arXiv++ Combinatorics

The renowned theorem of Dirac states that if $G$ is a graph with minimum degree at least $n/2$ then $G$ has a Hamilton cycle. A natural generalisation asks what properties of an edge-colouring of $G$ guarantee the existence of a properly edge-coloured Hamilton cycle in $G$. This concept can be further generalised as follows: an \emph{incompatibility system} for $G$ is a set~$\mathcal{F}$ of `forbidden' pairs of adjacent edges, that is, $\mathcal{F}\subseteq \{\{uv,vw\}\in \binom{E(G)}2\}$. A cycle in $G$ is then \emph{compatible} if no two of its edges form a pair in $\mathcal{F}$. The system $\mathcal{F}$ is called \emph{$μn$-bounded} if for all $v\in V(G)$ and $uv\in E(G)$, there are at most $μn$ pairs $\{uv,vw\}\in \mathcal{F}$. How small must $μ$ be to guarantee the existence of a compatible Hamilton cycle in $G$? Krivelevich, Lee and Sudakov showed that $μ=10^{-16}$ suffices (for $n$ large), while an example of Bollobás and Erdős shows that $μ\leq 1/4$ is necessary. We significantly reduce this gap for large graphs of minimum degree at least $(1/2+\varepsilon)n$, by showing that $μ=1/8$ suffices but $μ\leq 1/6$ is necessary for such graphs. In fact, we give more precise bounds which are functions of $δ(G)/n$.

We prove that every $n$-vertex 4-uniform hypergraph with minimum codegree at least $\lfloor n/4 \rfloor$ has a spanning tight component. This is tight, and it settles the 4-uniform case of a conjecture of Illingworth, Lang, Müyesser, Parczyk, and Sgueglia.

A question posed independently by Letzter and Pokrovskiy asks: how many vertex-disjoint monochromatic cycles are needed to cover the vertex set of an $r$-edge-coloured graph, as a function of its minimum (uncoloured) degree? We resolve this problem up to a $(\log r)$-factor. Specifically, we prove that, for any $r \geq 2$ and $δ\in (0,1/2)$, any $n$-vertex $r$-edge-coloured graph $G$ with $δ(G) \geq (1- δ)n$ can be covered with $\mathcal{O}(r \log r \cdot \lceil r/\log(1/δ)\rceil)$ vertex-disjoint monochromatic cycles. We construct graphs that show this is tight up to the $(\log r)$-factor for all values of $r$ and $δ$, and along the way disprove a conjecture of Bal and DeBiasio about monochromatic tree covering.

Kühn and Osthus conjectured in 2013 that regular tripartite tournaments are decomposable into Hamilton cycles. Somewhat surprisingly, Granet gave a simple counterexample to this conjecture almost 10 years later. In this paper, we show that the conjecture of Kühn and Osthus nevertheless holds in an approximate sense, by proving that every regular tripartite tournament admits an approximate decomposition into Hamilton cycles. We also study Hamilton cycle packings of directed graphs in the same regime, and show that for large $n$, every balanced tripartite digraph on $3n$ vertices which is $d$-regular for $d\ge (1+o(1))n$ admits a Hamilton decomposition.

An $n$-vertex graph is degree 3-critical if it has $2n - 2$ edges and no proper induced subgraph with minimum degree at least 3. In 1988, Erdős, Faudree, Gyárfás, and Schelp asked whether one can always find cycles of all short lengths in these graphs, which was disproven by Narins, Pokrovskiy, and Szabó through a construction based on leaf-to-leaf paths in trees whose vertices have degree either 1 or 3. They went on to suggest several weaker conjectures about cycle lengths in degree 3-critical graphs and leaf-to-leaf path lengths in these so-called 1-3 trees. We resolve three of their questions either fully or up to a constant factor. Our main results are the following: - every $n$-vertex degree 3-critical graph has $Ω(\log n)$ distinct cycle lengths; -every tree with maximum degree $Δ\ge 3$ and $\ell$ leaves has at least $\log_{Δ-1}\, ((Δ-2)\ell)$ distinct leaf-to-leaf path lengths; - for every integer $N\geq 1$, there exist arbitrarily large 1-3 trees which have $O(N^{0.91})$ distinct leaf-to-leaf path lengths smaller than $N$, and, conversely, every 1-3 tree on at least $2^N$ vertices has $Ω(N^{2/3})$ distinct leaf-to-leaf path lengths smaller than $N$. Several of our proofs rely on purely combinatorial means, while others exploit a connection to an additive problem that might be of independent interest.

We prove that every tree of maximum degree $Δ$ with $\ell$ leaves contains paths between leaves of at least $\log_{Δ-1}((Δ-2)\ell)$ distinct lengths. This settles in a strong form a conjecture of Narins, Pokrovskiy and Szabó. We also make progress towards another conjecture of the same authors, by proving that every tree with no vertex of degree 2 and diameter at least $N$ contains $N^{2/3}/6$ distinct leaf-to-leaf path lengths between $0$ and $N$.

In 1975, Bollobás, Erdős, and Szemerédi asked for the smallest $τ$ such that an $n \times n \times n$ tripartite graph with minimum degree $n + τ$ must contain $K_{t, t, t}$, conjecturing that $τ= \mathcal{O}(n^{1/2})$ for $t = 2$. We prove that $τ= \mathcal{O}(n^{1 - 1/t})$ which confirms their conjecture and is best possible assuming the widely believed conjecture that $\operatorname{ex}(n, K_{t, t}) = Θ(n^{2 - 1/t})$. Our proof uses a density increment argument. We also construct an infinite family of extremal graphs.