arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Kirsti Kuenzel

24 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
Diamond-free, claw-free cubic graphs are (1, 1, 2, 3)-packing colorable
A $(1, 1, 2, k)$-packing coloring of a graph $G$ is a partition of $V(G)$ into two independent sets, a 2-packing, and a $k$-packing. Recently, the question was posed in [A short proof that every claw-free cubic graph is (1, 1, 2, 2)-packing colorable, arXiv:2512.24001v1] as to whether every claw-free cubic graph is $(1, 1, 2, 3)$-packing colorable. We provide an answer in the affirmative in the case that $G$ is a diamond-free, claw-free cubic graph.
2026-05-30
Characterizing all nonbipartite well-edge-dominated graphs
Given a graph $G$, a set $F$ of edges is an edge dominating set of $G$ if every edge in $G$ is either in $F$ or adjacent to an edge in $F$. A graph $G$ is said to be well-edge-dominated if every minimal edge dominating set has the same cardinality. This definition is the edge version of domination in that a set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is a dominating set if every vertex in $G$ is in $D$ or adjacent to a vertex in $D$ and the domination number $γ(G)$ is the minimum cardinality among all dominating sets. In this paper, we complete the characterization of all nonbipartite, well-edge-dominated graphs. In addition, we produce an infinite class of graphs that satisfy the well-known Vizing's conjecture in domination theory that states $γ(G\Box H) \ge γ(G)γ(H)$ where $G\Box H$ is the Cartesian product of $G$ and $H$.
2025-11-08 v2
Characterizing all $K_4$-free well-edge-dominated graphs of girth 3
Given a graph $G$, a set $F$ of edges is an edge dominating set if all edges in $G$ are either in $F$ or adjacent to an edge in $F$. $G$ is said to be well-edge-dominated if every minimal edge dominating set is also minimum. In 2022, it was proven that there are precisely three nonbipartite, well-edge-dominated graphs with girth at least four. Then in 2025, a characterization of all well-edge-dominated graphs containing exactly one triangle was found. In this paper, we characterize all well-edge-dominated graphs that contain a triangle and yet are $K_4$-free.
Isolation number: Cartesian and lexicographic products and generalized Sierpiński graphs
The isolation number $ι(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set $A\subset V(G)$ such that the subgraph induced by the vertices that are not in the union of the closed neighborhoods of vertices in $A$ has no edges. The invariant, known also under the name vertex-edge domination number of $G$, has attracted a lot of interest in recent years. In this paper, we study the behavior of the isolation number under several graph operations, namely the Cartesian and the lexicographic product and the fractalization leading to generalized Sierpiński graphs. We prove several upper and lower bounds on the isolation number of the Cartesian product of two graphs. We prove a lower bound for the isolation number of the prism $G\,\Box\, K_2$ over an arbitrary graph $G$, which in the case of bipartite graphs leads to the equality $ι(G\,\Box\, K_2)=γ(G)$, where $γ(G)$ is the domination number of $G$. In particular, $ι(Q_{n+1})=γ(Q_n)$ holds for all positive integers $n$, where $Q_n$ is the $n$-dimensional hypercube. For the lexicographic product $G\circ H$ we prove that its isolation number, under certain mild restrictions, equals the total domination number of the first factor $G$. We also prove sharp lower and upper bounds on the isolation numbers of the generalized Sierpiński graphs $S_G^t$, where $G$ is an arbitrary base graph. These bounds in the case of classical Sierpiński graphs, namely $S_{K_n}^t$, coincide and lead to the exact values $ι(S_{K_n}^t)=(n-1)\cdot n^{t-2}$ for all dimensions $t\ge 2$.
On Maker-Breaker domination game critical graphs
The Maker-Breaker domination game is played on a graph $G$ by Dominator and Staller who alternate turns selecting an unplayed vertex of $G$. The goal of Dominator is that the vertices he selected during the game form a dominating set while Staller's goal is to prevent this from happening. The graph invariant $γ_{\rm MB}'(G)$ is the number of Dominator's moves in the game played on $G$ in which he can achieve his goal when Staller makes the first move and both players play optimally. In this paper, we continue the investigation of $2$-$γ_{\rm MB}'$-critical graphs, initiated in [Divarakan et al., Maker--Breaker domination game critical graphs, Discrete Appl.\ Math. 368 (2025) 126--134], which are defined as the graphs $G$ with $γ_{\rm MB}'(G)=2$ and $γ_{\rm MB}'(G-e)>2$ for every edge $e$ in $G$. The authors characterized bipartite $2$-$γ_{\rm MB}'$-critical graphs, and found an example of a non-bipartite $2$-$γ_{\rm MB}'$-critical graph. In this paper, we characterize the $2$-$γ_{\rm MB}'$-critical graphs that have a cut-vertex, which are represented by two infinite families. In addition, we prove that $C_5$ is the only non-bipartite, triangle-free $2$-$γ_{\rm MB}'$-critical graph.
