arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this case-study in computer-human collaboration, we develop, implement, and execute symbolic-computational algorithms for the automatic discovery and proof of explicit expressions for the expectation, variance, and higher moments of a large class of natural combinatorial statistics defined on Catalan-counted objects, enabling, inter-alia, to prove that they are not asymptotically normal. In particular, we reproduce in 0.12 seconds results of Miklos Bona, and derive far deeper results, way beyond the scope of humans, concerning higher moments of the random variable "number of occurrences of a pattern" in the set of 132-avoiding permutations for all patterns of length 2 and 3, and, more impressively, explicit expressions for the averages for all patterns of lengths up to 10. The ample output inspired us to make an intriguing conjecture concerning the number of so-called Bona classes, and we pledge to donate 100 dollars to the OEIS Foundation in honor of the prover (or disprover).

I conjecture a certain explicit determinant evaluation, whose proof would imply the solution of certain enumeration problem that I have been working on, and that I find interesting. I am pledging \$500 to the OEIS Foundation (in honor of the prover!) for a proof, and \$50 (in honor of the disprover)

I describe an empirical-yet-rigorous, algorithm, based on Riordan's rook polynomials and the so-called C-finite ansatz, fully implemented in the accompanying Maple package (http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/tokhniot/MENAGES ), MENAGES, that reproduces in a few seconds, rigorously-proved enumeration theorems on permutations with restricted positions, previously proved by quite a few illustrious human mathematicians, and that can go far beyond any human attempts.

We study statistical properties of the random variables $X_σ(π)$, the number of occurrences of the pattern $σ$ in the permutation $π$. We present two contrasting approaches to this problem: traditional probability theory and the ``less traditional'' computational approach. Through the perspective of the first one, we prove that for any pair of patterns $σ$ and $τ$, the random variables $X_σ$ and $X_τ$ are jointly asymptotically normal (when the permutation is chosen from $S_{n}$). From the other perspective, we develop algorithms that can show asymptotic normality and joint asymptotic normality (up to a point) and derive explicit formulas for quite a few moments and mixed moments empirically, yet rigorously. The computational approach can also be extended to the case where permutations are drawn from a set of pattern avoiders to produce many empirical moments and mixed moments. This data suggests that some random variables are not asymptotically normal in this setting.

This article is a sequel to a recent article by Eric Rowland and Reem Yassawi, presenting yet another approach to the fast determination of congruence properties of `famous' combinatorial sequences. The present approach can be taught to a computer, and our beloved servant, Shalosh B. Ekhad, was able to generate many new theorems, for famous sequences, of course, but also for many obscure ones!

We show how to extend the Karolyi-Nagy beautiful proof of the Zeilberger-Bressoud q-Dyson theorem, (first proved by Zeilberger and Bressoud in 1985, and originally conjectured by George Andrews in 1975), that states that the constant term of a certain Laurent polynomial equals the q-multinomial coefficient, how to evaluate any other specific coefficient. The algorithm implies that any such coefficient is always a certain rational function (that the algorithm finds) times the q-multinomial coefficient.

When Mike Hirschhorn showed us his lovely gem, that gives the simplest-to-date proof of Ramanujan's famous result that p(11n+6) is divisible by 11, we realized that his amazing method can be extended, and taught to a computer, and can prove even deeper identities. We would have done much more if not for the existence of Silviu Radu's powerful algorithm that handle any Ramanujan type congruence for any modular form (of a very general type), but it is still nice to know that in order to prove such simply stated results, that can be explained to a seven-year-old, one does not need the intimidating edifice of the "web of modularity", that Ramanujan never mastered, and probably would not have liked.

We give a short proof of a Ptolemy-style result first discovered and proved by Jane McDougall. It may be viewed as a generalization to any even number of points of the cubic relation connecting the six joint distances of four points on a circle (whose quadratic relation is the famed Plucker relation, alias Ptolemy's theorem). This article is in fond memory of Andrei Zelevinsky (1953-2013) who loved Ptolemy's theorem.

One of the greatest experimental mathematicians of all time was also one of the greatest mathematicians of all time, the great Leonhard Euler. Usually he had an uncanny intuition on how many "special cases" one needs before one can formulate a plausible conjecture, but one time he was "almost fooled", only to find out that his conjecture was premature. In 1990, George Andrews found a way to "correct" Euler. Here we show how to generate, AUTOMATICALLY, rigorously-proved Euler-Andrews Style formulas, that enables one to generate Euler-style "cautionary tales" about the "danger" of using naive empirical induction. Ironically, the way we prove the Andrews-style corrections is empirical! But in order to turn the empirical proof into a full-fledged rigorous proof, we must make sure that we check sufficiently many (but still not that many!) special cases.

