arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Dieter Rautenbach

103 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2017-11-27
Maximal determinants of combinatorial matrices
Published • View PublicationBIB
We prove that $\det A\leq 6^\frac{n}{6}$ whenever $A\in\{0,1\}^{n\times n}$ contains at most $2n$ ones. We also prove an upper bound on the determinant of matrices with the $k$-consecutive ones property, a generalisation of the consecutive ones property, where each row is allowed to have up to $k$ blocks of ones. Finally, we prove an upper bound on the determinant of a path-edge incidence matrix in a tree and use that to bound the leaf rank of a graph in terms of its order.
On the Kőnig-Egerváry Theorem for $k$-Paths
Published • View PublicationBIB
The famous Kőnig-Egerváry theorem is equivalent to the statement that the matching number equals the vertex cover number for every induced subgraph of some graph if and only if that graph is bipartite. Inspired by this result, we consider the set ${\cal G}_k$ of all graphs such that, for every induced subgraph, the maximum number of disjoint paths of order $k$ equals the minimum order of a set of vertices intersecting all paths of order $k$. For $k\in \{ 3,4\}$, we give complete structural descriptions of the graphs in ${\cal G}_k$. Furthermore, for odd $k$, we give a complete structural description of the graphs in ${\cal G}_k$ that contain no cycle of order less than $k$. For these graph classes, our results yield efficient recognition algorithms as well as efficient algorithms that determine maximum sets of disjoint paths of order $k$ and minimum sets of vertices intersecting all paths of order $k$.
Locally Searching for Large Induced Matchings
It is an easy observation that a natural greedy approach yields a $\left(d-O(1)\right)$-factor approximation algorithm for the maximum induced matching problem in $d$-regular graphs. The only considerable and non-trivial improvement of this approximation ratio was obtained by Gotthilf and Lewenstein using a combination of the greedy approach and local search, where understanding the performance of the local search was the challenging part of the analysis. We study the performance of their local search when applied to general graphs, $C_4$-free graphs, $\{C_3,C_4\}$-free graphs, $C_5$-free graphs, and claw-free graphs. As immediate consequences, we obtain approximation algorithms for the maximum induced matching problem restricted to the $d$-regular graphs in these classes.
2017-07-08
The Cat and the Noisy Mouse
Published • View PublicationBIB
We consider a variant of a pursuit and evasion game studied independently by Britnell and Wildon as well as Haslegrave. In their game, a cat has to catch an invisible mouse that moves along the edges of some graph $G$. In our version, the cat receives partial information about its distance to the mouse, and we show that the cat has a winning strategy if and only if $G$ is a forest. Seager proposed a similar game with complete distance information whose rules cause some small yet important differences to the game we consider.
Sandwiches Missing Two Ingredients of Order Four
Published • View PublicationBIB
For a set ${\cal F}$ of graphs, an instance of the ${\cal F}$-{\sc free Sandwich Problem} is a pair $(G_1,G_2)$ consisting of two graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ with the same vertex set such that $G_1$ is a subgraph of $G_2$, and the task is to determine an ${\cal F}$-free graph $G$ containing $G_1$ and contained in $G_2$, or to decide that such a graph does not exist. Initially motivated by the graph sandwich problem for trivially perfect graphs, which are the $\{ P_4,C_4\}$-free graphs, we study the complexity of the ${\cal F}$-{\sc free Sandwich Problem} for sets ${\cal F}$ containing two non-isomorphic graphs of order four. We show that if ${\cal F}$ is one of the sets $\left\{ {\rm diamond},K_4\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm diamond},C_4\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm diamond},{\rm paw}\right\}$, $\left\{ K_4,\overline{K_4}\right\}$, $\left\{ P_4,C_4\right\}$, $\left\{ P_4,\overline{\rm claw}\right\}$, $\left\{ P_4,\overline{\rm paw}\right\}$, $\left\{ P_4,\overline{\rm diamond}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},C_4\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},{\rm claw}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},\overline{\rm claw}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},\overline{\rm paw}\right\}$, $\left\{ C_4,\overline{C_4}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm claw},\overline{\rm claw}\right\}$, and $\left\{ {\rm claw},\overline{C_4}\right\}$, then the ${\cal F}$-{\sc free Sandwich Problem} can be solved in polynomial time, and, if ${\cal F}$ is one of the sets $\left\{ C_4,K_4\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},K_4\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},\overline{K_4}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},\overline{C_4}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm diamond},\overline{C_4}\right\}$, $\left\{ {\rm paw},\overline{\rm diamond}\right\}$, and $\left\{ {\rm diamond},\overline{\rm diamond}\right\}$, then the decision version of the ${\cal F}$-{\sc free Sandwich Problem} is NP-complete.
