arXiv++ Combinatorics

Tree-child networks are one of the most prominent network classes for modeling evolutionary processes which contain reticulation events. Several recent studies have addressed counting questions for bicombining tree-child networks in which every reticulation node has exactly two parents. We extend these studies to $d$-combining tree-child networks where every reticulation node has now $d\geq 2$ parents, and we study one-component as well as general tree-child networks. For the number of one-component networks, we derive an exact formula from which asymptotic results follow that contain a stretched exponential for $d=2$, yet not for $d \geq 3$. For general networks, we find a novel encoding by words which leads to a recurrence for their numbers. From this recurrence, we derive asymptotic results which show the appearance of a stretched exponential for all $d \geq 2$. Moreover, we also give results on the distribution of shape parameters (e.g., number of reticulation nodes, Sackin index) of a network which is drawn uniformly at random from the set of all tree-child networks with the same number of leaves. We show phase transitions depending on $d$, leading to normal, Bessel, Poisson, and degenerate distributions. Some of our results are new even in the bicombining case.

We prove limit laws for the number of occurrences of a pattern on the fringe of a ranked tree-child network which is picked uniformly at random. Our results extend the limit law for cherries proved by Bienvenu et al. (2022). For patterns of height $1$ and $2$, we show that they either occur frequently (mean is asymptotically linear and limit law is normal) or sporadically (mean is asymptotically constant and limit law is Poisson) or not all (mean tends to $0$ and limit law is degenerate). We expect that these are the only possible limit laws for any fringe pattern.

Tree-child networks are one of the most prominent network classes for modeling evolutionary processes which contain reticulation events. Several recent studies have addressed counting questions for {\it bicombining tree-child networks} which are tree-child networks with every reticulation node having exactly two parents. In this paper, we extend these studies to {\it $d$-combining tree-child networks} where every reticulation node has now $d\geq 2$ parents. Moreover, we also give results and conjectures on the distributional behavior of the number of reticulation nodes of a network which is drawn uniformly at random from the set of all tree-child networks with the same number of leaves.

In evolutionary studies it is common to use phylogenetic trees to represent the evolutionary history of a set of species. However, in case the transfer of genes or other genetic information between the species or their ancestors has occurred in the past, a tree may not provide a complete picture of their history. In such cases,tree-based phylogenetic networks can provide a useful, more refined representation of the species evolution. Such a network is essentially a phylogenetic tree with some arcs added between the tree edges so as to represent reticulate events such as gene transfer. Even so, this model does not permit the representation of evolutionary scenarios where reticulate events have taken place between different subfamilies or lineages of species. To represent such scenarios, in this paper we introduce the notion of a forest-based phylogenetic network, that is, a collection of leaf-disjoint phylogenetic trees on a set of species with arcs added between the edges of distinct trees within the collection. Forest-based networks include the recently introduced class of overlaid species forests which are used to model introgression. As we shall see, even though the definition of forest-based networks is closely related to that of tree-based networks, they lead to new mathematical theory which complements that of tree-based networks. As well as studying the relationship of forest-based networks with other classes of phylogenetic networks, such as tree-child networks and universal tree-based networks, we present some characterizations of some special classes of forest-based networks. We expect that our results will be useful for developing new models and algorithms to understand reticulate evolution, such as gene transfer between collections of bacteria that live in different environments.

Tree-child networks are an important network class which are used in phylogenetics to model reticulate evolution. In a recent paper, Pons and Batle (2021) conjectured a relation between tree-child networks and certain words. In this short note, we prove their conjecture for the (important) class of one-component tree-child networks.

