arXiv++ Combinatorics

The \textit{node reliability} of a graph $G$ is the probability that at least one node is operational and that the operational nodes can all communicate in the subgraph that they induce, given that the edges are perfectly reliable but each node operates independently with probability $p\in[0,1]$. We show that unlike many other notions of graph reliability, the number of maximal intervals of decrease in $[0,1]$ is unbounded, and that there can be arbitrarily many inflection points in the interval as well.

The beautiful Beraha-Kahane-Weiss theorem has found many applications within graph theory, allowing for the determination of the limits of root of graph polynomials in settings as vast as chromatic polynomials, network reliability, and generating polynomials related to independence and domination. Here we extend the class of functions to which the BKW theorem can be applied, and provide some applications in combinatorics.

Assume that the vertices of a graph $G$ are always operational, but the edges of $G$ are operational independently with probability $p \in[0,1]$. For fixed vertices $s$ and $t$, the \emph{two-terminal reliability} of $G$ is the probability that the operational subgraph contains an $(s,t)$-path, while the \emph{all-terminal reliability} of $G$ is the probability that the operational subgraph contains a spanning tree. Both reliabilities are polynomials in $p$, and have very similar behaviour in many respects. However, unlike all-terminal reliability, little is known about the roots of two-reliability polynomials. In a variety of ways, we shall show that the nature and location of the roots of two-terminal reliability polynomials have significantly different properties than those held by roots of the all-terminal reliability.

The independence polynomial of a graph is the generating polynomial for the number of independent sets of each size, and its roots are called {\em independence roots}. We investigate the stability of such polynomials, that is, conditions under which the roots lie in the left half-plane (all of the real roots of independence polynomial are negative and hence lie in this half-plane). We show stability for all independence polynomials of graphs with independence number at most three, but for larger independence number we show that the independence polynomials can have roots arbitrarily far to the right. We provide families of graphs whose independence polynomials are stable and ones that are not, utilizing various graph operations.

Given a graph $G$ in which each edge fails independently with probability $q\in[0,1],$ the all-terminal reliability of $G$ is the probability that all vertices of $G$ can communicate with one another, that is, the probability that the operational edges span the graph. The all-terminal reliability is a polynomial in $q$ whose roots (all-terminal reliability roots) were conjectured to have modulus at most $1$ by Brown and Colbourn. Royle and Sokal proved the conjecture false, finding roots of modulus larger than $1$ by a slim margin. Here, we present the first nontrivial upper bound on the modulus of any all-terminal reliability root, in terms of the number of vertices of the graph. We also find all-terminal reliability roots of larger modulus than any previously known. Finally, we consider the all-terminal reliability roots of simple graphs; we present the smallest known simple graph with all-terminal reliability roots of modulus greater than $1,$ and we find simple graphs with all-terminal reliability roots of modulus greater than $1$ that have higher edge connectivity than any previously known examples.

Given a graph $G$ whose edges are perfectly reliable and whose nodes each operate independently with probability $p\in[0,1],$ the node reliability of $G$ is the probability that at least one node is operational and that the operational nodes can all communicate in the subgraph that they induce. We study analytic properties of the node reliability on the interval $[0,1]$ including monotonicity, concavity, and fixed points. Our results show a stark contrast between this model of network robustness and models that arise from coherent set systems (including all-terminal, two-terminal and K-terminal reliability).

A {\em chromatic root} is a root of the chromatic polynomial of a graph. While the real chromatic roots have been extensively studied and well understood, little is known about the {\em real parts} of chromatic roots. It is not difficult to see that the largest real chromatic root of a graph with $n$ vertices is $n-1$, and indeed, it is known that the largest real chromatic root of a graph is at most the tree-width of the graph. Analogous to these facts, it was conjectured in [8] that the real parts of chromatic roots are also bounded above by both $n-1$ and the tree-width of the graph. In this article we show that for all $k\geq 2$ there exist infinitely many graphs $G$ with tree-width $k$ such that $G$ has non-real chromatic roots $z$ with $\Re(z)>k$. We also discuss the weaker conjecture and prove it for graphs $G$ with $χ(G)\geq n-3$.

The $σ$-polynomial is given by $σ(G,x) = \sum_{i=χ(G)}^{n} a_{i}(G)\, x^{i}$, where $a_{i}(G)$ is the number of partitions of the vertices of $G$ into $i$ nonempty independent sets. These polynomials are closely related to chromatic polynomials, as the chromatic polynomial of $G$ is given by $\sum_{i=χ(G)}^{n} a_{i}(G)\, x(x-1) \cdots (x-(i-1))$. It is known that the closure of the real roots of chromatic polynomials is precisely $\{0,~1\} \bigcup [32/27,\infty)$, with $(-\infty,0)$, $(0,1)$ and $(1,32/27)$ being maximal zero-free intervals for roots of chromatic polynomials. We ask here whether such maximal zero-free intervals exist for $σ$-polynomials, and show that the only such interval is $[0,\infty)$ -- that is, the closure of the real roots of $σ$-polynomials is $(-\infty,0]$.

