arXiv++ Combinatorics

Algorithms can be used to prove and to discover new theorems. This paper shows how algorithmic skills in general, and the notion of invariance in particular, can be used to derive many results from Euclid's algorithm. We illustrate how to use the algorithm as a verification interface (i.e., how to verify theorems) and as a construction interface (i.e., how to investigate and derive new theorems). The theorems that we verify are well-known and most of them are included in standard number theory books. The new results concern distributivity properties of the greatest common divisor and a new algorithm for efficiently enumerating the positive rationals in two different ways. One way is known and is due to Moshe Newman. The second is new and corresponds to a deforestation of the Stern-Brocot tree of rationals. We show that both enumerations stem from the same simple algorithm. In this way, we construct a Stern-Brocot enumeration algorithm with the same time and space complexity as Newman's algorithm. A short review of the original papers by Stern and Brocot is also included.

We investigate the space complexity of refuting $3$-CNFs in Resolution and algebraic systems. We prove that every Polynomial Calculus with Resolution refutation of a random $3$-CNF $φ$ in $n$ variables requires, with high probability, $Ω(n)$ distinct monomials to be kept simultaneously in memory. The same construction also proves that every Resolution refutation $φ$ requires, with high probability, $Ω(n)$ clauses each of width $Ω(n)$ to be kept at the same time in memory. This gives a $Ω(n^2)$ lower bound for the total space needed in Resolution to refute $φ$. These results are best possible (up to a constant factor). The main technical innovation is a variant of Hall's Lemma. We show that in bipartite graphs $G$ with bipartition $(L,R)$ and left-degree at most 3, $L$ can be covered by certain families of disjoint paths, called VW-matchings, provided that $L$ expands in $R$ by a factor of $(2-ε)$, for $ε< 1/23$.

We investigate the space complexity of refuting $3$-CNFs in Resolution and algebraic systems. No lower bound for refuting any family of $3$-CNFs was previously known for the total space in resolution or for the monomial space in algebraic systems. We prove that every Polynomial Calculus with Resolution refutation of a random $3$-CNF $φ$ in $n$ variables requires, with high probability, $Ω(n/\log n)$ distinct monomials to be kept simultaneously in memory. The same construction also proves that every Resolution refutation $φ$ requires, with high probability, $Ω(n/\log n)$ clauses each of width $Ω(n/\log n)$ to be kept at the same time in memory. This gives a $Ω(n^2/\log^2 n)$ lower bound for the total space needed in Resolution to refute $φ$. The main technical innovation is a variant of Hall's theorem. We show that in bipartite graphs $G$ with bipartition $(L,R)$ and left-degree at most 3, $L$ can be covered by certain families of disjoint paths, called $(2,4)$-matchings, provided that $L$ expands in $R$ by a factor of $(2-ε)$, for $ε< \frac{1}{23}$.

Let $X$ be a finite set in $Z^d$. We consider the problem of optimizing linear function $f(x) = c^T x$ on $X$, where $c\in Z^d$ is an input vector. We call it a problem $X$. A problem $X$ is related with linear program $\max\limits_{x \in P} f(x)$, where polytope $P$ is a convex hull of $X$. The key parameters for evaluating the complexity of a problem $X$ are the dimension $d$, the cardinality $|X|$, and the encoding size $S(X) = \log_2 \left(\max\limits_{x\in X} \|x\|_{\infty}\right)$. We show that if the (time and space) complexity of some algorithm $A$ for solving a problem $X$ is defined only in terms of combinatorial structure of $P$ and the size $S(X)$, then for every $d$ and $n$ there exists polynomially (in $d$, $\log n$, and $S$) solvable problem $Y$ with $\dim Y = d$, $|Y| = n$, such that the algorithm $A$ requires exponential time or space for solving $Y$.

In this paper, given a parameter $k$, we demonstrate an infinite class of {\sc cnf}s of treewidth at most $k$ of their primary graphs such that the equivalent nondeterministic read-once branching programs ({\sc nrobp}s) are of size at least $n^{ck}$ for some universal constant $c$. Thus we rule out the possibility of fixed-parameter space complexity of {\sc nrobp}s parameterized by the smallest treewidth of the equivalent {\sc cnf}.

The stable roommates problem with $n$ agents has worst case complexity $O(n^2)$ in time and space. Random instances can be solved faster and with less memory, however. We introduce an algorithm that has average time and space complexity $O(n^\frac{3}{2})$ for random instances. We use this algorithm to simulate large instances of the stable roommates problem and to measure the probabilty $p_n$ that a random instance of size $n$ admits a stable matching. Our data supports the conjecture that $p_n = Θ(n^{-1/4})$.