In the study of rooted phylogenetic networks, analyzing the set of rooted phylogenetic trees that are embedded in such a network is a recurring task. From an algorithmic viewpoint, this analysis almost always requires an exhaustive search of a particular multiset $S$ of rooted phylogenetic trees that are embedded in a rooted phylogenetic network $\mathcal{N}$. Since the size of $S$ is exponential in the number of reticulations of $\mathcal{N}$, it is consequently of interest to keep this number as small as possible but without loosing any element of $S$. In this paper, we take a first step towards this goal by introducing the notion of a non-essential arc of $\mathcal{N}$, which is an arc whose deletion from $\mathcal{N}$ results in a rooted phylogenetic network $\mathcal{N}'$ such that the sets of rooted phylogenetic trees that are embedded in $\mathcal{N}$ and $\mathcal{N}'$ are the same. We investigate the popular class of tree-child networks and characterize which arcs are non-essential. This characterization is based on a family of directed graphs. Using this novel characterization, we show that identifying and deleting all non-essential arcs in a tree-child network takes time that is cubic in the number of leaves of the network. Moreover, we show that deciding if a given arc of an arbitrary phylogenetic network is non-essential is $Π_2^P$-complete.

The class of ranked tree-child networks, tree-child networks arising from an evolution process with a fixed embedding into the plane, has recently been introduced by Bienvenu, Lambert, and Steel. These authors derived counting results for this class. In this note, we will give bijective proofs of three of their results. Two of our bijections answer questions raised in their paper.

Tree-child networks, one of the prominent network classes in phylogenetics, have been introduced for the purpose of modeling reticulate evolution. Recently, the first author together with Gittenberger and Mansouri (2019) showed that the number ${\rm TC}_{\ell,k}$ of tree-child networks with $\ell$ leaves and $k$ reticulation vertices has the first-order asymptotics \[ {\rm TC}_{\ell,k}\sim c_k\left(\frac{2}{e}\right)^{\ell}\ell^{\ell+2k-1},\qquad (\ell\rightarrow\infty). \] Moreover, they also computed $c_k$ for $k=1,2,$ and $3$. In this short note, we give a second approach to the above result which is based on a recent (algorithmic) approach for the counting of tree-child networks due to Cardona and Zhang (2020). This second approach is also capable of giving a simple, closed-form expression for $c_k$, namely, $c_k=2^{k-1}\sqrt{2}/k!$ for all $k\geq 0$.

Rooted triples, rooted binary phylogenetic trees on three leaves, are sufficient to encode rooted binary phylogenetic trees. That is, if $\mathcal T$ and $\mathcal T'$ are rooted binary phylogenetic $X$-trees that infers the same set of rooted triples, then $\mathcal T$ and $\mathcal T'$ are isomorphic. However, in general, this sufficiency does not extend to rooted binary phylogenetic networks. In this paper, we show that trinets, phylogenetic network analogues of rooted triples, are sufficient to encode rooted binary orchard networks. Rooted binary orchard networks naturally generalise rooted binary tree-child networks. Moreover, we present a polynomial-time algorithm for building a rooted binary orchard network from its set of trinets. As a consequence, this algorithm affirmatively answers a previously-posed question of whether there is a polynomial-time algorithm for building a rooted binary tree-child network from the set of trinets it infers.

Tree-child networks are a recently-described class of directed acyclic graphs that have risen to prominence in phylogenetics (the study of evolutionary trees and networks). Although these networks have a number of attractive mathematical properties, many combinatorial questions concerning them remain intractable. In this paper, we show that endowing these networks with a biologically relevant ranking structure yields mathematically tractable objects, which we term ranked tree-child networks (RTCNs). We explain how to derive exact and explicit combinatorial results concerning the enumeration and generation of these networks. We also explore probabilistic questions concerning the properties of RTCNs when they are sampled uniformly at random. These questions include the lengths of random walks between the root and leaves (both from the root to the leaves and from a leaf to the root); the distribution of the number of cherries in the network; and sampling RTCNs conditional on displaying a given tree. We also formulate a conjecture regarding the scaling limit of the process that counts the number of lineages in the ancestry of a leaf. The main idea in this paper, namely using ranking as a way to achieve combinatorial tractability, may also extend to other classes of networks.

