arXiv++ Combinatorics

An edge of a graph \emph{dominates} itself and each edge adjacent to it. A \emph{perfect edge dominating set} is a subset of edges such that each edge outside the subset is dominated by exactly one edge of the subset. In this article, we characterize the extremal graphs on $n$ vertices in the classes of trees, forests, and chordal graphs with respect to the number of perfect edge dominating sets. Moreover, we derive linear-time algorithms for counting perfect edge dominating sets and for counting dominating induced matchings in generalized series-parallel graphs and chordal graphs.

Given a graph $G$, a set $F$ of edges is an edge dominating set of $G$ if every edge in $G$ is either in $F$ or adjacent to an edge in $F$. A graph $G$ is said to be well-edge-dominated if every minimal edge dominating set has the same cardinality. This definition is the edge version of domination in that a set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is a dominating set if every vertex in $G$ is in $D$ or adjacent to a vertex in $D$ and the domination number $γ(G)$ is the minimum cardinality among all dominating sets. In this paper, we complete the characterization of all nonbipartite, well-edge-dominated graphs. In addition, we produce an infinite class of graphs that satisfy the well-known Vizing's conjecture in domination theory that states $γ(G\Box H) \ge γ(G)γ(H)$ where $G\Box H$ is the Cartesian product of $G$ and $H$.

Given a graph $G$, a set $F$ of edges is an edge dominating set if all edges in $G$ are either in $F$ or adjacent to an edge in $F$. $G$ is said to be well-edge-dominated if every minimal edge dominating set is also minimum. In 2022, it was proven that there are precisely three nonbipartite, well-edge-dominated graphs with girth at least four. Then in 2025, a characterization of all well-edge-dominated graphs containing exactly one triangle was found. In this paper, we characterize all well-edge-dominated graphs that contain a triangle and yet are $K_4$-free.

An edge of a graph dominates itself along with any edge that shares an endpoint with it. An efficient edge dominating set (also called a dominating induced matching, DIM) is a subset of edges such that each edge of the graph is dominated by exactly one edge in the subset. A perfect edge dominating set is a subset of edges in which every edge outside the subset is dominated by exactly one edge within it. In this article, we establish the NP-completeness of deciding whether a graph that does not admit any efficient edge dominating set has at least two perfect edge dominating sets. We also present a cubic time algorithm designed to identify a perfect dominating set of minimal cardinality for $P_6$-free graphs. Moreover, we show how this algorithm can be adapted to handle the weighted version of the problem and to count all perfect edge dominating sets as well as DIMs in a given graph, while preserving the same time complexity.

Haynes et al. (2020) introduced and investigated the concept of coalition in graphs \cite{hhhmm1}. Their study examined this concept from a vertex-based perspective, whereas in this paper, we extend the investigation to an edge-based perspective of graphs. \\ An edge coalition in a graph $G=(V,E)$ consists of two disjoint sets of edges $E_1$ and $E_2$, neither of which individually forms an edge dominating set, but whose union $E_1\cup E_2$ is an edge dominating set. An edge coalition partition in a graph $G$ of order $n=|V|$ and size $|E|=m$ is an edge partition $π=\{E_1,\cdots,E_k\}$ so that every set $E_i$ of $π$ either is a singleton edge dominating set, or is not an edge dominating set but forms an edge coalition with another set $E_j$ in $π$, which is also not an edge dominating set. In this paper, we introduce the concept of an edge coalition and demonstrate its existence in particular graphs and trees. Additionally, we characterize graphs with small number of edge coalitions and analyze edge coalition structures in various special graph classes.

A set of edges $F$ in a graph $G$ is an edge dominating set if every edge in $G$ is either in $F$ or shares a vertex with an edge in $F$. $G$ is said to be well-edge-dominated if all of its minimal edge dominating sets have the same cardinality. Recently it was shown that any triangle-free well-edge-dominated graph is either bipartite or in the set $\{C_5, C_7, C_7^*\}$ where $C_7^*$ is obtained from $C_7$ by adding a chord between any pair of vertices distance three apart. In this paper, we completely characterize all well-edge-dominated graphs containing exactly one triangle, of which there are two infinite families. We also prove that there are only eight well-edge-dominated outerplanar graphs, most of which contain at most one triangle.

