arXiv++ Combinatorics

A pair $(\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B})$ of families of subsets of $[n]$ is cancellative if whenever $A, A' \in \mathcal{A}, B \in \mathcal{B}$ satisfy $A \cup B=A' \cup B$, then $A=A'$, and whenever $A \in \mathcal{A}, B, B' \in \mathcal{B}$ satisfy $A \cup B=A \cup B'$, then $B=B'$. We show that for every cancellative pair $(\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B})$, the inequality $|\mathcal{A}||\mathcal{B}| \le 2.25^n$ holds, matching Tolhuizen's $(2.25-o(1))^n$ lower bound construction.

Determining the combinatorial structures that maximize the number of prescribed substructures is a central theme in extremal combinatorics. Grzesik, Král', Lovász and Volec showed that when $\ell$ is not divisible by $4$, the random tournament contains asymptotically the most directed cycles of length $\ell$ among all $n$-vertex tournaments. In the paper, we resolve the remaining cases where $\ell$ is divisible by $4$. We show that, in this regime, the so-called carousel tournament asymptotically maximizes the number of directed $\ell$-cycles among all $n$-vertex tournaments, and in particular contains strictly more such cycles than the random tournament. This confirms the conjecture of Bartley and Day.

Let $\mathcal{F}\subset\binom{[n]}{k}$ be an intersecting family. For an element $i\in[n]$, the degree of $i$ is the number of sets in $\mathcal{F}$ that contain $i$. Assume that the degrees are ordered as $d_{1}\ge d_{2}\ge\cdots\ge d_{n}$. Huang and Zhao showed that if $n>2k$, then the minimum degree satisfies $d_{n}\le\binom{n-2}{k-2}$, with the maximum attained by the $1$-star. We strengthen this result by proving that for $n\ge 2k+1$, the $(2k+1)$-th largest degree satisfies $d_{2k+1}\le\binom{n-2}{k-2}$, thereby confirming a conjecture of Frankl and Wang. Furthermore, we prove that for $k>50$ and $n>\frac{11}{2}k$, the $(k+2)$-th largest degree $d_{k+2}$ is already at most $\binom{n-2}{k-2}$. The techniques we developed also yield an tight upper bound for the $(\ell+1)$-th largest degree $d_{\ell+1}$ for $\ell \le k$ and sufficiently large $n$.

Seymour's celebrated second neighborhood conjecture, now more than thirty years old, states that in every oriented digraph, there is a vertex $u$ such that the size of its second out-neighborhood $N^{++}(u)$ is at least as large as that of its first out-neighborhood $N^+(u)$. In this paper, we prove the existence of $u$ for which $|N^{++}(u)| \ge 0.715538 |N^+(u)|$. This result provides the first improvement to the best known constant factor in over two decades.

A family of subsets $\mathcal{F}$ is intersecting if $A \cap B \neq \emptyset$ for any $A, B \in \mathcal{F}$. In this paper, we show that for given integers $k > d \ge 2$ and $n \ge 2k+2d-3$, and any intersecting family $\mathcal{F}$ of $k$-subsets of $\{1, \cdots, n\}$, there exists a $d$-subset of $[n]$ contained in at most $\binom{n-d-1}{k-d-1}$ subsets of $\mathcal{F}$. This result, proved using spectral graph theory, gives a $d$-degree generalization of the celebrated Erdős-Ko-Rado Theorem, improving a theorem of Kupavskii.

Motivated by the analysis of consensus formation in the Deffuant model for social interaction, we consider the following procedure on a graph $G$. Initially, there is one unit of tea at a fixed vertex $r \in V(G)$, and all other vertices have no tea. At any time in the procedure, we can choose a connected subset of vertices $T$ and equalize the amount of tea among vertices in $T$. We prove that if $x \in V(G)$ is at distance $d$ from $r$, then $x$ will have at most $\frac{1}{d+1}$ units of tea during any step of the procedure. This bound is best possible and answers a question of Gantert. We also consider arbitrary initial weight distributions. For every finite graph $G$ and $w \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^{V(G)}$, we prove that the set of weight distributions reachable from $w$ is a compact subset of $\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^{V(G)}$.

A celebrated theorem of Baranyai states that when $k$ divides $n$, the family $K_n^k$ of all $k$-subsets of an $n$-element set can be partitioned into perfect matchings. In other words, $K_n^k$ is $1$-factorable. In this paper, we determine all $n, k$, such that the family $K_n^{\le k}$ consisting of subsets of $[n]$ of size up to $k$ is $1$-factorable, and thus extend Baranyai's Theorem to the non-uniform setting. In particular, our result implies that for fixed $k$ and sufficiently large $n$, $K_n^{\le k}$ is $1$-factorable if and only if $n \equiv 0$ or $-1 \pmod k$.

