arXiv++ Combinatorics

As a continuation of a previous study of isolation numbers in Cartesian and lexicographic products, we investigate isolation numbers and, more generally, $\cal F$-isolation numbers in direct, strong, lexicographic, and Cartesian products of graphs. For direct products, we derive upper bounds for the $\{K_{n_1,\ldots,n_d}\}$-isolation number in terms of isolation and total domination parameters of the factors, and establish lower bounds based on open packings. We also determine exact values for several infinite families of direct products, including $ι(P_{4\ell}\times C_{2k+1})=\ell(k+1)$. For strong products, we prove a general lower bound on $ι(G\,\boxtimes\, H,{\cal F})$ involving the $2$-packing number and provide an upper bound on $ι(G\,\boxtimes\, H)$. For lexicographic products, we determine the $\cal F$-isolation number in several general settings, obtaining exact formulas in terms of domination and total domination numbers of the first factor. Finally, for Cartesian products, we extend results from our previous work to arbitrary graph families $\cal F$. We introduce $\cal F$-isolation graphs and use $\cal F$-transversals to derive general upper bounds, together with corresponding lower bounds.

The total isolation game is played on a graph $G$ by two players who take turns playing a vertex such that if $S$ is the set of already played vertices, then a vertex can be selected only if it is adjacent to a vertex that belongs to a (nontrivial) component of the graph $G - N_G(S)$ of order at least $2$ or a vertex that is isolated in $G - N_G(S)$ and belongs to the set $S$, where $N_G(S)$ is the set of vertices adjacent to a vertex in $S$. Dominator wishes to finish the game with the minimum number of played vertices, while Staller has the opposite goal. The game total isolation number $ι_{\rm gt}(G)$ is the number of moves in the Dominator-start game where both players play optimally. We prove that if $G$ is a connected graph of order $n \ge 3$, then $ι_{\rm gt}(G) < \frac{5}{6}n$. Furthermore if $G$ has minimum degree at least $2$, then we prove that $ι_{\rm gt}(G) \le \frac{3}{4}n$. More generally, if $G$ is a connected graph of order $n \ge 3$ with minimum degree $δ$ where $δ\ge 2$, then we prove that $ι_{\rm gt}(G) \le \left( \frac{2δ-1}{3δ-2} \right) n$. Among other results it is proved that if $G$ is a graph of order $n$ with diameter $2$, then $ι_{\rm gt}(G) \le \frac{2}{3}n$.

Given a set $U \subset V$ of vertices in a graph $G = (V, E)$, a {\it private neighbor with respect to the set $U$} is any vertex $w \in V$ having precisely one neighbor, say $v$, in $U$. If $w \in V - U$, then $w$ is called an {\it external private neighbor} of $v$ with respect to $U$. If $w \in U$ then $w$ is called an {\it internal private neighbor} of $v$ with respect to $U$. We also add one special case: if $w \in U$ and $N(w) \cap U = \emptyset$, then we say that $w$ is a {\it self private neighbor} with respect to $U$. By definition, a self private neighbor with respect to $U$ is an isolated vertex in the subgraph of $G$ induced by $U$. In this paper we consider the general problems of trying to find sets of vertices which maximize the number of private neighbors of specific types in a graph. In the process of doing this we define several new maximization parameters of graphs which generalize some known and well-studied parameters of graphs relating to vertex and edge independence, domination and irredundance in graphs.

The isolation number $ι(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set $A\subset V(G)$ such that the subgraph induced by the vertices that are not in the union of the closed neighborhoods of vertices in $A$ has no edges. The invariant, known also under the name vertex-edge domination number of $G$, has attracted a lot of interest in recent years. In this paper, we study the behavior of the isolation number under several graph operations, namely the Cartesian and the lexicographic product and the fractalization leading to generalized Sierpiński graphs. We prove several upper and lower bounds on the isolation number of the Cartesian product of two graphs. We prove a lower bound for the isolation number of the prism $G\,\Box\, K_2$ over an arbitrary graph $G$, which in the case of bipartite graphs leads to the equality $ι(G\,\Box\, K_2)=γ(G)$, where $γ(G)$ is the domination number of $G$. In particular, $ι(Q_{n+1})=γ(Q_n)$ holds for all positive integers $n$, where $Q_n$ is the $n$-dimensional hypercube. For the lexicographic product $G\circ H$ we prove that its isolation number, under certain mild restrictions, equals the total domination number of the first factor $G$. We also prove sharp lower and upper bounds on the isolation numbers of the generalized Sierpiński graphs $S_G^t$, where $G$ is an arbitrary base graph. These bounds in the case of classical Sierpiński graphs, namely $S_{K_n}^t$, coincide and lead to the exact values $ι(S_{K_n}^t)=(n-1)\cdot n^{t-2}$ for all dimensions $t\ge 2$.