The Geodetic Hull Number is Hard for Chordal Graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
We show the hardness of the geodetic hull number for chordal graphs.
Constant Threshold Intersection Graphs of Orthodox Paths in Trees
Published • View PublicationBIB
A graph $G$ belongs to the class ${\rm ORTH}[h,s,t]$ for integers $h$, $s$, and $t$ if there is a pair $(T,{\cal S})$, where $T$ is a tree of maximum degree at most $h$, and ${\cal S}$ is a collection $(S_u)_{u\in V(G)}$ of subtrees $S_u$ of maximum degree at most $s$ of $T$, one for each vertex $u$ of $G$, such that, for every vertex $u$ of $G$, all leaves of $S_u$ are also leaves of $T$, and, for every two distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ of $G$, the following three properties are equivalent: (i) $u$ and $v$ are adjacent. (ii) $S_u$ and $S_v$ have at least $t$ vertices in common. (iii) $S_u$ and $S_v$ share a leaf of $T$. The class ${\rm ORTH}[h,s,t]$ was introduced by Jamison and Mulder. Here we focus on the case $s=2$, which is closely related to the well-known VPT and EPT graphs. We collect general properties of the graphs in ${\rm ORTH}[h,2,t]$, and provide a characterization in terms of tree layouts. Answering a question posed by Golumbic, Lipshteyn, and Stern, we show that ${\rm ORTH}[h+1,2,t]\setminus {\rm ORTH}[h,2,t]$ is non-empty for every $h\geq 3$ and $t\geq 3$. We derive decomposition properties, which lead to efficient recognition algorithms for the graphs in ${\rm ORTH}[h,2,2]$ for every $h\geq 3$. Finally, we give a complete description of the graphs in ${\rm ORTH}[3,2,2]$, and show that the graphs in ${\rm ORTH}[3,2,3]$ are line graphs of planar graphs.
2017-02-08
Degenerate Matchings and Edge Colorings
Published • View PublicationBIB
A matching $M$ in a graph $G$ is $r$-degenerate if the subgraph of $G$ induced by the set of vertices incident with an edge in $M$ is $r$-degenerate. Goddard, Hedetniemi, Hedetniemi, and Laskar (Generalized subgraph-restricted matchings in graphs, Discrete Mathematics 293 (2005) 129-138) introduced the notion of acyclic matchings, which coincide with $1$-degenerate matchings. Solving a problem they posed, we describe an efficient algorithm to determine the maximum size of an $r$-degenerate matching in a given chordal graph. Furthermore, we study the $r$-chromatic index of a graph defined as the minimum number of $r$-degenerate matchings into which its edge set can be partitioned, obtaining upper bounds and discussing extremal graphs.
2016-11-21
Uniquely restricted matchings and edge colorings
Published • View PublicationBIB
A matching in a graph is uniquely restricted if no other matching covers exactly the same set of vertices. This notion was defined by Golumbic, Hirst, and Lewenstein and studied in a number of articles. Our contribution is twofold. We provide approximation algorithms for computing a uniquely restricted matching of maximum size in some bipartite graphs. In particular, we achieve a ratio of $9/5$ for subcubic bipartite graphs, improving over a $2$-approximation algorithm proposed by Mishra. Furthermore, we study the uniquely restricted chromatic index of a graph, defined as the minimum number of uniquely restricted matchings into which its edge set can be partitioned. We provide tight upper bounds in terms of the maximum degree and characterize all extremal graphs. Our constructive proofs yield efficient algorithms to determine the corresponding edge colorings.
