, monomial ideals and order dimension. While orthogonal surfaces in one or two dimensions are rather trivial already the three dimensional case has a rich structure with connections to Schnyder woods, planar graphs and 3-polytopes. Our objective is to detect more of the structure of orthogonal surfaces in four and higher dimensions. In particular we are driven by the question which non-generic orthogonal surfaces have a polytopal structure. We study characteristic points and the cp-orders of orthogonal surfaces, i.e., the dominance orders on the characteristic points. In the generic case these orders are (almost) face lattices of polytopes. Examples show that in general cp-orders can lack key properties of face lattices. We investigate extra requirements which may help to have cp-orders which are face lattices. Finally, we turn the focus and ask for the realizability of polytopes on orthogonal surfaces. There are criteria which prevent large classes of simplicial polytopes from being realizable. On the other hand we identify some families of polytopes which can be realized on orthogonal surfaces.
2003-05-23 v2
The Order Dimension of the Poset of Regions in a Hyperplane Arrangement
Published • View PublicationBIB
We show that the order dimension of the weak order on a Coxeter group of type A, B or D is equal to the rank of the Coxeter group, and give bounds on the order dimensions for the other finite types. This result arises from a unified approach which, in particular, leads to a simpler treatment of the previously known cases, types A and B. The result for weak orders follows from an upper bound on the dimension of the poset of regions of an arbitrary hyperplane arrangement. In some cases, including the weak orders, the upper bound is the chromatic number of a certain graph. For the weak orders, this graph has the positive roots as its vertex set, and the edges are related to the pairwise inner products of the roots.