The domatic number of a graph is the maximum number of pairwise disjoint dominating sets admitted by the graph. We introduce a game based around this graph invariant. The domatic number game is played on a graph $G$ by two players, Alice and Bob, who take turns selecting a vertex and placing it into one of $k$ sets. Alice is trying to make each of these sets into a dominating set of $G$ while Bob's goal is to prevent this from being accomplished. The maximum $k$ for which Alice can achieve her goal when both players are playing optimal strategies, is called the game domatic number of $G$. There are two versions of the game and two resulting invariants depending on whether Alice or Bob is the first to play. We prove several upper bounds on these game domatic numbers of arbitrary graphs and find the exact values for several classes of graphs including trees, complete bipartite graphs, cycles and some narrow grid graphs. We pose several open problems concerning the effect of standard graph operations on the game domatic number as well as a vexing question related to the monotonicity of the number of sets available to Alice.

The Maker-Breaker domination game is played on a graph $G$ by Dominator and Staller who alternate turns selecting an unplayed vertex of $G$. The goal of Dominator is that the vertices he selected during the game form a dominating set while Staller's goal is to prevent this from happening. The graph invariant $γ_{\rm MB}'(G)$ is the number of Dominator's moves in the game played on $G$ in which he can achieve his goal when Staller makes the first move and both players play optimally. In this paper, we continue the investigation of $2$-$γ_{\rm MB}'$-critical graphs, initiated in [Divarakan et al., Maker--Breaker domination game critical graphs, Discrete Appl.\ Math. 368 (2025) 126--134], which are defined as the graphs $G$ with $γ_{\rm MB}'(G)=2$ and $γ_{\rm MB}'(G-e)>2$ for every edge $e$ in $G$. The authors characterized bipartite $2$-$γ_{\rm MB}'$-critical graphs, and found an example of a non-bipartite $2$-$γ_{\rm MB}'$-critical graph. In this paper, we characterize the $2$-$γ_{\rm MB}'$-critical graphs that have a cut-vertex, which are represented by two infinite families. In addition, we prove that $C_5$ is the only non-bipartite, triangle-free $2$-$γ_{\rm MB}'$-critical graph.

A $(1,1,2,2)$-coloring of a graph is a partition of its vertex set into four sets two of which are independent and the other two are $2$-packings. In this paper, we prove that every claw-free cubic graph admits a $(1,1,2,2)$-coloring. This implies that the conjecture from [Packing chromatic number, $(1,1,2,2)$-colorings, and characterizing the Petersen graph, Aequationes Math.\ 91 (2017) 169--184] that the packing chromatic number of subdivisions of subcubic graphs is at most $5$ is true in the case of claw-free cubic graphs.

