arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $\mathbb{H}_{n+1}$ denote a computable copy of the $(n+1)$-clique free universal homogeneous Henson graph, $G$ denote a finite subgraph of $\mathbb{H}_{n+1}$, and $k(G,n)$ denote the big Ramsey degree of $G$ in $\mathbb{H}_{n+1}$. We prove that for any computable coloring $χ$ of the copies of $G$ in $\mathbb{H}_{n+1}$, there is a copy $\mathbb{H}'$ of $\mathbb{H}_{n+1}$ that is computable from $0^{(2δ(G,n)-1)}$ in which $χ$ takes no more than $k(G,n)$ colors, where $δ(G,n)$ denotes the maximum number of levels of a diary for $G$ in $\mathbb{H}_{n+1}$ (this is a finite number). It follows that the statement, ``Henson graphs have finite big Ramsey degrees," is provable in ACA$_0'$. Combining this with a recent result of Cholak, Dobrinen, and McCoy \cite{CDM} yields the equivalence of the statement with ACA$_0'$ over RCA$_0$.

The aim of this note is to overview some of our work in Chernikov, Towsner'20 (arXiv:2010.00726) developing higher arity VC theory (VC$_n$ dimension), including a generalization of Haussler packing lemma, and an associated tame (slice-wise) hypergraph regularity lemma; and to demonstrate that it characterizes higher arity PAC learning (PAC$_n$ learning) in $n$-fold product spaces with respect to product measures introduced by Kobayashi, Kuriyama and Takeuchi'15. We also point out how some of the recent results in arXiv:2402.14294, arXiv:2505.15688, arXiv:2509.20404 follow from our work in arXiv:2010.00726.

We show that $k$-ary functions giving the measure of the intersection of multi-parametric families of sets in probability spaces, e.g. $(x,y,z) \in X \times Y \times Z \mapsto μ(P_{x,y} \cap Q_{x,z} \cap R_{y,z})$, satisfy a particularly strong form of hypergraph regularity. More generally, this applies to the (integral) averages of continuous combinations of functions of smaller arity. This result is connected to higher arity stability in model theory, that we discuss in the second part of the paper. We demonstrate that all hypergraphs embedding both into the half-simplex and into $GS(\mathbb{F}_3)$, the two known sources of failure of ternary stability, do satisfy an analogous regularity lemma -- hence strong ternary stability cannot be characterized simply by excluded hypergraphs.

For $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $\varepsilon > 0$, given a sufficiently long sequence of events in a probability space all of measure at least $\varepsilon$, some $n$ of them will have a common intersection. A more subtle pattern: for any $0 < p < q < 1$, we cannot find events $A_i$ and $B_i$ so that $μ\left( A_i \cap B_j \right) \leq p$ and $μ\left( A_j \cap B_i\right) \geq q$ for all $1 < i < j < n$, assuming $n$ is sufficiently large. This is closely connected to model-theoretic stability of probability algebras. We survey some results from our recent work on more complicated patterns that arise when our events are indexed by multiple indices. In particular, how such results are connected to higher arity generalizations of de Finetti's theorem in probability, structural Ramsey theory, hypergraph regularity in combinatorics, and model theory.

We investigate various forms of (model-theoretic) stability for hypergraphs and their corresponding strengthenings of the hypergraph regularity lemma with respect to partitions of vertices. On the one hand, we provide a complete classification of the various possibilities in the ternary case. On the other hand, we provide an example of a family of slice-wise stable 3-hypergraphs so that for no partition of the vertices, any triple of parts has density close to 0 or 1. In particular, this addresses some questions and conjectures of Terry and Wolf. We work in the general measure theoretic context of graded probability spaces, so all our results apply both to measures in ultraproducts of finite graphs, leading to the aforementioned combinatorial applications, and to commuting definable Keisler measures, leading to applications in model theory.

We prove a removal lemma for induced ordered hypergraphs, simultaneously generalizing Alon--Ben-Eliezer--Fischer's removal lemma for ordered graphs and the induced hypergraph removal lemma. That is, we show that if an ordered hypergraph $(V,G,<)$ has few induced copies of a small ordered hypergraph $(W,H,\prec)$ then there is a small modification $G'$ so that $(V,G',<)$ has no induced copies of $(W,H,\prec)$. (Note that we do \emph{not} need to modify the ordering $<$.) We give our proof in the setting of an ultraproduct (that is, a Keisler graded probability space), where we can give an abstract formulation of hypergraph removal in terms of sequences of $σ$-algebras. We then show that ordered hypergraphs can be viewed as hypergraphs where we view the intervals as an additional notion of a ``very structured'' set. Along the way we give an explicit construction of the bijection between the ultraproduct limit object and the corresponding hyerpgraphon.