Jacobi said "man muss immer umkehren". And indeed it takes a genius like Michael Somos to take a specific non-linear recurrence, like a(n)=(a(n-1)a(n-3)+a(n-2)^2)/a(n-4), subject to a(1)=1, a(2)=1, a(3)=1, a(4)=1, and observe that surprise, surprise, they always generate integers. Then it takes other geniuses to actually prove this fact (and the more general so-called Laurent phenomenon). But let's follow Jacobi's advise and go backwards. Rather than try to shoot a target fifty meters away, and most probably miss it, let's shoot first, and then draw the bull'e eye. Then we are guaranteed to be champion target-shooters. So let's take a sequence of integers that manifestly and obviously only consists of integers, and ask our beloved computers to find non-linear recurrences satisfied by the sequence itself, or by well-defined subsequences.

We use recurrence equations (alias difference equations) to enumerate the number of formula-representations of positive integers using only addition and multiplication, and using addition, multiplication, and exponentiation, where all the inputs are ones. We also describe efficient algorithms for the random generation of such representations, and use Dynamical Programming to find a shortest possible formula representing any given positive integer.

The brilliant idea of Jean Betrema and Jean-Guy Penaud that proved the celebrated "three to the power n" theorem of Dominique Gouyou-Beauchamps and Xavier Viennot, counting towers of domino pieces is extended and used to enumerate much more general towers, where the pieces can be many i-mers.

We apply a classic result in Theoretical Computer Science to solve a sticky problem, and give a neat and slick quick proof of half of it

One of the most challenging problems in enumerative combinatorics is to count Wilf classes, where you are given a pattern, or set of patterns, and you are asked to find a "formula", or at least an efficient algorithm, that inputs a positive integer n and outputs the number of permutations avoiding that pattern. In 1996, John Noonan and Doron Zeilberger initiated the counting of permutations that have a prescribed, r, say, occurrences of a given pattern. They gave an ingenious method to generate Functional Equations, alas, with an unbounded number of "catalytic variables", but then described a clever way, using multivariable calculus, how to get enumeration schemes. Alas, their method becomes very complicated for r larger than 1. In the present article we describe a far simpler way to squeeze the necessary information, in polynomial time, for increasing patterns of any length, and for any number of occurrences, r.

The most amazing (at least to me) result in Enumerative Combinatorics is Dominique Gouyou-Beauchamps and Xavier Viennot's theorem that states that the number of so-called directed animals with compact source (that are equivalent, via Viennot's beautiful concept of heaps, to towers of dominoes, that I take the liberty of renaming xaviers) with n+1 points equals 3^n. This amazing result received an even more amazing proof by Jean Bétrema and Jean-Guy Penaud. Both theorem and proof deserve to be better known! Hence this article, that is also accompanied by a comprehensive Maple package http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/tokhniot/BORDELAISE that implements everything (and much more)

The deductive method ruled mathematics for the last 2500 years, now it is the turn of the inductive method. Here we make a modest start by using the inductive method to discover and prove (rigorously) explicit generating functions for the number of dimer (and monomer-dimer) tilings of large families of "skinny" plane regions.

The aim of this paper is to describe the inversion of the sum $\sum_{n\geq 0}a^nb^n$ where $a$ and $b$ are non-commuting variables as a formal series in $a$ and $b$. We show that the inversion satisfies a non-commutative quadratic equation and that the number of certain monomials in its homogeneous components equals to a Catalan number. We also study general solutions of similar quadratic equations.

In how many ways can you place n chocolate pieces all of different sizes in an n by n chocolate box, in such a way that when you go from left to right and from top to bottom, there are no gaps AND the sizes increase along each row and each column? The answer is the well-known OEIS Sequence Number 85. To our amazement, the analogous sequence for a three-dimensional chocolate box was not there. Here we fill this gap, and more importantly, offer some computational and theoretical challenges about enumerating families of Solid Standard Young Tableaux.

This article, written in fond memory of Herbert Saul Wilf (June 13, 1931- Jan. 7, 2012), explores integer partitions where each part shows up a different number of times than the other parts (if it shows up at least once), thereby making a modest contribution towards the solution of one of the eight intrigiung problems posted by Herb Wilf on his website on Dec. 13, 2010

Richard Stanely proposed, in a recent Amer. Math. Monthly Problem, to prove a nice explicit formula for the generating function for the number of n-letter words in {H,T} that have as many occurrences of HT as HH. In this article, we show how to prove this problem automatically, and ANY problem of that type, regardless of the size of the alphabet and the length of the two chosen strings