Given a graph $G$ and a family of graphs $\cal F$, an $\cal F$-isolating set, as introduced by Caro and Hansberg, is any set $S\subset V(G)$ such that $G - N[S]$ contains no member of $\cal F$ as a subgraph. In this paper, we introduce a game in which two players with opposite goals are together building an $\cal F$-isolating set in $G$. Following the domination games, Dominator (Staller) wants that the resulting $\cal F$-isolating set obtained at the end of the game, is as small (as big) as possible, which leads to the graph invariant called the game $\cal F$-isolation number, denoted $ι_{\rm g}(G,\cal F)$. We prove that the Continuation Principle holds in the $\cal F$-isolation game, and that the difference between the game $\cal F$-isolation numbers when either Dominator or Staller starts the game is at most $1$. Considering two arbitrary families of graphs $\cal F$ and $\cal F'$, we find relations between them that ensure $ι_{\rm g}(G,{\cal{F}}') \leq ι_{\rm g}(G,{\cal{F}})$ for any graph $G$. A special focus is given on the isolation game, which takes place when ${\cal F}=\{K_2\}$. We prove that $ι_{\rm g}(G,\{K_2\})\le |V(G)|/2$ for any graph $G$, and conjecture that $\lceil 3|V(G)|/7\rceil$ is the actual (sharp) upper bound. We prove that the isolation game on a forest when Dominator has the first move never lasts longer than the one in which Staller starts the game. Finally, we prove good lower and upper bounds on the game isolation numbers of paths $P_n$, which lead to the exact values $ι_{\rm g}(P_n,\{K_2\})=\left\lfloor\frac{2n+2}{5}\right\rfloor$ when $n \equiv i \pmod 5$ and $i \in \{1,2,3\}$.

Motivated by the success of domination games and by a variation of the coloring game called the indicated coloring game, we introduce a version of domination games called the indicated domination game. It is played on an arbitrary graph $G$ by two players, Dominator and Staller, where Dominator wants to finish the game in as few rounds as possible while Staller wants just the opposite. In each round, Dominator indicates a vertex $u$ of $G$ that has not been dominated by previous selections of Staller, which, by the rules of the game, forces Staller to select a vertex in the closed neighborhood of $u$. The game is finished when all vertices of $G$ become dominated by the vertices selected by Staller. Assuming that both players are playing optimally according to their goals, the number of selected vertices during the game is the indicated domination number, $γ_i(G)$, of $G$. We prove several bounds on the indicated domination number expressed in terms of other graph invariants. In particular, we find a place of the new graph invariant in the well-known domination chain, by showing that $γ_i(G)\ge Γ(G)$ for all graphs $G$, and by showing that the indicated domination number is incomparable with the game domination number and also with the upper irredundance number. In connection with the trivial upper bound $γ_i(G)\le n(G)-δ(G)$, we characterize the class of graphs $G$ attaining the bound provided that $n(G)\ge 2δ(G)+2$. We prove that in trees, split graphs and grids the indicated domination number equals the independence number. We also find a formula for the indicated domination number of powers of paths, from which we derive that there exist graphs in which the indicated domination number is arbitrarily larger than the upper irredundance number.

A vertex $u$ in a graph $G$ totally dominates a vertex $v$ if $u$ is adjacent to $v$ in $G$. A total dominating set of $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex of $G$ is totally dominated by a vertex in $S$. The indicated total domination game is played on a graph $G$ by two players, Dominator and Staller, who take turns making a move. In each of his moves, Dominator indicates a vertex $v$ of the graph that has not been totally dominated in the previous moves, and Staller chooses (or selects) any vertex adjacent to $v$ that has not yet been played, and adds it to a set $D$ that is being built during the game. The game ends when every vertex is totally dominated, that is, when $D$ is a total dominating set of $G$. The goal of Dominator is to minimize the size of $D$, while Staller wants just the opposite. Providing that both players are playing optimally with respect to their goals, the size of the resulting set $D$ is the indicated total domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_t^{\rm i}(G)$. In this paper we present several results on indicated total domination game. Among other results we prove that the indicated total domination number of a graph is bounded below by the well studied upper total domination number.

The $2$-packing number $ρ_2(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the cardinality of a largest $2$-packing of $G$ and the open packing number $ρ^{\rm o}(G)$ is the cardinality of a largest open packing of $G$, where an open packing (resp. $2$-packing) is a set of vertices in $G$ no two (closed) neighborhoods of which intersect. It is proved that if $G$ is bipartite, then $ρ^{\rm o}(G\Box K_2) = 2ρ_2(G)$. For hypercubes, the lower bounds $ρ_2(Q_n) \ge 2^{n - \lfloor \log n\rfloor -1}$ and $ρ^{\rm o}(Q_n) \ge 2^{n - \lfloor \log (n-1)\rfloor -1}$ are established. These findings are applied to injective colorings of hypercubes. In particular, it is demonstrated that $Q_9$ is the smallest hypercube which is not perfect injectively colorable. It is also proved that $γ_t(Q_{2^k}\times H) = 2^{2^k-k}γ_t(H)$, where $H$ is an arbitrary graph with no isolated vertices.