Well-hued graphs with first difference two
A graph $G$ is said to be well-hued if every maximal $k$-colorable subgraph of $G$ has the same order $a_k$. Therefore, if $G$ is well-hued, we can associate with $G$ a sequence $\{a_k\}$. Necessary and sufficient conditions were given as to when a sequence $\{a_k\}$ is realized by a well-hued graph. Further, it was conjectured there is only one connected well-hued graph with $a_2 = a_1 + 2$ for every $a_1 \ge 4$. In this paper, we prove this conjecture as well as characterize nearly all well-hued graphs with $a_1=2$. We also investigate when both $G$ and its complement are well-hued.
Well-edge-dominated graphs containing triangles
A set of edges $F$ in a graph $G$ is an edge dominating set if every edge in $G$ is either in $F$ or shares a vertex with an edge in $F$. $G$ is said to be well-edge-dominated if all of its minimal edge dominating sets have the same cardinality. Recently it was shown that any triangle-free well-edge-dominated graph is either bipartite or in the set $\{C_5, C_7, C_7^*\}$ where $C_7^*$ is obtained from $C_7$ by adding a chord between any pair of vertices distance three apart. In this paper, we completely characterize all well-edge-dominated graphs containing exactly one triangle, of which there are two infinite families. We also prove that there are only eight well-edge-dominated outerplanar graphs, most of which contain at most one triangle.
Claw-free cubic graphs are $(1, 1, 2, 2)$-colorable
A $(1,1,2,2)$-coloring of a graph is a partition of its vertex set into four sets two of which are independent and the other two are $2$-packings. In this paper, we prove that every claw-free cubic graph admits a $(1,1,2,2)$-coloring. This implies that the conjecture from [Packing chromatic number, $(1,1,2,2)$-colorings, and characterizing the Petersen graph, Aequationes Math.\ 91 (2017) 169--184] that the packing chromatic number of subdivisions of subcubic graphs is at most $5$ is true in the case of claw-free cubic graphs.
Isolation game on graphs
Given a graph $G$ and a family of graphs $\cal F$, an $\cal F$-isolating set, as introduced by Caro and Hansberg, is any set $S\subset V(G)$ such that $G - N[S]$ contains no member of $\cal F$ as a subgraph. In this paper, we introduce a game in which two players with opposite goals are together building an $\cal F$-isolating set in $G$. Following the domination games, Dominator (Staller) wants that the resulting $\cal F$-isolating set obtained at the end of the game, is as small (as big) as possible, which leads to the graph invariant called the game $\cal F$-isolation number, denoted $ι_{\rm g}(G,\cal F)$. We prove that the Continuation Principle holds in the $\cal F$-isolation game, and that the difference between the game $\cal F$-isolation numbers when either Dominator or Staller starts the game is at most $1$. Considering two arbitrary families of graphs $\cal F$ and $\cal F'$, we find relations between them that ensure $ι_{\rm g}(G,{\cal{F}}') \leq ι_{\rm g}(G,{\cal{F}})$ for any graph $G$. A special focus is given on the isolation game, which takes place when ${\cal F}=\{K_2\}$. We prove that $ι_{\rm g}(G,\{K_2\})\le |V(G)|/2$ for any graph $G$, and conjecture that $\lceil 3|V(G)|/7\rceil$ is the actual (sharp) upper bound. We prove that the isolation game on a forest when Dominator has the first move never lasts longer than the one in which Staller starts the game. Finally, we prove good lower and upper bounds on the game isolation numbers of paths $P_n$, which lead to the exact values $ι_{\rm g}(P_n,\{K_2\})=\left\lfloor\frac{2n+2}{5}\right\rfloor$ when $n \equiv i \pmod 5$ and $i \in \{1,2,3\}$.
Orientable total domination in graphs
Given a directed graph $D$, a set $S \subseteq V(D)$ is a total dominating set of $D$ if each vertex in $D$ has an in-neighbor in $S$. The total domination number of $D$, denoted $γ_t(D)$, is the minimum cardinality among all total dominating sets of $D$. Given an undirected graph $G$, we study the maximum and minimum total domination numbers among all orientations of $G$. That is, we study the upper (or lower) orientable domination number of $G$, $\rm{DOM}_t(G)$ (or $\rm{dom}_t(G)$), which is the largest (or smallest) total domination number over all orientations of $G$. We characterize those graphs with $\rm{DOM}_t(G) =\rm{dom}_t(G)$ when the girth is at least $7$ as well as those graphs with $\rm{dom}_t(G) = |V(G)|-1$. We also consider how these parameters are effected by removing a vertex from $G$, give exact values of $\rm{DOM}_t(K_{m,n})$ and $\rm{dom}_t(K_{m,n})$ and bound these parameters when $G$ is a grid graph.