A graph G = (V,E) is called fully regular if for every independent set $I\subset V$ , the number of vertices in $V\setminus$ I that are not connected to any element of I depends only on the size of I. A linear ordering of the vertices of G is called successive if for every i, the first i vertices induce a connected subgraph of G. We give an explicit formula for the number of successive vertex orderings of a fully regular graph. As an application of our results, we give alternative proofs of two theorems of Stanley and Gao + Peng, determining the number of linear edge orderings of complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs, respectively, with the property that the first i edges induce a connected subgraph. As another application, we give a simple product formula for the number of linear orderings of the hyperedges of a complete 3-partite 3-uniform hypergraph such that, for every i, the first i hyperedges induce a connected subgraph. We found similar formulas for complete (non-partite) 3-uniform hypergraphs and in another closely related case, but we managed to verify them only when the number of vertices is small.

Since its formulation, Turán's hypergraph problems have been among the most challenging open problems in extremal combinatorics. One of them is the following: given a $3$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal{F}$ on $n$ vertices in which any five vertices span at least one edge, prove that $|\mathcal{F}| \ge (1/4 -o(1))\binom{n}{3}$. The construction showing that this bound would be best possible is simply $\binom{X}{3} \cup \binom{Y}{3}$ where $X$ and $Y$ evenly partition the vertex set. This construction has the following more general $(2p+1, p+1)$-property: any set of $2p+1$ vertices spans a complete sub-hypergraph on $p+1$ vertices. One of our main results says that, quite surprisingly, for all $p>2$ the $(2p+1,p+1)$-property implies the conjectured lower bound.

In this paper, we show that every $(2^{n-1}+1)$-vertex induced subgraph of the $n$-dimensional cube graph has maximum degree at least $\sqrt{n}$. This result is best possible, and improves a logarithmic lower bound shown by Chung, Füredi, Graham and Seymour in 1988. As a direct consequence, we prove that the sensitivity and degree of a boolean function are polynomially related, solving an outstanding foundational problem in theoretical computer science, the Sensitivity Conjecture of Nisan and Szegedy.

In this paper, we consider the following problem: what is the minimum number of affine hyperplanes in $\mathbb{R}^n$, such that all the vertices of $\{0, 1\}^n \setminus \{\vec{0}\}$ are covered at least $k$ times, and $\vec{0}$ is uncovered? The $k=1$ case is the well-known Alon-Füredi theorem which says a minimum of $n$ affine hyperplanes is required, proved by the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz. We develop an analogue of the Lubell-Yamamoto-Meshalkin inequality for subset sums, and completely solve the fractional version of this problem, which also provides an asymptotic answer to the integral version for fixed $n$ and $k \rightarrow \infty$. We also use a Punctured Combinatorial Nullstellensatz developed by Ball and Serra, to show that a minimum of $n+3$ affine hyperplanes is needed for $k=3$, and pose a conjecture for arbitrary $k$ and large $n$.

A celebrated theorem of Kleitman in extremal combinatorics states that a collection of binary vectors in $\{0, 1\}^n$ with diameter $d$ has cardinality at most that of a Hamming ball of radius $d/2$. In this paper, we give an algebraic proof of Kleitman's Theorem, by carefully choosing a pseudo-adjacency matrix for certain Hamming graphs, and applying the Cvetković bound on independence numbers. This method also allows us to prove several extensions and generalizations of Kleitman's Theorem to other allowed distance sets, in particular blocks of consecutive integers that do not necessarily grow linearly with $n$. We also improve on a theorem of Alon about subsets of $\mathbb{F}_{p}^{n}$ whose difference set does not intersect $\left\{0,1\right\}^{n}$ nontrivially.

A hypergraph $H$ is properly colored if for every vertex $v\in V(H)$, all the edges incident to $v$ have distinct colors. In this paper, we show that if $H_{1}$, \cdots, $H_{s}$ are properly-colored $k$-uniform hypergraphs on $n$ vertices, where $n\geq3k^{2}s$, and $e(H_{i})>{{n}\choose {k}}-{{n-s+1}\choose {k}}$, then there exists a rainbow matching of size $s$, containing one edge from each $H_i$. This generalizes some previous results on the Erdős Matching Conjecture.