A graph is well-dominated if all its minimal dominating sets have the same cardinality. In this paper we prove that at least one factor of every connected, well-dominated Cartesian product is a complete graph, which then allows us to give a complete characterization of the connected, well-dominated Cartesian products if both factors have order at least $2$. In particular, we show that $G\,\Box\,H$ is well-dominated if and only if $G\,\Box\,H = P_3 \,\Box\,K_3$ or $G\,\Box\,H= K_n \,\Box\,K_n$ for some $n\ge 2$.

The Grundy domination number, ${γ_{\rm gr}}(G)$, of a graph $G$ is the maximum length of a sequence $(v_1,v_2,\ldots, v_k)$ of vertices in $G$ such that for every $i\in \{2,\ldots, k\}$, the closed neighborhood $N[v_i]$ contains a vertex that does not belong to any closed neighborhood $N[v_j]$, where $j<i$. It is well known that the Grundy domination number of any graph $G$ is greater than or equal to the upper domination number $Γ(G)$, which is in turn greater than or equal to the independence number $α(G)$. In this paper, we initiate the study of the class of graphs $G$ with $Γ(G)={γ_{\rm gr}}(G)$ and its subclass consisting of graphs $G$ with $α(G)={γ_{\rm gr}}(G)$. We characterize the latter class of graphs among all twin-free connected graphs, provide a number of properties of these graphs, and prove that the hypercubes are members of this class. In addition, we give several necessary conditions for graphs $G$ with $Γ(G)={γ_{\rm gr}}(G)$ and present large families of such graphs.

The orientable domination number, ${\rm DOM}(G)$, of a graph $G$ is the largest domination number over all orientations of $G$. In this paper, ${\rm DOM}$ is studied on different product graphs and related graph operations. The orientable domination number of arbitrary corona products is determined, while sharp lower and upper bounds are proved for Cartesian and lexicographic products. A result of Chartrand et al. from 1996 is extended by establishing the values of ${\rm DOM}(K_{n_1,n_2,n_3})$ for arbitrary positive integers $n_1,n_2$ and $n_3$. While considering the orientable domination number of lexicographic product graphs, we answer in the negative a question concerning domination and packing numbers in acyclic digraphs posed in [Domination in digraphs and their direct and Cartesian products, J. Graph Theory 99 (2022) 359-377].

In \cite{nr-1996} Nowakowski and Rall listed a series of conjectures involving several different graph products. In particular, they conjectured that $i(G\times H) \ge i(G)i(H)$ where $i(G)$ is the independent domination number of $G$ and $G\times H$ is the direct product of graphs $G$ and $H$. We show this conjecture is false, and, in fact, construct pairs of graphs for which $\min\{i(G), i(H)\} - i(G\times H)$ is arbitrarily large. We also give the exact value of $i(G\times K_n)$ when $G$ is either a path or a cycle.

A graph is said to be well-edge-dominated if all its minimal edge dominating sets are minimum. It is known that every well-edge-dominated graph $G$ is also equimatchable, meaning that every maximal matching in $G$ is maximum. In this paper, we show that if $G$ is a connected, triangle-free, nonbipartite, well-edge-dominated graph, then $G$ is one of three graphs. We also characterize the well-edge-dominated split graphs and Cartesian products. In particular, we show that a connected Cartesian product $G\Box H$ is well-edge-dominated, where $G$ and $H$ have order at least $2$, if and only if $G\Box H = K_2 \Box K_2$.

If each minimal dominating set in a graph is a minimum dominating set, then the graph is called well-dominated. Since the seminal paper on well-dominated graphs appeared in 1988, the structure of well-dominated graphs from several restricted classes have been studied. In this paper we give a complete characterization of nontrivial direct products that are well-dominated. We prove that if a strong product is well-dominated, then both of its factors are well-dominated. When one of the factors of a strong product is a complete graph, the other factor being well-dominated is also a sufficient condition for the product to be well-dominated. Our main result gives a complete characterization of well-dominated Cartesian products in which at least one of the factors is a complete graph. In addition, we conjecture that this result is actually a complete characterization of the class of nontrivial, well-dominated Cartesian products.

