arXiv++ Combinatorics

The neighbourhood complexity $nc(G,k)$ of a graph $G$ is a quantity measuring, for a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the maximum possible number (over all vertex subsets $S$ of size $k$) $|\{N[v]\cap S, v\in V(G)\}|$ of $S$-neighbourhoods in $G$. This notion is important in structural graph theory and algorithm design (especially in parameterized complexity, in particular model checking and kernelization). While generally $nc(G,k)\leq 2^k$ and this bound can be achieved, it is known that sparse graphs and structured dense graphs have linear neighbourhood complexity, that is, $nc(G,k)\in O(k)$ for any such graph $G$. However, for many graph classes, the best possible constants are not known. We focus on graphs of bounded treewidth and pathwidth, showing that (when $k\geq w+1$) (i) if $G$ has treewidth $w\geq 2$, then $nc(G,k)\leq (k-w+1)2^{w}+w$, and (ii) if $G$ has pathwidth $w\geq 2$, then $nc(G,k)\leq (k-w+2)2^{w-1}+2k-w-2$. Moreover, we provide constructions that reach these bounds, whenever $w\geq 2$ and $k\geq 2w+1$ ($k\geq 2w-1$ for pathwidth). Interestingly, in contrast, we also have the tight bound $nc(G,k)\leq \frac{7}{3}k$, for graphs $G$ with pathwidth 1 or treewidth 1.

Levenshtein's sequence reconstruction model plays an essential role in information retrieval of advanced memory systems, such as the DNA-based storage systems. In the model, a word $\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{Z}_q^n$ is transmitted through $N$ noisy channels, and the goal is to recover it. Errors occurring in the channels usually involve substitutions, insertions and deletions. Our focus is on insertions. One of the main questions in this context is determining the minimum number of channels $N$ required to recover the transmitted word $\mathbf{x}$. The original formulation of the reconstruction problem requires that all the output words from the channels are distinct. However, different insertion errors may lead to the same output words. In this paper, we investigate two reconstruction models where the channels are allowed to produce identical output words even though different insertion errors occur in the channels. These two models, called \textit{the multiset model} and \textit{non-multiset model}, generalize the Levenshtein's model. We denote the minimum number of channels required to \textit{unambiguously} recover the transmitted word $\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{Z}_q^n$ by $N_q^m(n,t)+1$ in the multiset model and $N_q^{nm}(n,t)+1$ in the non-multiset model, where $t$ is the exact number of insertions occurring in a channel. We determine $N_q^m(n,1)$ and $N_q^{nm}(n,1)$ for all $n$ and $q$, and show the somewhat surprising fact that $N_q^m(n,1)=N_q^{nm}(n,1)$. We also provide a full characterization of the words attaining this value and give a general lower bound on $N_q^m(n,t)$ for $t\ge1$ and a recursive upper bound. For $t=1$, we construct codes $C'\subseteq\mathbb{Z}_q^{n+2}$ from codes $C\subseteq\mathbb{Z}_q^n$ such that the number of channels required to determine the transmitted word $\mathbf{x}\in C'$ is small. This construction is shown to be optimal for certain parameters.

The interest in studying the size of the intersection of multiple $q$-ary Hamming balls has grown due to the recent advances in DNA-based data storage systems. We present an exact formula for the cardinality of the intersection of $s$ Hamming balls of varying radii over a $q$-ary alphabet. It is known that the distances between the center points of the Hamming balls are not enough, in general, to determine the size of the intersection. Based on our formula, we are able to find more refined structural properties of the center points for determining the exact size of the intersection. Moreover, we also analyze the size of the intersection for sufficiently large $n$. When $s=3$, we give the necessary and sufficient conditions (for all $q\ge 2$, $q\neq 6$ and sufficiently large $n$) to obtain the maximum size of the intersection when the center points of the Hamming balls have a given minimum distance and demonstrate how to compute it using our general formula.