The Dichotomy Conjecture for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) states that every CSP is in P or is NP-complete (Feder-Vardi, 1993). It has been verified for conservative problems (also known as list homomorphism problems) by A. Bulatov (2003). We augment this result by showing that for digraph templates H, every conservative CSP, denoted LHOM(H), is solvable in logspace or is hard for NL. More precisely, we introduce a digraph structure we call a circular N, and prove the following dichotomy: if H contains no circular N then LHOM(H) admits a logspace algorithm, and otherwise LHOM(H) is hard for NL. Our algorithm operates by reducing the lists in a complex manner based on a novel decomposition of an auxiliary digraph, combined with repeated applications of Reingold's algorithm for undirected reachability (2005). We also prove an algebraic version of this dichotomy: the digraphs without a circular N are precisely those that admit a finite chain of polymorphisms satisfying the Hagemann-Mitschke identities. This confirms a conjecture of Larose and Tesson (2007) for LHOM(H). Moreover, we show that the presence of a circular N can be decided in time polynomial in the size of H.

Given positive integers $a_1,..., a_n, t$, the fixed weight subset sum problem is to find a subset of the $a_i$ that sum to $t$, where the subset has a prescribed number of elements. It is this problem that underlies the security of modern knapsack cryptosystems, and solving the problem results directly in a message attack. We present new exponential algorithms that do not rely on lattices, and hence will be applicable when lattice basis reduction algorithms fail. These algorithms rely on a generalization of the notion of splitting system given by Stinson. In particular, if the problem has length $n$ and weight $\ell$ then for constant $k$ a power of two less than $n$ we apply a $k$-set birthday algorithm to the splitting system of the problem. This randomized algorithm has time and space complexity that satisfies $T \cdot S^{\log{k}} = O({n \choose \ell})$ (where the constant depends uniformly on $k$). In addition to using space efficiently, the algorithm is highly parallelizable.

The topological filtration of interacting RNA complexes is studied and the role is analyzed of certain diagrams called irreducible shadows, which form suitable building blocks for more general structures. We prove that for two interacting RNAs, called interaction structures, there exist for fixed genus only finitely many irreducible shadows. This implies that for fixed genus there are only finitely many classes of interaction structures. In particular the simplest case of genus zero already provides the formalism for certain types of structures that occur in nature and are not covered by other filtrations. This case of genus zero interaction structures is already of practical interest, is studied here in detail and found to be expressed by a multiple context-free grammar extending the usual one for RNA secondary structures. We show that in $O(n^6)$ time and $O(n^4)$ space complexity, this grammar for genus zero interaction structures provides not only minimum free energy solutions but also the complete partition function and base pairing probabilities.

A $k$-L(2,1)-labeling of a graph is a function from its vertex set into the set $\{0,...,k\}$, such that the labels assigned to adjacent vertices differ by at least 2, and labels assigned to vertices of distance 2 are different. It is known that finding the smallest $k$ admitting the existence of a $k$-L(2,1)-labeling of any given graph is NP-Complete. In this paper we present an algorithm for this problem, which works in time $O(\complexity ^n)$ and polynomial memory, where $\eps$ is an arbitrarily small positive constant. This is the first exact algorithm for L(2,1)-labeling problem with time complexity $O(c^n)$ for some constant $c$ and polynomial space complexity.

In this paper we present an algorithm that generates $k$-noncrossing, $σ$-modular diagrams with uniform probability. A diagram is a labeled graph of degree $\le 1$ over $n$ vertices drawn in a horizontal line with arcs $(i,j)$ in the upper half-plane. A $k$-crossing in a diagram is a set of $k$ distinct arcs $(i_1, j_1), (i_2, j_2),\ldots,(i_k, j_k)$ with the property $i_1 < i_2 < \ldots < i_k < j_1 < j_2 < \ldots< j_k$. A diagram without any $k$-crossings is called a $k$-noncrossing diagram and a stack of length $σ$ is a maximal sequence $((i,j),(i+1,j-1),\dots,(i+(σ-1),j-(σ-1)))$. A diagram is $σ$-modular if any arc is contained in a stack of length at least $σ$. Our algorithm generates after $O(n^k)$ preprocessing time, $k$-noncrossing, $σ$-modular diagrams in $O(n)$ time and space complexity.