A \textit{restraint} $r$ on $G$ is a function which assigns each vertex $v$ of $G$ a finite set of forbidden colours $r(v)$. A proper colouring $c$ of $G$ is said to be \textit{permitted by the restraint r} if $c(v)\notin r(v)$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$. A restraint $r$ on a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices is called a \textit{$k$-restraint} if $|r(v)|=k$ and $r(v) \subseteq \{1,2,\dots ,kn\}$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$. In this article we discuss the following problem: among all $k$-restraints $r$ on $G$, which restraints permit the largest number of $x$-colourings for all large enough $x$? We determine such extremal restraints for all bipartite graphs.

If $G$ is a $k$-chromatic graph of order $n$ then it is known that the chromatic polynomial of $G$, $π(G,x)$, is at most $x(x-1)\cdots (x-(k-1))x^{n-k} = (x)_{\downarrow k}x^{n-k}$ for every $x\in \mathbb{N}$. We improve here this bound by showing that \[ π(G,x) \leq (x)_{\downarrow k} (x-1)^{Δ(G)-k+1} x^{n-1-Δ(G)}\] for every $x\in \mathbb{N},$ where $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of $G$. Secondly, we show that if $G$ is a connected $k$-chromatic graph of order $n$ where $k\geq 4$ then $π(G,x)$ is at most $(x)_{\downarrow k}(x-1)^{n-k}$ for every real $x\geq n-2+\left( {n \choose 2} -{k \choose 2}-n+k \right)^2$ (it had been previously conjectured that this inequality holds for all $x \geq k$). Finally, we provide an upper bound on the moduli of the chromatic roots that is an improvment over known bounds for dense graphs.

Given a graph $G$ whose edges are perfectly reliable and whose nodes each operate independently with probability $p\in[0,1],$ the node reliability of $G$ is the probability that at least one node is operational and that the operational nodes can all communicate in the subgraph that they induce; it is the analogous node measure of robustness to the well studied \textit{all-terminal reliability}, where the nodes are perfectly reliable but the edges fail randomly. In sharp contrast to what is known about the roots of the all-terminal reliability polynomial, we show that the node reliability polynomial of any connected graph on at least three nodes has a nonreal polynomial root, the collection of real roots of all node reliability polynomials is unbounded, and the collection of complex roots of all node reliability polynomials is dense in the entire complex plane.

Let $G$ be a simple graph of order $n$. The {\em domination polynomial} of $G$ is the polynomial ${D(G, x)=\sum_{i=0}^{n} d(G,i) x^{i}}$, where $d(G,i)$ is the number of dominating sets of $G$ of size $i$. Let $n$ be any positive integer and $F_n$ be the Friendship graph with $2n + 1$ vertices and $3n$ edges, formed by the join of $K_{1}$ with $nK_{2}$. We study the domination polynomials of this family of graphs, and in particular examine the domination roots of the family, and find the limiting curve for the roots. We also show that for every $n\geq 2$, $F_n$ is not $\mathcal{D}$-unique, that is, there is another non-isomorphic graph with the same domination polynomial. Also we construct some families of graphs whose real domination roots are only $-2$ and $0$. Finally, we conclude by discussing the domination polynomials of a related family of graphs, the $n$-book graphs $B_n$, formed by joining $n$ copies of the cycle graph $C_4$ with a common edge.

Given a graph $G$ of order $n$, the $σ$-$polynomial$ of $G$ is the generating function $σ(G,x) = \sum a_{i}x^{i}$ where $a_{i}$ is the number of partitions of the vertex set of $G$ into $i$ nonempty independent sets. Such polynomials arise in a natural way from chromatic polynomials. Brenti [1] proved that $σ$-polynomials of graphs with chromatic number at least $n-2$ had all real roots, and conjectured the same held for chromatic number $n-3$. We affirm this conjecture.

We consider the number of independent sets in hypergraphs, which allows us to define the independence density of countable hypergraphs. Hypergraph independence densities include a broad family of densities over graphs and relational structures, such as $F$-free densities of graphs for a given graph $F.$ In the case of $k$-uniform hypergraphs, we prove that the independence density is always rational. In the case of finite but unbounded hyperedges, we show that the independence density can be any real number in $[0,1].$ Finally, we extend the notion of independence density via independence polynomials.

Let F be a field and let G be a finite graph with a total ordering on its edge set. Richard Stanley noted that the Stanley-Reisner ring F(G) of the broken circuit complex of G is Cohen-Macaulay. Jason Brown gave an explicit description of a homogeneous system of parameters for F(G) in terms of fundamental cocircuits in G. So F(G) modulo this hsop is a finite dimensional vector space. We conjecture an explicit monomial basis for this vector space in terms of the circuits of G and prove that the conjecture is true for two infinite families of graphs. We also explore an application of these ideas to bounding the number of acyclic orientations of G from above.

The generalized theta graph Θ_{s_1,...,s_k} consists of a pair of endvertices joined by k internally disjoint paths of lengths s_1,...,s_k \ge 1. We prove that the roots of the chromatic polynomial $pi(Θ_{s_1,...,s_k},z) of a k-ary generalized theta graph all lie in the disc |z-1| \le [1 + o(1)] k/\log k, uniformly in the path lengths s_i. Moreover, we prove that Θ_{2,...,2} \simeq K_{2,k} indeed has a chromatic root of modulus [1 + o(1)] k/\log k. Finally, for k \le 8 we prove that the generalized theta graph with a chromatic root that maximizes |z-1| is the one with all path lengths equal to 2; we conjecture that this holds for all k.