arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Proof of a local antimagic conjecture

Published: 2017-05-28 | Updated: 2018-05-27
Comments: Final version for publication in DMTCS. Changes from previous version are formatting to journal style and correction of two minor typographical errors
Journal: Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 20 no. 1, Graph Theory (June 4, 2018) dmtcs:3887

Abstract

An antimagic labelling of a graph $G$ is a bijection $f:E(G)\to\{1,\ldots,E(G)\}$ such that the sums $S_v=\sum_{e\ni v}f(e)$ distinguish all vertices. A well-known conjecture of Hartsfield and Ringel (1994) is that every connected graph other than $K_2$ admits an antimagic labelling. Recently, two sets of authors (Arumugam, Premalatha, Bača \& Semaničová-Feňovčíková (2017), and Bensmail, Senhaji \& Lyngsie (2017)) independently introduced the weaker notion of a local antimagic labelling, where only adjacent vertices must be distinguished. Both sets of authors conjectured that any connected graph other than $K_2$ admits a local antimagic labelling. We prove this latter conjecture using the probabilistic method. Thus the parameter of local antimagic chromatic number, introduced by Arumugam et al., is well-defined for every connected graph other than $K_2$ .

BibTeX

Loading...