A graph is well-(edge-)dominated if every minimal (edge) dominating set is minimum. A graph is equimatchable if every maximal matching is maximum. We study these concepts on strong product graphs. We fully characterize well-edge-dominated and equimatchable strong product graphs of nontrivial graphs, and identify a large family of graphs whose strong products with any well-dominated graph are well-dominated.

An edge coalition in a graph $G=(V,E)$ consists of two disjoint sets of edges $E_1$ and $E_2$, neither of which is an edge dominating set but whose union $E_1\cup E_2$ is an edge dominating set. An edge coalition partition in a graph $G$ of order $n=|V|$ and size $m$ is an edge partition $π=\{E_1,\cdots,E_k\}$ so that every set $E_i$ of $π$ either is a singleton edge dominating set, or is not an edge dominating set but forms an edge coalition with another set $E_j$ which is not an edge dominating set. In this paper we introduce the concept of edge coalition and show that there exists edge coalition for some graphs and trees. The graphs $G$ with small and size number of edge coalition are characterized. Finally, coalition graphs of special graphs are studied.

A set of edges $Γ$ of a graph $G$ is an edge dominating set if every edge of $G$ intersects at least one edge of $Γ$, and the edge domination number $γ_e(G)$ is the smallest size of an edge dominating set. Expanding on work of Laskar and Wallis, we study $γ_e(G)$ for graphs $G$ which are the incidence graph of some incidence structure $D$, with an emphasis on the case when $D$ is a symmetric design. In particular, we show in this latter case that determining $γ_e(G)$ is equivalent to determining the largest size of certain incidence-free sets of $D$. Throughout, we employ a variety of combinatorial, probabilistic and geometric techniques, supplemented with tools from spectral graph theory.

A graph is said to be well-edge-dominated if all its minimal edge dominating sets are minimum. It is known that every well-edge-dominated graph $G$ is also equimatchable, meaning that every maximal matching in $G$ is maximum. In this paper, we show that if $G$ is a connected, triangle-free, nonbipartite, well-edge-dominated graph, then $G$ is one of three graphs. We also characterize the well-edge-dominated split graphs and Cartesian products. In particular, we show that a connected Cartesian product $G\Box H$ is well-edge-dominated, where $G$ and $H$ have order at least $2$, if and only if $G\Box H = K_2 \Box K_2$.

As a fundamental research object, the minimum edge dominating set (MEDS) problem is of both theoretical and practical interest. However, determining the size of a MEDS and the number of all MEDSs in a general graph is NP-hard, and it thus makes sense to find special graphs for which the MEDS problem can be exactly solved. In this paper, we study analytically the MEDS problem in the pseudofractal scale-free web and the Sierpiński gasket with the same number of vertices and edges. For both graphs, we obtain exact expressions for the edge domination number, as well as recursive solutions to the number of distinct MEDSs. In the pseudofractal scale-free web, the edge domination number is one-ninth of the number of edges, which is three-fifths of the edge domination number of the Sierpiński gasket. Moreover, the number of all MEDSs in the pseudofractal scale-free web is also less than that corresponding to the Sierpiński gasket. We argue that the difference of the size and number of MEDSs between the two studied graphs lies in the scale-free topology.

For a graph $G = (V, E)$ with vertex set $V$ and edge set $E$, a subset $F$ of $E$ is called an $\emph{edge dominating set}$ (resp. a $\emph{total edge dominating set}$) if every edge in $E\backslash F$ (resp. in $E$) is adjacent to at least one edge in $F$, the minimum cardinality of an edge dominating set (resp. a total edge dominating set) of $G$ is the {\em edge domination number} (resp. {\em total edge domination number}) of $G$, denoted by $γ^{'}(G)$ (resp. $γ_t^{'}(G)$). In the present paper, we prove that the total edge domination problem is NP-complete for bipartite graphs with maximum degree 3. We also design a linear-time algorithm for solving this problem for trees. Finally, for a graph $G$, we give the inequality $γ^{'}(G)\leqslant γ^{'}_{t}(G)\leqslant 2γ^{'}(G)$ and characterize the trees $T$ which obtain the upper or lower bounds in the inequality.