The problem of storing large amounts of information safely for a long period of time has become essential. One of the most promising new data storage mediums are the polymer-based data storage systems, like the DNA-storage system. These storage systems are highly durable and they consume very little energy to store the data. When information is retrieved from a storage, however, several different types of errors may occur in the process. It is known that the Levenshtein's sequence reconstruction framework is well-suited to overcome such errors and to retrieve the original information. Many of the previous results regarding Levenshtein's sequence reconstruction method are so far given only for the binary alphabet. However, larger alphabets are natural for the polymer-based data storage. For example, the quaternary alphabet is suitable for DNA-storage due to the four amino-acids in DNA. The results for larger alphabets often require, as we will see in this work, different and more complicated techniques compared to the binary case. Moreover, we show that an increase in the alphabet size makes some error types behave rather surprisingly.

We consider a logical puzzle which we call double pouring problem, which was original defined for $k=3$ vessels. We generalize this definition to $k \ge 2 $ as follows. Each of the $k$ vessels contains an integer amount of water, called its value, where the values are $a_i$ for $i=1,2,\dots,k$ and the sum of values is $n$. A pouring step means pouring water from one vessel with value $a_i$ to another vessel with value $a_j$, where $ 1 \le i \not= j \le k $ and $a_i \le a_j $. After this pouring step the first vessel has value $2a_i$ and the second one value $a_j-a_i$. Now the pouring problem is to find as few pourings steps as possible to empty at least one vessel, or to show that such an emptying is not possible (which is possible only in the case $k=2$). For $k=2$ each pouring step is unique. We give a necessary and sufficient condition, when for a given $ (a_1,a_2)$ with $a_1+a_2=n$ the pouring problem is solvable. For $k=3$ we improve the upper bound of the pouring problem for some special cases. For $k \ge 4 $ we extend the known lower bound for $k=3$ and improve the known upper bound $\mathcal{O}((\log n)^2)$ for $k=3$ to $\mathcal{O}(\log n\log\log n)$. Finally, for $k \ge 3$, we investigate values and bounds for some functions related to the pouring problem.

We generalize the problem of reconstructing strings from their substring compositions first introduced by Acharya et al. in 2015 motivated by polymer-based advanced data storage systems utilizing mass spectrometry. Namely, we see strings as labeled path graphs, and as such try to reconstruct labeled graphs. For a given integer t, the subgraph compositions contain either vectors of labels for each connected subgraph of order t (t-multiset-compositions) or the sum of all labels of all connected subgraphs of order t (t-sum-composition). We ask whether, given a graph of which we know the structure and an oracle whom you can query for compositions, we can reconstruct the labeling of the graph. If it is possible, then the graph is reconstructable; otherwise, it is confusable, and two labeled graphs with the same compositions are called equicomposable. We prove that reconstructing through a brute-force algorithm is wildly inefficient, before giving methods for reconstructing several graph classes using as few compositions as possible. We also give negative results, finding the smallest confusable graphs and trees, as well as families with a large number of equicomposable non-isomorphic graphs. An interesting result occurs when twinning one leaf of a path: some paths are confusable, creating a twin out of a leaf sees the graph alternating between reconstructable and confusable depending on the parity of the path, and creating a false twin out of a leaf makes the graph reconstructable using only sum-compositions in all cases.

The location-domination number is conjectured to be at most half of the order for twin-free graphs with no isolated vertices. We prove that this conjecture holds and is tight for subcubic graphs. We also show that the same upper bound holds for subcubic graphs with open twins of degree 3 and closed twins of any degree, but not for subcubic graphs with open twins of degree 1 or 2. These results then imply that the same upper bound holds for all cubic graphs (with or without twins) except $K_4$ and $K_{3,3}$.

