arXiv++ Combinatorics

The regular set tolerance is an important term in sensitivity analysis. For combinatorial sum problems, e.g., the Traveling Salesman Problem, Shortest Path Problem and Minimum Spanning Tree Problem, it determines how much the sum of the costs of the elements of a set can be increased while ensuring that all current optimal solutions remain optimal. The regular set lower tolerance determines how much the sum of the costs of the elements of a set can be decreased while ensuring that the objective value of the optimal solution is not changed. We investigate a general method for computing regular (upper and lower) set tolerances in combinatorial sum problems. For the upper tolerance, we present a linear programming approach, and for the lower tolerances, three linear programming approaches, where the last two are novel and lead to recursive procedures for computation of the lower tolerances of all subsets of the given ground set. Furthermore, we give new upper bounds for set lower tolerances. For both upper and lower tolerances, we give an exact formula for sets of cardinality 2 and 3. Finally, we consider the computation of tolerances for the Minimum Spanning Tree Problem, give a formula for single tolerances, a lower bound for regular set upper tolerances and an exact formula for regular set lower tolerances.

For the buffet, the waiter of a restaurant gets a large stack of pancakes from the overworked cook. As usual, one side is burnt, and as the level of batter decreases, the pancakes became smaller and smaller. Hence, the waiter ends up with a stack of one-sided burnt pancakes sorted by size, with the larger at the bottom and burnt side up. However, the waiter cannot serve them this way. He needs to turn all the burnt sides down, without changing the order. Having only a spatula, he can only perform flips to the top of the stack. How can he perform this transformation in a minimum number of flips? Having n pancakes, this problem can be modeled in the burnt pancake graph, having 2^n*n! vertices, where each possible stack of pancakes corresponds to a vertex expressed by a permutation of size n, where the pancakes are ordered by size, and the pancake numbers are multiplied by -1, if the corresponding pancake has the burnt side side up. An edge exists in this graph, if the corresponding stacks can be reached from each other by one flip. Let T(n) be the minimum number of flips to sort the stack of n pancakes (-1,...,-n). General burnt pancake sorting has been introduced by Bill Gates and Papadimitriou. The instance (-1,...,-n) has strong relevance because of its easy structure and as it has been shown to be a worst-case instance for several small n. Heydari and Sudborough gave the currently best upper bound of T(n), namely (3n+3)/2 for n = 3 mod 4, which later has been shown to be exact by a work of Cibulka. Except these two works, no progress regarding lower and upper bounds has been made until now. In our work, we present that (3n+3)/2 is also an upper bound of T(n) for n = 1 mod 4, which again matches the lower bound of Cibulka and thus is exact. The case of even n keeps an open problem, where two possible values for T(n) are possible, namely (3/2)n + 1 or (3/2)n + 2.

We consider a logical puzzle which we call double pouring problem, which was original defined for $k=3$ vessels. We generalize this definition to $k \ge 2 $ as follows. Each of the $k$ vessels contains an integer amount of water, called its value, where the values are $a_i$ for $i=1,2,\dots,k$ and the sum of values is $n$. A pouring step means pouring water from one vessel with value $a_i$ to another vessel with value $a_j$, where $ 1 \le i \not= j \le k $ and $a_i \le a_j $. After this pouring step the first vessel has value $2a_i$ and the second one value $a_j-a_i$. Now the pouring problem is to find as few pourings steps as possible to empty at least one vessel, or to show that such an emptying is not possible (which is possible only in the case $k=2$). For $k=2$ each pouring step is unique. We give a necessary and sufficient condition, when for a given $ (a_1,a_2)$ with $a_1+a_2=n$ the pouring problem is solvable. For $k=3$ we improve the upper bound of the pouring problem for some special cases. For $k \ge 4 $ we extend the known lower bound for $k=3$ and improve the known upper bound $\mathcal{O}((\log n)^2)$ for $k=3$ to $\mathcal{O}(\log n\log\log n)$. Finally, for $k \ge 3$, we investigate values and bounds for some functions related to the pouring problem.

In this work we determine the metric dimension of $ K_a \times K_b \times K_c$ for all $a,b,c\in \mathbb N$ with $ a \le b \le c $ as follows. For $3a<b+c$ and $2b \le c$, this value is $c-1$, for $3a<b+c$ and $2b > c$, it is $\left \lfloor \frac{2}{3}(b+c-1) \right \rfloor$, and for $3a=b+c$, it is $\left \lfloor \frac{a+b+c}{2} \right \rfloor -1 $. The only open case is $3a>b+c$, where two values are possible, namely $\left \lfloor \frac{a+b+c}{2} \right \rfloor -1 $ and $\left \lfloor \frac{a+b+c}{2} \right \rfloor $. This result extends previous results of Cácere et al., who computed the metric dimension of $ K_a \times K_b$, and of Drewes and Jäger, who computed the metric dimension of $ K_a \times K_a \times K_a$. We prove our result by introducing and analyzing a new variant of Static Black-Peg Mastermind, in which each peg has its own permitted set of colors. For all cases, we present strategies which we prove to be both feasible and optimal. Our main result follows, as the number of questions of these strategies is equal to the metric dimension of $K_a \times K_b \times K_c$.