We generalize the fact that graphs with small VC-dimension can be approximated by rectangles, showing that hypergraphs with small VC_k-dimension (equivalently, omitting a fixed finite (k+1)-partite (k+1)-uniform hypergraph) can be approximated by k-ary cylinder sets. In the language of hypergraph regularity, this shows that when H is a k'-uniform hypergraph with small VC_k-dimension for some k<k', the decomposition of H given by hypergraph regularity only needs the first k levels---one can approximate H using sets of vertices, sets of pairs, and so on up to sets of k-tuples---and that on most of the resulting k-ary cylinder sets, the density of H is either close to 0 or close to 1. We also show a suitable converse: k'-uniform hypergraphs with large VC_k-dimension cannot have such approximations uniformly under all measures on the vertices.

Recently the breakthrough method of hypergraph containers, developed independently by Balogh, Morris, and Samotij as well as Saxton and Thomason, has been used to study sparse random analogs of a variety of classical problems from combinatorics and number theory. The previously known proofs of the containers theorem use the so-called scythe algorithm---an iterative procedure that runs through the vertices of the hypergraph. (Saxton and Thomason have also proposed an alternative, randomized construction in the case of simple hypergraphs.) Here we present the first known deterministic proof of the containers theorem that is not algorithmic, i.e., it does not involve an iterative process. Our proof is less than 4 pages long while being entirely self-contained and conceptually transparent. Although our proof is completely elementary, it was inspired by considering hypergraphs in the setting of nonstandard analysis, where there is a notion of dimension capturing the logarithmic rate of growth of finite sets. Before presenting the proof in full detail, we include a one-page informal outline that refers to this notion of dimension and summarizes the essence of the argument.

We examine the correspondence between the various notions of quasirandomness for k-uniform hypergraphs and sigma-algebras related to measurable hypergraphs. This gives a uniform formulation of most of the notions of quasirandomness for dense hypergraphs which have been studied, with each notion of quasirandomness corresponding to a sigma-algebra defined by a collection of subsets of [1,k]. We associate each notion of quasirandomness I with a collection of hypergraphs, the I-adapted hypergraphs, so that G is quasirandom exactly when it contains roughly the correct number of copies of each I-adapted hypergraph. We then identify, for each I, a particular I-adapted hypergraph M_k[I] with the property that if G contains roughly the correct number of copies of M_k[I] then G is quasirandom in the sense of I. This generalizes recent results of Kohayakawa, Nagle, Rödl, and Schacht; Conlon, Hàn, Person, and Schacht; and Lenz and Mubayi giving this result for some notions of quasirandomness.

We give a proof of Szemeredi's regularity lemma in the special case of a graph with bounded VC dimension and show that it is possible to obtain "merely" doubly exponential bounds on the size of the partition in this case.

The use of tools from analysis to approach problems in graph theory has become an active area of research. Usually such methods are applied to problems involving dense graphs and hypergraphs; here we give the an extension of such methods to sparse but pseudorandom hypergraphs. We use this framework to give a proof of hypergraph removal for sub-hypergraphs of sparse random hypergraphs.

We present a logical framework for formalizing connections between finitary combinatorics and measure theory or ergodic theory that have appeared various places throughout the literature. We develop the basic syntax and semantics of this logic and give applications, showing that the method can express the classic Furstenberg correspondence and to give a short proof of the Szemerédi Regularity Lemma. We also derive some connections between the model-theoretic notion of stability and the Gowers uniformity norms from combinatorics.

We present a short proof of Szemerédi's Theorem using a dynamical system enriched by ideas from model theory. The resulting proof contains features reminiscent of proofs based on both ergodic theory and on hypergraph regularity.

The Dense Hindman's Theorem states that, in any finite coloring of the integers, one may find a single color and a "dense" set $B_1$, for each $b_1\in B_1$ a "dense" set $B_2^{b_1}$ (depending on $b_1$), for each $b_2\in B_2^{b_1}$ a "dense" set $B_3^{b_1,b_2}$ (depending on $b_1,b_2$), and so on, such that for any such sequence of $b_i$, all finite sums belong to the chosen color. (Here density is often taken to be "piecewise syndetic", but the proof is unchanged for any notion of density satisfying certain properties.) This theorem is an example of a combinatorial statement for which the only known proof requires the use of ultrafilters or a similar infinitary formalism. Here we give a direct combinatorial proof of the theorem.

Hindman's Theorem states that in any finite coloring of the integers, there is an infinite set all of whose finite sums belong to the same color. This is much stronger than the corresponding finite form, stating that in any finite coloring of the integers there are arbitrarily long finite sets with the same property. We extend the finite form of Hindman's Theorem to a "transfinite" version for each countable ordinal, and show that Hindman's Theorem is equivalent to the appropriate transfinite approximation holding for every countable ordinal. We then give a proof of Hindman's Theorem by directly proving these transfinite approximations.

We give a short, explicit proof of Hindman's Theorem that in every finite coloring of the integers, there is an infinite set all of whose finite sums have the same color. We give several exampls of colorings of the integers which do not have computable witnesses to Hindman's Theorem.

Hindman's Theorem is a prototypical example of a combinatorial theorem with a proof that uses the topology of the ultrafilters. We show how the methods of this proof, including topological arguments about ultrafilters, can be translated into second order arithmetic.