The Maker-Breaker domination game is a positional game played on a graph by two players called Dominator and Staller. The players alternately select a vertex of the graph that has not yet been chosen. Dominator wins if at some point the vertices she has chosen form a dominating set of the graph. Staller wins if Dominator cannot form a dominating set. Deciding if Dominator has a winning strategy has been shown to be a PSPACE-complete problem even when restricted to chordal or bipartite graphs. In this paper, we consider strategies for Dominator based on partitions of the graph into basic subgraphs where Dominator wins as the second player. Using partitions into cycles and edges (also called perfect [1,2]-factors), we show that Dominator always wins in regular graphs and that deciding whether Dominator has a winning strategy as a second player can be computed in polynomial time for outerplanar and block graphs. We then study partitions into subgraphs with two universal vertices, which is equivalent to considering the existence of pairing dominating sets with adjacent pairs. We show that in interval graphs, Dominator wins if and only if such a partition exists. In particular, this implies that deciding whether Dominator has a winning strategy playing second is in NP for interval graphs. We finally provide an algorithm in $n^{k+3}$ for $k$-nested interval graphs (i.e. interval graphs with at most $k$ intervals included one in each other).

An $\textit{identifying code}$ of a closed-twin-free graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that any two vertices in $G$ have a distinct intersection between their closed neighborhood and $S$. It was conjectured that there exists a constant $c$ such that for every connected closed-twin-free graph $G$ of order $n$ and maximum degree $Δ$, the graph $G$ admits an identifying code of size at most $\left( \frac{Δ-1}Δ \right) n+c$. In [D. Chakraborty, F. Foucaud, M. A. Henning, and T. Lehtilä. Identifying codes in graphs of given maximum degree: Characterizing trees. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13172, 2024], we proved the conjecture for all trees. In this article, we show that the conjecture holds for all triangle-free graphs, with the same list of exceptional graphs needing $c>0$ as for trees: for $Δ\ge 3$, $c=1/3$ suffices and there is only a set of 12 trees requiring $c>0$ for $Δ=3$, and when $Δ\ge 4$ this set is reduced to the $Δ$-star only. Our proof is by induction, whose starting point is the above result for trees. Along the way, we prove a generalized version of Bondy's theorem on induced subsets [J. A. Bondy. Induced subsets. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 1972] that we use as a tool in our proofs. We also use our main result for triangle-free graphs, to prove the upper bound $\left( \frac{Δ-1}Δ \right) n+1/Δ+4t$ for graphs that can be made triangle-free by the removal of $t$ edges.

An identifying code of a closed-twin-free graph $G$ is a dominating set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that any two vertices in $G$ have a distinct intersection between their closed neighborhoods and $S$. It was conjectured that there exists an absolute constant $c$ such that for every connected graph $G$ of order $n$ and maximum degree $Δ$, the graph $G$ admits an identifying code of size at most $( \frac{Δ-1}Δ )n +c$. We provide significant support for this conjecture by exactly characterizing every tree requiring a positive constant $c$ together with the exact value of the constant. Hence, proving the conjecture for trees. For $Δ=2$ (the graph is a path or a cycle), it is long known that $c=3/2$ suffices. For trees, for each $Δ\ge 3$, we show that $c=1/Δ\le 1/3$ suffices and that $c$ is required to have a positive value only for a finite number of trees. In particular, for $Δ= 3$, there are 12 trees with a positive constant $c$ and, for each $Δ\ge 4$, the only tree with positive constant $c$ is the $Δ$-star. Our proof is based on induction and utilizes recent results from [F. Foucaud, T. Lehtilä. Revisiting and improving upper bounds for identifying codes. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 2022]. We remark that there are infinitely many trees for which the bound is tight when $Δ=3$; for every $Δ\ge 4$, we construct an infinite family of trees of order $n$ with identification number very close to the bound, namely $\left( \frac{Δ-1+\frac{1}{Δ-2}}{Δ+\frac{2}{Δ-2}} \right) n > (\frac{Δ-1}Δ ) n -\frac{n}{Δ^2}$. Furthermore, we also give a new tight upper bound for identification number on trees by showing that the sum of the domination and identification numbers of any tree $T$ is at most its number of vertices.

