arXiv++ Combinatorics

The representation number of a graph is the minimum number of copies of each vertex required to represent the graph as a word, such that the letters corresponding to vertices $x$ and $y$ alternate if and only if $xy$ is an edge in the graph. It is known that path graphs, circle graphs, and ladder graphs have representation number 2, while prism graphs have representation number 3. In this paper, we extend these results by showing that generalizations of the aforementioned graphs -- namely, the $m \times n$ grid graphs and $m \times n$ cylindrical grid graphs -- have representation number $3$ for $m \geq 3$ and $m \geq 2$, respectively, and $n\geq 3$. Furthermore, we discuss toroidal grid graphs in the context of word-representability, which leads to an interesting conjecture.

An orientation of a graph is semi-transitive if it contains no directed cycles and has no shortcuts. An undirected graph is semi-transitive if it can be oriented in a semi-transitive manner. The class of semi-transitive graphs includes several important graph classes. The Mycielski graph of an undirected graph is a larger graph constructed in a specific manner, which maintains the property of being triangle-free but increases the chromatic number. In this note, we prove Hameed's conjecture, which states that the Mycielski graph of a graph $G$ is semi-transitive if and only if $G$ is a bipartite graph. Notably, our solution to the conjecture provides an alternative and shorter proof of the Hameed's result on a complete characterization of semi-transitive extended Mycielski graphs.

The notion of a $k$-11-representable graph was introduced by Jeff Remmel in 2017 and studied by Cheon et al.\ in 2019 as a natural extension of the extensively studied notion of word-representable graphs, which are precisely 0-11-representable graphs. A graph $G$ is $k$-11-representable if it can be represented by a word $w$ such that for any edge (resp., non-edge) $xy$ in $G$ the subsequence of $w$ formed by $x$ and $y$ contains at most $k$ (resp., at least $k+1$) pairs of consecutive equal letters. A remarkable result of Cheon at al.\ is that {\em any} graph is 2-11-representable, while it is unknown whether every graph is 1-11-representable. Cheon et al.\ showed that the class of 1-11-representable graphs is strictly larger than that of word-representable graphs, and they introduced a useful toolbox to study 1-11-representable graphs. In this paper, we introduce new tools for studying 1-11-representation of graphs. We apply them for establishing 1-11-representation of Chvátal graph, Mycielski graph, split graphs, and graphs whose vertices can be partitioned into a comparability graph and an independent set.

Word-representable graphs, which are the same as semi-transitively orientable graphs, generalize several fundamental classes of graphs. In this paper we propose a novel approach to study word-representability of graphs using a technique of homomorphisms. As a proof of concept, we apply our method to show word-representability of the simplified graph of overlapping permutations that we introduce in this paper. For another application, we obtain results on word-representability of certain subgraphs of simplified de Bruijn graphs that were introduced recently by Petyuk and studied in the context of word-representability.

Partially ordered patterns (POPs) generalize the notion of classical patterns studied in the literature in the context of permutations, words, compositions and partitions. In this paper, we give a number of general, and specific enumerative results for POPs in permutations defined by bipartite graphs, substantially extending the list of known results in this direction. In particular, we completely characterize the Wilf-equivalence for patterns defined by the N-shape posets.

A directed graph is semi-transitive if and only if it is acyclic and for any directed path $u_1\rightarrow u_2\rightarrow \cdots \rightarrow u_t$, $t \geq 2$, either there is no edge from $u_1$ to $u_t$ or all edges $u_i\rightarrow u_j$ exist for $1 \leq i < j \leq t$. Recognizing semi-transitive orientability of a graph is an NP-complete problem. A split graph is a graph in which the vertices can be partitioned into a clique and an independent set. Semi-transitive orientability of spit graphs was recently studied in the literature. The main result in this paper is proving that recognition of semi-transitive orientability of split graphs can be done in a polynomial time. We also characterize, in terms of minimal forbidden induced subgraphs, semi-transitively orientable split graphs with the size of the independent set at most 3, hence extending the known classification of such graphs with the size of the clique at most 5.