A dominating (respectively, total dominating) set $S$ of a digraph $D$ is a set of vertices in $D$ such that the union of the closed (respectively, open) out-neighborhoods of vertices in $S$ equals the vertex set of $D$. The minimum size of a dominating (respectively, total dominating) set of $D$ is the domination (respectively, total domination) number of $D$, denoted $γ(D)$ (respectively,$γ_t(D)$). The maximum number of pairwise disjoint closed (respectively,open) in-neighborhoods of $D$ is denoted by $ρ(D)$ (respectively,$ρ^{\rm o}(D)$). We prove that in digraphs whose underlying graphs have girth at least $7$, the closed (respectively,open) in-neighborhoods enjoy the Helly property, and use these two results to prove that in any ditree $T$ (that is, a digraph whose underlying graph is a tree), $γ_t(T)=ρ^{\rm o}(T)$ and $γ(T)=ρ(T)$. By using the former equality we then prove that $γ_t(G\times T)=γ_t(G)γ_t(T)$, where $G$ is any digraph and $T$ is any ditree, each without a source vertex, and $G\times T$ is their direct product. From the equality $γ(T)=ρ(T)$ we derive the bound $γ(G\mathbin{\Box} T)\geγ(G)γ(T)$, where $G$ is an arbitrary digraph, $T$ an arbitrary ditree and $G\mathbin{\Box} T$ is their Cartesian product. In general digraphs this Vizing-type bound fails, yet we prove that for any digraphs $G$ and $H$, where $γ(G)\geγ(H)$, we have $γ(G \mathbin{\Box} H) \ge \frac{1}{2}γ(G)(γ(H) + 1)$. This inequality is sharp as demonstrated by an infinite family of examples. Ditrees $T$ and digraphs $H$ enjoying $γ(T\mathbin{\Box} H)=γ(T)γ(H)$ are also investigated.

For a subset $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$, a vertex $v \in S$ is an enclave of $S$ if $v$ and all of its neighbors are in $S$, where a neighbor of $v$ is a vertex adjacent to $v$. A set $S$ is enclaveless if it does not contain any enclaves. The enclaveless number $Ψ(G)$ of $G$ is the maximum cardinality of an enclaveless set in $G$. As first observed in 1997 by Slater [J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards 82 (1977), 197--202], if $G$ is a graph with $n$ vertices, then $γ(G) + Ψ(G) = n$ where $γ(G)$ is the well-studied domination number of $G$. In this paper, we continue the study of the competition-enclaveless game introduced in 2001 by Phillips and Slater [Graph Theory Notes N. Y. 41 (2001), 37--41] and defined as follows. Two players take turns in constructing a maximal enclaveless set $S$, where one player, Maximizer, tries to maximize $|S|$ and one player, Minimizer, tries to minimize~$|S|$. The competition-enclaveless game number $Ψ_g^+(G)$ of $G$ is the number of vertices played when Maximizer starts the game and both players play optimally. We study among other problems the conjecture that if $G$ is an isolate-free graph of order $n$, then $Ψ_g^+(G) \ge \frac{1}{2}n$. We prove this conjecture for regular graphs and for claw-free graphs.

A set $P$ of vertices in a graph $G$ is an open packing if no two distinct vertices in $P$ have a common neighbor. Among all maximal open packings in $G$, the smallest cardinality is denoted $ρ^{\rm o}_L(G)$ and the largest cardinality is $ρ^{\rm o}(G)$. There exist graphs for which these two invariants are arbitrarily far apart. In this paper we begin the investigation of the class of graphs that have one size of maximal open packings. By presenting a method of constructing such graphs we show that every graph is the induced subgraph of a graph in this class. The main result of the paper is a structural characterization of those $G$ that do not have a cycle of order less than $15$ and for which $ρ^{\rm o}_L(G)=ρ^{\rm o}(G)$.