Phylogenetic networks are used to study evolutionary relationships between species in biology. Such networks are often categorized into classes by their topological features, which stem from both biological and computational motivations. We study two network classes in this paper: tree-based networks and orchard networks. Tree-based networks are those that can be obtained by inserting edges between the edges of an underlying tree. Orchard networks are a recently introduced generalization of the class of tree-child networks. Structural characterizations have already been discovered for tree-based networks; this is not the case for orchard networks. In this paper, we introduce cherry covers---a unifying characterization of both network classes---in which we decompose the edges of the networks into so-called cherry shapes and reticulated cherry shapes. We show that cherry covers can be used to characterize the class of tree-based networks as well as the class of orchard networks. Moreover, we also generalize these results to non-binary networks.

In a recent paper, McDiarmid, Semple, and Welsh (2015) showed that the number of tree-child networks with $n$ leaves has the factor $n^{2n}$ in its main asymptotic growth term. In this paper, we improve this by completely identifying the main asymptotic growth term up to a constant. More precisely, we show that the number of tree-child networks with $n$ leaves grows like \[ Θ\left(n^{-2/3}e^{a_1(3n)^{1/3}}\left(\frac{12}{e^2}\right)^{n}n^{2n}\right), \] where $a_1=-2.338107410\cdots$ is the largest root of the Airy function of first kind. For the proof, we bijectively map the underlying graph-theoretical problem onto a problem on words. For the latter, we can find a recurrence to which a recent powerful asymptotic method of Elvey Price, Fang, and Wallner (2019) can be applied.

Phylogenetic networks are important for the study of evolution. The number of methods to find such networks is increasing, but most such methods can only reconstruct small networks. To find bigger networks, one can attempt to combine small networks. In this paper, we study the {\sc Network Hybridization} problem, a problem of combining networks into another network with low complexity. We characterize this complexity via a restricted problem, {\sc Tree-child Network Hybridization}, and we present an FPT algorithm to efficiently solve this restricted problem.

We present the first fixed-parameter algorithm for constructing a tree-child phylogenetic network that displays an arbitrary number of binary input trees and has the minimum number of reticulations among all such networks. The algorithm uses the recently introduced framework of cherry picking sequences and runs in $O((8k)^k \mathrm{poly}(n, t))$ time, where $n$ is the number of leaves of every tree, $t$ is the number of trees, and $k$ is the reticulation number of the constructed network. Moreover, we provide an efficient parallel implementation of the algorithm and show that it can deal with up to $100$ input trees on a standard desktop computer, thereby providing a major improvement over previous phylogenetic network construction methods.

Galled trees are studied as a recombination model in theoretic population genetics. This class of phylogenetic networks has been generalized to tree-child networks, normal networks and tree-based networks by relaxing a structural condition. Although these networks are simple, their topological structures have yet to be fully understood. It is well-known that all phylogenetic trees on $n$ taxa can be generated by the insertion of the $n$-th taxa to each edge of all the phylogenetic trees on $n-1$ taxa. We prove that all tree-child networks with $k$ reticulate nodes on $n$ taxa can be uniquely generated via three operations from all the tree-child networks with $k-1$ or $k$ reticulate nodes on $n-1$ taxa . An application of this result is found in counting tree-child networks and normal networks. In particular, a simple formula is given for the number of rooted phylogenetic networks with one reticulate node.

This paper studies the relationship between undirected (unrooted) and directed (rooted) phylogenetic networks. We describe a polynomial-time algorithm for deciding whether an undirected nonbinary phylogenetic network, given the locations of the root and reticulation vertices, can be oriented as a directed nonbinary phylogenetic network. Moreover, we characterize when this is possible and show that, in such instances, the resulting directed nonbinary phylogenetic network is unique. In addition, without being given the location of the root and the reticulation vertices, we describe an algorithm for deciding whether an undirected binary phylogenetic network $N$ can be oriented as a directed binary phylogenetic network of a certain class. The algorithm is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when the parameter is the level of $N$ and is applicable to classes of directed phylogenetic networks that satisfy certain conditions. As an example, we show that the well-studied class of binary tree-child networks satisfies these conditions.

Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees to leaf-labeled directed acyclic graphs that represent ancestral relationships between species whose past includes non-tree-like events such as hybridization and horizontal gene transfer. Indeed, each phylogenetic network embeds a collection of phylogenetic trees. Referring to the collection of trees that a given phylogenetic network $N$ embeds as the display set of $N$, several questions in the context of the display set of $N$ have recently been analyzed. For example, the widely studied Tree-Containment problem asks if a given phylogenetic tree is contained in the display set of a given network. The focus of this paper are two questions that naturally arise in comparing the display sets of two phylogenetic networks. First, we analyze the problem of deciding if the display sets of two phylogenetic networks have a tree in common. Surprisingly, this problem turns out to be NP-complete even for two temporal normal networks. Second, we investigate the question of whether or not the display sets of two phylogenetic networks are equal. While we recently showed that this problem is polynomial-time solvable for a normal and a tree-child network, it is computationally hard in the general case. In establishing hardness, we show that the problem is contained in the second level of the polynomial-time hierarchy. Specifically, it is $Π_2^P$-complete. Along the way, we show that two other problems are also $Π_2^P$-complete, one of which being a generalization of Tree-Containment.

Phylogenetic trees canonically arise as embeddings of phylogenetic networks. We recently showed that the problem of deciding if two phylogenetic networks embed the same sets of phylogenetic trees is computationally hard, \blue{in particular, we showed it to be $Π^P_2$-complete}. In this paper, we establish a polynomial-time algorithm for this decision problem if the initial two networks consists of a normal network and a tree-child network. The running time of the algorithm is quadratic in the size of the leaf sets.

Rooted phylogenetic networks provide an explicit representation of the evolutionary history of a set $X$ of sampled species. In contrast to phylogenetic trees which show only speciation events, networks can also accommodate reticulate processes (for example, hybrid evolution, endosymbiosis, and lateral gene transfer). A major goal in systematic biology is to infer evolutionary relationships, and while phylogenetic trees can be uniquely determined from various simple combinatorial data on $X$, for networks the reconstruction question is much more subtle. Here we ask when can a network be uniquely reconstructed from its `ancestral profile' (the number of paths from each ancestral vertex to each element in $X$). We show that reconstruction holds (even within the class of all networks) for a class of networks we call `orchard networks', and we provide a polynomial-time algorithm for reconstructing any orchard network from its ancestral profile. Our approach relies on establishing a structural theorem for orchard networks, which also provides for a fast (polynomial-time) algorithm to test if any given network is of orchard type. Since the class of orchard networks includes tree-sibling tree-consistent networks and tree-child networks, our result generalise reconstruction results from 2008 and 2009. Orchard networks allow for an unbounded number $k$ of reticulation vertices, in contrast to tree-sibling tree-consistent networks and tree-child networks for which $k$ is at most $2|X|-4$ and $|X|-1$, respectively.

Phylogenetic networks are used to represent evolutionary scenarios in biology and linguistics. To find the most probable scenario, it may be necessary to compare candidate networks, to distinguish different networks, and to see when one network is contained in another. In this paper, we introduce cherry-picking networks, a class of networks that can be reduced by a sequence of two graph operations. We show that some networks are uniquely determined by the sequences that reduce them---we call these the reconstructible cherry-picking networks, and further show that given two cherry-picking networks within the same reconstructible class, one is contained in the other if a sequence for the latter network reduces the former network. By restricting our scope to tree-child networks, we show that the converse of the above statement holds, thereby showing that {\sc Network Containment}, the problem of checking whether a network is contained in another, can be solved in linear time for tree-child networks. We implement this algorithm in Python and show that the linear-time theoretical bound on the input size is achievable in practice. Lastly, we provide a linear time algorithm for deciding whether two tree-child networks are isomorphic.