An orientation of a graph is semi-transitive if it is acyclic, and for any directed path $v_0\rightarrow v_1\rightarrow \cdots\rightarrow v_k$ either there is no arc between $v_0$ and $v_k$, or $v_i\rightarrow v_j$ is an arc for all $0\leq i<j\leq k$. An undirected graph is semi-transitive if it admits a semi-transitive orientation. Semi-transitive graphs generalize several important classes of graphs and they are precisely the class of word-representable graphs studied extensively in the literature. Determining if a triangle-free graph is semi-transitive is an NP-hard problem. The existence of non-semi-transitive triangle-free graphs was established via Erdős' theorem by Halldórsson and the authors in 2011. However, no explicit examples of such graphs were known until recent work of the first author and Saito who have shown computationally that a certain subgraph on 16 vertices of the triangle-free Kneser graph $K(8,3)$ is not semi-transitive, and have raised the question on the existence of smaller triangle-free non-semi-transitive graphs. In this paper we prove that the smallest triangle-free 4-chromatic graph on 11 vertices (the Grötzsch graph) and the smallest triangle-free 4-chromatic 4-regular graph on 12 vertices (the Chvátal graph) are not semi-transitive. Hence, the Grötzsch graph is the smallest triangle-free non-semi-transitive graph. We also prove the existence of semi-transitive graphs of girth 4 with chromatic number 4 including a small one (the circulant graph $C(13;1,5)$ on 13 vertices) and dense ones (Toft's graphs). Finally, we show that each $4$-regular circulant graph (possibly containing triangles) is semi-transitive.

Distinct letters $x$ and $y$ alternate in a word $w$ if after deleting in $w$ all letters but the copies of $x$ and $y$ we either obtain a word of the form $xyxy\cdots$ (of even or odd length) or a word of the form $yxyx\cdots$ (of even or odd length). A simple graph $G=(V,E)$ is word-representable if there exists a word $w$ over the alphabet $V$ such that letters $x$ and $y$ alternate in $w$ if and only if $xy$ is an edge in $E$. Thus, edges of $G$ are defined by avoiding the consecutive pattern 11 in a word representing $G$, that is, by avoiding $xx$ and $yy$. In 2017, Jeff Remmel has introduced the notion of a $k$-$11$-representable graph for a non-negative integer $k$, which generalizes the notion of a word-representable graph. Under this representation, edges of $G$ are defined by containing at most $k$ occurrences of the consecutive pattern $11$ in a word representing $G$. Thus, word-representable graphs are precisely $0$-$11$-representable graphs. Our key result in this paper is showing that any graph is $2$-$11$-representable by a concatenation of permutations, which is rather surprising taking into account that concatenation of permutations has limited power in the case of $0$-$11$-representation. Also, we show that the class of word-representable graphs, studied intensively in the literature, is contained strictly in the class of $1$-$11$-representable graphs. Another result that we prove is the fact that the class of interval graphs is precisely the class of $1$-$11$-representable graphs that can be represented by uniform words containing two copies of each letter. This result can be compared with the known fact that the class of circle graphs is precisely the class of $0$-$11$-representable graphs that can be represented by uniform words containing two copies of each letter.

A graph $G=(V,E)$ is word-representable if there exists a word $w$ over the alphabet $V$ such that letters $x$ and $y$ alternate in $w$ if and only if $xy$ is an edge in $E$. It is known that any word-representable graph $G$ is $k$-word-representable for some $k$, that is, there exists a word $w$ representing $G$ such that each letter occurs exactly $k$ times in $w$. The minimum such $k$ is called $G$'s representation number. A crown graph $H_{n,n}$ is a graph obtained from the complete bipartite graph $K_{n,n}$ by removing a perfect matching. In this paper we show that for $n\geq 5$, $H_{n,n}$'s representation number is $\lceil n/2 \rceil$. This result not only provides a complete solution to the open Problem 7.4.2 in \cite{KL}, but also gives a negative answer to the question raised in Problem 7.2.7 in \cite{KL} on 3-word-representability of bipartite graphs. As a byproduct we obtain a new example of a graph class with a high representation number.