Large Values of the Clustering Coefficient
Published • View PublicationBIB
A prominent parameter in the context of network analysis, originally proposed by Watts and Strogatz (Collective dynamics of `small-world' networks, Nature 393 (1998) 440-442), is the clustering coefficient of a graph $G$. It is defined as the arithmetic mean of the clustering coefficients of its vertices, where the clustering coefficient of a vertex $u$ of $G$ is the relative density $m(G[N_G(u)])/{d_G(u)\choose 2}$ of its neighborhood if $d_G(u)$ is at least $2$, and $0$ otherwise. It is unknown which graphs maximize the clustering coefficient among all connected graphs of given order and size. We determine the maximum clustering coefficients among all connected regular graphs of a given order, as well as among all connected subcubic graphs of a given order. In both cases, we characterize all extremal graphs. Furthermore, we determine the maximum increase of the clustering coefficient caused by adding a single edge.
2016-09-28
Extremal Values of the Chromatic Number for a Given Degree Sequence
Published • View PublicationBIB
For a degree sequence $d:d_1\geq \cdots \geq d_n$, we consider the smallest chromatic number $χ_{\min}(d)$ and the largest chromatic number $χ_{\max}(d)$ among all graphs with degree sequence $d$. We show that if $d_n\geq 1$, then $χ_{\min}(d)\leq \max\left\{ 3,d_1-\frac{n+1}{4d_1}+4\right\}$, and, if $\sqrt{n+\frac{1}{4}}-\frac{1}{2}>d_1\geq d_n\geq 1$, then $χ_{\max}(d)=\max\limits_{i\in [n]}\min\left\{ i,d_i+1\right\}$. For a given degree sequence $d$ with bounded entries, we show that $χ_{\min}(d)$, $χ_{\max}(d)$, and also the smallest independence number $α_{\min}(d)$ among all graphs with degree sequence $d$, can be determined in polynomial time.
2016-08-16
Some Comments on the Slater number
Published • View PublicationBIB
Let $G$ be a graph with degree sequence $d_1\geq \ldots \geq d_n$. Slater proposed $s\ell(G)=\min\{ s: (d_1+1)+\cdots+(d_s+1)\geq n\}$ as a lower bound on the domination number $γ(G)$ of $G$. We show that deciding the equality of $γ(G)$ and $s\ell(G)$ for a given graph $G$ is NP-complete but that one can decide efficiently whether $γ(G)>s\ell(G)$ or $γ(G)\leq \left(\left\lceil\ln \left(\frac{n(G)}{s\ell(G)}\right)\right\rceil+1\right)s\ell(G)$. For real numbers $α$ and $β$ with $α\geq \max\{ 0,β\}$, let ${\cal G}(α,β)$ be the class of non-null graphs $G$ such that every non-null subgraph $H$ of $G$ has at most $αn(H)-β$ many edges. Generalizing a result of Desormeaux, Haynes, and Henning, we show that $γ(G)\leq (2α+1)s\ell(G)-2β$ for every graph $G$ in ${\cal G}(α,β)$ with $α\leq \frac{3}{2}$. Furthermore, we show that $γ(G)/s\ell(G)$ is bounded for graphs $G$ in ${\cal G}(α,β)$ if and only if $α<2$. For an outerplanar graph $G$ with $s\ell(G)\geq 2$, we show $γ(G)\leq 6s\ell(G)-6$. In analogy to $s\ell(G)$, we propose $s\ell_t(G)=\min\{ s: d_1+\cdots+d_s\geq n\}$ as a lower bound on the total domination number. Strengthening results due to Raczek as well as Chellali and Haynes, we show that $s\ell_t(T)\geq \frac{n+2-n_1}{2}$ for every tree $T$ of order $n$ at least $2$ with $n_1$ endvertices.