A \emph{resolving set} $R$ in a graph $G$ is a set of vertices such that every vertex of $G$ is uniquely identified by its distances to the vertices of $R$. Introduced in the 1970s, this concept has been since then extensively studied from both combinatorial and algorithmic points of view. We propose a generalization of the concept of resolving sets to temporal graphs, \emph{i.e.}, graphs with edge sets that change over discrete time-steps. In this setting, the \emph{temporal distance from $u$ to $v$} is the earliest possible time-step at which a journey with strictly increasing time-steps on edges leaving $u$ reaches $v$, \emph{i.e.}, the first time-step at which $v$ could receive a message broadcast from $u$. A \emph{temporal resolving set} of a temporal graph $\mathcal{G}$ is a subset $R$ of its vertices such that every vertex of $\mathcal{G}$ is uniquely identified by its temporal distances from vertices of $R$. We study the problem of finding a minimum-size temporal resolving set, and show that it is NP-complete even on very restricted graph classes and with strong constraints on the time-steps: temporal complete graphs where every edge appears in either time-step~1 or~2, temporal trees where every edge appears in at most two consecutive time-steps, and even temporal subdivided stars where every edge appears in at most two (not necessarily consecutive) time-steps. On the other hand, we give polynomial-time algorithms for temporal paths and temporal stars where every edge appears in exactly one time-step, and give a combinatorial analysis and algorithms for several temporal graph classes where the edges appear in periodic time-steps.

In this paper, we broaden the understanding of the recently introduced concepts of solid-locating-dominating and self-locating-dominating codes in various graphs. In particular, we present the optimal, i.e., smallest possible, codes in the infinite triangular and king grids. Furthermore, we give optimal locating-dominating, self-locating-dominating and solid-locating-dominating codes in the direct product $K_n\times K_m$ of complete graphs. We also present optimal solid-locating-dominating codes for the Hamming graphs $K_q\square K_q\square K_q$ with $q\geq2$.

We introduce two new classes of covering codes in graphs for every positive integer $r$. These new codes are called local $r$-identifying and local $r$-locating-dominating codes and they are derived from $r$-identifying and $r$-locating-dominating codes, respectively. We study the sizes of optimal local 1-identifying codes in binary hypercubes. We obtain lower and upper bounds that are asymptotically tight. Together the bounds show that the cost of changing covering codes into local 1-identifying codes is negligible. For some small $n$ optimal constructions are obtained. Moreover, the upper bound is obtained by a linear code construction. Also, we study the densities of optimal local 1-identifying codes and local 1-locating-dominating codes in the infinite square grid, the hexagonal grid, the triangular grid, and the king grid. We prove that seven out of eight of our constructions have optimal densities.

We give essentially tight bounds for, $ν(d,k)$, the maximum number of distinct neighbourhoods on a set $X$ of $k$ vertices in a graph with twin-width at most~$d$. Using the celebrated Marcus-Tardos theorem, two independent works [Bonnet et al., Algorithmica '22; Przybyszewski '22] have shown the upper bound $ν(d,k) \leqslant \exp(\exp(O(d)))k$, with a double-exponential dependence in the twin-width. The work of [Gajarsky et al., ICALP '22], using the framework of local types, implies the existence of a single-exponential bound (without explicitly stating such a bound). We give such an explicit bound, and prove that it is essentially tight. Indeed, we give a short self-contained proof that for every $d$ and $k$ $$ν(d,k) \leqslant (d+2)2^{d+1}k = 2^{d+\log d+Θ(1)}k,$$ and build a bipartite graph implying $ν(d,k) \geqslant 2^{d+\log d+Θ(1)}k$, in the regime when $k$ is large enough compared to~$d$.