We computationally completely enumerate a number of types of row-column designs up to isotopism, including double, sesqui and triple arrays as known from the literature, and two newly introduced types that we call mono arrays and AO-arrays. We calculate autotopism group sizes for the designs we generate. For larger parameter values, where complete enumeration is not feasible, we generate examples of some of the designs, and generate exhaustive lists of admissible parameters. For some admissible parameter sets, we prove non-existence results. We also give some explicit constructions of sesqui arrays, mono arrays and AO-arrays, and investigate connections to Youden rectangles and binary pseud Youden designs.

The AB~Game is a game similar to the popular game Mastermind. We study a version of this game called Static Black-Peg AB~Game. It is played by two players, the codemaker and the codebreaker. The codemaker creates a so-called secret by placing a color from a set of $c$ colors on each of $p \le c$ pegs, subject to the condition that every color is used at most once. The codebreaker tries to determine the secret by asking questions, where all questions are given at once and each question is a possible secret. As an answer the codemaker reveals the number of correctly placed colors for each of the questions. After that, the codebreaker only has one more try to determine the secret and thus to win the game. For given $p$ and $c$, our goal is to find the smallest number $k$ of questions the codebreaker needs to win, regardless of the secret, and the corresponding list of questions, called a $(k+1)$-strategy. We present a $\lceil 4c/3 \rceil-1)$-strategy for $p=2$ for all $c \ge 2$, and a $\lfloor (3c-1)/2 \rfloor$-strategy for $p=3$ for all $c \ge 4$ and show the optimality of both strategies, i.e., we prove that no $(k+1)$-strategy for a smaller $k$ exists.

The dominating set problem (DSP) is one of the most famous problems in combinatorial optimization. It is defined as follows. For a given simple graph $G=(V,E)$, a dominating set of $G$ is a subset $S\subseteq V$ such that every vertex in $ V \setminus S$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $S$. Furthermore, the DSP is the problem of finding a minimum-size dominating set and the corresponding minimum size, the domination number of $G$. In this, work we investigate a variant of the DSP, the super dominating set problem (SDSP), which has attracted much attention during the last years. A dominating set $S$ is called a super dominating set of $G$, if for every vertex $u\in \overline{S}=V \setminus S$, there exists a $v\in S$ such that $N(v)\cap \overline{S}=\{u\}$. Analogously, the SDSP is to find a minimum-size super dominating set, and the corresponding minimum size, the super domination number of $G$. The decision variants of both the DSP and the SDSP have shown to be $\mathcal{NP}$-hard. In this paper, we present tight bounds for the super domination number of the neighbourhood corona product, $r$-gluing, and the Hajós sum of two graphs. Additionally, we present infinite families of graphs attaining our bounds. Finally, we give the exact number of minimum size super dominating sets for some graph classes. In particular, the number of super dominating sets for cycles has quite surprising properties as it varies between values of the set $\{4,n,2n,\frac{5n^2-10n}{8}\}$ based on $n\mod4$.

In this paper we first study $k \times n$ Youden rectangles of small orders. We have enumerated all Youden rectangles for a range of small parameter values, excluding the almost square cases where $k = n-1$, in a large scale computer search. In particular, we verify the previous counts for $(n,k) = (7,3), (7,4)$, and extend this to the cases $(11,5), (11,6), (13,4)$ and $(21,5)$. For small parameter values where no Youden rectangles exist, we also enumerate rectangles where the number of symbols common to two columns is always one of two possible values, differing by 1, which we call \emph{near Youden rectangles}. For all the designs we generate, we calculate the order of the autotopism group and investigate to which degree a certain transformation can yield other row-column designs, namely double arrays, triple arrays and sesqui arrays. Finally, we also investigate certain Latin rectangles with three possible pairwise intersection sizes for the columns and demonstrate that these can give rise to triple and sesqui arrays which cannot be obtained from Youden rectangles, using the transformation mentioned above.

We study sets of mutually orthogonal Latin rectangles (MOLR), and a natural variation of the concept of self-orthogonal Latin squares which is applicable on larger sets of mutually orthogonal Latin squares and MOLR, namely that each Latin rectangle in a set of MOLR is isotopic to each other rectangle in the set. We call such a set of MOLR \emph{homogeneous}. In the course of doing this, we perform a complete enumeration of non-isotopic sets of $t$ mutually orthogonal $k\times n$ Latin rectangles for $k\leq n \leq 7$, for all $t < n$. Specifically, we keep track of homogeneous sets of MOLR, as well as sets of MOLR where the autotopism group acts transitively on the rectangles, and we call such sets of MOLR \emph{transitive}. We build the sets of MOLR row by row, and in this process we also keep track of which of the MOLR are homogeneous and/or transitive in each step of the construction process. We use the prefix \emph{stepwise} to refer to sets of MOLR with this property. Sets of MOLR are connected to other discrete objects, notably finite geometries and certain regular graphs. Here we observe that all projective planes of order at most 9 except the Hughes plane can be constructed from a stepwise transitive MOLR.

We have performed a complete enumeration of non-isotopic triples of mutually orthogonal $k\times n$ Latin rectangles for $k\leq n \leq 7$. Here we will present a census of such triples, classified by various properties, including the order of the autotopism group of the triple. As part of this we have also achieved the first enumeration of pairwise orthogonal triples of Youden rectangles. We have also studied orthogonal triples of $k \times 8$ rectangles which are formed by extending mutually orthogonal triples with non-trivial autotopisms one row at a time, and requiring that the autotopism group is non-trivial in each step. This class includes a triple coming from the projective plane of order 8. Here we find a remarkably symmetrical pair of triples of $4 \times 8$ rectangles, formed by juxtaposing two selected copies of complete sets of MOLS of order 4.