We develop a new framework for generalizing approximation algorithms from the structural graph algorithm literature so that they apply to graphs somewhat close to that class (a scenario we expect is common when working with real-world networks) while still guaranteeing approximation ratios. The idea is to $\textit{edit}$ a given graph via vertex- or edge-deletions to put the graph into an algorithmically tractable class, apply known approximation algorithms for that class, and then $\textit{lift}$ the solution to apply to the original graph. We give a general characterization of when an optimization problem is amenable to this approach, and show that it includes many well-studied graph problems, such as Independent Set, Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, Minimum Maximal Matching, Chromatic Number, ($\ell$-)Dominating Set, Edge ($\ell$-)Dominating Set, and Connected Dominating Set. To enable this framework, we develop new editing algorithms that find the approximately-fewest edits required to bring a given graph into one of several important graph classes (in some cases, also approximating the target parameter of the family). For bounded degeneracy, we obtain a bicriteria $(4,4)$-approximation which also extends to a smoother bicriteria trade-off. For bounded treewidth, we obtain a bicriteria $(O(\log^{1.5} n), O(\sqrt{\log w}))$-approximation, and for bounded pathwidth, we obtain a bicriteria $(O(\log^{1.5} n), O(\sqrt{\log w} \cdot \log n))$-approximation. For treedepth $2$ (also related to bounded expansion), we obtain a $4$-approximation. We also prove complementary hardness-of-approximation results assuming $\mathrm{P} \neq \mathrm{NP}$: in particular, these problems are all log-factor inapproximable, except the last which is not approximable below some constant factor ($2$ assuming UGC).

An edge dominating set $F$ of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is an \textit{edge cut dominating set} if the subgraph $\langle V,G-F \rangle$ is disconnected. The \textit{edge cut domination number} $γ_{ct}(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of an edge cut dominating set of $G.$ In this paper we study the edge cut domination number and investigate its relationships with other parameters of graphs. We also introduce the properties edge cut irredundance and edge cut independence.

The game of SET is a popular card game in which the objective is to form Sets using cards from a special deck. In this paper we study single- and multi-round variations of this game from the computational complexity point of view and establish interesting connections with other classical computational problems. Specifically, we first show that a natural generalization of the problem of finding a single Set, parameterized by the size of the sought Set is W-hard; our reduction applies also to a natural parameterization of Perfect Multi-Dimensional Matching, a result which may be of independent interest. Second, we observe that a version of the game where one seeks to find the largest possible number of disjoint Sets from a given set of cards is a special case of 3-Set Packing; we establish that this restriction remains NP-complete. Similarly, the version where one seeks to find the smallest number of disjoint Sets that overlap all possible Sets is shown to be NP-complete, through a close connection to the Independent Edge Dominating Set problem. Finally, we study a 2-player version of the game, for which we show a close connection to Arc Kayles, as well as fixed-parameter tractability when parameterized by the number of rounds played.

Say that an edge of a graph G dominates itself and every other edge adjacent to it. An edge dominating set of a graph G = (V,E) is a subset of edges E' of E which dominates all edges of G. In particular, if every edge of G is dominated by exactly one edge of E' then E' is a dominating induced matching. It is known that not every graph admits a dominating induced matching, while the problem to decide if it does admit is NP-complete. In this paper we consider the problem of finding a minimum weighted dominating induced matching, if any, of a graph with weighted edges. We describe two exact algorithms for general graphs. The algorithms are efficient in the cases where G admits a known vertex dominating set of small size, or when G contains a polynomial number of maximal independent sets.

For an arbitrary undirected simple graph G with m edges, we give an algorithm with running time O(m^4 |L|^2) to generate the set L of all minimal edge dominating sets of G. For bipartite graphs we obtain a better result; we show that their minimal edge dominating sets can be enumerated in time O(m^4 |L|). In fact our results are stronger; both algorithms generate the next minimal edge dominating set with incremental-polynomial delay O(m^5 |L|) and O(m^4 |L|) respectively, when L is the set of already generated minimal edge dominating sets. Our algorithms are tailored for and solve the equivalent problems of enumerating minimal (vertex) dominating sets of line graphs and line graphs of bipartite graphs, with incremental-polynomial delay, and consequently in output-polynomial time. Enumeration of minimal dominating sets in graphs has very recently been shown to be equivalent to enumeration of minimal transversals in hypergraphs. The question whether the minimal transversals of a hypergraph can be enumerated in output-polynomial time is a fundamental and challenging question in Output-Sensitive Enumeration; it has been open for several decades and has triggered extensive research in the field.