2016-08-02
Some Bounds on the Zero Forcing Number of a Graph
Published • View PublicationBIB
A set $Z$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a zero forcing set of $G$ if initially labeling all vertices in $Z$ with $1$ and all remaining vertices of $G$ with $0$, and then, iteratively and as long as possible, changing the label of some vertex $u$ from $0$ to $1$ if $u$ is the only neighbor with label $0$ of some vertex with label $1$, results in the entire vertex set of $G$. The zero forcing number $Z(G)$, defined as the minimum order of a zero forcing set of $G$, was proposed as an upper bound of the corank of matrices associated with $G$, and was also considered in connection with quantum physics and logic circuits. In view of the computational hardness of the zero forcing number, upper and lower bounds are of interest. Refining results of Amos, Caro, Davila, and Pepper, we show that $Z(G)\leq \frac{Δ-2}{Δ-1}n$ for a connected graph $G$ of order $n$ and maximum degree $Δ$ at least $3$ if and only if $G$ does not belong to $\{ K_{Δ+1},K_{Δ,Δ},K_{Δ-1,Δ},G_1,G_2\}$, where $G_1$ and $G_2$ are two specific graphs of orders $5$ and $7$, respectively. For a connected graph $G$ of order $n$, maximum degree $3$, and girth at least $5$, we show $Z(G)\leq \frac{n}{2}-Ω\left(\frac{n}{\log n}\right)$. Using a probabilistic argument, we show $Z(G)\leq \left(1-\frac{H_r}{r}+o\left(\frac{H_r}{r}\right)\right)n$ for an $r$-regular graph $G$ of order $n$ and girth at least $5$, where $H_r$ is the $r$-th harmonic number. Finally, we show $Z(G)\geq (g-2)(δ-2)+2$ for a graph $G$ of girth $g\in \{ 5,6\}$ and minimum degree $δ$, which partially confirms a conjecture of Davila and Kenter.
2016-05-19
Exponential Independence
For a set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$, a vertex $u$ in $V(G)\setminus S$, and a vertex $v$ in $S$, let ${\rm dist}_{(G,S)}(u,v)$ be the distance of $u$ and $v$ in the graph $G-(S\setminus \{ v\})$. Dankelmann et al. (Domination with exponential decay, Discrete Math. 309 (2009) 5877-5883) define $S$ to be an exponential dominating set of $G$ if $w_{(G,S)}(u)\geq 1$ for every vertex $u$ in $V(G)\setminus S$, where $w_{(G,S)}(u)=\sum\limits_{v\in S}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{{\rm dist}_{(G,S)}(u,v)-1}$. Inspired by this notion, we define $S$ to be an exponential independent set of $G$ if $w_{(G,S\setminus \{ u\})}(u)<1$ for every vertex $u$ in $S$, and the exponential independence number $α_e(G)$ of $G$ as the maximum order of an exponential independent set of $G$. Similarly as for exponential domination, the non-local nature of exponential independence leads to many interesting effects and challenges. Our results comprise exact values for special graphs as well as tight bounds and the corresponding extremal graphs. Furthermore, we characterize all graphs $G$ for which $α_e(H)$ equals the independence number $α(H)$ for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, and we give an explicit characterization of all trees $T$ with $α_e(T)=α(T)$.
Hereditary Equality of Domination and Exponential Domination
Published • View PublicationBIB
We characterize a large subclass of the class of those graphs $G$ for which the exponential domination number of $H$ equals the domination number of $H$ for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$.
Relating Domination, Exponential Domination, and Porous Exponential Domination
Published • View PublicationBIB
The domination number $γ(G)$ of a graph $G$, its exponential domination number $γ_e(G)$, and its porous exponential domination number $γ_e^*(G)$ satisfy $γ_e^*(G)\leq γ_e(G)\leq γ(G)$. We contribute results about the gaps in these inequalities as well as the graphs for which some of the inequalities hold with equality. Relaxing the natural integer linear program whose optimum value is $γ_e^*(G)$, we are led to the definition of the fractional porous exponential domination number $γ_{e,f}^*(G)$ of a graph $G$. For a subcubic tree $T$ of order $n$, we show $γ_{e,f}^*(T)=\frac{n+2}{6}$ and $γ_e(T)\leq 2γ_{e,f}^*(T)$. We characterize the two classes of subcubic trees $T$ with $γ_e(T)=γ_{e,f}^*(T)$ and $γ(T)=γ_e(T)$, respectively. Using linear programming arguments, we establish several lower bounds on the fractional porous exponential domination number in more general settings.
How to determine if a random graph with a fixed degree sequence has a giant component
Published • View PublicationBIB
For a fixed degree sequence $\mathcal{D}=(d_1,...,d_n)$, let $G(\mathcal{D})$ be a uniformly chosen (simple) graph on $\{1,...,n\}$ where the vertex $i$ has degree $d_i$. In this paper we determine whether $G(\mathcal{D})$ has a giant component with high probability, essentially imposing no conditions on $\mathcal{D}$. We simply insist that the sum of the degrees in $\mathcal{D}$ which are not 2 is at least $λ(n)$ for some function $λ$ going to infinity with $n$. This is a relatively minor technical condition, and when $\mathcal{D}$ does not satisfy it, both the probability that $G(\mathcal{D})$ has a giant component and the probability that $G(\mathcal{D})$ has no giant component are bounded away from $1$.