In this short note, we address two problems in extremal set theory regarding intersecting families. The first problem is a question posed by Kupavskii: is it true that given two disjoint cross-intersecting families $\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} \subset \binom{[n]}{k}$, they must satisfy $\min\{|\mathcal{A}|, |\mathcal{B}|\} \le \frac{1}{2} \binom{n-1}{k-1}$? We give an affirmative answer for $n \ge 2k^2$, and construct families showing that this range is essentially the best one could hope for, up to a constant factor. The second problem is a conjecture of Frankl. It states that for $n \ge 3k$, the maximum diversity of an intersecting family $\mathcal{F} \subset \binom{[n]}{k}$ is equal to $\binom{n-3}{k-2}$. We are able to find a construction beating the conjectured bound for $n$ slightly larger than $3k$, which also disproves a conjecture of Kupavskii.

A tight $k$-uniform $\ell$-cycle, denoted by $TC_\ell^k$, is a $k$-uniform hypergraph whose vertex set is $v_0, \cdots, v_{\ell-1}$, and the edges are all the $k$-tuples $\{v_i, v_{i+1}, \cdots, v_{i+k-1}\}$, with subscripts modulo $\ell$. Motivated by a classic result in graph theory that every $n$-vertex cycle-free graph has at most $n-1$ edges, Sós and, independently, Verstraëte asked whether for every integer $k$, a $k$-uniform $n$-vertex hypergraph without any tight $k$-uniform cycles has at most $\binom{n-1}{k-1}$ edges. In this paper, we answer this question in negative.

An intersecting family of sets is trivial if all of its members share a common element. Hilton and Milner proved a strong stability result for the celebrated Erdős--Ko--Rado theorem: when $n> 2k$, every non-trivial intersecting family of $k$-subsets of $[n]$ has at most $\binom{n-1}{k-1}-\binom{n-k-1}{k-1}+1$ members. One extremal family $\mathcal{HM}_{n, k}$ consists of a $k$-set $S$ and all $k$-subsets of $[n]$ containing a fixed element $x\not\in S$ and at least one element of $S$. We prove a degree version of the Hilton--Milner theorem: if $n=Ω(k^2)$ and $\mathcal{F}$ is a non-trivial intersecting family of $k$-subsets of $[n]$, then $δ(\mathcal{F})\le δ(\mathcal{HM}_{n.k})$, where $δ(\mathcal{F})$ denotes the minimum (vertex) degree of $\mathcal{F}$. Our proof uses several fundamental results in extremal set theory, the concept of kernels, and a new variant of the Erdős--Ko--Rado theorem.

We use an algebraic method to prove a degree version of the celebrated Erd\H os-Ko-Rado theorem: given $n>2k$, every intersecting $k$-uniform hypergraph $H$ on $n$ vertices contains a vertex that lies on at most $\binom{n-2}{k-2}$ edges. This result can be viewed as a special case of the degree version of a well-known conjecture of Erdős on hypergraph matchings. Improving the work of Bollobás, Daykin, and Erd\H os from 1976, we show that given integers $n, k, s$ with $n\ge 3k^2 s$, every $k$-uniform hypergraph $H$ on $n$ vertices with minimum vertex degree greater than $\binom{n-1}{k-1}-\binom{n-s}{k-1}$ contains $s$ disjoint edges.

A connected $n$-chromatic graph $G$ is double-critical if for all the edges $xy$ of $G$, the graph $G-x-y$ is $(n-2)$-chromatic. In 1966, Erd\H os and Lovász conjectured that the only double-critical $n$-chromatic graph is $K_n$. This conjecture remains unresolved for $n \ge 6.$ In this short note, we verify this conjecture for claw-free graphs $G$ of chromatic number $6$.

We call a graph $G$ an $(r,t)$-Ruzsa-Szemerédi graph if its edge set can be partitioned into $t$ edge-disjoint induced matchings, each of size $r$. These graphs were introduced in 1978 and has been extensively studied since then. In this paper, we consider the case when $r=cn$. For $c>1/4$, we determine the maximum possible $t$ which is a constant depending only on $c$. On the other hand, when $c=1/4$, there could be as many as $Ω(\log n)$ induced matchings. We prove that this bound is tight up to a constant factor. Finally, when $c$ is fixed strictly between $1/5$ and $1/4$, we give a short proof that the number $t$ of induced matchings is $O(n/\log n)$. We are also able to further improve the upper bound to $o(n/\log n)$ for fixed $c> 1/4-b$ for some positive constant $b$.

We prove that for any constant $k$ and any $ε<1$, there exist bimatrix win-lose games for which every $ε$-WSNE requires supports of cardinality greater than $k$. To do this, we provide a graph-theoretic characterization of win-lose games that possess $ε$-WSNE with constant cardinality supports. We then apply a result in additive number theory of Haight to construct win-lose games that do not satisfy the requirements of the characterization. These constructions disprove graph theoretic conjectures of Daskalakis, Mehta and Papadimitriou, and Myers.