A graph $G=(V,E)$ is a \emph{word-representable graph} if there exists a word $W$ over the alphabet $V$ such that letters $x$ and $y$ alternate in $W$ if and only if $(x,y)\in E$ for each $x\neq y$. In this paper we give an effective characterization of word-representable graphs in terms of orientations. Namely, we show that a graph is word-representable if and only if it admits a \emph{semi-transitive orientation} defined in the paper. This allows us to prove a number of results about word-representable graphs, in particular showing that the recognition problem is in NP, and that word-representable graphs include all 3-colorable graphs. We also explore bounds on the size of the word representing the graph. The representation number of $G$ is the minimum $k$ such that $G$ is a representable by a word, where each letter occurs $k$ times; such a $k$ exists for any word-representable graph. We show that the representation number of a word-representable graph on $n$ vertices is at most $2n$, while there exist graphs for which it is $n/2$.

The notion of a word-representable graph has been studied in a series of papers in the literature. A graph $G=(V,E)$ is word-representable if there exists a word $w$ over the alphabet $V$ such that letters $x$ and $y$ alternate in $w$ if and only if $xy$ is an edge in $E$. If $V =\{1, \ldots, n\}$, this is equivalent to saying that $G$ is word-representable if for all $x,y \in \{1, \ldots, n\}$, $xy \in E$ if and only if the subword $w_{\{x,y\}}$ of $w$ consisting of all occurrences of $x$ or $y$ in $w$ has no consecutive occurrence of the pattern 11. In this paper, we introduce the study of $u$-representable graphs for any word $u \in \{1,2\}^*$. A graph $G$ is $u$-representable if and only if there is a labeled version of $G$, $G=(\{1, \ldots, n\}, E)$, and a word $w \in \{1, \ldots, n\}^*$ such that for all $x,y \in \{1, \ldots, n\}$, $xy \in E$ if and only if $w_{\{x,y\}}$ has no consecutive occurrence of the pattern $u$. Thus, word-representable graphs are just $11$-representable graphs. We show that for any $k \geq 3$, every finite graph $G$ is $1^k$-representable. This contrasts with the fact that not all graphs are 11-representable graphs. The main focus of the paper is the study of $12$-representable graphs. In particular, we classify the $12$-representable trees. We show that any $12$-representable graph is a comparability graph and the class of $12$-representable graphs include the classes of co-interval graphs and permutation graphs. We also state a number of facts on $12$-representation of induced subgraphs of a grid graph.

A graph $G=(V,E)$ is representable if there exists a word $W$ over the alphabet $V$ such that letters $x$ and $y$ alternate in $W$ if and only if $(x,y)\in E$ for each $x\neq y$. If $W$ is $k$-uniform (each letter of $W$ occurs exactly $k$ times in it) then $G$ is called $k$-representable. It was shown that a graph is representable if and only if it is $k$-representable for some $k$. Minimum $k$ for which a representable graph $G$ is $k$-representable is called its representation number. In this paper we give a characterization of representable graphs in terms of orientations. Namely, we show that a graph is representable if and only if it admits an orientation into a so-called \emph{semi-transitive digraph}. This allows us to prove a number of results about representable graphs, not the least that 3-colorable graphs are representable. We also prove that the representation number of a graph on $n$ nodes is at most $n$, from which one concludes that the recognition problem for representable graphs is in NP. This bound is tight up to a constant factor, as we present a graph whose representation number is $n/2$. We also answer several questions, in particular, on representability of the Petersen graph and local permutation representability.