In the paper, the Levenshtein's sequence reconstruction problem is considered in the case where at most $t$ substitution errors occur in each of the $N$ channels and the decoder outputs a list of length $\mathcal{L}$. Moreover, it is assumed that the transmitted words are chosen from an $e$-error-correcting code $C \ (\subseteq \{0,1\}^n)$. Previously, when $t = e+\ell$ and the length $n$ of the transmitted word is large enough, the numbers of required channels are determined for $\mathcal{L} =1, 2 \text{ and } \ell+1$. Here we determine the exact number of channels in the cases $\mathcal{L} = 3, 4, \ldots, \ell$. Furthermore, with the aid of covering codes, we also consider the list sizes in the cases where the length $n$ is rather small (improving previously known results). After that we study how much we can decrease the number of required channels when we use list-decoding codes. Finally, the majority algorithm is discussed for decoding in a probabilistic set-up; in particular, we show that with high probability a decoder based on it is verifiably successful, i.e., the output word of the decoder can be verified to be the transmitted one.

We introduce the Red-Blue Separation problem on graphs, where we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$ whose vertices are colored either red or blue, and we want to select a (small) subset $S \subseteq V$, called red-blue separating set, such that for every red-blue pair of vertices, there is a vertex $s \in S$ whose closed neighborhood contains exactly one of the two vertices of the pair. We study the computational complexity of Red-Blue Separation, in which one asks whether a given red-blue colored graph has a red-blue separating set of size at most a given integer. We prove that the problem is NP-complete even for restricted graph classes. We also show that it is always approximable in polynomial time within a factor of $2\ln n$, where $n$ is the input graph's order. In contrast, for triangle-free graphs and for graphs of bounded maximum degree, we show that Red-Blue Separation is solvable in polynomial time when the size of the smaller color class is bounded by a constant. However, on general graphs, we show that the problem is $W[2]$-hard even when parameterized by the solution size plus the size of the smaller color class. We also consider the problem Max Red-Blue Separation where the coloring is not part of the input. Here, given an input graph $G$, we want to determine the smallest integer $k$ such that, for every possible red-blue coloring of $G$, there is a red-blue separating set of size at most $k$. We derive tight bounds on the cardinality of an optimal solution of Max Red-Blue Separation, showing that it can range from logarithmic in the graph order, up to the order minus one. We also give bounds with respect to related parameters. For trees however we prove an upper bound of two-thirds the order. We then show that Max Red-Blue Separation is NP-hard, even for graphs of bounded maximum degree, but can be approximated in polynomial time within a factor of $O(\ln^2 n)$.

The dominating set problem (DSP) is one of the most famous problems in combinatorial optimization. It is defined as follows. For a given simple graph $G=(V,E)$, a dominating set of $G$ is a subset $S\subseteq V$ such that every vertex in $ V \setminus S$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $S$. Furthermore, the DSP is the problem of finding a minimum-size dominating set and the corresponding minimum size, the domination number of $G$. In this, work we investigate a variant of the DSP, the super dominating set problem (SDSP), which has attracted much attention during the last years. A dominating set $S$ is called a super dominating set of $G$, if for every vertex $u\in \overline{S}=V \setminus S$, there exists a $v\in S$ such that $N(v)\cap \overline{S}=\{u\}$. Analogously, the SDSP is to find a minimum-size super dominating set, and the corresponding minimum size, the super domination number of $G$. The decision variants of both the DSP and the SDSP have shown to be $\mathcal{NP}$-hard. In this paper, we present tight bounds for the super domination number of the neighbourhood corona product, $r$-gluing, and the Hajós sum of two graphs. Additionally, we present infinite families of graphs attaining our bounds. Finally, we give the exact number of minimum size super dominating sets for some graph classes. In particular, the number of super dominating sets for cycles has quite surprising properties as it varies between values of the set $\{4,n,2n,\frac{5n^2-10n}{8}\}$ based on $n\mod4$.

