arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a graph $G$, a proper $k$-coloring of $G$ is \emph{equitable} if the sizes of any two color classes differ by at most one. The \textsc{Equitable $k$-Coloring} problem asks, for a given graph $G$ and integer $k$, whether $G$ admits an equitable $k$-coloring. Bodlaender and Fomin showed that it is polynomial-time solvable on graphs of bounded treewidth, while it remains $\NP$-hard on cographs, and thus on graphs of constant clique-width. Fellows et al. showed that the problem becomes $\mathsf{W[1]}$-hard when parameterized by tree-width (and hence clique-width) plus the number of colors~$k$. We first show that, for every fixed $k$, counting equitable $k$-colorings is polynomial-time solvable on graph classes of bounded clique-width, given a clique-width expression. We then show that, under $\mathsf{SETH}$, the dependence on clique-width in this algorithm is essentially optimal. As a consequence, our results provide a fairly tight picture of the complexity of \textsc{Equitable $k$-Coloring} with respect to the combined parameter $k$+clique-width. Second, we refine our clique-width algorithm for the linear setting. We show that there exists an algorithm, given an integer $k\ge 1$ and an $n$-vertex graph $G$ together with a linear $w$-expression constructing $G$, computes the number of equitable $k$-colorings of $G$ in time $\max\{1,2^k-2\}^w\cdot n^{k+O(1)}$. Third, we consider a different structural restriction, namely the class of $P_t$-free graphs. A graph is called $P_t$-free if it does not contain the path on $t$ vertices as an induced subgraph. This is a different setting from bounded clique-width; in particular, already $P_5$-free graphs have unbounded clique-width. Nevertheless, we show that for every $P_t$-free graph $G$, the number of equitable list $3$-colorings of $G$ can be computed in subexponential time.

Given a directed graph, we show how to efficiently find a shortest (directed, simple) cycle on an even number of vertices. As far as we know, no polynomial-time algorithm was previously known for this problem. In fact, finding any even cycle in a directed graph in polynomial time was open for more than two decades until Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas (Ann. of Math. (2) 1999) and, independently, McCuaig (Electron. J. Combin. 2004; announced jointly at STOC 1997) gave an efficiently testable structural characterisation of even-cycle-free directed graphs. Methodologically, our algorithm relies on algebraic fingerprinting and randomized polynomial identity testing over a finite field, and uses a generating polynomial implicit in Vazirani and Yannakakis ( Discrete Appl. Math. 1989) that enumerates weighted cycle covers as a difference of a permanent and a determinant polynomial. The need to work with the permanent is where our main technical contribution occurs. We design a family of finite commutative rings of characteristic 4 that simultaneously (i) give a nondegenerate representation for the generating polynomial identity via the permanent and the determinant, (ii) support efficient permanent computations, and (iii) enable emulation of finite-field arithmetic in characteristic 2. Here our work is foreshadowed by that of Björklund and Husfeldt (SIAM J. Comput. 2019), who used a considerably less efficient ring design to obtain a polynomial-time algorithm for the shortest two disjoint paths problem. Building on work of Gilbert and Tarjan (Numer. Math. 1978) as well as Alon and Yuster (J. ACM 2013), we also show how ideas from the nested dissection technique for solving linear equation systems leads to faster algorithm designs when we have control on the separator structure of the input graph; for example, this happens when the input has bounded genus.

We show conditional lower bounds for well-studied #P-hard problems: (a) The number of satisfying assignments of a 2-CNF formula with n variables cannot be counted in time exp(o(n)), and the same is true for computing the number of all independent sets in an n-vertex graph. (b) The permanent of an n x n matrix with entries 0 and 1 cannot be computed in time exp(o(n)). (c) The Tutte polynomial of an n-vertex multigraph cannot be computed in time exp(o(n)) at most evaluation points (x,y) in the case of multigraphs, and it cannot be computed in time exp(o(n/polylog n)) in the case of simple graphs. Our lower bounds are relative to (variants of) the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), which says that the satisfiability of n-variable 3-CNF formulas cannot be decided in time exp(o(n)). We relax this hypothesis by introducing its counting version #ETH, namely that the satisfying assignments cannot be counted in time exp(o(n)). In order to use #ETH for our lower bounds, we transfer the sparsification lemma for d-CNF formulas to the counting setting.

We study ways to expedite Yates's algorithm for computing the zeta and Moebius transforms of a function defined on the subset lattice. We develop a trimmed variant of Moebius inversion that proceeds point by point, finishing the calculation at a subset before considering its supersets. For an $n$-element universe $U$ and a family $\scr F$ of its subsets, trimmed Moebius inversion allows us to compute the number of packings, coverings, and partitions of $U$ with $k$ sets from $\scr F$ in time within a polynomial factor (in $n$) of the number of supersets of the members of $\scr F$. Relying on an intersection theorem of Chung et al. (1986) to bound the sizes of set families, we apply these ideas to well-studied combinatorial optimisation problems on graphs of maximum degree $Δ$. In particular, we show how to compute the Domatic Number in time within a polynomial factor of $(2^{Δ+1-2)^{n/(Δ+1)$ and the Chromatic Number in time within a polynomial factor of $(2^{Δ+1-Δ-1)^{n/(Δ+1)$. For any constant $Δ$, these bounds are $O\bigl((2-ε)^n\bigr)$ for $ε>0$ independent of the number of vertices $n$.

The deletion--contraction algorithm is perhaps the most popular method for computing a host of fundamental graph invariants such as the chromatic, flow, and reliability polynomials in graph theory, the Jones polynomial of an alternating link in knot theory, and the partition functions of the models of Ising, Potts, and Fortuin--Kasteleyn in statistical physics. Prior to this work, deletion--contraction was also the fastest known general-purpose algorithm for these invariants, running in time roughly proportional to the number of spanning trees in the input graph. Here, we give a substantially faster algorithm that computes the Tutte polynomial--and hence, all the aforementioned invariants and more--of an arbitrary graph in time within a polynomial factor of the number of connected vertex sets. The algorithm actually evaluates a multivariate generalization of the Tutte polynomial by making use of an identity due to Fortuin and Kasteleyn. We also provide a polynomial-space variant of the algorithm and give an analogous result for Chung and Graham's cover polynomial. An implementation of the algorithm outperforms deletion--contraction also in practice.

We present a fast algorithm for the subset convolution problem: given functions f and g defined on the lattice of subsets of an n-element set N, compute their subset convolution f*g, defined for all S\subseteq N by (f * g)(S) = \sum_{T \subseteq S}f(T) g(S\setminus T), where addition and multiplication is carried out in an arbitrary ring. Via Möbius transform and inversion, our algorithm evaluates the subset convolution in O(n^2 2^n) additions and multiplications, substantially improving upon the straightforward O(3^n) algorithm. Specifically, if the input functions have an integer range {-M,-M+1,...,M}, their subset convolution over the ordinary sum-product ring can be computed in O^*(2^n log M) time; the notation O^* suppresses polylogarithmic factors. Furthermore, using a standard embedding technique we can compute the subset convolution over the max-sum or min-sum semiring in O^*(2^n M) time. To demonstrate the applicability of fast subset convolution, we present the first O^*(2^k n^2 + n m) algorithm for the minimum Steiner tree problem in graphs with n vertices, k terminals, and m edges with bounded integer weights, improving upon the O^*(3^k n + 2^k n^2 + n m) time bound of the classical Dreyfus-Wagner algorithm. We also discuss extensions to recent O^*(2^n)-time algorithms for covering and partitioning problems (Björklund and Husfeldt, FOCS 2006; Koivisto, FOCS 2006).