arXiv++ Combinatorics

Automated proof assistants are a technology pre-empting mistakes in mathematics. In our practice we have seen that reasoning about planar diagrams is difficult to both humans and computers. One example that has led to wrong statements in publications is that an orientation-preserving mapping is not always defined by how it acts on triples of elements. In this paper we formalise orientation-preserving mappings in proof assistant software Lean and report on our take-aways.

We study permutations on n elements preserving orientation (parity) of every subset of size k. We describe all groups of these permutations. Unexpectedly, these groups (except for some special cases) are either trivial, cyclic or dihedral. In this context, we define and study monoids generalizing monoids of order-preserving mappings and monoids of orientation-preserving mappings.

We characterise the respective semigroups of mappings that preserve, or that preserve or reverse orientation of a finite cycle, in terms of their actions on oriented triples and oriented quadruples. This leads to a proof that the latter semigroup coincides with the semigroup of all mappings that preserve intersections of chords on the corresponding circle.

One model of message delivery in a computer network is based on labelling each edge by a subset of a (reasonably small) universal set, and then encoding a path as the union of the labels of its edges. Earlier work suggested using random edge labels, and that approach has a disadvantage of producing errors (false positives). We demonstrate that if we make an assumption about the shape of the network (in this paper we consider networks with a dense core and a tree-like periphery) and assume that messages are delivered along shortest paths, we can label edges in a way which prevents any false positives.

The set D_n of all difunctional relations on an n element set is an inverse semigroup under a variation of the usual composition operation. We solve an open problem of Kudryavtseva and Maltcev (2011), which asks: What is the rank (smallest size of a generating set) of D_n? Specifically, we show that the rank of D_n is B(n)+n, where B(n) is the nth Bell number. We also give the rank of an arbitrary ideal of D_n. Although D_n bears many similarities with families such as the full transformation semigroups and symmetric inverse semigroups (all contain the symmetric group and have a chain of J-classes), we note that the fast growth of rank(D_n) as a function of n is a property not shared with these other families.