An identifying code $C$ of a graph $G$ is a dominating set of $G$ such that any two distinct vertices of $G$ have distinct closed neighbourhoods within $C$. The smallest size of an identifying code of $G$ is denoted $γ^{\text{ID}}(G)$. When every vertex of $G$ also has a neighbour in $C$, it is said to be a total dominating identifying code of $G$, and the smallest size of a total dominating identifying code of $G$ is denoted by $γ_t^{\text{ID}}(G)$. Extending similar characterizations for identifying codes from the literature, we characterize those graphs $G$ of order $n$ with $γ_t^{\text{ID}}(G)=n$ (the only such connected graph is $P_3$) and $γ_t^{\text{ID}}(G)=n-1$ (such graphs either satisfy $γ^{\text{ID}}(G)=n-1$ or are built from certain such graphs by adding a set of universal vertices, to each of which a private leaf is attached). Then, using bounds from the literature, we remark that any (open and closed) twin-free tree of order $n$ has a total dominating identifying code of size at most $\frac{3n}{4}$. This bound is tight, and we characterize the trees reaching it. Moreover, by a new proof, we show that this bound actually holds for the larger class of all twin-free graphs of girth at least 5. The cycle $C_8$ also attains this bound. We also provide a generalized bound for all graphs of girth at least 5 (possibly with twins). Finally, we relate $γ_t^{\text{ID}}(G)$ to the related parameter $γ^{\text{ID}}(G)$ as well as the location-domination number of $G$ and its variants, providing bounds that are either tight or almost tight.

An identifying code $C$ of a graph $G$ is a dominating set of $G$ such that any two distinct vertices of $G$ have distinct closed neighbourhoods within $C$. These codes have been widely studied for over two decades. We give an improvement over all the best known upper bounds, some of which have stood for over 20 years, for identifying codes in trees, proving the upper bound of $(n+\ell)/2$, where $n$ is the order and $\ell$ is the number of leaves (pendant vertices) of the graph. In addition to being an improvement in size, the new upper bound is also an improvement in generality, as it actually holds for bipartite graphs having no twins (pairs of vertices with the same closed or open neighbourhood) of degree 2 or greater. We also show that the bound is tight for an infinite class of graphs and that there are several structurally different families of trees attaining the bound. We then use our bound to derive a tight upper bound of $2n/3$ for twin-free bipartite graphs of order $n$, and characterize the extremal examples, as $2$-corona graphs of bipartite graphs. This is best possible, as there exist twin-free graphs, and trees with twins, that need $n-1$ vertices in any of their identifying codes. We also generalize the existing upper bound of $5n/7$ for graphs of order $n$ and girth at least 5 when there are no leaves, to the upper bound $\frac{5n+2\ell}{7}$ when leaves are allowed. This is tight for the $7$-cycle $C_7$ and for all stars.

A locating-dominating set in an undirected graph is a subset of vertices $S$ such that $S$ is dominating and for every $u,v \notin S$, we have $N(u)\cap S\ne N(v)\cap S$. In this paper, we consider the oriented version of the problem. A locating-dominating set in an oriented graph is a set $S$ such that for every $w\in V$, $N[w]^-\cap S=\emptyset$ and for each pair of vertices $u,v\in V\setminus S$, $N^-(u)\cap S\ne N^-(v)\cap S$. We consider the following two parameters. Given an undirected graph $G$, we look for $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)$ ($\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G))$ which is the size of the smallest (largest) optimal locating-dominating set over all orientations of $G$. In particular, if $D$ is an orientation of $G$, then $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)\leqγ_{LD}(D)\leq\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)$. For the best orientation, we prove that, for every twin-free graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)\le n/2$ proving a ``directed version'' of a conjecture on $γ_{LD}(G)$. Moreover, we give some bounds for $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)$ on many graph classes and drastically improve the value $n/2$ for (almost) $d$-regular graphs by showing that $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)\in O(\log d/d\cdot n)$ using a probabilistic argument. While $\overset{\rightarrow}γ_{LD}(G)\leqγ_{LD}(G)$ holds for every graph $G$, we give some graph classes graphs for which $\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)\geqγ_{LD}(G)$ and some for which $\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)\leq γ_{LD}(G)$. We also give general bounds for $\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)$. Finally, we show that for many graph classes $\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)$ is polynomial on $n$ but we leave open the question whether there exist graphs with $\overset{\rightarrow}Γ_{LD}(G)\in O(\log n)$.