arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a graph $G$, a proper $k$-coloring of $G$ is \emph{equitable} if the sizes of any two color classes differ by at most one. The \textsc{Equitable $k$-Coloring} problem asks, for a given graph $G$ and integer $k$, whether $G$ admits an equitable $k$-coloring. Bodlaender and Fomin showed that it is polynomial-time solvable on graphs of bounded treewidth, while it remains $\NP$-hard on cographs, and thus on graphs of constant clique-width. Fellows et al. showed that the problem becomes $\mathsf{W[1]}$-hard when parameterized by tree-width (and hence clique-width) plus the number of colors~$k$. We first show that, for every fixed $k$, counting equitable $k$-colorings is polynomial-time solvable on graph classes of bounded clique-width, given a clique-width expression. We then show that, under $\mathsf{SETH}$, the dependence on clique-width in this algorithm is essentially optimal. As a consequence, our results provide a fairly tight picture of the complexity of \textsc{Equitable $k$-Coloring} with respect to the combined parameter $k$+clique-width. Second, we refine our clique-width algorithm for the linear setting. We show that there exists an algorithm, given an integer $k\ge 1$ and an $n$-vertex graph $G$ together with a linear $w$-expression constructing $G$, computes the number of equitable $k$-colorings of $G$ in time $\max\{1,2^k-2\}^w\cdot n^{k+O(1)}$. Third, we consider a different structural restriction, namely the class of $P_t$-free graphs. A graph is called $P_t$-free if it does not contain the path on $t$ vertices as an induced subgraph. This is a different setting from bounded clique-width; in particular, already $P_5$-free graphs have unbounded clique-width. Nevertheless, we show that for every $P_t$-free graph $G$, the number of equitable list $3$-colorings of $G$ can be computed in subexponential time.

In this paper, we relate a beautiful theory by Lovász with a popular heuristic algorithm for the graph isomorphism problem, namely the color refinement algorithm and its k-dimensional generalization known as the Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm. We prove that two graphs G and H are indistinguishable by the color refinement algorithm if and only if, for all trees T, the number Hom(T,G) of homomorphisms from T to G equals the corresponding number Hom(T,H) for H. There is a natural system of linear equations whose nonnegative integer solutions correspond to the isomorphisms between two graphs. The nonnegative real solutions to this system are called fractional isomorphisms, and two graphs are fractionally isomorphic if and only if the color refinement algorithm cannot distinguish them (Tinhofer 1986, 1991). We show that, if we drop the nonnegativity constraints, that is, if we look for arbitrary real solutions, then a solution to the linear system exists if and only if, for all t, the two graphs have the same number of length-t walks. We lift the results for trees to an equivalence between numbers of homomorphisms from graphs of tree width k, the k-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm, and the level-k Sherali-Adams relaxation of our linear program. We also obtain a partial result for graphs of bounded path width and solutions to our system where we drop the nonnegativity constraints. A consequence of our results is a quasi-linear time algorithm to decide whether, for two given graphs G and H, there is a tree T with Hom(T,G) = Hom(T,H).

We show conditional lower bounds for well-studied #P-hard problems: (a) The number of satisfying assignments of a 2-CNF formula with n variables cannot be counted in time exp(o(n)), and the same is true for computing the number of all independent sets in an n-vertex graph. (b) The permanent of an n x n matrix with entries 0 and 1 cannot be computed in time exp(o(n)). (c) The Tutte polynomial of an n-vertex multigraph cannot be computed in time exp(o(n)) at most evaluation points (x,y) in the case of multigraphs, and it cannot be computed in time exp(o(n/polylog n)) in the case of simple graphs. Our lower bounds are relative to (variants of) the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), which says that the satisfiability of n-variable 3-CNF formulas cannot be decided in time exp(o(n)). We relax this hypothesis by introducing its counting version #ETH, namely that the satisfying assignments cannot be counted in time exp(o(n)). In order to use #ETH for our lower bounds, we transfer the sparsification lemma for d-CNF formulas to the counting setting.