The number of independent sets in bipartite graphs and benzenoids
Given a graph $G$, we study the number of independent sets in $G$, denoted $i(G)$. This parameter is known as both the Merrifield-Simmons index of a graph as well as the Fibonacci number of a graph. In this paper, we give general bounds for $i(G)$ when $G$ is bipartite and we give its exact value when $G$ is a balanced caterpillar. We improve upon a known upper bound for $i(T)$ when $T$ is a tree, and study a conjecture that all but finitely many positive integers represent $i(T)$ for some tree $T$. We also give exact values for $i(G)$ when $G$ is a particular type of benzenoid.
2023-06-07 v2
A characterization of well-dominated Cartesian products
A graph is well-dominated if all its minimal dominating sets have the same cardinality. In this paper we prove that at least one factor of every connected, well-dominated Cartesian product is a complete graph, which then allows us to give a complete characterization of the connected, well-dominated Cartesian products if both factors have order at least $2$. In particular, we show that $G\,\Box\,H$ is well-dominated if and only if $G\,\Box\,H = P_3 \,\Box\,K_3$ or $G\,\Box\,H= K_n \,\Box\,K_n$ for some $n\ge 2$.
Graphs with equal Grundy domination and independence number
The Grundy domination number, ${γ_{\rm gr}}(G)$, of a graph $G$ is the maximum length of a sequence $(v_1,v_2,\ldots, v_k)$ of vertices in $G$ such that for every $i\in \{2,\ldots, k\}$, the closed neighborhood $N[v_i]$ contains a vertex that does not belong to any closed neighborhood $N[v_j]$, where $j<i$. It is well known that the Grundy domination number of any graph $G$ is greater than or equal to the upper domination number $Γ(G)$, which is in turn greater than or equal to the independence number $α(G)$. In this paper, we initiate the study of the class of graphs $G$ with $Γ(G)={γ_{\rm gr}}(G)$ and its subclass consisting of graphs $G$ with $α(G)={γ_{\rm gr}}(G)$. We characterize the latter class of graphs among all twin-free connected graphs, provide a number of properties of these graphs, and prove that the hypercubes are members of this class. In addition, we give several necessary conditions for graphs $G$ with $Γ(G)={γ_{\rm gr}}(G)$ and present large families of such graphs.
2022-12-01
Loop zero forcing and grundy domination in planar graphs and claw-free cubic graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
Given a simple, finite graph with vertex set $V(G)$, we define a zero forcing set of $G$ as follows. Choose $S\subseteq V(G)$ and color all vertices of $S$ blue and all vertices in $V(G) - S$ white. The color change rule is if $w$ is the only white neighbor of blue vertex $v$, then we change the color of $w$ from white to blue. If after applying the color change rule as many times as possible eventually every vertex of $G$ is blue, we call $S$ a zero forcing set of $G$. $Z(G)$ denotes the minimum cardinality of a zero forcing set. Davila and Henning proved in \cite{zerocubic} that for any claw-free cubic graph $G$, $Z(G) \le \frac{1}{3}|V(G)| + 1$. We show that if $G$ is $2$-edge-connected, claw-free, and cubic, then $Z(G) \le \left\lceil\frac{5n(G)}{18}\right\rceil+1$. We also study a similar graph invariant known as the loop zero forcing number of a graph $G$ which happens to be the dual invariant to the Grundy domination number of $G$. Specifically, we study the loop zero forcing number in two particular types of planar graphs.
Orientable domination in product-like graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
The orientable domination number, ${\rm DOM}(G)$, of a graph $G$ is the largest domination number over all orientations of $G$. In this paper, ${\rm DOM}$ is studied on different product graphs and related graph operations. The orientable domination number of arbitrary corona products is determined, while sharp lower and upper bounds are proved for Cartesian and lexicographic products. A result of Chartrand et al. from 1996 is extended by establishing the values of ${\rm DOM}(K_{n_1,n_2,n_3})$ for arbitrary positive integers $n_1,n_2$ and $n_3$. While considering the orientable domination number of lexicographic product graphs, we answer in the negative a question concerning domination and packing numbers in acyclic digraphs posed in [Domination in digraphs and their direct and Cartesian products, J. Graph Theory 99 (2022) 359-377].
