arXiv++ Combinatorics

Green's popular difference theorem says that for every \(\varepsilon>0\), all sufficiently large primes \(p\), and every set \(A\subseteq\mathbb F_p\) of density \(α\), there exists a nonzero \(d\in\mathbb F_p\) such that \[ \mathbb E_{x\in\mathbb F_p} 1_A(x)1_A(x+d)1_A(x+2d) \geq α^3-\varepsilon. \] We show that a stronger simultaneous popular difference phenomenon holds for polynomial configurations. Namely, if $\mathcal P=\{P_1,\dots,P_k\} \subset \mathbb Z[t]$ is a fixed collection of linearly independent polynomials with zero constant terms, we show that for every \(\varepsilon>0\), all sufficiently large primes \(p\), and every set \(A\subseteq\mathbb F_p\) of density \(α\), there exists a nonzero \(d\in\mathbb F_p\) such that \[ \mathbb E_{x\in\mathbb F_p} 1_A(x) \prod_{i=1}^k 1_A\bigl(x+P_i(d)\bigr)^{ω_i} \geq α^{1+\sum_iω_i}-\varepsilon \] simultaneously for every \(ω=(ω_1,\dots,ω_k)\in\{0,1\}^k\). We also show that such simultaneous popular difference phenomena have sharp limitations by proving that for every sufficiently large prime \(p\), there is a constant \(c>0\) such that, for all sufficiently large \(n\), one can find a set \(A\subseteq\mathbb F_p^n\) of density \(1/2+o_n(1)\) satisfying \[ \max_{d\neq 0} \min\left\{ \mathbb E_{x\in\mathbb F_p^n} 1_A(x)1_A(x+d)1_A(x+2d), \mathbb E_{x\in\mathbb F_p^n} 1_A(x)1_A(x+2d)1_A(x+4d) \right\} \leq \frac18-c. \] That is, the strengthening of Green's result, in this case over $\mathbb F_p^n$ for $p$ fixed and $n$ tending to infinity, requiring that both \(d\) and \(2d\) are simultaneously popular differences for three-term arithmetic progressions is false.

We investigate the Peres--Schlag nonempty interior problem for orthogonal projections in both the finite-field and Euclidean settings. Over finite fields $\mathbb F_q^n$, we employ the polynomial method to establish sharp projection results, and uncover a new connection with stability versions of the finite-field \((n,m)\)-set problem. Over Euclidean spaces $\mathbb R^n$, we obtain improved nonempty interior results beyond those of Peres and Schlag in certain parameter ranges. Our proof combines techniques from geometric measure theory and harmonic analysis, including $L^p$-estimates for Kakeya maximal operators and maximal $k$-plane transforms.

We study finite-field analogues of the Peres--Schlag nonempty-interior problem for product sets. Given \(A\subseteq\mathbb F_p\), we ask when a suitable one-dimensional linear image of \(A^n\) is full; equivalently, when there exist coefficients \(t_1,\ldots,t_n\in\mathbb F_p\) such that \[ t_1A+\cdots+t_nA=\mathbb F_p. \] For \(n\ge3\), we prove that, for every \(η>0\), this holds whenever \[ |A|\gg_{n,η} p^{\frac{3}{2n-1}+η}. \] This improves the exponent predicted by the direct product-set analogue of the Peres--Schlag threshold, namely \(|A|\gg p^{2/n}\). We also prove a two-dimensional near-half-density result. Motivated by sum-product phenomena, we also introduce and study a product-type variant in which linear forms are replaced by shifted product maps. We prove finite-field covering results for shifted products \[ (t_1 + A)(t_2 + A)\cdots(t_n + A) \] at the same density scale as in the linear case. Finally, we prove a Euclidean shifted-product analogue: if \(A\subseteq\mathbb R\) is Borel and \(\dim_H A>2/n\), then some shifted product of \(n\) copies of \(A\) contains a nonempty open interval.

This article is a study guide for ``On the Hausdorff dimension of Furstenberg sets and orthogonal projections in the plane" by Orponen and Shmerkin. We begin by introducing Furstenberg set problem and exceptional set of projections and provide a summary of the proof with the core ideas.

Let $F(t),G(t)\in \mathbb{Q}(t)$ be rational functions such that $F(t),G(t)$ and the constant function $1$ are linearly independent over $\mathbb{Q}$, we prove an asymptotic formula for the number of the three term rational function progressions of the form $x,x+F(y),x+G(y)$ in subsets of $\mathbb{F}_p$. The main new ingredient is an algebraic geometry version of PET induction that bypasses Weyl's differencing. This answers a question of Bourgain and Chang.