2016-01-09 v2
Dynamic Monopolies for Degree Proportional Thresholds in Connected Graphs of Girth at least Five and Trees
Published • View PublicationBIB
Let $G$ be a graph, and let $ρ\in (0,1)$. For a set $D$ of vertices of $G$, let the set $H_ρ(D)$ arise by starting with the set $D$, and iteratively adding further vertices $u$ to the current set if they have at least $\lceil ρd_G(u)\rceil$ neighbors in it. If $H_ρ(D)$ contains all vertices of $G$, then $D$ is known as an irreversible dynamic monopoly or a perfect target set associated with the threshold function $u\mapsto \lceil ρd_G(u)\rceil$. Let $h_ρ(G)$ be the minimum cardinality of such an irreversible dynamic monopoly. For a connected graph $G$ of maximum degree at least $\frac{1}ρ$, Chang (Triggering cascades on undirected connected graphs, Information Processing Letters 111 (2011) 973-978) showed $h_ρ(G)\leq 5.83ρn(G)$, which was improved by Chang and Lyuu (Triggering cascades on strongly connected directed graphs, Theoretical Computer Science 593 (2015) 62-69) to $h_ρ(G)\leq 4.92ρn(G)$. We show that for every $ε>0$, there is some $ρ(ε)>0$ such that $h_ρ(G) \leq(2+ε)ρn(G)$ for every $ρ$ in $(0,ρ(ε))$, and every connected graph $G$ that has maximum degree at least $\frac{1}ρ$ and girth at least $5$. Furthermore, we show that $h_ρ(T) \leq ρn(T)$ for every $ρ$ in $(0,1]$, and every tree $T$ that has order at least $\frac{1}ρ$.
Relating $2$-Rainbow Domination to Roman domination
Published • View PublicationBIB
For a graph $G$, let $γ_R(G)$ and $γ_{r2}(G)$ denote the Roman domination number of $G$ and the $2$-rainbow domination number of $G$, respectively. It is known that $γ_{r2}(G)\leq γ_R(G)\leq \frac{3}{2}γ_{r2}(G)$. Fujita and Furuya (Difference between 2-rainbow domination and Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Applied Mathematics 161 (2013) 806-812) present some kind of characterization of the graphs $G$ for which $γ_R(G)-γ_{r2}(G)=k$ for some integer $k$. Unfortunately, their result does not lead to an algorithm that allows to recognize these graphs efficiently. We show that for every fixed non-negative integer $k$, the recognition of the connected $K_4$-free graphs $G$ with $γ_R(G)-γ_{r2}(G)=k$ is NP-hard, which implies that there is most likely no good characterization of these graphs. We characterize the graphs $G$ such that $γ_{r2}(H)=γ_R(H)$ for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, and collect several properties of the graphs $G$ with $γ_R(G)=\frac{3}{2}γ_{r2}(G)$.
Dominating Sets inducing Large Components in Maximal Outerplanar Graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
For a maximal outerplanar graph $G$ of order $n$ at least $3$, Matheson and Tarjan showed that $G$ has domination number at most $n/3$. Similarly, for a maximal outerplanar graph $G$ of order $n$ at least $5$, Dorfling, Hattingh, and Jonck showed, by a completely different approach, that $G$ has total domination number at most $2n/5$ unless $G$ is isomorphic to one of two exceptional graphs of order $12$. We present a unified proof of a common generalization of these two results. For every positive integer $k$, we specify a set ${\cal H}_k$ of graphs of order at least $4k+4$ and at most $4k^2-2k$ such that every maximal outerplanar graph $G$ of order $n$ at least $2k+1$ that does not belong to ${\cal H}_k$ has a dominating set $D$ of order at most $\lfloor\frac{kn}{2k+1}\rfloor$ such that every component of the subgraph $G[D]$ of $G$ induced by $D$ has order at least $k$.