arXiv++ Combinatorics

Graphs that change over time arise throughout applications, but there is no single standard way to decompose them into smaller pieces. In this paper, we propose a systematic categorical method for doing so. The main idea is to combine structured decompositions, which generalize graph decompositions, such as tree-decompositions, with persistent narratives, which model time-varying data as diagrams. We prove that, under suitable categorical hypotheses, any static theory of decompositions can be lifted to a corresponding temporal theory. As case studies, we apply this construction to time-varying graphs and recover natural temporal analogues of ordinary tree-width, complemented tree-width, and the tree-independence number.

It is folklore that tree-width is monotone under taking subgraphs (i.e. injective graph homomorphisms) and contractions (certain kinds of surjective graph homomorphisms). However, although tree-width is obviously not monotone under any surjective graph homomorphism, it is not clear whether contractions are canonically the only class of surjections with respect to which it is monotone. Under the requirement that the decomposition shape must be preserved, we prove that this is indeed the case. Our results provide a framework for answering questions of this sort for many other kinds of combinatorial data structures (such as directed multigraphs, hypergraphs, Petri nets, circular port graphs, half-edge graphs, databases, simplicial sets etc.) for which natural analogues of tree decompositions can be defined. Furthermore and of independent interest, we prove these results by introducing the notion of a lasso, a generalization of contractions of graphs to arbitrary categories with pushouts of monomorphisms.

Algorithmicists are well-aware that fast dynamic programming algorithms are very often the correct choice when computing on compositional (or even recursive) graphs. Here we initiate the study of how to generalize this folklore intuition to mathematical structures writ large. We achieve this horizontal generality by adopting a categorial perspective which allows us to show that: (1) structured decompositions (a recent, abstract generalization of many graph decompositions) define Grothendieck topologies on categories of data (adhesive categories) and that (2) any computational problem which can be represented as a sheaf with respect to these topologies can be decided in linear time on classes of inputs which admit decompositions of bounded width and whose decomposition shapes have bounded feedback vertex number. This immediately leads to algorithms on objects of any C-set category; these include -- to name but a few examples -- structures such as: symmetric graphs, directed graphs, directed multigraphs, hypergraphs, directed hypergraphs, databases, simplicial complexes, circular port graphs and half-edge graphs. Thus we initiate the bridging of tools from sheaf theory, structural graph theory and parameterized complexity theory; we believe this to be a very fruitful approach for a general, algebraic theory of dynamic programming algorithms. Finally we pair our theoretical results with concrete implementations of our main algorithmic contribution in the AlgebraicJulia ecosystem.

We introduce structured decompositions, category-theoretic structures which simultaneously generalize notions from graph theory (including treewidth, layered treewidth, co-treewidth, graph decomposition width, tree independence number, hypergraph treewidth and H-treewidth), geometric group theory (specifically Bass-Serre theory), and dynamical systems (e.g. hybrid dynamical systems). We define width functors, which provide a compositional way to analyze and relate different structural complexity measures, and establish a general duality between decompositions and completions of objects.

Given a finite structure $M$ and property $p$, it is a natural to study the degree of satisfiability of $p$ in $M$; i.e. to ask: what is the probability that uniformly randomly chosen elements in $M$ satisfy $p$? In group theory, a well-known result of Gustafson states that the equation $xy=yx$ has a finite satisfiability gap: its degree of satisfiability is either $1$ (in Abelian groups) or no larger than $\frac{5}{8}$. Degree of satisfiability has proven useful in the study of (finite and infinite) group-like and ring-like algebraic structures, but finite satisfiability gap questions have not been considered in lattice-like, order-theoretic settings yet. Here we investigate degree of satisfiability questions in the context of Heyting algebras and intuitionistic logic. We classify all equations in one free variable with respect to finite satisfiability gap, and determine which common principles of classical logic in multiple free variables have finite satisfiability gap. In particular we prove that, in a finite non-Boolean Heyting algebra, the probability that a randomly chosen element satisfies $x \vee \neg x = \top$ is no larger than $\frac{2}{3}$. Finally, we generalize our results to infinite Heyting algebras, and present their applications to point-set topology, black-box algebras, and the philosophy of logic.

Treewidth is a well-known graph invariant with multiple interesting applications in combinatorics. On the practical side, many NP-complete problems are polynomial-time (sometimes even linear-time) solvable on graphs of bounded treewidth. On the theoretical side, treewidth played an essential role in the proof of the celebrated Robertson-Seymour graph minor theorem. While defining treewidth-like invariants on graphs and treewidth analogues on other sorts of combinatorial objects (incl. hypergraphs, digraphs) has been a fruitful avenue of research, a direct, categorial description capturing multiple treewidth-like invariants is yet to emerge. Here we report on our recent work on spined categories (arXiv:2104.01841): categories equipped with extra structure that permits the definition of a functorial analogue of treewidth, the triangulation functor. The usual notion of treewidth is recovered as a special case, the triangulation functor of a spined category with graphs as objects and graph monomorphisms as arrows. The usual notion of treewidth for hypergraphs arises as the triangulation functor of a similar category of hypergraphs.

Tree-width is an invaluable tool for computational problems on graphs. But often one would like to compute on other kinds of objects (e.g. decorated graphs or even algebraic structures) where there is no known tree-width analogue. Here we define an abstract analogue of tree-width which provides a uniform definition of various tree-width-like invariants including graph tree-width, hypergraph tree-width, complemented tree-width and even new constructions such as the tree-width of modular quotients. We obtain this generalization by developing a general theory of categories that admit abstract analogues of both tree decompositions and tree-width; we call these pseudo-chordal completions and the triangulation functor respectively.

We introduce a natural temporal analogue of Eulerian circuits and prove that, in contrast with the static case, it is NP-hard to determine whether a given temporal graph is temporally Eulerian even if strong restrictions are placed on the structure of the underlying graph and each edge is active at only three times. However, we do obtain an FPT-algorithm with respect to a new parameter called interval-membership-width which restricts the times assigned to different edges; we believe that this parameter will be of independent interest for other temporal graph problems. Our techniques also allow us to resolve two open question of Akrida, Mertzios and Spirakis [CIAC 2019] concerning a related problem of exploring temporal stars. Furthermore, we introduce a vertex-variant of interval-membership-width (which can be arbitrarily larger than its edge-counterpart) and use it to obtain an FPT-time algorithm for a natural vertex-exploration problem that remains hard even when interval-membership-width is bounded.

Gurski and Wanke showed that a graph class C has bounded tree-width if and only if its associated class of directed line graphs has bounded clique-width. Inevitably -- asking whether this relationship lifts to directed graphs -- we introduce a new digraph width measure: we obtain it by investigating digraphs whose directed line graphs have bounded cliquewidth. Thus, to generalize Gurski and Wanke's aforementioned result, we introduce a natural generalization of branch-width to digraphs and we name it accordingly. Directed branch-width is a genuinely directed width-measure insofar as it cannot be used to bound the value of the underlying undirected tree-width. Despite this, the two measures are still closely related: the directed branch-width of a digraph D can differ from the branch-width of its underlying undirected graph only at sources and sinks. This relationship allows us to extend a range of algorithmic results from directed graphs with bounded underlying treewidth to the strictly larger class of digraphs having bounded directed branch-width.