Graphs which satisfy a Vizing-like bound for power domination of Cartesian products
Power domination is a two-step observation process that is used to monitor power networks and can be viewed as a combination of domination and zero forcing. Given a graph $G$, a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ that can observe all vertices of $G$ using this process is known as a power dominating set of $G$, and the power domination number of $G$, $γ_P(G)$, is the minimum number of vertices in a power dominating set. We introduce a new partition on the vertices of a graph to provide a lower bound for the power domination number. We also consider the power domination number of the Cartesian product of two graphs, $G \Box H$, and show certain graphs satisfy a Vizing-like bound with regards to the power domination number. In particular, we prove that for any two trees $T_1$ and $T_2$, $γ_P(T_1)γ_P(T_2) \leq γ_P(T_1 \Box T_2)$.
2022-09-08
Power domination in cubic graphs and Cartesian products
Published • View PublicationBIB
The power domination problem focuses on finding the optimal placement of phase measurement units (PMUs) to monitor an electrical power network. In the context of graphs, the power domination number of a graph $G$, denoted $γ_P(G)$, is the minimum number of vertices needed to observe every vertex in the graph according to a specific set of observation rules. In \cite{ZKC_cubic}, Zhao et al. proved that if $G$ is a connected claw-free cubic graph of order $n$, then $γ_P(G) \leq n/4$. In this paper, we show that if $G$ is a claw-free diamond-free cubic graph of order $n$, then $γ_P(G) \le n/6$, and this bound is sharp. We also provide new bounds on $γ_P(G \Box H)$ where $G\Box H$ is the Cartesian product of graphs $G$ and $H$. In the specific case that $G$ and $H$ are trees whose power domination number and domination number are equal, we show the Vizing-like inequality holds and $γ_P(G \Box H) \ge γ_P(G)γ_P(H)$.
2022-03-23
On independent domination in direct products
Published • View PublicationBIB
In \cite{nr-1996} Nowakowski and Rall listed a series of conjectures involving several different graph products. In particular, they conjectured that $i(G\times H) \ge i(G)i(H)$ where $i(G)$ is the independent domination number of $G$ and $G\times H$ is the direct product of graphs $G$ and $H$. We show this conjecture is false, and, in fact, construct pairs of graphs for which $\min\{i(G), i(H)\} - i(G\times H)$ is arbitrarily large. We also give the exact value of $i(G\times K_n)$ when $G$ is either a path or a cycle.
On well-edge-dominated graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
A graph is said to be well-edge-dominated if all its minimal edge dominating sets are minimum. It is known that every well-edge-dominated graph $G$ is also equimatchable, meaning that every maximal matching in $G$ is maximum. In this paper, we show that if $G$ is a connected, triangle-free, nonbipartite, well-edge-dominated graph, then $G$ is one of three graphs. We also characterize the well-edge-dominated split graphs and Cartesian products. In particular, we show that a connected Cartesian product $G\Box H$ is well-edge-dominated, where $G$ and $H$ have order at least $2$, if and only if $G\Box H = K_2 \Box K_2$.
Domination in digraphs and their products
A dominating (respectively, total dominating) set $S$ of a digraph $D$ is a set of vertices in $D$ such that the union of the closed (respectively, open) out-neighborhoods of vertices in $S$ equals the vertex set of $D$. The minimum size of a dominating (respectively, total dominating) set of $D$ is the domination (respectively, total domination) number of $D$, denoted $γ(D)$ (respectively,$γ_t(D)$). The maximum number of pairwise disjoint closed (respectively,open) in-neighborhoods of $D$ is denoted by $ρ(D)$ (respectively,$ρ^{\rm o}(D)$). We prove that in digraphs whose underlying graphs have girth at least $7$, the closed (respectively,open) in-neighborhoods enjoy the Helly property, and use these two results to prove that in any ditree $T$ (that is, a digraph whose underlying graph is a tree), $γ_t(T)=ρ^{\rm o}(T)$ and $γ(T)=ρ(T)$. By using the former equality we then prove that $γ_t(G\times T)=γ_t(G)γ_t(T)$, where $G$ is any digraph and $T$ is any ditree, each without a source vertex, and $G\times T$ is their direct product. From the equality $γ(T)=ρ(T)$ we derive the bound $γ(G\mathbin{\Box} T)\geγ(G)γ(T)$, where $G$ is an arbitrary digraph, $T$ an arbitrary ditree and $G\mathbin{\Box} T$ is their Cartesian product. In general digraphs this Vizing-type bound fails, yet we prove that for any digraphs $G$ and $H$, where $γ(G)\geγ(H)$, we have $γ(G \mathbin{\Box} H) \ge \frac{1}{2}γ(G)(γ(H) + 1)$. This inequality is sharp as demonstrated by an infinite family of examples. Ditrees $T$ and digraphs $H$ enjoying $γ(T\mathbin{\Box} H)=γ(T)γ(H)$ are also investigated.